Will
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 80
|
Post by Will on Aug 12, 2015 14:07:37 GMT -5
8 years ago today was Apollo C Vermouth's most "famous" post. Re: Paul Is Dead True Story « Reply #13 on Aug 12, 2007, 1:18am » Once upon a long ago, lived four young lads I'm sure you know. The other three, you know them two. You'll know me better when this is through. Before the band was on the run, a natures child followed the sun. And soon the four became a three, a list of clues for those to see. A story told in fine detail, to keep the loonies on the trail. A coin, a sheep, a favored son, were welcomed guest when the day was done. Now, those days are gone, the stories told, in rivers of ash, and urns of gold. A final hint to all of those, who refuse to see the Emporer's clothes.
Apollo C. VermouthIts also 49 years ago today that The Beatles gave their press conference apologizing for More Popular than Jesus. Now I don't want to get into any kind of moralizing about this or force the possibility of a supernatural answer (at least in part) onto anyone not into that sort of thing, but I'd like to post this willemaus.wordpress.com/2015/08/09/rip-frank-gifford/ and point out that the God is Dead obituary and the most commonly referenced date for Paul is Dead both happened to be on November 9th, one year apart. If you look at Apollo's post, he never references Paul is Dead, only the number 3 and follows it with what seems to be a religious Luke 15 reference in A Coin, a sheep, a favored son. Was this entirely coincidental?
|
|
Will
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 80
|
Post by Will on Jul 27, 2014 16:00:39 GMT -5
It was the International Times launch party that McCartney attended dressed as an arab. Also in attendance was Yoko Ono - even though, at this stage, she claims to have never heard of the Beatles!
IT launch should be from April 1966. I meant something from Sept. It's mentioned on one of the Beatles history sites, beatlesbible.com, I think. Yes, Ono knew Sir P before & seemingly John & Paul. Well, Sir P says by accident in 2004 on radio (Howard Stern) that Yoko came to his house asking for Beatles original song page & he sent her to John. Is it Sir P or Paul? Likely Sir P himself. However, it does mean he and at least John knew each other. -- By the way, in this line of reasoning we can also wonder if the Paul "dressed as an Arab" was actually Sir P already mimicking his desired target. Just wondering. No way to know right now. Its on Page 14 of the October 31st 1966 issue of IT, the date of the launch party was October 15th 1966 as mentioned twice in Volume 1 Issue 1 of IT. www.internationaltimes.it/archive/index.php?year=1966&volume=IT-Volume-1&issue=2&item=IT_1966-10-31_B-IT-Volume-1_Iss-2_014
|
|
Will
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 80
|
Post by Will on Oct 18, 2012 7:48:48 GMT -5
Thanks B, I just copied the highlights from Fishdelusion’s work. Thanks FD, fascinating stuff to say the least! The only thing I contributed was the fact that John Smith’s kick was blocked. I hadn’t seen that mentioned before. Is the timing with all the above mentioned events all coincidences? Are tptb staging these events in a particular sequence? I can’t remember where I saw it, if I find it I’ll post it here, but there was a presentation on how there was a spike in anxiety levels on 9/10/2001. Are we subliminally picking up on the sequencings of these events? And though most of us are familiar with these, I thought I’d throw them into the pile too, for anyone that hasn’t seen them. Note how they emphasized the light rising, here. There are some interesting cross-overs between Anger's Lucifer Rising, and Beatles films & artwork. It is interesting that Jann Haworth was one of the co-creators of the Sgt. Pepper’s cover and also worked as a costume designer for Lucifer Rising. Could she perhaps have also worked on the MMT album design and went uncredited? Or was there some one else cross-pollinating the two? Romans 9:22, with John as one unfortunate recipient, is the point of all the 922's.... There's what happened via magic, or magick as you prefer, and then there's what may have been their true intent. www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,835309-8,00.html We were talking about the space between us all...flowers in the dirt? Hey Jude... And, as I mentioned a few days ago, isn't it interesting that the "Is God dead?" issue of Time Magazine was released one month after Lennon's statement about Jesus was published in England. A two-pronged strike? Thanks Linus, The "other" John Lennon clip, just as telling with "Atlanta is burning"... ...and pointing back towards it? www.feelnumb.com/2012/04/12/paul-mccartney-run-devil-run-album-cover-location/B, there's another part to all of this that I don't get into much on the forums that might be the 923 piece you mention...the civil rights piece. Maybe someone out there didn't like something and ultimately responded but the Beatles weren't exactly wrong either in what they may have been reacting to with MPTJ in the South... Attachments:
|
|
Will
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 80
|
Post by Will on Oct 17, 2012 19:39:20 GMT -5
Romans 9:22, with John as one unfortunate recipient, is the point of all the 922's.... There's what happened via magic, or magick as you prefer, and then there's what may have been their true intent. www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,835309-8,00.html We were talking about the space between us all...flowers in the dirt? Hey Jude... Attachments:
