|
Post by maclen on Jul 7, 2018 13:53:59 GMT -5
meant timmyb52 - still goes for you too, chica
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Jul 6, 2018 14:59:17 GMT -5
tell you what, b - we wager any amount you say that carlesi & gavazzeni would rule in our favor. but check out pics 1 and 3 in the array below the main jfk airport pic in our pinned comments and material on our google + community, and tell us honestly they're not both 'bill'. in fact, all five are bill and only insentience could excuse a different opinion. here it is straight no cream no sugar; we don't insist, we command all to stop playing nancy drew for a moment and accept the unavoidable senses derived factual conclusion that the 1964 jfk beatles arrrival photo show the long time failed and only imposter mccartney ever had posing with paul and the beatles and almost center positioned in the frame. can you dig it: plus.google.com/communities/113259080418561648785?sqinv=bi1CbUwtUGRhaldoS0EtMXI0bEx1X29EQko3TkJR welcome to 'we buried faul'
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Jul 6, 2018 14:40:02 GMT -5
late saying it but welcome, chica
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Jul 6, 2018 14:38:14 GMT -5
we're left thinking ann hood is an senseless imbecile or a conniving opportunist - so sue
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Jul 5, 2018 18:52:27 GMT -5
the face supposedly reflected is bill's - it is not, as anyone who's seen the original shot can see. it's paul and it doesn't appear he's in any type of distress. also his chin is pressed again the top edge of his bass or perhaps his six
it's a good opportunity to bring up that one of the reasons there has been ludicrous talk and theorizing about multiple pauls is that mcccartney utilized proper operatic singing techniques that altered his facial muscles in ways seldom seen and in ways which made his singing face seem very different than another singing face and different than the faces he made when he wasn't singing. which were many and varied as he was, in our opinion, still settling on the face and look he wanted - creative and intelligent people have the ability to do this and mccartney was a creative genius. we've all heard the expression 'inventing oneself' - that's essentialy what paul did and to his talented specifications
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Jun 23, 2018 18:31:46 GMT -5
it's unfortunate that clare kuehn has put her faith in fetzer - check out his promotion of crazy lady judyth baker and her ludicrous claim of being lee oswald's girlfriend in '63. the education forum has over two hundred pages dealing with her and the unmistakable conclusion was she and fetzer were running a game
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Jun 23, 2018 18:05:32 GMT -5
aspinal never doubled for mccartney - but, there's a foto of him posing with jp&r while holding a 6 string on stage and standing in george's usual place; correct us if we're wrong. otherwise, it's purveying puckey to assert paul was doubled by neil and it illustrates insincerity on the part of the purveyor - as no one can be that honestly stupid to think that really transpired
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Jun 23, 2018 17:28:36 GMT -5
faul (billy) is a jackass to people who aren't rich. good op
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Jun 23, 2018 17:23:30 GMT -5
knowthe411 - that is about the dumbest shit about the case we've ever seen and read
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Jun 14, 2018 10:59:31 GMT -5
get the italian cranial/computer experts to tell us it isn't lennon - because they surely would if presented with comparison pics. while you're at it, get them to compare the 'airport guy' foto - from the 1964 jfk arrrival shot - with any of bill or faul; ding, ding, ding, ding, ding - we have a match
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Jun 10, 2018 9:44:07 GMT -5
very intetesting new info - thanks, b
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Jun 4, 2018 18:15:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Jan 2, 2018 23:19:42 GMT -5
hi - we see one paul from different angles; one from below and one from above making him look different to the innocent eye. also one of them is glitching and might be sped up. otherwise,great comp
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Aug 5, 2017 11:20:14 GMT -5
hi, chica. we didn't watch to see if this is emilio's recantment, or his original testimony attesting to paul's departure and disappearance. but, we think lari had pressure put on him to change his story in the interim
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Aug 5, 2017 11:09:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Aug 5, 2017 10:49:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by maclen on May 29, 2017 22:40:04 GMT -5
So this guy has a larger chin. These look like it's him: smg.photobucket.com/user/JGD/media/MGB/Paul117.jpg.htmlThis guy is very good-looking. He seems to be the favorite Paul, the one more people consider to be Paul. But he's one of the doubles who look the less like the real Paul who has a rather small chin (see previous page). all paul, rabbitteeth - they're all fotos and gifs of paul
|
|
|
Post by maclen on May 29, 2017 22:35:23 GMT -5
hi doc - you were compelled to come back when you saw this and something clicked, right:
|
|
|
Post by maclen on May 19, 2017 8:37:48 GMT -5
