|
Post by applepie on Jan 5, 2017 16:38:25 GMT -5
If you wanna find the real James "Paul" (and the real Beatles), you have to look at pictures from 1957 to 1963. And if you wanna know what happened to the real James "Paul", whether he died or not, it would be great if you could read the posts of someone who was there and knows everything that happened, someone who had a part in the making of the Sgt Pepper cover. And that is the mysterious Apollo C Vermouth or Neil Aspinall who pretty much wrote everything that happened behind the scenes. And it fits with the lyrics. I will quote what he wrote, especially about Paul's "death" soon, maybe in a new thread. Or if someone wants to do it, go ahead. willemaus.wordpress.com/2015/07/03/apollo-c-vermouth/The Beatles have always been The Beatles; with a little assistance from their friends— that is. But in the end— excluding their helpers and all; there had always been a John, Paul, George & Ringo. No one in The Beatles was deceased circa 1966, although the "death"-clues were interjected in their songs for quite a different-reason— but forget about Paul being "dead." This isn't about Paul any longer. He might've suffered from an automobile-accident for all I know— which would have further left him wanting to leave the group; but it's highly-unlikely— or else; we'd be able to know about it. I think Paul wanted to leave the group— for the length of time that he did— because; he felt impending pressure; and wasn't able to cope with responsibilities of being a Beatle; and therefore wished to restrain from the limelight (or the "public-EYE."). He was still very much involved with the Sgt. Pepper's album— and the "myth."
|
|
|
Post by applepie on Jan 4, 2017 19:42:23 GMT -5
I'm surprised MD&C isn't in there somewhere. My eyes roughly-approximate the image above as— "I MDC I DIE." Very downright chilling— if you are to consider cautiously who "MDC" might be referring to...
|
|
|
Post by applepie on Jan 2, 2017 16:01:52 GMT -5
People age; and people die. Some people don't— however.
|
|
|
Post by applepie on Dec 31, 2016 9:47:08 GMT -5
I like how the other lads have a serious expression - but 'Paul' has this Mono Lisa smile as if - 'I can't believe we are pulling this off. I'm on the cover of frickin' Life magazine. And nobody has a clue'. Have you— if at all; read up on ze "Mandela-Effect"? A common "Mandela-Effect" is when people swear that they remember the Mona Lisa in an entirely different way— claiming that originally; she never exhibited any sort of varying-degree of happiness via smiling; and that she was significantly more overweight than what is shown nowadays— almost claiming with certainty that she is a "different-person" than how she is depicted nowadays.
|
|
|
Post by applepie on Dec 30, 2016 17:11:37 GMT -5
Then this guy: The realization was to me 'WOW!' Never saw that! Now, I can't understand how someone can look at the two pics and think they could be the same person. Well, that's quite interesting. I think the 'McCartney' visualized on the "LIFE Magzine" cover-shoot does look quite different; but this could be because of possible weight-gain, or perhaps differing-angles? Avant-Grade a clue! He seems similar to how he looked like circa late-1965 (think "Rubber Soul" album-sleeve; the one that isn't tampered/stretched— of course).
|
|
|
Post by applepie on Dec 28, 2016 18:55:32 GMT -5
And why would you come to that conclusion? ps - your avatar has special meaning for me. I wonder if you want my username? I could be 'applepieversion2.' I think you sharing my username would be more contextually-appropriate. What d'ya say?
|
|
|
Post by applepie on Dec 28, 2016 18:51:51 GMT -5
Ain't it funny how we've revived this thread from 'the dead'? Wonder what else we could revive from the dead...
|
|
|
Post by applepie on Dec 28, 2016 18:50:01 GMT -5
Have a look at the "Love" Premier Video. Look at the images at 28-30 seconds in. It has that same color and it looks like people gathered around and looking down at a table(?) . A few seconds later the White VW Beetle explodes, still cast in that blue-white light. Rather violent image for a show entitled "Love". Here is the link: www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKcqTkPqOJQ`There they are! The three lads from Liverpo— Oh! Shit!
|
|
|
Post by applepie on Dec 28, 2016 18:47:29 GMT -5
It seems as though the image in reference has been 'stretched' vertically (not in post-production; there'd likely be such a prospect).
|
|
|
Post by applepie on Dec 28, 2016 18:40:04 GMT -5
And why would you come to that conclusion? ps - your avatar has special meaning for me. Oh! Glad you liked it. I dig yours as well, Ramone! I see a really angry and frustrated face; belonging to a woman, in that snapshot; and since it has been theorized that one is supposed to see the 'Lucy' in 'Lucy in The Sky with Diamonds,' when shining black light upon an American mono-pressing of 'Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band,' in the dark (I haven't conducted such an experiment as of yet; hence my description of said procedure that is required to experience such revelations might be incorrect. Whatever! I'd hope people would understand the idea). Therefore— I simply commented that I saw 'Lucy,'; from the song 'LSD' [in short-form] in agitation— possibly losing all her temperament, for whatever reason.
