|
Post by GN on Mar 2, 2010 9:38:15 GMT -5
ahhh... that fake ear again ..... "This video, an interview in 1968, is clearly Paul" Nope... it's not Paul, but you're right the ear looks pretty suspect. The top five photos are all of Paul. ^ Interviewer - "One final question.... In all the time you've been Beatles, before you were just people from Liverpool..." Faul - BIG WINK, and John cracks up. It's better quality on this vid at 2.55 - Also note at 20 seconds in when the interviewer asks how are Ringo and George... John sarcastically replies "lovely...very healthy" - Faul tenses up and looks away. I 've replied "You are right" in braille since that language is for blind people.... life is easy with eyes closed ... I was not referring to the true blind in eyes people but to true blind people in mind .... Yeah that photo stripe DOES PROVE that in genuine photos Paul NEVER changed his face features ... and the guy in that 1968 video is not Paul at all ... A better Paul resemblance for Faul there BECAUSE that was a full mask and not a partial make-up....
|
|
|
Post by GN on Feb 28, 2010 9:58:49 GMT -5
www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQjcG9tXY5E&NR=1Of course Paul is alive. Please use your noggins. Subject your own photos of yourselves to your comparisons of before and after. This video, an interview in 1968, is clearly Paul. He's still clearly Paul now. Hope you all get real and find some peace. You should take responsibility that you might be really breaking hearts and frightening gullible sensitive souls. Blessings... ahhh... that fake ear again ..... "This video, an interview in 1968, is clearly Paul"
|
|
|
Post by GN on Feb 21, 2010 4:04:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by GN on Feb 20, 2010 19:53:27 GMT -5
Put that in that row, and it is still the same guy:
|
|
|
Post by GN on Feb 20, 2010 7:56:29 GMT -5
Did paul die? I don't think so because he seems to appear occasionally post 67, but he was replaced, no doubt.... hence the forum name. Compare 66 Paul to 67 "paul"..focus on 66 vs 67 there are no similarities... none.. zip.. zero. You really think that tall guy on Sgt. Pepper is the real Paul? Really?? There are at least 2 Pauls.... that is clear. The power of suggestion is amazing. Get your heads out of the fog & open your eyes.... it's right in front of you. who changed most?? not Paul... The reason why your photo gallery is ALREADY well explained at: invanddis.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=TAR&thread=3264&page=1Things got different with TRUE VINTAGE documents. I agree among Sgt Pepper Band all made by Beatles doubles during fall 1967 - 1968 False Paul was the best double. Interesting to see: www.guardian.co.uk/music/gallery/2009/sep/06/thebeatles-johnlennon?picture=352550831
|
|
|
CANDY
Feb 9, 2010 18:41:00 GMT -5
Post by GN on Feb 9, 2010 18:41:00 GMT -5
GN wrote:"Rocket shaped written Rocket shaped John's legs Rocket Man Across The Universe " ------------------The listing of the characters in the Magical Mystery Tour album is listed in a rocket shape. It also appears that the photograph of them waving from the top of the bus has been made to look like an eye (of Horus, no doubt). The scene of John shoveling spaghetti in the cartoon was not quite the same in the film, and it is never quite explained in the MMT comic. Someone - I think it may have been "the dezombificator" - at TKIN, pointed out that the spaghetti is flame-like, and so what may be being depicted is John shoveling souls into hell. Aunt Jessie, as the world in this bad dream, is opening her mouth, allowing for the burning souls to descend into hell, which traditionally has been considered to be beneath us on the surface of the earth. Or she may be swallowing souls who would otherwise be descending into hell, in an effort to preserve them. Whatever the meaning is, it was never fully developed in either the film or the comics, as far as I can tell. Paul as an astronaut. That is in keeping with all the strangeness of the Gemini 12 flight being hailed as somehow significant. I know that at TKIN BeatlePaul had proposed that Paul, having died, was flown into space aboard the docking module of Gemini 12, possibly in a cryonic (frozen) state. Perhaps the idea was that he could be kept "on ice" in the coldness of space 'til such time as he could be thawed, "repaired" and brought back to life here on Earth. I am more inclined to think that he may have been shipped to that triangular craft that appears to be awaiting his arrival in the docking module, if he was, in fact, aboard, but more about that in just a little bit. Does anyone know more about the particulars of the circumstances under which that photograph of Paul in a space suit was taken? Let's get back to The Shining for a second. "Will Paul be back as Superman?"
