|
Post by noodles on Aug 31, 2006 7:26:21 GMT -5
Is there some way of downloading and saving youtube videos so that they can be re-posted at some other place later? greasemonkey.mozdev.org/
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Feb 7, 2006 17:41:08 GMT -5
In this picture you can clearly see the shadow of the square piece of cloth. In the 'Let It Be' movie Faul has a thick head of hair he likes to push back and show off his hairline. This this Faul is the same as the 'Let It Be' Faul then why the wig?
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Feb 4, 2006 7:35:34 GMT -5
Thanks JoJo, I have a copy of this but without the very telling bit with Frost at the start. I think mines a slightly different version too. It's an interesting clip. They seem to be miming to a prerecorded version of the track. At the end there's very little footage of 'McCartney' doing his vocal freakout. The only bits that are look as if they may have been cut in later. At one point he looks off camera as if someone is guiding him. Presumably all the people at the end were brought in to distract from all of this. Also is there a problem with 'Paul's' wig? It's most evident around the 3:20 mark.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Mar 9, 2006 16:04:29 GMT -5
one flame is smaller, can it mean something? That's the Ringo Flame.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Mar 4, 2006 10:23:30 GMT -5
Your looking in the right place for sublinals. Chances are the smoke would have been added or altered later on. We need a better picture of this though. Can anyone can and upload it? While we're on the subject can anyone scan and upload Paul from the second 'Yesterday And Today' sleeve' please.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Apr 5, 2006 8:01:08 GMT -5
60IF/TKIN is full of disinfo.
There are those photos from August 27th 1966 that show Paul without shirt/swimming underwater/playing pool/etc. He looks to be perfectly healthy there.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Apr 4, 2006 11:09:36 GMT -5
Where does the theory that he was ill come from? Or perhaps I should ask what evidence there is to support this? Is there a thread here?
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Feb 8, 2006 18:21:52 GMT -5
www.jojoplace.org/Shoebox/Imagineouttakes/
Some discussion that didn't make into Lennon's "Imagine" movie, and a rough version of How Do You Sleep. (language warning) The discussion about "Beatle Ed" was rehearsed it seems. No need for the language warning... that mp3 file is kinda messed up... www.jojoplace.org/Shoebox/LennonClip.mp3
Short clip where Lennon compares Dylan to McCartney, "it's just a myth"Maybe Dylan was really replaced too?! Has anyone investigated into whether Dylan was replaced? His voice did change an enormous amount after that motorbike crash he had in the Summer of 1966.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Sept 3, 2006 6:53:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Oct 31, 2006 4:10:34 GMT -5
Dino Danelli is an unlikely candidate due to the closeness of the facial features between Paul and the doubles. Dinelli's eyes for example, do not match Paul's eyes which would mean he would have had to have been surgically altered backwards and forwards between the two groups. It's seems more likely that the Paul doubles would be unknowns who could be permanently altered (or at least for long periods of time) rather than other celebrities who bear a resemblance to him.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Oct 30, 2006 11:20:48 GMT -5
Notice how real Paul has two different head shapes. The two pictures on the left (top and bottom) show a longer face whereas the middle right picture shows a shorter rounder face. This is something I've noticed in pictures before and I'm guessing it's due to either doctored (stretched/squashed) pictures or an early double.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Sept 4, 2006 12:49:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Sept 3, 2006 7:04:21 GMT -5
As tkp66 says this is from the first half of 1967. They all look about the same as they do on the Pepper sleeve aside from it being LSD Paul rather than SFF Paul. This is early 1968 when John had his big sideys and faux Paul's face started puffing out and reshaping itself which it did through much of 1968 and on into 1969.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Sept 2, 2006 5:54:27 GMT -5
They just look like two different people to me. People here are free to see whoever they want. Thats fine, but your response to a question posed was a resounding "NO", which sounded a lot more like fact than opinion. It was statements like that which spiralled TKIN into a forum of disinformation, and was detrimental to anyone sincerely interested in this subject. The use of a Ringo double has been discussed before on this board. And John Lennon being switched was central to the Charlie Brill thread. In fact doubles for all of them have been discussed so I don't see what's different about this. I only asked the question because I'm curious if other people are noticing the same things I'm noticing. I understand why people are cautious about discussing the use of doubles or even permanant replacements of other band members but if we don't ask questions, examine evidence and discuss then we'll never know. I have zero desire in taking this or any topic into the ridiculous realms of TKIN. I'm far more interested in the facts than in creating more theories. This is one of the reasons I started digging deeper into the Billy Pepper thing. Of course it just results in more implausible theories (Yoko Ono & the Pepperpots anyone?). The main complaints about TKIN seem to be their pushing of theories based on little or no evidence and their enforcemment of those beliefs by banning people who disagree. So as long as people here demand evidence and as long as the mods don't start banning people for holding an alternative viewpoint then we'll be fine. At least I think we will. Isn't this from 1968 too, lili?