|
|
|
Post by applepie on Dec 24, 2016 11:02:17 GMT -5
Hi guys, this is my first post here. I am from Montreal, Canada. I was born at the end of the 50s, so I was too young to follow the Beatles when they were together. But during my teenage years, in the 70s, I listened to the radio a lot and bought many records. I liked many songs by Paul and Wings, starting with Uncle Albert. And I loved many of the Beatles songs that were still played on the radio, especially the first ones. I love harmonies. I also like Elvis, the Beach Boys, Neil Sedaka and a big part of the oldies. I thought most of the last Beatles songs were either too noisy or too slow. But I loved a few, mostly by Paul. And now that I listened more to the last albums, I especially like the vaudevillian kind of songs. I knew the main things about the Beatles' careers and personal lives, but not the details. I never paid any attention to this PID rumor that was said to be false, but after I saw an article about it in a magazine, I decided to do research on it online. I read many posts on this forum, many websites and many books, looked at pictures and watched videos of the shows and of the press conferences (that's real fun). Paul was always my favorite Beatle because he was so good looking and seemed so nice. And yes, I do have rabbit teeth, like him. Even if that must be some kind of flaw, I was often told I had a beautiful smile and I think it's because of my rabbit teeth. I think it's also the main reason Paul was so good looking. Welcome— you seemed to have fallen quite deep into a rabbit-hole! (Rabbit teeth? Through The Looking Glass reference? Sgt. Pepper's drumplate? Get it? LOL). I also reside in Canada, and stay near Montreal; so greetings! What you seem to be embarking on may prove to be damaging to your mental-wellbeing; because this conspiracy has reached new-heights in perceivable absolute-ridiculousness (that is— if you choose to believe the thousands of theories that have been presented on here) and it seems to be getting more far-fetched as time passes (that is— if you choose to believe in said theories; because it just doesn't involve Paul anymore). Be careful; you must proceed with rationale— and caution! .
|
|
|
Post by applepie on Dec 23, 2016 19:15:10 GMT -5
Shit-posts aren't a trait of mine, or a talent that requires any feasible-skill— but rather unjustifiable-anger. Anyhoot; I used to be an avid-contributor on this chat-forum— nowadays I surprise myself. There is nothing to be surprised of anymore; FOLLOWING TIMEMUDDIES TRAIL MIGHT PROVE HELPFUL TO CLEAR YOUR INQUIRY: This image above is indiscernibly-blurry, so I must further apologize for any inconveniences that may be caused. It would be in your best interests to enlarge this image— by simply clicking on it. Happy to be of some feeble-assistance.
|
|
|
Post by applepie on Dec 23, 2016 19:09:02 GMT -5
So... This is inevitably bound to become some sort of a vaguely-humorous (or rather, humourless) shit-post; so here it goes <follow the trail>: Paul (the 'real' McCartney; because obviously— in a world of conspiracies— there exists such a notion [no sarcasm]) is actually the current-Ringo Starr, and Ringo (who is actually the 'real' Paul) played John Lennon up until the 'real' John met Yoko Ono, (the 'genuine' Paul, & Ringo) along with John are dead, George has died for sure, and Brian Epstein is actually a $2 transvestite-hooker that I met in Chicago— who also; believe it or not— used to be Don Knotts, up until "The Apple Dumpling Gang," incident, which left Epstein battling chronic-substance-addiction, so he had no choice but to retort into becoming a hooker to accumulate drug-income, so— if Ringo is still with us; this could only mean... BEATALS REUNION! (Mal Evans is still alive, and organized 'iamaphoney', alongside Neil Aspinall). Gotta keep those 'loonies on the path... You must be psychic, this is a real shit post. However— it's not entirely a shit-post. Especially when I'd stress certain-points using ALL-CAPS...
|
|
|
Post by applepie on Dec 23, 2016 19:06:23 GMT -5
So... This is inevitably bound to become some sort of a vaguely-humorous (or rather, humourless) shit-post; so here it goes <follow the trail>: Paul (the 'real' McCartney; because obviously— in a world of conspiracies— there exists such a notion [no sarcasm]) is actually the current-Ringo Starr, and Ringo (who is actually the 'real' Paul) played John Lennon up until the 'real' John met Yoko Ono, (the 'genuine' Paul, & Ringo) along with John are dead, George has died for sure, and Brian Epstein is actually a $2 transvestite-hooker that I met in Chicago— who also; believe it or not— used to be Don Knotts, up until "The Apple Dumpling Gang," incident, which left Epstein battling chronic-substance-addiction, so he had no choice but to retort into becoming a hooker to accumulate drug-income, so— if Ringo is still with us; this could only mean... BEATALS REUNION! (Mal Evans is still alive, and organized 'iamaphoney', alongside Neil Aspinall). Gotta keep those 'loonies on the path... You must be psychic, this is a real shit post. My pleasure!
|
|
|
Post by applepie on Dec 22, 2016 23:01:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by applepie on Dec 22, 2016 15:02:36 GMT -5
lol I have something to argue as Will.