|
|
Will
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 80
|
Post by Will on Aug 16, 2012 9:05:29 GMT -5
This is oddly similar to what I read on Iamaphoney's youtube page and Tafultong's blog for many months and you would believe it's enough to get this forum shut down if one so chose to pursue it. More to the point though, you don't own any of the ideas expressed here and many have been circulating since the sixties; I don't agree with all of Beacon's conclusions, but I agree with quite a few and he's on the right road and it's about time someone finally got on it and made an honest attempt to articulate another viewpoint and I commend him for it. It's an interesting book. Plus, for all of the great work done here years back, not much of it is happening now other than a cryptic esoterica competition. A case study in how not to say anything as often as possible...not exactly something anyone would have an interest to steal. Regardless, threats like this are not a joke and if it's some kid in his basement, someone more adult needs to set them straight; this is serious business... beacon - satan is a bad idea in the first place. fishdelusions - youre goofy. b - thanks for being a human and letting us know how the water is being poisoned. iameye - he thinks youve started a cryptic esoterica competition. fishdelusions - words merely sculpt the nothingness of eternity. the ultimate truth is emptiness. the void devouring the self. ultimate death. man. it probably doesnt mean very much to you but that revelation helped turn on the world. thats "satan". its just us. friend. if a human can be a friend with fish delusions. tells us where hes at. Well dude you seemed to sort of threaten a friend of mine about stuff you really don't own and that was kind of the point. Anyways, I get what you're saying better than you probably realize, one of the few books I carry with me every day is Thus spoke Zarathustra, but we all relate based on our experiences and those we observe through others. If John Lennon was in the middle of this and had full access and had the beliefs to write Imagine and God, why did he continue to return to the outskirts of Christianity in '72 and '77 and was still questioning in '80? He didn't really seem to have full conviction in his own views, did he? If someone would prefer this in a different thread, feel free to move it to wherever it fits...
|
|
Will
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 80
|
Post by Will on Aug 15, 2012 9:26:39 GMT -5
So, fishdelusions, can you give us a hint of what's in the book? So many of us don't have Kindle, etc. and I am curious. Maybe a clue or two. A theme, a coin, a kettle of fish. Anything would be good right now. Who is the clue, or perhaps, Star is the key! IamIameyeAmI? Yeah, and am I in the book or not? ;D[/quote] ...maybe you'll get mentioned in mine. www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,835309,00.html ...Hey Jude
|
|
Will
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 80
|
Post by Will on Aug 15, 2012 9:02:12 GMT -5
So, fishdelusions, can you give us a hint of what's in the book? So many of us don't have Kindle, etc. and I am curious. Maybe a clue or two. A theme, a coin, a kettle of fish. Anything would be good right now. B, you should be able to download the Kindle app to your PC if you have an Amazon account and then download the book . Nothing personal btw with the previous comment, you've made some great points through the years. This is a great research tool and I'm sure many of us use the forum to aid in research. I don't want to give Beacon's book away for free, but it is reminiscent of his blog postings but a bit more in depth. I definitely used his premise to spur more of my own digging about where the secret societies' heads were at in the sixties...
|
|
Will
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 80
|
Post by Will on Aug 15, 2012 8:42:41 GMT -5
alls i can say iz youse bettah not be taken shyt from dis ere forums an callin it ya own. cause if paul was an alienand ya could prove it wed know by now. this i assure you. therefore what could ya possibly be sayin? ya links ah fragile. what do ya even mention on brotherhood of eternal love? i word search and nothing turn up. nada? you slackin. you jivin. just another dud for the paul is dead mythos on amazon. now why you gotta do that? but iz swear if youse takes our logos we takes you. This is oddly similar to what I read on Iamaphoney's youtube page and Tafultong's blog for many months and you would believe it's enough to get this forum shut down if one so chose to pursue it. More to the point though, you don't own any of the ideas expressed here and many have been circulating since the sixties; I don't agree with all of Beacon's conclusions, but I agree with quite a few and he's on the right road and it's about time someone finally got on it and made an honest attempt to articulate another viewpoint and I commend him for it. It's an interesting book. Plus, for all of the great work done here years back, not much of it is happening now other than a cryptic esoterica competition. A case study in how not to say anything as often as possible...not exactly something anyone would have an interest to steal. Regardless, threats like this are not a joke and if it's some kid in his basement, someone more adult needs to set them straight; this is serious business...
