|
Post by thewalrus1966 on Nov 13, 2015 8:13:41 GMT -5
www.youtube.com/watch?v=-t0XxtWF3bAThis the guy i'm talking about. Have a listen, been doing some more work on his recordings compared to Elvis and i'm just in shock really. I thought i'd seen everything, I really did.
|
|
|
Post by thewalrus1966 on Nov 12, 2015 17:31:22 GMT -5
Here we go, it took me 10 hours to produce a 20 minute video which conerns 2 seconds of recorded sound. The process is extremely complex but i've tried to explain it all in as simple terms as I could. Please watch in full screen and listen very carefully as to what is being said. www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSw-kP2EBAQ&feature=youtu.beThis video has been removed by the user.
|
|
|
Post by thewalrus1966 on Nov 11, 2015 18:09:34 GMT -5
OK, i'll do a special like I did on Macca, will take a few days to put together. The implications of this are shattering to say the least. I thought i'd seen it all but now i'm not so sure. This planet we live on is one twisted place.
|
|
|
Post by thewalrus1966 on Nov 11, 2015 15:12:46 GMT -5
No offence intended, if you want to see the evidence i will provide it.
|
|
|
Post by thewalrus1966 on Nov 11, 2015 13:10:50 GMT -5
No i'm not suggesting, i'm informing you that he is still alive and recording music of his own.
|
|
|
Post by thewalrus1966 on Nov 11, 2015 12:32:01 GMT -5
Hello again, don't know if you remember me but I'm the sound analysis guy from a few years ago who did the stuff on Mr McCartney. See here: invanddis.proboards.com/thread/7358/voice-analysis-results-seperate-videosI work on all kinds of projects that involve sound analysis, filtering of harmonics, cleaning up bad sound recordings etc etc and I come across all kinds of projects people send me including cleaning up sound files to be used in lawsuits and other court cases. On The McCartney case, I proved that voice recordings were indeed those of sir Paul's and there is absolutely no argument. The software I use is admissible in a court of law and is used to prove cases of nuisance phone calls and krank calls. The software is also used by University doctors to analyse speech empediments. Recently, something has cropped up concerning Elvis Presley which I was sent as a project to clarify and I thought you guys might be interested in this. Usually I can clarify or resolve issues within hours of receiving data files or sound bytes but this case has me baffled completely. I've had to go to extreme lengths and make my own recordings in 24 bit of dozens of clips and still it is not resolved. I would have to conclude without any shadow of doubt that Elvis Presley did not die in 1977 and I can prove it in any court of law anywhere in the world. If you guys are interested in this let me know and I will show you all the data analysis on here with conclusive proof. Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by thewalrus1966 on Oct 5, 2013 4:46:08 GMT -5
Thanks for the reply.. however does this mean everybody has a unique voiceprint no matter what? What about if its the same person but with different moods? Is the voiceprint the same if they are energetic when they talk or if they are more mellow? I'm just trying to get a consistency with the results. So it would be impossible for an impersonator to practice again and again on a particular person ( tone of voice, style of speaking, etc.) and they would still not be able to get within range of what would be considered normal of the person they are impersonating? Hi decitfaul, if you look over on the general section I posted my conclusions of my analysis, I strongly advise you do the analysis yourself because I haven't got the time at the moment, full instructions are on there. But I will answer your query. Everyone's voice box is incapable of producing frequencies out of its range otherwise we would all be able to sing like Celine Dion. Each person has frequency nulls or dead spots if you like in their voiceprint that no matter how hard you try, you will not be able reproduce certain frequencies. It's the physical makeup of your body that causes this including how you were brought up. If your voice box is incapable of producing perhaps 2200-2250Hz then I'm afraid it doesn't matter if you are sad, happy, energetic or otherwise you will not be able to produce that frequency even if you practice and it will show up as a null on the voiceprint, its a physical characteristic of the vocal chords that remains with you for life. Like I have said, if we didn't have those properties in our voice we would all talk the same and sound like Celine Dion when ever we felt like it. Hope this answers your query.
