|
Post by horseloverphat on Sept 22, 2007 11:08:16 GMT -5
jarv's picture...great find btw. ...is it from the 'Love' graphics...? Levi's Baphomet Looks to be a rendition of the Hermaphrodite (notice the breasts) templar god 'baphomet' as stylised by occult French Quabbalistic Magician Eliphas Levi...the animal/beastial nature of man before enlightenment....(one of Levi's sigils, below, i think from his book of black magick & pacts has been linked to the Son of Sam/Berkowitz killings paraphenalia....one of the letters sent.) Levi's : THE GOËTIC CIRCLE OF PACTS
|
|
time
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 11
|
Post by time on Sept 22, 2007 18:44:52 GMT -5
ATENTION: Iamaphoney chances his registered vid all the time, and we can see privates videos See now
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Sept 22, 2007 20:00:27 GMT -5
I don't see anything new.
|
|
|
Post by MikeNL on Sept 23, 2007 5:24:02 GMT -5
remember, remember, the 12th of november
|
|
|
Post by MikeNL on Sept 23, 2007 9:17:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by MikeNL on Sept 23, 2007 9:25:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by B on Sept 23, 2007 10:09:52 GMT -5
So what? It's out of focus and out of context. (No offense to you, Mike, I just mean that it's worthless as a clue.)
|
|
|
Post by MikeNL on Sept 23, 2007 10:38:23 GMT -5
Which clue are you talking about
|
|
|
Post by B on Sept 23, 2007 11:00:51 GMT -5
Mike wrote: "This is probably a very important piece.... Below you can see: 1 August 1966...Palace and many more things, like a timeline...."
I can't see any of those things, but even if I could, what he posted is so blurry as to be useless.
|
|
|
Post by MikeNL on Sept 23, 2007 11:13:12 GMT -5
i can read some of it... but it LOOKS important.. that's the only thing i wanted to say, not as a clue
|
|
|
Post by skyward on Sept 23, 2007 11:17:56 GMT -5
i can read some of it... but it LOOKS important.. that's the only thing i wanted to say, not as a clue Mike, thanks for slowing it down. I think when you convert the original you are degrading the quality a bit, and that is why a screen cap is less legible. When I saw that chart, I thought it was a family tree. McCartney's Dad----McCartney's Mom.
|
|
|
Post by skyward on Sept 23, 2007 11:21:32 GMT -5
jarv's picture...great find btw. ...is it from the 'Love' graphics...? Welcome Horseloverphat, my first reaction was the image resembled Bast standing before a blue 'candle'? or something other.
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Sept 23, 2007 11:51:50 GMT -5
no, it was in the last one
|
|
|
Post by MikeNL on Sept 23, 2007 13:02:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Sept 23, 2007 16:39:07 GMT -5
That "Joey Phil" bit.
Could it be Jessy? As in Aunt Jessie.
Sorry if I've missed the point, just finding it hard to follow atm and made a random observation!
|
|
|
Post by ccinri on Sept 24, 2007 18:58:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Sept 24, 2007 19:09:39 GMT -5
Hmmm, not one of his best efforts but I like to see them keep coming.
Having said that I probably have missed some blatant symbolism somewhere along the lines!
Does anyone have any idea what the dripping is meant to represent?
|
|
|
Post by B on Sept 24, 2007 19:34:04 GMT -5
It's like a glass of water after a long walk through the dessert. ;D
So let's see: the red pill if you want to face reality; the blue if you want to go on living with eyes closed, right? The Red album Beatles (real) are 'over' (guiding) the Blue album 'Beatles'. I hadn't noticed before, but in the Blue album Beatle picture, 2 are in white, 2 are not. And then there are those d***ed subliminals that IAAP always puts in. Hopefully someone will pull them out. (Please)
Does anyone know what the red thing at the end of the video is?