|
|
Will
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 80
|
Post by Will on May 18, 2012 12:39:16 GMT -5
|
|
Will
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 80
|
922
Aug 16, 2011 10:52:42 GMT -5
Post by Will on Aug 16, 2011 10:52:42 GMT -5
fish delusions wrote: I don't think they intended the drum either for what it's worth. No, of course not. I think the clue is real, I just don't think they tried to put it there. I also think it equals 13, not a date. One and One and One is three.
|
|
Will
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 80
|
922
Aug 16, 2011 9:34:02 GMT -5
Post by Will on Aug 16, 2011 9:34:02 GMT -5
Did John Lennon intend to shoot a scene on September 22nd 1967 (9/22) that foreshadowed his own death and assassin? Was the light ultimately his friend?You always hear Paul was "largely responsible" for that movie, so consider that. They were the light's friends. In June of '67 I'm sure they were. I certainly also think that there were clues planted deliberately, but this one I don't think is. This one was planted by the light, so to speak. I don't think they intended the drum either for what it's worth. Do you think they were trying to say Paul is dead?
|
|
Will
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 80
|
922
Aug 16, 2011 9:03:25 GMT -5
Post by Will on Aug 16, 2011 9:03:25 GMT -5
|
|
Will
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 80
|
922
Aug 16, 2011 0:39:28 GMT -5
Post by Will on Aug 16, 2011 0:39:28 GMT -5
Didn't we say that? Yes, but Imagine defines the bottle.
|
|
Will
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 80
|
922
Aug 15, 2011 23:11:21 GMT -5
Post by Will on Aug 15, 2011 23:11:21 GMT -5
didn't you already ask this? That was a simple riddle used by Zen Masters in the training of monks, Joe remembered. You take a newborn gosling and slip it through the neck of a bottle. Month after month you keep it in there and feed it, until it is a full-grown goose and can no longer be passed through the bottle's neck. The question is: Without breaking the bottle, how do you get the goose out? Neither riddle seemed to shed much light on the other. Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law. How do you get the goose out of the bottle? "Holy God." Joe laughed. "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law." The goose gets out of the bottle the same way John Dillinger got out of the "escape-proof" Crown Point jail. "Jesus motherfucking Christ," Joe gasped. "It's alive!" Imagine there's no bottle. Do what thou wilt.
|
|
Will
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 80
|
922
Aug 15, 2011 23:02:08 GMT -5
Post by Will on Aug 15, 2011 23:02:08 GMT -5
" I bring you light. AND ....pizza Pi ;D Do you see the bottle?
|
|
Will
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 80
|
922
Aug 15, 2011 22:47:47 GMT -5
Post by Will on Aug 15, 2011 22:47:47 GMT -5
A 4 year old child's drawing. George Harrison's mom. Unimpeachable sources. It has everything to do with temptation and creativity. They were deliberately courting "random". What other source were they going to tap into? They were tapping the light source. It has everything to do with temptation and creativity.creativity, yes Who else could create a kaleidoscope eye temptation? no you're missing the point of your own research, R 9:22 read it again I really appreciate all of your feedback Iameye, I believe it was temptation but I don't want to be contentious about it. Did John Lennon intend to shoot a scene on September 22nd 1967 (9/22) that foreshadowed his own death and assassin? Was the light ultimately his friend?
|
|
Will
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 80
|
922
Aug 15, 2011 21:50:15 GMT -5
Post by Will on Aug 15, 2011 21:50:15 GMT -5
A 4 year old child's drawing. George Harrison's mom. Unimpeachable sources. It has everything to do with temptation and creativity. They were deliberately courting "random". What other source were they going to tap into?
|
|
Will
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 80
|
922
Aug 15, 2011 21:27:01 GMT -5
Post by Will on Aug 15, 2011 21:27:01 GMT -5
This has nothing to do with temptation. school of rock is the current tag. There is a perfectly plausible explanation, just like there really was a Lucy.
|
|
Will
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 80
|
922
Aug 15, 2011 21:09:41 GMT -5
Post by Will on Aug 15, 2011 21:09:41 GMT -5
I, Mater. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mater_(Cars)In Cars 2, Mater displays a vast knowledge of automotive parts. It's this knowledge that causes him to accidentally guess the correct code phrase answer to a spy's code question, as well as eventually figure out the identity of a mysterious villian based only on a photograph of the car's engine. It is implied that he knows more about the older cars that he is used to towing for repairs.drink it in James 1:13 - When tempted, no one should say, “God is tempting me.” For God cannot be tempted by evil, nor does he tempt anyone www.disneycarstoys.net/cars-behind-the-scenes/the-a113-mystery-code
|
|
Will
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 80
|
922
Aug 15, 2011 20:40:45 GMT -5
Post by Will on Aug 15, 2011 20:40:45 GMT -5
It's out. don't worry about it
|
|
Will
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 80
|
922
Aug 15, 2011 11:21:56 GMT -5
Post by Will on Aug 15, 2011 11:21:56 GMT -5
As I said, the Rising Star gate is in the East. Just walk there. Then he brought me back the way of the gate of the outward sanctuary which looketh toward the east; and it was shut.