|
|
|
Post by thewalrus1966 on Oct 4, 2013 13:51:11 GMT -5
It has been a pleasure to converse with you guys on the pro's and con's of whether it is or is not Mr McCartney. Those of you who participated in my threads I would like to thank and I wish each and everyone of you good luck with your research. It has been an interesting 10 days work but I have to move on because I have projects that I'm getting behind with and there is an important case I'm working on between a group of people versus the US Government and that group need my undivided attention at the moment. Actually you may see this case in the press in the years to come so look out for it. Working on stuff like this is relaxing though and I enjoy it from time to time. For those of you who have been following my work on the sound and have learned a little about speech and sound analysis, here is a the song Yesterday compared with the song Hey Jude. I'll let you guys conclude the analysis but I've seen enough comparisons of McCartney to know that I've seen enough. Don't forget that you can do the sound stuff yourself and you can download the software here: www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/resource/sfs/wasp.htmHave a go at it, Wasp is one of the simplest programs to use and only needs a basic knowledge of computers. Once you learn, maybe you can play around seeing if other people from the past really are who they claim to be now. Nudge nudge, wink, wink. I've no doubt that Mr McCartney has used doubles in the past during times of trouble, the ears thing just baffles me to be honest, I've no idea why a band appears to be wearing rubber ears, maybe it was fashion to sport large ears - who knows? Really, I set out to find out if McCartney is still alive through sound analysis which I did to my own satisfaction and I hope to everyone else's too for that matter, just remember to all have a go yourselves. A word of caution: I have a degree in sound engineering from the University of Surrey 1996, a degree in Computer science from Cambridge 2002 and a BSc in computer graphics from University of East Anglia 2005 and I found it very easy to prove McCartney is still alive with sound analysis. There are people out there with PHD's in this stuff who are cleverer than me and they'll crucify you believe me, if Paul McCartney so wished he could build a case against you guys that are saying he is dead and a fraud/imposter. In both the US and UK if found guilty you will probably go to jail and a site like this and its Proboard owners will have to by law hand over IP addresses of its members under a court ruling. I'm not talking about the using of doubles and backward recordings, rubber ears, and stuff like that, just the ones who are saying he's dead and its a fraud. Be very careful. Well it's been a blast guys and I wish you all good luck, remember to have a go with the sound analysis yourselves, it will put your minds at rest believe me.
|
|
|
Post by thewalrus1966 on Oct 4, 2013 12:20:06 GMT -5
OK here we go: During the Iraq war Tony Blair was interviewed about the UK's involvement in the war. At the same time a pretty good impersonator Rory Bremner impersonated Blair from that interview and I may say was pretty convincing. Here are the results of the voice fingerprints. Please click to enlarge. Here is the Analysis: The ramping frequencies are similar but the compression is wider on Bremner and that is where any similarities stop. Blair's entire voice apart from a few small peaks is in the mid range from 900Hz to 7000Hz with a very faint null between 3200 and 3900Hz which is hardly visible. Then a Massive null between 7000 and 10600Hz which is his high frequency. Bremner on the other hand hits a similar ramping frequency then has a smooth frequency layout with no prominent mid ranges right up to 11,000Hz which is his high frequency. He has a clear null between 2900 and 3400hz which is missing from Blair's. Two people sound remarkably similar but you CANNOT hide from this technology.
|
|
|
Post by thewalrus1966 on Oct 4, 2013 11:32:36 GMT -5
This is very interesting, this is the type of research that I'm open to. I do have one question.. I know that it has been stated that even if two people sound the same the program would still be able to spot the differences in their voiceprints.. how about an example of that. How about putting a known voice impersonator and comparing him with the person he is impersonating? I think that could possibly rule out if impersonators can produce similar voiceprints. Just a thought though.. OK, I can do that no probs.
