|
Post by maclen on May 4, 2019 12:35:40 GMT -5
fools - then employ yall's detective skills & tell us who 'airport guy' is. our investigation yield nothing from these sources: the pan am historical society at miami u. in cincy,u.s. customs with jurisdiction over jfkx, and the smithsonian, keeper of the original photo. we sought the passenger manifest and the angry customs officer said no and said the manifest is classified confidential based on national security - he hung up before we could ask him if that were true for all manifests throughout time we've read 'nothing is real' threads and most of them lately are strictly bonkers. here we've provided raw biometric data that convince us - and many others at the defunct 'we buried faul' google+ community that the guy is faul and has been faul since late '66 so there goofball looking a bit glum
|
|
|
Post by maclen on May 4, 2019 11:34:53 GMT -5
we think 'oh darling' is a great example of the parodist direction the beatles took occasionally - the crazy emotive stylings of 50s style rock balladeering a la gene vincent would be an example
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Apr 30, 2019 16:30:30 GMT -5
we-buried-faul.freeforums.net/for us who've concluded that the guy in the center of the photo of the beatles arrival in the u.s. febuary 7th, 1964 became faul, billy, or whatever you want to call him. we want to know who he was. what he was. where he came from. so come on
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Jan 9, 2019 3:03:26 GMT -5
lets change this thread's title to poor interpretations of non evidence and wretched photo analyses. please ask why
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Jan 9, 2019 2:55:48 GMT -5
The best description I can give for The Beatles, or any other members of the "counter-culture" when it comes to anti-war is controlled opposition. a not very nice or accurate 'description' as it arrives without a shred of evidence - if applied to the beatles before the replacement of mccartney. though we agree that it does apply post replacement (demonstrated by the ineffective 'anti-war' rhetoric and acts initiated by lennon and harrison post replacement). but, certainly billy is a grand example of extremely controlled, though hardly to be considered 'opposition'; as he recorded dreck in support of the 9/11 fraud and thus the contemptible invasion and occupation of provably 'non-involved in the plot' iraq. what we know about the decade of assassinations is that 4 well known and beloved liberal leaders (and countless others non-fatally injured in the struggles) opposed to the status quo took bullets to end true liberal opposition from those days forward mccartney was one of the most recognised moral forces among cultural figures of the time. his offer to pen the music for lane's 'rush to judgement' remembered and told by several able researchers, was turned down by lane because of lane's conviction it would hurt paul and the beatles professionally. paul was a constant and well spoken critic of bigotry and violent military aggression spilling all around at the time, and would have been a plum target for say pentagon planners looking not only to silence another opponent and leader, but to gain control of the most influential force speaking to youth at the time - one that had demonstrated a stranglehold on their minds, ears, and hearts; an influence the chiefs wanted as their very own. we, of course, mean the beatles, or what was left of the beatles after mccartney 'went missing'. unfortunately liberalism and moderates 'went missing' in large droves as well. now we have billy and lucchese associate trump holding court - and, your controlled opposition has no better examples than those two buggers
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Jan 7, 2019 0:21:20 GMT -5
2019, so far: peeps still fall hook, line, and sinker, for counter intel operations (qnon) and billy is still as bland and flavorless as the day he began his imposter role
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Jan 6, 2019 14:02:50 GMT -5
no, the beatles were not baddies, ffs. they were extraordinary anti-military musicians whose every public utterance was the polar opposite of uscia's and its main client, the military's missions, and, most assuredly the rhetoric given to justify those missions to the public This reads like parody. the truth often does in times of universal deceit
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Dec 31, 2018 15:37:38 GMT -5
"His friends called him Macca, too, as is evidenced by the Anthology recording of "You've Got to Hide Your Love Away," when John asks, "Macca, you ready?" (or something like that). I like the nickname...it's better than Paulie."