|
|
|
Post by GN on Feb 8, 2010 9:48:37 GMT -5
IMO, the difference between the way he looked in 73 and 76 is different botox effects and/or continued surgery "enhancements". Right. Taken from: www.beatlesinterviews.org/db1965.0828pc.beatles.htmlI would really appreciate, if you could do that. You can keep it short, but please, i am very interested how somebody who doesn't believe that PID, believes that he was once replaced.... What makes you think that? Happy to. There's a bounty of evidence... photos, lyrical clues, anecdotal, and logical deduction that supports the idea that there are two Pauls operating at once. The original James Paul McCartney burned out, got tired of it all, and retreated to a behind-the-scenes role while the guy I refer to as Sir Paul goes out and does the public role. Not to say that the replacement doesn't have a strong creative hand. There are periods in the discography where you can point to one or the other or both. For example, I believe most of the Wings era is solely the replacement, sans Venus and Mars (which is both). Chaos & Creation was both. Memory Almost Full was the replacement. The Fireman and Electric Arguments was the creative design of JPM. The death theory doesn't hold up after intensive scrutiny. It's fun and dangerous to suspect that at first, but it ultimately a house of cards. Don't get me wrong: I know the "Paul orchestrated his own replacement" theory sounds a bit crackers too, but nearly every aspect of his work post-1966 screams it. So Sgt. Pepper took you by surprise You better see right through that mother's eyes
Those freaks was right when they said you was dead The one mistake you made was in your head Ah, how do you sleep? Ah, how do you sleep at night?
You live with straights who tell you you was king Jump when your momma tell you anything The only thing you done was yesterday And since you're gone you're just another day Ah, how do you sleep? Ah, how do you sleep at night?
Ah, how do you sleep? Ah, how do you sleep at night?
A pretty face may last a year or two But pretty soon they'll see what you can do The sound you make is muzak to my ears You must have learned something in all those years Ah, how do you sleep? Ah, how do you sleep at night? - IMO - After putting so many clues (as he told in Glass Onion - "The Lennon Code"-) in songs this is John conclusive witness about PID Read once again that lyrics and see ALL my post here -wings- and you will see that your "theory" comes true P.S. Ringo was the first to be replaced, better "helped", by Billy Shears. Then there was Paul time. John and George had their "doubles" too. For John that meant controlling and discredit his figure.
|
|
|
CANDY
Feb 7, 2010 4:30:12 GMT -5
Post by GN on Feb 7, 2010 4:30:12 GMT -5
The subject of the Gemini 12 space shot has come up here before, as well as at TKIN. A keen-eyed observer noticed that the cover for the Moody Blues album "Days of Future Passed" appeared to artisticly pay homage to that particular flight. The album was released in England on November 11, 1967, and in the US it came out in the Spring of 1968. As with Sgt. Pepper before it, there seems to be a lot of significant imagery on the album cover. It was also the first Moody Blues album featuring the John Lodge and Justin Hayward version of The Moodies, as opposed to the Denny Laine line up. Now I have to tell you, my innocence has been shattered by the recent revelation at tafultong's blog that Faul may be a Billy Martin 3 or 4, and that Justin is a member in good standing of Martin Sr.'s transparently quasi-masonic SODS (Society of Distinguished Songwriters) group. Justin is shown second from right here. Pictures like this make me cringe. In any case, I am beginning to suspect that the quasi-masonic order of SODS took it upon themselves to ensure that after 1966, the major names in British rock would carry the Horus/Isis/Osiris message, if they hadn't already been behind the scenes implementing such a scheme. But getting back to Gemini 12, I remember seeing this image in Life magazine (if memory serves) when I was a teenager, and thinking that it looked to me as if the docking module that the crew of that flight had been practicing docking with, was heading toward some sort of triangular spacecraft, even though the official explanation for the white dots given at the time was that they were some sort of space debris. Here is a picture of the docking module close up: Now, I like Gemini 12 as much as the next guy, but what was so special about that mission that it warranted being commemorated on an album cover? After all, the Gemini missions featured two guys in a space capsule orbiting the Earth. One would think the "big enchilada" would be the Apollo missions, when men (alledgedly) left the Earth's orbit, and sallied forth to explore the moon. Gemini 12 was the last of the Gemini missions. It was launched on November 11, 1966, at 3:46:33 p.m. EST. Or, for those of you whose watches don't measure seconds, it could be said to have been launched at 3:47 EST, rounding off to the nearest minute. 3:47 EST is the first album by the Canadian group Klaatu released in August 1976. more to come Rocket shaped written Rocket shaped John's legs Rocket Man Across The Universe
|
|
|
Post by GN on Jan 22, 2010 13:41:37 GMT -5
Astronaut I believe. ('65?) Yep. That was a full original NASA astronaut suit Across The Universe
|
|
|
Post by GN on Jan 17, 2010 9:08:32 GMT -5
Actually with a proper make-up you can't say who is who.