|
|
|
Post by thewalrus1966 on Oct 4, 2013 11:03:55 GMT -5
Close up of Paul's eye. Please enlarge by clicking. If you look at his left eye (right eye as we look at the picture) the lower eyelid where I have marked in red is actually touching the eye. Upper and lower eyelids do this for a number of reasons, to keep dirt out and so that when you shut your eyes and blink they act like a windscreen wiper and clean the eye with the use of naturally produced fluid. Now look at Paul's right eye (left eye as we look) and you will see where I have marked in red that the lower eyelid has come away from the eye and a shadow has been cast behind it between the eyelid and the eye. This is not a natural phenomenon and is caused when the muscles in the cheek below collapse and the eyelid muscle collapses too and pulls it away from the eye, usually due to stroke or Bells Palsy. If this is not surgically corrected that part of the eye will become damaged and possibly infected when dirt and debris get trapped between the lid and eye. Later pictures show that the eyelid has been corrected and there is no longer a gap. There is clear evidence of the whole side of Paul's face at that side having surgery in the eye, the cheek, the lower jaw and lip, the upper lip and the area between the cheek and the nose.
|
|
|
Post by thewalrus1966 on Oct 3, 2013 11:33:54 GMT -5
Truby's analysis ain't worth Jack and wouldn't stand up in a court of law. The equipment I am using is state of the art hardware and voice analysis software used by departments of Phonetics in Universities and labs the world over, this hardware and software is used to prove murder cases where telephone's have been used and is 100% reliable. I'll tell you what you can do, those of you who are doubting Thomas's at least. Record McCartney talking on any interview from any year 1962 to present day. Record him using Windows sound recorder in 16 bit stereo, 44Khz which will cover all frequencies. Save the sound files to your hard drive. Contact any University Phonetics department or any sound analysis lab in the world including the FBI at Langley Virginia via email and ask them if they will partake in a little test to see if it is the same person on the recordings. Or......download the software yourself, read how to use it, talk to people on University websites and ask their advice if necessary on how to read the data. There are about six programs available that are industry standard and are widely accepted as 100% reliable by experts in the field. Jai Guru Deva and cherilynzennah7, with all due respect, it doesn't matter what you 'feel' sounds different or what you 'think' is or isn't McCartney. You are voicing an opinion without one shred of evidence that is based on speculation. Why don't you do what I have suggested above and prove it to yourselves for real.
|
|
|
Post by thewalrus1966 on Oct 3, 2013 10:58:53 GMT -5
Someone who has a stroke bad enough to paralyze one side of their face would also have paralysis down that side of their body as well. 24 is young for a stroke in any event. Unless it was Bell's Palsy which would affect the face only. This rarely, if ever returns to how it appeared before. Having rods and wire threaded through the chin I have never heard of this before. The fact is; the personality changed anyway after circa 1965 as vOOdOOguru has pointed out 1966 seems to be something of a red herring...when is this alleged stroke supposed to have happened? Yes there are false ears all over the place imo Paul and Ringo in particular but it is my contention that Ringo was replaced as was John also and, in fact, all four at different times and eventually completely. Something strange was definitely going on but I, personally, do not buy into this stroke theory. Most of your evidence is based on speculation and your own personal opinion. My sound analysis would stand up in a court of law and that is a fact. The 1963 Paul is the Paul of 2006 in interviews - fact. There are no red herrings just people trying to understand what has and is going on and trying to form some kind of credible case. The evidence is not about one eye being higher than the other, it is the fact that the lower eyelid muscles have collapsed and pulled the lower eyelid away from the eye which is a tell tale sign of a stroke or indeed as people have stated Bells Palsy. You cannot form a credible hypothesis on opinion and speculation, you need hard evidence, evidence which can be used in a court of law if necessary. Strokes do not always affect the entire side of the body, there are plenty of recorded cases of such strokes. Strokes have happened in children as young as five years old, they are caused by blood clotting in the brain. Some people can have Bells Palsy all their life and not be affected by it severely, others can have an attack and be disfigured for life just like a stroke. Therefore I cannot rule out a severe attack of Bells Palsy. At the moment I am studying Paul's singing, the movement of his lips and jaw for signs of stroke and I must confess that the Paul of pre 1966 is singing different from the Paul of perhaps early 1967 onward and it appears there is restricted lip movement and it appears he is singing out the side of his mouth. I strongly believe Paul had a full facial construction after either a stroke or an attack of Bells Palsy. This I will continue to work on and produce further evidence when ever I can.