we call bull - or, something like that
|
|
|
Artwork
Dec 28, 2018 18:19:00 GMT -5
Post by maclen on Dec 28, 2018 18:19:00 GMT -5
dreadful - just dreadful. painted on fotos is chumpwork
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Dec 28, 2018 18:13:29 GMT -5
no, the replacement came to be called that in the 90s. at no time was mccartney referred to as that
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Dec 28, 2018 16:33:41 GMT -5
another crappy load of crap from a main source of crap over the past half century - faul mccrapster
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Dec 28, 2018 16:18:29 GMT -5
no, the beatles were not baddies, ffs. they were extraordinary anti-military musicians whose every public utterance was the polar opposite of uscia's and its main client, the military's missions, and, most assuredly the rhetoric given to justify those missions to the public
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Dec 28, 2018 15:48:02 GMT -5
that third image is of course a photo of the replacement before the replacement. it is also the founding photo of our group 'we buried faul', a google + community . and, no, the photo and subject matter have not been discussed, here. there, but, not here - despite us having posted the pic, here, about a year ago. but, we'll discuss it if you'd like - it's a feature for feature match that has not, nor, ever will be debunked. the first two fotos are quite interesting, but the isolated shot of that particular individual shows very bizarre unhuman type ears. knowing the deceptive nature of beatle media in '68, we'd say it's a retouched frame whereas faul is doctored in so we get a shot of him as he was before the switch and in his then current role as 'paul' - much like the three pauls on a boat picture taken the same year
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Dec 5, 2018 23:13:28 GMT -5
john was gone and his shadow was lost. be that as it may the truth died with mccartney
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Nov 18, 2018 18:54:38 GMT -5
I'm looking at these early Quarry Men/Beatles pix. And, boy, does that Paul look like Faul... What if Faul is "the real" Paul? And the familiar, Beatlemania til Pepper menagerie of small, dark, humble, charming, bedroom eyed, possibly bald & bewigged Pauls were all the ringers? I have no idea why Paul would have been replaced, only to return... Maybe he was in an accident that destroyed the left side of his face...which might help to explain the fake ears. Maybe he quit after a fight with John or left in solidarity with Pete or Stu or maybe John kicked him out or maybe Brian thought he was a liability, whatever. Maybe he wouldn't go along with the boy band plan or got sick of Brian hitting on him or maybe he just got sick. Whatever happened, he resurfaced around the time Brian and one of the Fauls died. Maybe Brian didn't even know there was an "original" Paul. John was certainly bright and capable and weird enough to have orchestrated a revolving door of replacements. Some may disagree, but it has looked to me like Fohn came on the scene around the time the kid smoking the cigarette in the above pic rejoined the band. I think we need to know more about what happened in Hamburg. I find Stu's death extremely suspicious. no, its definite you have it backward - one paul, one faul, that's all
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Nov 18, 2018 18:51:31 GMT -5
eensy weensy teeny tiny correction: that is not paul mccartney
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Nov 18, 2018 18:48:20 GMT -5
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I, for one, LIKE the Memoirs. At least the old edition. Haven't seen the new one. LOTS of intriguing 'connect the dots' info in it, and well worth the read, imho. By its own admission it is 'a work of fiction', but even that is said with a nod and a wink. Besides, where else would you discover that this pretty-much-forgotten Rolling Stones song is the Stones' commentary on Faul? The Rolling Stones - Something Happened To Me Yesterdaywww.youtube.com/watch?v=Va0Fm6zZLbcFits like a glove. In the OJ case! But seriously, it does! As well as this one: www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADtnUC_ctNkhello Ruby in the dust (dead)has your band begun to rust?Read the memoirs! It's a treasure trove for those who appreciate it. I have read it and bought it in several different forms by mistake. The interpretations of lyrics without confirmation from the writers of the songs themselves means nothing unfortunately, and does not constitue real evidence of anything...especially the death of Paul. None of this would be considered as real evidence in a court of law. The Memoirs is entertaining...but it is not based on any hard facts or evidence that would prove beyond a shadow of a doubt a PID scenario. It is fiction and nothing more IMHO. And I,for one, will not be fooled into buying a book again that I already own in several versions. PID needs hard evidence...not what some lyrics in a song may or may not mean. Sorry B...that is just how I feel. I'm frustrated that after sll these many years of PID research that we can't get hard evidence to prove that something horrible happened to the real Paul. absolutely right, tim. anyone can say anything - doesn't mean there's a shred of truth to it. why we just got the assertion two stones' songs were about faul or the replacement we can only suspect - god knows what they're about, but they're not what is claimed and that's for sure. a stones' tune that most likely is about the disappearance and replacement is 'jigsaw puzzle'. let us know what you think
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Nov 18, 2018 18:34:52 GMT -5