|
|
|
Post by GN on Jan 16, 2010 4:39:15 GMT -5
...and that it had occurred in October 1963. Are we sure then, that the Paul from the cavern days is the same one that appeared on The Ed Sullivan Show? Maybe there have been several Paul replacements. This is one thing that has really bothered me. All over the internet there are numerous facial comparisons between Paul and "Faul." After looking at countless numbers of these comparisons I began to ask myself why the "true" pre-1967 Paul had so many fluctuations in his appearance. Granted, few people look EXACTLY the same from year-to-year and camera angles can do funny things, but what's up with the many faces of Paul McCartney before 1967? Here is a collection of photos of what is commonly assumed to be the true James Paul McCartney. Why are there so many differences? -The 3rd pic on the top row doesn't really look like any Paul OR Faul that I've ever seen in any other picture or video. -The first pic in the second row and the Butcher Cover pic show Paul with a very swollen looking face. -The pic from the 1962-1966 Red Album also looks way off from most any other picture of JPM I've ever seen. Yes, its a funny angle but the rest of the group looks consistent with other photos I've seen. -Looking at the 2nd pic in the second row, the face strikes me more of the face usually associated with Faul. -Compare the bottom two photos. Most people think of the authentic JPM as the second photo: Rounded face with the slightly downward slanted puppy-dog eyes. Yet the photo of young Paul to its left looks more like Faul's long, narrow head with the exaggerated, slanted right eyebrow. What gives? I don't consider BOTH as genuine photos From "Meet The Beatels" to "Seatlle 1966" in UNTOUCHED genuine photos Paul looked ALWAYS the same.
|
|
|
Post by GN on Jan 15, 2010 19:58:43 GMT -5
Above: The REAL the TRUE the ONE and ONLY James Paul McCartney Above: A good Paul Double Above: A good Paul Double ( Keith photo is taken from: magicdolphinmusic.com/Page_3.html )I was asking myself who was that Paul's "perfect" double after 1966 during the Beatles era. It could not be our "Faul" since that guy had a small nose and hi-fi face proportions. I was wondering about what Apollo told in another forum and checking it out. Now I got the answer.
|
|
|
Post by GN on Jan 15, 2010 9:15:22 GMT -5
I don't see a match there, GN. However your proposition made me think of a mysterious musician described in a book ... You say? I still see great similarities among So what the name of that guy?
|
|
|
Post by GN on Jan 14, 2010 18:11:18 GMT -5
Probably Billy the Bigmouth Bassplayer, I should think, GN. ... probably we have missed Pepper ...
|
|
|
Post by GN on Jan 12, 2010 19:28:11 GMT -5
... so he was the BASSMAN of "Pete Best Four" ... (?)
|
|
|
Post by GN on Jan 10, 2010 19:07:05 GMT -5
Hello INVestigation AND DIScussion people! I ask you HELP! The arrow points to a member of "Pete Best Four" group. Who is that guy?
|
|
|
Post by GN on Jan 9, 2010 5:13:56 GMT -5
I dig a pony! So...the pony was replaced with... a horse, and noone even noticed. Since we're on about improbable theories, perhaps I should mention in the original dream I had many years ago about Paul's death, and five years before coming across 60IF, that I had got the impression in the dream that Paul had died of NATURAL CAUSES (not whacked and so on) and that it had occurred in October 1963. Are we sure then, that the Paul from the cavern days is the same one that appeared on The Ed Sullivan Show? Maybe there have been several Paul replacements. I don't know about BEFORE "Meet the Beatles!" release ...
|
|
|
Post by GN on Jan 8, 2010 8:52:40 GMT -5
You can not explain how a distinctly shorter woman was able to pull off playing the role of JPM. Don't give me this nonsense about how she was stooping her back and bending her knees throughout her whole entire life to fool people into thinking she was short. How tall was Linda McCartney? How tall would Pearl have to be to match the height of a man who would be several inches taller than Linda? How did Pearl look so manly while running around in men's swim-trunks? And Pearl is now dead, are you suggesting that she is still alive and still carrying on the role? That's not a pony Please folllow the path. Don't miss a post from me.
|
|
|
Post by GN on Jan 8, 2010 8:45:31 GMT -5
In the early stages of 60IF, the story was simple and uncomplicated. Over the years, I think a number of disinfo agents have crept in to make the story so complicated and bizarre, that anyone coming here to find the simple truth wouldn't know where to start. "You better see right through that mother's eyes"
|
|
|
Post by GN on Jan 6, 2010 4:51:33 GMT -5
Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.