Hi cyndaquilfire35-- I guess I listened to what someone else swore was true when I should of told them to f*ck off...that's one of the problems with this type of thing...some of us are simple minded and trusting enough to believe what we're told while some are driven to make up 'facts' to swear are true. I wonder what they get out of lying about this stuff ? Thanks for posting the birth cert and birth list ! hey, bandi. faul's prancing around your area with a series of concerts. was wondering if you could go see one with video and sound and record his reaction to the 'airport guy's foto, after a request for him to autograph it. we think much may be gained from that. respond by email if you prefer. thanks
|
|
|
Post by maclen on May 19, 2017 8:22:32 GMT -5
our threeshot of billy and this foto are all the same guy; the impersonator from late '66 to present day. one paul, one faul, that's all. we think the italian forensic team that determined that the physical differences between paul and faul were discernible should compare the 'airport guy's physical features with any displayed in post-'66 'faul' pictures. we're confident - despite amateur musings from this one and that -that they'd find a total and complete match, taking into account various cosmetic fixes like teeth, competent mimicry, and facial volume Maclen, first of all, you should find a picture of a Paul who has the facial features of this guy. I mean, try to find this guy as Paul. Can you find one picture of Paul or Faul with such big ears? I think this guy did what he said he did. That's all. I still haven't seen him anywhere else. we've never asserted 'airport guy' looked much like mccartney, but, in fact looks exactly like billy attempting to look like paul, after cosmetic accrutements are added/taken away
|
|
|
Post by maclen on May 19, 2017 8:16:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by maclen on May 18, 2017 13:22:21 GMT -5
hey, how's it going. so, let us rephrase; the previous array of fotos are of the same man, j paul mccartney born 1942, passed 1966. we just used this array in another post - but, here let us use them as examples of impersonator faul's base looks - pun intended: Hi Maclen, The three guys just open their mouths in a similar vertical way when they smile. But they are much different The first two guys have different eyebrows, eyes, noses, teeth, chins, cheeks. Clearly they are not the same guy. The second one was there as a double before 1966. He's one of the ten above. He just looks different and weird with a mustachio. For the third one, you need a picture of his face upfront, like the others. He's clearly not the first guy either. You can see him in this video. (Can't find Part 1) You can try to find him in the pictures above and in other pictures and in videos before 1967. our threeshot of billy and this foto are all the same guy; the impersonator from late '66 to present day. one paul, one faul, that's all. we think the italian forensic team that determined that the physical differences between paul and faul were discernible should compare the 'airport guy's physical features with any displayed in post-'66 'faul' pictures. we're confident - despite amateur musings from this one and that -that they'd find a total and complete match, taking into account various cosmetic fixes like teeth, competent mimicry, and facial volume
|
|
|
Post by maclen on May 16, 2017 8:30:42 GMT -5
we're thinking a military themed approach for the remaining three beatles' next effort - after paul's departure/disappearance in '66 - was in exchange for the military's 'gracious' assistance in putting 'faul' over on the masses. ie., the beatles lost all control over their image from that point on. a faustian bargain, yes, but there couldn't be any other way that would keep their employees from starving - and, perhaps keep the 3 beatles' and their loved ones alive and well
|
|
|
Post by maclen on May 16, 2017 8:19:12 GMT -5
take note; faul's foto, far left, was snapped at jfk intl on Feb 7,1964 - two years before the swap-out
|
|
|
Post by maclen on May 16, 2017 8:15:38 GMT -5
they all look the same - ie., like the real paul mccartney. the jfk foto from 1964 shows only one possible double in play then, and also later through-out the current and only impersonator's career. one paul, one faul, and that's all Hi Maclen yes, they do all look the same. They are lookalikes. But they all look unlike also. There are many differences if you look closely at all the facial features. For each one, you could make a list of characteristics (like the shape of the eyes, the lines around the eyes, the eyebrows, the nose, the lips, the teeth, the chin, the ears, the nose from the side, the height, etc) and see there are many different guys. That's why there are all these websites comparing Paul before 1967 with Faul starting in 1967 and finding they are not the same person. They are comparing one double before 1967 with another one afterwards. But they could also compare two doubles before 1967 and also find they are not the same person. Now what are your favorite pictures of Paul and what are his facial features? Which one do you call the jfk photo? And which pictures do you think represent Faul the best and what are his facial features? hey, how's it going. so, let us rephrase; the previous array of fotos are of the same man, j paul mccartney born 1942, passed 1966. we just used this array in another post - but, here let us use them as examples of impersonator faul's base looks - pun intended:
|
|