|
Post by bosshugo on May 16, 2008 13:57:32 GMT -5
Alright, I'll take that as an order:
P = 3 E = 1 P = 3 P = 3 E = 1 R = 1 L = 1 A = 1 N = 1 D = 2
That's 17 points (without falling on any double letter / word scores...impossible for a 10-letter word).
|
|
|
Post by bosshugo on May 5, 2008 15:13:16 GMT -5
www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2Q91LjUYkYTrailer for "All Together Now." First shot: to the tune of "Can You Take Me Back," 4 silhouettes on Abbey Road, three walking in one direction and the fourth walking away from them. Also, a quote from Ringo: "We have to get over it, because we WERE this incredibly close knit FOUR MAN BAND."
|
|
|
Post by bosshugo on May 3, 2008 2:35:32 GMT -5
From en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zodiac_killer:"At 2 a.m. on October 22, 1969, someone claiming to be the Zodiac called Oakland PD demanding that one of two prominent lawyers, F. Lee Bailey or Melvin Belli, appear on Jim Dunbar's television talk show in the morning. Bailey was not available, but Belli appeared on the show." What could have kept F. Lee Bailey from getting involved in the Zodiac case? Well, not a month later (Thanksgiving weekend of 1969), he was cross-examining witnesses on national television to find out whether or not Paul McCartney had really died. ludix.com/moriarty/paul.html
|
|
|
Post by bosshugo on May 2, 2008 1:02:05 GMT -5
FWIW "subliminal pilgrim" anagrams into Sir Paul = Bill Miming
|
|
|
Post by bosshugo on May 1, 2008 13:42:15 GMT -5
The Beatles Monthly knew that the group had grown mustaches from the press interviews outside Abbey Road in late 1966. Since there were very few new photographs available between then and the release of Sgt. Pepper in June 1967, they decided to manipulate earlier pictures to create the impression that they had all-access to the group. That led to quite a bit of fake-mustachery on the whole group.
|
|
|
Post by bosshugo on Apr 24, 2008 14:01:14 GMT -5
Has anybody seen a picture of Amado Crowley? He is allegedly Aleister Crowley's illegitimate son who lives in London and writes about the occult. Could he be this old man? It would certainly explain the hints about the son of the magickian and the father of evil. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amado_Crowley
|
|
|
Post by bosshugo on Apr 21, 2008 0:43:06 GMT -5
SHE IS . . .
She is . . . the Yin to my Yang the I to my Ching the See to my Saw the Head to my Tails the Lily of my Valley
Paul McCartney, Blackbird Singing, 2001
|
|
|
Post by bosshugo on Apr 18, 2008 17:20:03 GMT -5
I'm eagerly awaiting the fortcoming making-of-Love DVD...seems like it could be a veritable goldmine of new clues. thebeatles.com/core/news/
|
|
|
Post by bosshugo on Apr 18, 2008 17:05:12 GMT -5
I've had thoughts thought as to IAAP's identity. From everything I can research on the subject, the 1995 version of "Now and Then" was NOT released to the public in any way, and no know bootlegs existed before IAAP slapped it onto a RA video. Where did IAAP get it? The original Lennon demo was first made available in 1996 on the Pegboy bootleg "Free As A Bird - The Dakota Beatle Demos." The drums on the IAAP version (and on "St. Paul" as well, I believe) are sampled from Ringo's introduction to the Sgt. Pepper reprise. The backing vocals sound like the acappella version of "Because" found on the Anthology and Love. It's a very well-done outfake, but by no means legit. Definitely more modern and synthetic than what Jeff Lynne would have produced in 1995. There's another few RA videos where Faul can be heard saying something about clubbing someone to death. Again, I don't recall this being something Macca said in a public forum. This was a private conversation between him and someone close to him. It was most certainly said in a public forum - www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMV3Doxbg2A (warning, contains bloody baby seals). As for the remark about groupies and prostitutes, the voice in question didn't sound like Sir/Saint Paul/Faul at all. The voice goes on to talk about Heather's disreputable past from a point of view that is unlikely to be spoken by any McCartney, dead or alive. Here's the video in question: www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CA4Fg3xihY
|
|
|
Post by bosshugo on Mar 28, 2008 0:03:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by bosshugo on Mar 20, 2008 14:54:18 GMT -5
In May of '69, Terry Knight released a 45 rpm titled "St Paul." It predates the rumours by several months. Oddest yet, it was owned by Maclen Music, John and Pauls private publishing company. It remains the only non-Lennon/McCartney song in the collection. Does anyone else think the Maclen business is much ado about nothing? The chorus of the song is deliberately based around the chord progression of "Hey Jude," and that song is quoted along with "Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds," "Strawberry Fields Forever," "Hello Goodbye" and "All You Need Is Love." Could the meeting with Paul at Apple before its release just be a handshake agreement to get around the copyright infringement? So Lennon/McCartney could still get some compensation while Terry Knight remains the sole songwriting credit? When the soundtrack to The Rutles was released, ATV sued Neil Innes because the original songs he wrote for the project were based on Beatles songs that ATV owned. In lieu of a nasty (no pun intended) protracted court battle, they elected to change the songwriting credits to Lennon/McCartney/Innes. Could it be that a similar arrangement was made with Terry Knight? Or would it be different if Neil wrote a song called "Stig Has Been Dead For Ages, Honestly?"
|
|
|
Post by bosshugo on Mar 18, 2008 1:48:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by bosshugo on Mar 17, 2008 11:50:02 GMT -5
Heather was quoted in the UK Telegraph as saying she had been asking for £125m ($253,675,246) and Paul had offered £15.8 million ($32,064,551). As he left court, Paul said "all will be revealed" and that a statement would be made shortly.
Looks like someone's been huffin' from the IAAP bag.
|
|
|
Post by bosshugo on Mar 17, 2008 1:46:39 GMT -5
Interesting indeed. JPM would never write such twaddle as the "dustbin lid" line. ;D
|
|
|
Post by bosshugo on Mar 17, 2008 1:40:23 GMT -5
99 Pounds - The Monkees
|
|
|
Post by bosshugo on Mar 28, 2008 23:26:07 GMT -5
Bosshugo, care to enlightmen me the significance of that name? [/quote] I'm not privy to any more knowledge than you are, but my guess is Hugo Boss is the designer of the suitcase itself. Either that or IAAP's rather...er...tight wardrobe. (You could see everything quite clearly....nothing left to the imagination...yes, thank you Mrs. Mountbatten.)
|
|
|
Post by bosshugo on Mar 17, 2008 13:09:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by bosshugo on Mar 17, 2008 1:23:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by bosshugo on Mar 16, 2008 15:47:56 GMT -5
[/quote] Has anyone tried to transcribe this? I got a piece of it from a zoom in one of the RA's... N Y O F I S R A E L A S H A D N O H E R E F O R E T H E A N G E R O F A M M O N A N D A M A L E K A N S U M M E R P A R L O U R W H I C H E Q U A R R I E S A N D E S C A I N K I N G O F C A N A A N T H A L L D E L I L E R H I M I N T O T E T H O F T H E G E N T I L E S U N E D I N U N T O H E R I N T O T H E C H I L D R E N O F I S R A E E A M O T H E R I N I S R A E L T A F T E R T H E E B E N J A M I N E R O F K I S H O N S W E P T T H D O U T A T A W I N D O W A N D C All seem to be Biblical quotes, and don't seem to be more than tangentially related...unless you consider "summer parlour" to be a portmanteau of "Summer's Day Song" and "Front Parlour" (as I did originally).
|
|