|
|
|
Post by GN on Dec 31, 2009 8:11:27 GMT -5
This is great video. I think it's James Paul. at 3:47 we see open hands smallish with short fingers. Nose got longer with time but it's still James Paul. Great song but, sorry, that's Granny McCartney again. Michelle you have to learn what Real Paul True Look really is. That's could help you:
|
|
|
Post by GN on Dec 26, 2009 9:29:11 GMT -5
The person in the "Night Before" 1965 video is Cecile Pearl Witherington, called Pearl. She was an SOE (Special Operations Executive) agent who began to fill for Paul in early 1965 or late 1964 when Paul began to step out of the spotlight to work on forming Apple Music and do more songwriting. She took male hormones to look like him. The real JPM was in Hard Day's Night (movie) but Pearl took over for Help! You can tell Pearl mainly from her body language and the way she played guitar. JPM would shake his head a little while playing; Pearl kept her head still. JPM stood up straight with square shoulders; Pearl caved her chest in while playing. JPM kept his feet and legs spread like a guy while playing; Pearl had a habit of knocking her knees together while playing. In one photo I've seen of Pearl, she's sitting with the guys in a casual photo. Where the guys all have their elbows planted on their knees, Pearl has her hands wrapped around one knee - just like a girl. Really a very good analysis Pauline ( I think her true name was Louise Marie Witherington ) has a throat electronic implant to modify her voice as told by Ernst Stavro Blofeld in "Diamonds Are Forever" movie. After this I am 100% sure that "Pauline" is "our" Faul
|
|
|
Post by GN on Dec 8, 2009 9:00:27 GMT -5
I disagree with you, P(D)L. Turn the sound down on the video (I had to, I can't stand that song) and compare it with Faul at the piano on Get Back: same guy. If he had his face jerked around to look more like Paul, what's another little cut on the lip? The real pity of this song is that Linda sang background on it. It shows how cowed she was from early on in the relationship. JPM has the scar on his lip from the moped accident in December of 1965. The guy in the My Love video has the scar on his lip (see previous post for pic). The guy at the piano in "Let It Be" and "The Long and Winding Road" (You said Get Back, but Paul plays bass in the live performances of Get Back) has the scar on his lip. So... Logically... They are all the SAME PERSON. And since the scar is traceable to JPM, that makes all of these people JPM. Sorry. BTW, what makes you so sure that "the guy at the piano on Get Back" is anyone but JPM? Are we sure that it was Paul McCartney in the picture on the right? Or... Had Dino an attack instead Paul so he said "goodbye" as McCartney stand-in? Danelli presents a capped incisor too ... in the same place
|
|
|
Post by GN on Dec 7, 2009 4:19:19 GMT -5
Good eye, FP. FP said: "And the scar does show up in the Revolution video; click HD and skip to 1:28:"FP also said: "His scar also isn't visible in his opening close up of Paperback Writer."And yet it's so prominent through most of the Let it Be performance... Hmmm. Perhaps it's lighting, mixed with the extent to which he was pursing his lips at any given moment. Or possibly a fake scar. Or.......<shudder>.........perhaps there is no Faul. To be continued. The one on the right (please scroll horizontally the image) was taken on August 1966 at Seattle and it is the last close up of the real Paul McCartney. That scar is not so noticeable.
|
|
|
Post by GN on Oct 30, 2009 17:45:38 GMT -5
From: www.beatlesinterviews.org/db1966.05flip.beatles.htmlFrom: See that cover: it seems to show "All Together Now" After Seattle '66 date Paul was going to marry in secret Marianne Faithfull. Paul and Marianne escaped. To live their own lives. For Paul to forget Sylvie. "One thing I can tell you is you got to be free " said John to Paul Sorry GN, nothing supports your theory. There was profound change in Marianne's voice but much later in life. Where did you get this idea anyway? Patti Boyd introduced Marianne Faithfull to Paul McCartney ( so he could forget Sylvie Vartan ) www.beatlesinterviews.org/db1966.0825.beatles.htmlM.C: "Can we have the first question, please." Q: "John, could you please tell me something about your new movie, 'How I Won The War'?"
JOHN: "Oh, I don't know anything about it except for I'm in it, and it's about the last world war."
Q: "I'd like to address a question to Paul McCartney. Would you confirm or deny the report of your marriage to Jane Asher in Seattle this evening?"
PAUL: (jokingly) "It's tonight, yeah."
Q: "What time and where?"
PAUL: "Tonight-- I can't tell you that, now can I?"
(laughter)
PAUL: "I couldn't tell ya... it's a secret."
GEORGE: "OK, it's a secret. We don't want all the people there, do we?"
Q: "You are confirming the report?"
PAUL: "No, not really. It was... it's a joke. Who started this? Anyone know? Does anyone know? I just got in today and found out I was getting married tonight. No, she is not coming in tonight as far as I know."
GEORGE: "And if she does, we are going out tonight anyway... so we'll miss her."
PAUL: (laughs)
(laughter)From here the Beatles tour flew to southern California, taking two days off in Beverly Hills ... ... where George was waiting for his friends .... In The Blue Jay Way
|
|