|
Post by mrshears on Dec 2, 2009 19:38:54 GMT -5
i acutally have abbey road under the odeon label.
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Jul 19, 2009 22:05:59 GMT -5
you used 2 heavily doctored pics.^
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Apr 3, 2009 11:00:04 GMT -5
Not the same?
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Apr 2, 2009 20:33:42 GMT -5
Ah i see, that's why there aren't many shots then.
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Apr 2, 2009 9:31:55 GMT -5
i wonder if the paparazzi took anymore pics of those two that day? It looks like one of those pictures taken by PI. Sorry but, who's PI.
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Apr 1, 2009 12:28:44 GMT -5
I had a gender change. I am now a woman! ♫ I feel pretty; oh so pretty...it's alarming how charming I feel! ♫(after).....................................................................................................(before)there goes my comp, thanx for using it, pass it around.
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Mar 27, 2009 11:01:39 GMT -5
Are you the one who pm-ed it to me there? I am not trying to steal anyone else's thunder. oh ........didnt realize you were a miss him member. i pm-ed that to everyone on the forum , thanx for posting it here though. i wouldve pm-ed it to everyone here but i cant cause im not a modera ;Dtor.
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Mar 26, 2009 15:40:55 GMT -5
i am that friend. who gave you that link!? i hope no ones taking credit for my work.
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Mar 26, 2009 15:38:28 GMT -5
i wonder if the paparazzi took anymore pics of those two that day?
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 28, 2009 20:43:35 GMT -5
that picture has always spooked me. i wonder if anybody has questioned the creators of that video, as too what that thing is supposed to be.
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 25, 2009 15:03:54 GMT -5
How about how he holds his brew in his left hand? Interesting tidbits in this book I found while researching the boat matter. Denis was trying to put together ideas and present movie concepts to United Artists, and while you may have heard of this one, he wanted to make a movie of "Lord of the Rings" with the Beatles in key roles. They were excited for a while, and they were discussing who would play which role. So, Denis got a dialog going with Stanley Kubrick, who initially seemed warm to the idea, but amazingly had never read the books. Some time passed, and after reading the books said the idea of making a movie from this story was "impossible". (hah sure) Denis didn't give up and arranged a meeting with the Beatles and Kubrick but.. After talking to SK the Beatles suddenly lost interest, essentially SK talked them out of it.. Too bad! And how Kubrick was wrong! i enjoy your site JoJo.
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 22, 2009 20:44:39 GMT -5
What is your point of reference to determine larger in these photos? JPM almost never shows his forehead so what are you comparing it to? Check out the features in the profile shot..........a dead on match. shes comparing it to faul . his forehead is visibly larger, and jpm's face takes up more space on his face then fauls does . fauls face is mostly forehead and chin.
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 22, 2009 19:28:44 GMT -5
ive pretty much came to the same conclusion, that its derek taylor.
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 22, 2009 16:46:32 GMT -5
"Why was the forehead thread locked?" It got locked b/c the PIA'ers were getting pretty rude. Not that it bothers me, really. I'm used to PIA'ers being really rude, b/c they don't have the facts on their side, so they have to be rude to bolster their "argument." I actually pity them for not being able to break out of their programming. It matters not to them that Paul was shorter, better-looking, more talented, had difft color eyes, etc, they just can't see it. Kind of sad, really. Too much TV, maybe? nuff said trutha.
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 22, 2009 16:42:38 GMT -5
Pauliedied, the ears are different to begin with. And in some photos, Faul's forehead is noticeably larger. Look, I don't want to argue with you or 65if2007. And I disagree with what he said. I don't think my statement was inflammatory at all. I have shown photos of both men to people who don't even know who Paul McCartney is and they told me that it was not the same person. They are the control in this "experiment" since they have no stake in this whatsoever. I am not the only person who has experienced this. It is mostly with very young people who have not yet been conditioned by society. When I first came across PID, I was shocked. I thought that Paul was the imposter. I was raised to think that Sir Paul IS Paul McCartney. To me, the original Paul did not look that much like him. I was confused for quite awhile about the whole thing. Then for some reason I can't explain, I could see the difference quite clearly in most photos. Now that I've seen it, there is no going back. I am not the only person who has experienced this on these forums. what she said makes alot of sense, his forhead is obviously larger than pauls. and pauls face takes up more space then fauls.