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Sept 24, 2007 19:54:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Sept 24, 2007 19:56:38 GMT -5
jarv's picture...great find btw. ...is it from the 'Love' graphics...? Welcome Horseloverphat, my first reaction was the image resembled Bast standing before a blue 'candle'? or something other. Excuse my dirty mind but could this represent a god of fertility?
|
|
|
Post by B on Sept 24, 2007 20:10:41 GMT -5
No. ;D And thanks for posting the subliminals.
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Sept 24, 2007 20:15:23 GMT -5
I think Freud would have had a field day analyzing me lol. You see candle, I see mammoth appendage... what is wrong with me? Does anyone see the significance of them being shot on two different levels yet? Also, I'm pretty sure I've seen the two Images combined in that way on the cover of a bootleg.. anyone know which one off the top of their heads?
|
|
|
Post by B on Sept 24, 2007 21:00:35 GMT -5
The Deceptionist wrote: "Does anyone see the significance of them being shot on two different levels yet?"
I had written: "The Red album Beatles (real) are 'over' (guiding) the Blue album 'Beatles'." I had meant to imply that the spirit of the original Beatles was guiding the copycat Beatles. Whether literally, as in a case where-in the original Beatles had all been killed, or figuratively, as in a situation where possibly surviving Beatles were giving guidance and material to the band that was playing in their name. If the Magical Mystery Tour was dying to take you away, the implication may be that the original Beatles were dead, but, as the MMT comics suggested, were guiding the band like magicians. You could interpret it as: the 'wanna-Beatles' were channeling music and inspiration from the (dead) originals. I also mentioned that on the blue cover, two were in white, two were not. I was alluding to the John Lennon statement that on the Sgt. Pepper album cover, "two are flying; two are not". This has been thought by some to mean "flying 'on drugs'", but is more likely a suggestion that two were flying like angels (dead). Iamaphoney opens the video with someone holding a book and a drawer with cash in it. One might interpret the picture, using his usual frame of reference, as an indication that on the blue album, the "good guys" are wearing white, while the "bad guys" (Ringo and Faul) are dressed in dark colors. Presumably they were the ones who were somehow "bought off". (Again, I say this as one who sees IAAP's viewpoint as being that Faul and Fringo were behind the "rotten apple". It is not my point of view. )
|
|
|
Post by jarvitronics on Sept 24, 2007 22:12:10 GMT -5
I saw Buddy Guy work the Roseland Theater in mid-February of 2006. I was so owned by his show that I wrote the following short lyric.
Buddy don't be blue Cuz everybody loves you Buddy don't be blue There ain't a better guy To chase away bad news Buddy don't be blue You set us all on fire Just like your bright red shoes You got a twinkle in your eye And when your fingers fly you light up the room Oh shit man!
-j
|
|
|
Post by The Deceptionist on Sept 25, 2007 10:24:02 GMT -5
Ok... where did IAAP get the idea that they were shot on different levels from?? I'm not in the habit of taking his word as gospel, so I had a look at my Please Please Me LP and the inlay for my Blue Album CD [which features both the Red and Blue album shots] and I just can't see how he would have thought that they weren't the same. I scanned the images, numbered the pillars and highlighted the floors above them to illustrate what I mean. [Incidentally the Red album shot is slightly different from the Please Please Me shot but only insofar as the poses have changed] [click the images for larger versions] ok.. picture 001: The Red Album Shot, clean. The top floor pillars are slightly blurred but nevertheless they are still there! picture 002: The Red Album Shot, numbered pillars, highlighted floors. As you can see - there are 5 floors above them. picture 003: The Blue Album Shot, numbered pillars, highlighted floors. The depth of field in this shot in better, so you can see that there are still... whaaaat?? thats right - FIVE floors above them picture 004: just for good measure, here's the Please Please Me shot. Again, there are FIVE floors above them. But don't take it from me - make your own comparisons, you'll see I'm not wrong. Conclusion? They were on the same floor for each of these pictures.. so what was the point in the video?? ...you know what really grinds my gears..? EDIT: The picture below [~1:10 on RA55] is taken from a Beatle bootleg. I'm not sure which one yet, but I've definitely seen it before at bootlegzone.com. I'll let you all know when I find it...
|
|