2 Then said the LORD unto me; This gate shall be shut, it shall not be opened, and no man shall enter in by it; because the LORD, the God of Israel, hath entered in by it, therefore it shall be shut.
3 It is for the prince; the prince, he shall sit in it to eat bread before the LORD; he shall enter by the way of the porch of that gate, and shall go out by the way of the same. ;D "How can you get a goose out of a bottle?"
|
|
Will
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 80
|
922
Aug 15, 2011 10:54:50 GMT -5
Post by Will on Aug 15, 2011 10:54:50 GMT -5
Romans 9:22- What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction:oh THAT yes, it's true.100% mucho long suffering, too. An angel on a Harley Pulls across to greet a fellow rolling stone Puts his bike up on it's stand Leans back and then extends A scarred and greasy hand...he said Hells Angel :"How ya doin bro?...where ya been?...where ya goin?" Then he takes your hand In some strange Californian handshake And breaks the bone Angels Moll :"Have a nice day" These are the pros and cons of hitchhiking Oh babe, I must be dreaming I'm standing on the leading edge The Eastern seaboard spread before my eyes "Jump" says Yoko "Oh No! I'm too scsred and too good looking" I cried "Go on",she says "Why don't you give it a try? Why prolong the agony all men must die" Do you remember Dick Tracy? Do you remember Shane? Joey :"And mother wants you" Could you see him selling tickets Where the buzzard circles over Joey :"Shane" The body on the plain Did you understand the music Yoko Or was it all in vain?
|
|
Will
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 80
|
922
Aug 15, 2011 9:58:04 GMT -5
Post by Will on Aug 15, 2011 9:58:04 GMT -5
"Romans 9 is mainly about the election of Israel, and Israel was founded on a sin, so who's actions accomplished that?"
LOOK and SEE where you are now. Nothing Isreal. You missed the election! number 9, number 9 lol I like Actually my opinion is that Number 9 is Romans 9. Then afterwards Razzle and Dimebag were just to reinforce the idea of December 8th.
|
|
Will
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 80
|
922
Aug 15, 2011 9:45:14 GMT -5
Post by Will on Aug 15, 2011 9:45:14 GMT -5
God cannot have anything to do with sin, so a Romans 9:22 Object of Wrath and Destruction would be handed over to demons to accomplish whatever purpose. God cannot have anything to do with sin. Exactly, now figure THAT ONE out so a Romans 9:22 Object of Wrath and Destruction would be handed over to demons to accomplish whatever purpose. That appears to be the case. Have you seen the right album? I've spent most of my free time this year researching so no I haven't. I exchange e-mails with Iamaphoney on occasion and know they listen to the Hotel California -> John Lennon videos but I haven't had much time this year to get into their stuff. Some of that time I spent looking through threads here, but I have a long way to go with that. I still don't know how Carnival of Light = MMT though except that the Seedy Bee's Mystery Tour cartoon in IT was January of '67 and not April. I watched all of the Rotten Apple videos last year though. Romans 9 is mainly about the election of Israel, and Israel was founded on a sin, so who's actions accomplished that? Things aren't quite what they seem, now or in the Bible era.
|
|
Will
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 80
|
922
Aug 15, 2011 9:27:50 GMT -5
Post by Will on Aug 15, 2011 9:27:50 GMT -5
Back to the temptation.
Temptation to sin is met with the resistance of free will, temptation to create is embraced.
Spirits were trying to communicate something through this stuff, at least that's my premise.
God cannot have anything to do with sin, so a Romans 9:22 Object of Wrath and Destruction would be handed over to demons to accomplish whatever purpose. I don't think John Lennon was singled out because he deserved it beyond anyone else, much like Esau, it just happened.
JFK, Aldous Huxley, CS Lewis, the Beatles 2nd LP and the first US broadcast of Beatlemania in the US all on the same day is beyond the ability of any intelligence operation and too much to be coincidence and clearly beyond the Beatles ability to control.
"Don't look left and right, look up and down".
|
|