Hi B; My friend who doesn't reside here in the USA and was there in England and then Canada with the lads and their handlers in the beginning years, mentioned to me more than once how JL was smacked around physically and was also taken out of circulation for a short period of time (removed from the group during their early years--mid '64) and made to spend a week alone in a seedy run down apartment, literally under guard (not a military guard but an MI5/6 plain clothes type assembly/small group of men) with a prison type menu of lousy food with zero entertainment/speed pills (very popular with the lads) zero women or night life, all because of his big, fat, loud, stupid drunken mouth. He was warned to keep his mouth closed and to respect the handlers in the early days, but out of the four he was the loud one who could not do as he was told especially when he felt the lads were even more important than they actually were. Almost everything the group was being taught to do (how to seemingly act naturally--how to appear as cool as they really were in terms of possessing a lower than most 'big stars' egos and how to carry themselves like guys in suits and not toughsters in leather clothes anymore). JL had something to say, and as for his being warned--- not that he'd be killed but be made to 'pay' for his, again, big, fat, loud, stupid drunken acting out while 'training' was underway in the beginning-- not in the Hamburg days but after that period--after the world had their first tastes of the lads and couldn't get enough of them; which, for someone like JL, would be the perfect time to start acting out because maybe he/the lads felt they should be earning more. Remember, in the beginning the 'big basket' of $$$ was being stolen by the handlers, the 'filth' as they were called by the group...so, yes, not to mislead about being 'beaten up' but these guys were 'handled' by the handlers, and since I haven't been lied to yet by this man who was there from the very early days right thru Beatlemania, I am just trying to convey this as it is told to me that to become good enough to be able to play their songs on TV and on the world stage in front of people they had to be good enough at fingering chords and learning the changes without looking at their instruments; and the way JL had that fast tongue--his words that came out--I could believe as it was told to me that he actually was knocked around for a short period to get him in line in the beginning. I know how hard it is to believe what people who come on these boards say. I've been here for years and then some. But there is quite a bit to this story that, when someone who comes along who was there from the start, someone who has a 50,000 word manuscript written up with details about the group that would make most anyone who was interested in these lads wet themselves, I listen. And then on occasion I like to pass on what I'm told as long as the person telling me what was happening back in the early days wants or needs to stay unknown and unpublished (that part sucks but he knows what happened to Mal Evans who wrote his memoirs then was gone). There's more that is so unbelievable that it would be just crazy to post here because of reactions that would follow. So I'll leave those things alone. At least for now. it's makes more sense to claim lennon was beaten in conjunction with mccartney's dissapearance in 66 than two years before when he looked healthy and happy. who is this guy with the 50k word book and the farfetched claims. would he come here and be questioned
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Nov 18, 2018 18:30:00 GMT -5
Are you joking? None of them have the same ears. we can see they're the same ears - the same paul
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Nov 18, 2018 18:22:56 GMT -5
I definitely think Bill has intelligence connections, But I don't think the original lads were connected to any intelligence agencies until they were hijacked in 1966 with Paul's murder and Bill arrived on the scene. you're right, of course. however, there's 'nazis' dumping anti-beatle crap like this topic and the stupid comments under it on this site. they're very active
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Oct 7, 2018 18:15:25 GMT -5
here's another clue for you all - the walrus was fred mundt
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Oct 7, 2018 17:41:55 GMT -5
LET ME INTRODUCE TO YOU, THE ONE AND ONLY BILLY SHEARS
could be bill and eric clapton's love child. but, we know it's not mccartney, so why do you call him paul. what's your game
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Oct 7, 2018 17:34:02 GMT -5
it's definitely Paul , Remember, Faul 1 (1964) had a square head funny - we don't remember that. doubtful if anyone does
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Oct 7, 2018 15:44:20 GMT -5
Wow, you people sure do hate leftists... I mean, every non-PID thread (and some that are) has become a virtual John Birch Society lately. You'd think that would change after Trump got elected but no - you grabbed on to QAnon like a baby to a breast. I mean you spend all this time and effort to get behind this truly despicable man (that's before politics, just by his brutish and disgusting behaviour) just to spite leftists, it seems and go on and on about "Deep State" as if the man is not in power. It looks like sheer inertia - you have all that conspiracy-theorist energy left and need somewhere to put it so now instead of the government being behind things - it's the cabal. Sad. your observations are sound, 'sniffer'. you've described a very infiltrated pid/pwr forum. it appears to be a concerted group effort to dent real research with the blunt end of despicable trumpzi politics - the polar opposite of what the beatles, esp. paul, stood for, put on the line, what cost him his young life
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Jul 7, 2018 14:06:43 GMT -5
hi, letitbeatle - a short summary would be helpful. also - cool name
|
|