|
|
|
Post by thewalrus1966 on Oct 2, 2013 11:19:51 GMT -5
Hi Linus, it is interesting that most of the pictures you have posted have the side of McCartney's face which I am interested in shadow which is the left as we look at it or his right. The first picture you showed at quick glace has three signs of airbrushing, most of the pictures are in poor resolution and difficult to process or work on. Do you think it is coincidence that the light source always seems to be from the right all the time and never from the left unless we are in long shot? The law of averages states that at least one photographer would have used a light source from the left at least one time. They are hiding McCartney's face from full exposure, there is no doubt about it. www.uwmedicine.org/patient-care/our-services/medical-services/reconstructive-surgery/pages/articleview.aspx?subId=128
|
|
|
Post by thewalrus1966 on Oct 2, 2013 10:28:56 GMT -5
Many thanks for taking the time to explain. I think your research on this is very interesting and seems to support the theory that, in the studio at least, it was always the same McCartney. I guess, if it were possible, the thing to do would be to compare your evidence with that that Dr Henry Truby compiled back in 1969 for the famous Life magazine article. Details of which can be found here and here. Truby alleged that there were differences in McCartney's voice. Quoting from the second source above... Voiceprints have been used to detect Faul, the imposter. In 1969, Dr. Henry M. Truby of the University of Miami used samples from three Beatles songs sung by Paul McCartney (Yesterday, Penny Lane, and Hey Jude) and produced three very different sonagrams. If you could debunk that research that would be hugely significant. One question though. If your theory concerning the stroke is correct, would that not have possibly permanently affected McCartney's voice? Hi, I can't comment and speculate on that, all I can say is that my analysis shows the three voices to be the same person. Truby wasn't using the equipment we have available today and to compare songs against voice would be different anyway because singers often change the key they sing in and the tone depending on the song. Also, a lot of the time accent isn't present during songs so part of the structure of the voice can be missing. But it would be interesting to compare results with Truby.
|
|
|
Post by thewalrus1966 on Oct 1, 2013 17:28:02 GMT -5
I take on board what you say and your reasons for your conclusions: however, how does the "stroke" theory account for the different ears, different shape head, different height and change in personality among many other factors? I did mention that throughout Paul's recovery that they may well have used doubles to fill in. If he did have a stroke and I strongly believe he did, it will have taken years to put Paul's face back to something like and he will have been missing from public view for long periods of time over a number of years. Different doubles could have possibly been used, there lies the height conflict. Judging by the examination of the pictures I have done thus far in regard to the ears, well to be honest I'm a bit perplexed by that because i'm currently examining pictures from 62/63 where some of the Beatles seem to be sporting false ears. But I will work on it.
|
|
|
Post by thewalrus1966 on Oct 1, 2013 17:14:27 GMT -5
Hello all, didn't see this section, quite rude of me not to introduce myself. I work in the field of computer based sound, video and graphics analysis and have done since 1995. I am currently working on NIST video's for "Architects and Engineers for 911 truth" on evidence of tampering.
I worked on the Zapruder tape for five years, also the faked Lunar landings projects that have floated around. I spend probably 40 hours a week analyzing footage, sound and graphics from various different projects I get sent.
I stumbled across the McCartney thing when I was sent some sound bytes of Beatle music played backwards. I usually get things done very quickly. Been looking at this stuff about a week now; anybody wants anything analyzed don't be afraid to ask, just don't be giving me massive projects I'm quite busy.