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 22, 2009 15:36:20 GMT -5
then we should probably start a new thread for this new topic.
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 22, 2009 15:30:37 GMT -5
Further conversation should be redirected? (iameye said that?) ;D huh
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 22, 2009 15:23:41 GMT -5
Expressing opposing viewpoints isn't what stops the discussion. If everyone could do that without the fear of being bashed every time they threw out a new idea or thought, maybe some new conversations would develop? There are a few aggressive heavy-hitters on this forum that ridicule and diminish people for their views or ideas, and that more than anything inhibits the feeling that you are free to examine new ideas. You would expect to have to defend yourself in an open forum to discuss the minutia of this Mystery, but it seems unfair to have to protect yourself so strongly here where the ideas should be invited. If there is a specific agenda of this board that Mgmt doesn't want to hear "woo-woo" topics of conversation, then all you have to do is clearly state it so people know if their input is wanted or not. However, if discussion of Don Knotts or Sun King or IAAP or whatever unsavory trail comes up is unacceptable for review, then what good is it to examine the evidence when you are forced to ignore half of the story? Shit, it's Christopher Columbus all over again. that exactly what mb had to go through, defending her views, all the time.
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 22, 2009 14:59:22 GMT -5
I gotta say that when you are on a forum that is strict to the topic at hand and outside influences are limited, you can get so much more accomplished in terms of research. I feel that although NIR has been generous to allow the PIA point of view, that has created somewhat of a block to getting any further progress done to what really happened to Paul and the Beatles in the fall of 1966. People have their opinions as to what happened and for a long time it was that Paul died in a car crash. Now the trend here is that he lived on past 1966 and people are comparing pics of "Paul" from 1968 and saying that it is the same guy as the one in 1966 and before. So you can see why I think we haven't progressed that much and actually have regressed a bit. Does anybody else recognize this? i agree to that one. i must say.....
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 22, 2009 13:50:24 GMT -5
Humor & sarcasm can be tough online sometimes. ;D But yep, it was pics like these that had me backing away from the PID theories a while back. These sure as hell aren't pics of Bill. And I'll take it a step further..... wanna know what a REAL McCartney album would sound like today? Play Chaos & Creation. The real JPM is on the cover for a reason. some pictures of faul have been manipulated to look more like paul.
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 22, 2009 13:45:47 GMT -5
.
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 22, 2009 11:21:17 GMT -5
Jo posted: NIR should stay what it is, a place for an assortment of differing views. Those that spin off their own forums so they can have a place they want to discuss their own views, more power to them, and D66H, they have the right to admit or deny anyone they wish. That is how I feel also. I like coming here, because I am interested in seeing other people's viewpoints. Not to mention that I have friends here. I am more than willing to discuss all viewpoints here, when I have the time. I like having a place where I can focus on my beliefs without interruption. whoever tempted mommybird to leave really shouldnt have , she is a very valuable gem, to have on the forum, and contribute.
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 21, 2009 15:22:17 GMT -5
im pretty sure that who we think is 67 paul is derek.
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 20, 2009 17:21:12 GMT -5
well happy b-day yoko. she does look great, actually.
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 20, 2009 17:17:39 GMT -5
eeeww i just noticed some thing...ringos nose is unusually big in this pic! A Pepper Faul nose indeed. wow the red stripe shirt paul and faul have the same nose .but if that was faul leving that plane, then wouldnt that mean paul was replaced earlier than nov. 1966
|
|