Let's season some Pepper on this Bacon, shall we? Of course— if you choose to argue, at will, in reference to the greatest paperback-literary known in the history of mankind: Whoopsies! Wrong photograph.... right?
|
|
|
Post by applepie on Dec 22, 2016 14:58:00 GMT -5
So... This is inevitably bound to become some sort of a vaguely-humorous (or rather, humourless) shit-post; so here it goes <follow the trail>: Paul (the 'real' McCartney; because obviously— in a world of conspiracies— there exists such a notion [no sarcasm]) is actually the current-Ringo Starr, and Ringo (who is actually the 'real' Paul) played John Lennon up until the 'real' John met Yoko Ono, (the 'genuine' Paul, & Ringo) along with John are dead, George has died for sure, and Brian Epstein is actually a $2 transvestite-hooker that I met in Chicago— who also; believe it or not— used to be Don Knotts, up until "The Apple Dumpling Gang," incident, which left Epstein battling chronic-substance-addiction, so he had no choice but to retort into becoming a hooker to accumulate drug-income, so— if Ringo is still with us; this could only mean... BEATALS REUNION!
(Mal Evans is still alive, and organized 'iamaphoney', alongside Neil Aspinall).
Gotta keep those 'loonies on the path...
|
|
|
Post by applepie on Dec 21, 2016 11:53:40 GMT -5
And I read with a lot of interest the summary of the posts by Apollo C Vermouth (said to be Neil Aspinall), because only insiders know what really happened. willemaus.wordpress.com/2015/07/03/apollo-c-vermouth/He wrote: 'Several recruits were used for differing reasons, Some used for photo ops, others for interviews. It required quite a cast of characters. It also explains the dfferences in photo comparisons.' Even for him, there are many different persons appearing if we search for Neil Aspinall in the images of Google. So there were obviously doubles for him too. I saw some people call some of them FrankenNeil or Frankenstein Aspinall. They look more like bodyguards. There seemed to be only one old Neil, so my guess is the real young Neil would be the one looking like the old one, the guy with the smallest face who is seen in many comparisons matching with Paul, showing he was indeed a double for Paul. What do you think? Strange days— indeed!
|
|
|
Post by applepie on Dec 15, 2016 11:42:17 GMT -5
Well, this page is 12 years-old. Any thread past 5 years is riddled with dead links!
|
|
|
Post by applepie on Dec 15, 2016 11:37:38 GMT -5
This one also interesting - Lucy's getting quite agitated these days!
|
|
|
Post by applepie on Dec 15, 2016 11:36:23 GMT -5
lol I have something to argue as Will.
Let's season some Pepper on this Bacon, shall we?
|
|
|
Post by applepie on Dec 15, 2016 11:32:43 GMT -5
Alrightey— if I read the following correctly; this alleged-doppelgänger's name was disclosed on this chat-forum? I can't fathom such information... Surely, this would've stirred-up quite the debate.. Tina, this dude is in front Please— you must be kidding us! This guy doesn't even remotely look like Paul himself; let alone Mr. Boogeyman at the airport!
|
|
|
Post by applepie on Dec 14, 2016 17:06:13 GMT -5
Double-post..
|
|
|
Post by applepie on Dec 14, 2016 17:05:55 GMT -5
And, this picture— I assume (the one above this comment); proves something?
|
|
|
Post by applepie on Dec 13, 2016 16:56:13 GMT -5
"A message from the past— to be interpreted in the future." Let us see how many of you will comprehensively understand just what exactly I'm trying to communicate- (to further help; understand the times in which we live in currently— or in 1972 terms; "the future." Examine the lyrical-content on songs like "Five Years", "Starman", & "Ziggy Stardust."— and take note of all themes conceived and depicted. Look for visual-messages on the front sleeve. I'll leave you with these aforementioned hints). Remember how I told all of you that those aforementioned clues were the only hints I was going to leave all of you with to ponder? Well; I'm going to drop another hint that isn't explicitly found on this album or its front-sleeve, but it is the underlying-premise behind this conceived 'folklore';- Only Ziggy Stardust (the Starman I speak of) & The Spiders From Mars could free us the very ideals of our society that seed unsettling spiritual-devoid, social-unrest, berserk-mania on the Internet and political-turmoil that we all currently face as of today. A bubble will burst; sooner or later.
|
|