|
|
|
Post by thewalrus1966 on Oct 1, 2013 15:40:16 GMT -5
OK, for the benefit of those who don't understand the sound analysis results I will go into detail about what it all means but first a brief explanation of how we produce sound and how it is measured. I will make this whole exercise as simple as I can. All sound no matter where it comes from is a series of vibrations from an object that travel through the air to our ears. Those vibrations vary in many different ways such as frequency/pitch, tone, volume amplitude and compression. We measure vibration in Hertz, an Hertz is simply one complete vibration (like hitting a drum once). We measure sound frequency in the amount of Hertz per second or vibrations per second. Human beings can hear frequencies usually between 20 Hertz and 20,000 Hertz. When we talk we use our lungs to enable us to vibrate our vocal chords at certain frequencies usually between 20 and 10,000 Hertz. Each individual person however has a unique set of vocal chords apart from identical twins who are remarkably similar, those vocal chords produce a unique sound which characterizes our voice. This unique fingerprint is made up of tone, frequency/pitch, time and volume. But not only that, it is complex and in each word that we speak there is a multitude of different frequencies used and those frequencies are sometimes close to each other or far away from each other. This is compression and is a measure of how fast your vocal chords can change from one frequency to another. When we change frequency slowly those compressions are far apart and when we change frequency quickly they are closer together or more compressed. When we say a word our vocal chords as good as they are cannot hit the correct frequency right away so they have a natural progression through firstly low frequency, then mid range frequencies and finally an high frequency. During that progression there are also what we call frequency nulls. These are frequencies that our own individual vocal chords are not comfortable with and sometimes cannot produce or an accent may prevent the use of. It is the combination of low, mid and high frequencies together with the nulls that give us all a unique voice fingerprint. This picture is from a sound file that was analyzed on Wasp 1.54 of three interviews given by McCartney. They are combined into one sound file so that the fingerprints can be compared. Along the vertical scale to the left is frequency and along the horizontal scale at the bottom is time in seconds. All the spikes, lines distortions you see are all the different aspects of that sound being broken down into readable data. There are two sets of results, narrow band (bottom set) and wide band (top set), narrow band just allows us to examine the results more closely but they are both the fingerprint of McCartney in all three sound clips. This next picture is a break down of what we see, the nulls, the low, mid and high frequencies which we are going to concentrate on. Firstly we examine the nulls, all three sound clips have nulls between 500-2400 Hertz and 4600-6100 Hertz respectively. This doesn't mean there are no sounds at all in those ranges, it means that the mean average of data we see in those zones is far less than the overall picture. McCartney's use of words, sounds and expressions tends to lean away from those zones depending what he's saying. On the picture at the bottom left in the frequency column is a blue number 1. I have added this to indicate where McCartney's low frequencies are. They start at about 10hz and finish at 500 Hertz at the first null, these are what I call the ramping frequencies and can depict tone and how croaky a voice sounds . As you can see they all match all way across time scale from left to right. The blue number 2 is McCartney's mid range frequencies which make up most of the sound he makes. They start at 2400 and finish at 4600 Hertz at the bottom of the second null. The blue number 3 is McCartney's mid to higher frequencies which start at 6100 and finish at about 9900 Hertz possibly touching 10,000 Hertz at times. All these cut off points between mid, low, high and null frequencies on McCartney's fingerprint are in the same places across the mean average of the graph (timescale). Look at the top picture without zooming in or clicking on it, you will see the obvious patterns. There are many, many more of these patterns in more complex close ups under examination but I have chosen to show you the main five speech characteristics of McCartney. McCartney in 2006 is slightly different from earlier but the nulls are still in the same places and the peak frequencies are the same. What has changed are his tones and power which comes with age, the frequencies and nulls are identical. I have examined thousands of sound files of speech over the years and seen many different fingerprints, it is absolutely impossible for two different people to have the same speech fingerprint, everyone is different because they have different length vocal chords, different mechanics in the parts that make up their throat and voice box, their lungs that power the sound, their diet which allows them to develop for the better or worse. Even identical twins over time will develop different length vocal chords with different characteristics, this is because their respective ways of life will change the make up of their body. Even if someone sounds the exact same as someone else their respective fingerprints will be completely different, what sounds the same to a human ear when examined electronically is quite different.
|
|
|
Post by thewalrus1966 on Oct 1, 2013 10:55:48 GMT -5
I will explain the voice analysis in a further thread for you to understand what the data means.