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Aug 31, 2006 4:34:12 GMT -5
Are these the same guys in both photos?
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Apr 1, 2006 7:44:12 GMT -5
Cheers JoJo. Great stuff. Something else, did anyone ever hear of this? Under "Great Friends", it says: "And of course, The Monkees went to that special recording, when Paul conducted a large orchestra." That could only be the recording of ADITL, no question. Had no idea The Monkees were there. They're in the video. A couple of them at least. Presumably the ADITL video is what became of the footage for the Sgt Pepper TV show they mention in the 'press conference'. I wonder if they recorded anything else.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Apr 7, 2006 6:25:10 GMT -5
Maybe it's Mountain Man's corny acting they don't want us to see. There are three parts where MM 'reminisces' about the old days with The Beatles. One where he's talking about writing 'One After 909' in the early days with John, another where he talks about watching the footage of The Beatles in India (I'm fairly sure that's the other guy in India) and another time he's talking about playing live in the early days. None of the other Beatles do this. It's kinda funny and pretty obvious when you know. Nice ear attatchment shot in the 'Get Back' book (I always call it the 'Let It Be' book so apologies for any confusion in this thread.)
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Apr 6, 2006 4:54:13 GMT -5
Mountain Man did get the part of Sir Paul and is annoying people to this day. I read that LIB is getting a proper release on DVD. Anyone know any more about this?
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Apr 4, 2006 14:48:42 GMT -5
I have the LIB book. My dad gave me his original copy along with The Beatles Illustrated Lyrics. I'd been longing for copies for years and I waited patiently and was around at the right time before he gave them to a charity shop. Interestingly that there is the exact same waterstain on this copy as there is on my dads. I'd figured he's spilled some bong water on it but they must all be like that which leads me to wonder whether whether the stain occured when they were touching up the picture and they didn't have time to doctor another one. In my opinion the softened angle on the eyes is a result of a little black pencil around the eyes. They seem to do this in all the official Beatles publications (Beatles Monthlys, LIB, BIL all have this) which is very telling. Technically there eyes are very similar. LIB Paul has thicker darker lashes though and he has thicker, darker (and more importantly) real hair. The pursed lips is one of the Mountain Man giveaways, as is the open mouth as if he is unable to breath through his nose. I was waching LIB again last night (great movie IMO) and 'Paul's' musical abilities are rather impressive. He plays guitar, bass and piano very well and with such confidence. He tears it up on the piano when they're jamming 'Shake, Rattle and Roll' and yet a few months earlier he's incapable of jamming with the other three Beatles on a musical interlude on the David Frost show. He then mimes his way through the song and yet in the LIB movie he performs all sorts of songs live and with a different sounding (and very obviously trained) voice. And a very strong voice. The vocals on the live version of 'Hey Jude' are much weaker and have been double tracked in parts to make up for that.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Feb 7, 2006 15:21:26 GMT -5
Thanks Jan. I'll track down a copy.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Feb 7, 2006 8:41:00 GMT -5
Thanks lili. Does anyone know where this picture originates from?
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Feb 4, 2006 6:34:00 GMT -5
I don't know if something is fishy is going on with that picture, but for unrelated kicks, I tweaked it to make it look more like Paul. Close, but the fact remains his head is much longer. From this it looks like they've been messing around with the eyes to make them look more like the real McCartney. If you blow up the picture it's obvious they have in fact they haven't even finished the job. It looks like they've cut and pasted his left eye in but haven't finished touching up the area to the left of it. Most of the area to the left of his face has been painted out and it's particularly evident and unfinished around his chin and neck. Not to mention the circular painted out sections by his forehead. There's a chunk of hair above and to the right of his right eyebrow which looks out of place too. It looks like it's from a different haircut or wig. It's also longer than the rest of his hair on his fringe. I'm assuming this picture was taken around the time of Sgt Pepper which means his fringe should be straight?
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Oct 30, 2006 11:16:03 GMT -5
Paul (1966, ?) vs Faul (1967, Sgt. Pepper) is this the "Strawberry Fields" Faul? Yes
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Sept 4, 2006 12:37:59 GMT -5
Noodles, that could very well be. You have a good eye for these kinds of things ! ;D You're very good at observational stuff with JPM too (I have no idea why ) so I'd be interested in your opinion, lili. I'm 99% sure though. It's all in the eyes. Oh and the enlarged hairdo that doesn't match SFF Paul's hair.
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Sept 4, 2006 12:02:15 GMT -5
I hate to go against popular opinion once again but I'm pretty sure this is a doctored picture of JPM pasted onto SFF Paul's body.
|
|