|
|
|
Post by thewalrus1966 on Oct 1, 2013 10:48:49 GMT -5
I posted these enlarged pictures on another thread. Please click to enlarge, these are much bigger. I have outlined the scar tissue on Paul's face on the lower picture and outlined the metal pin which has a metal loop on the end of it. Here is an enhanced picture of the pin. I have enlarged it and drawn on the lower image where it is. The scar tissue from the surgery after the stroke is all around Paul's mouth and cheek, on the last picture you can see clear scar tissue below the lip in what looks like a graft. The later pictures of Paul say it all really, you can see evidence from all the work in his later years.
|
|
|
Post by thewalrus1966 on Sept 30, 2013 18:40:48 GMT -5
Well people, you can finally lay all your worries to rest because you are going to hear exactly what happened to Paul McCartney and not only that you can prove it to yourself beyond any shadow of a doubt. There is absolutely no doubt that Paul, during the autumn of 1966 disappeared from public view, perhaps doubles were used in his absence and the Beatles changed forever. They stopped touring and performing live, changed their style of music and became different people. Something happened which changed this band forever and their attitude toward life and 'that' something happened to Paul McCartney, Heather Mills knows it and so do a lot of people. All the clues in the album covers are aimed at telling you that Paul is different from what he used to be but the subliminal backwards messages in the music such as 'Paul is dead' are unfortunately rubbish. I have analyzed all of them and apart from the obvious ones that are innocent the rest of them under advanced sound software prove to be fictitious. The Beatles when they did the Sg Pepper album were indeed telling us something and that was that the old Beatles which we all loved, the Beatles who were essentially a live band were now unable to tour anymore and were indeed - dead. I have proved with sound analysis software (over in the clues section) that the Paul McCartney of 1963 is indeed the Paul McCartney that is still producing music today, there can be no argument about that at all. So....what happened to Paul that would change his life and the life of the Beatles forever? Take a look at this picture: Do you know what this is? It's the typical pattern of facial muscles of a stroke victim. Take as look at the next picture: Do you know what this is? Its the typical pattern of facial muscles of a stroke victim but with a difference. The lower left side of his face has been reconstructed after the stroke complete with scars. You remember I posted this? I mentioned the pin protruding out of Paul's lower jaw on the left as we look at him. Do you know what that pin is? That pin is part of a mechanism which held Paul's face level all the time he had surgery to correct the damage the stroke did. Originally he had two of them, one on either side with a connecting rod between the two and when he was visited by John in hospital, John said he looked like a Walrus. .....And so, the Walrus was born and yes it was Paul. But in the picture of Paul above (the second one down of Paul's full face) we can see other tell tale signs besides the surgery scars. His left eye still has stroke damage which was to be corrected in later surgery. The lower eyelid muscles departing from the rest of the eye. I could show you a thousand pictures of the same damage to many stroke victims but I won't because you can go look for yourselves. In the above picture we can see the scars from the 1960's and indeed the scars from a modern Paul on his face in the same places. When this happened to Paul they must have thought it was all over for the Beatles, the doctors would have said Paul can never tour again and had to take it easy for the rest of his life. Ringo being consoled by Paul on Sg Pepper isn't because Paul is dead its because Ringo loved playing live and touring and took the news badly and Paul consoles him. That poor lad, in his prime struck down by this terrible affliction, there is no wonder it did what it did to the band. So.......no more tours and it takes a lot of operations to put Paul's face to something like he used to look and his life and the band are changed forever. Research it yourselves, you'll form the same conclusions as I did. Paul had a stroke and some clues are in Lennon's lyrics. As for Paul's later life...well he probably said stuff it after a while, I'm gonna just live and formed Wings. The rest is history. The reason they didn't tell us? your guess is as good as mine. Sleep well people.
|
|
|
Post by thewalrus1966 on Sept 30, 2013 16:33:52 GMT -5
Using Wasp 1.54 copyright of Mark Huckvale 2013, University college London, department of speech, hearing and phonetic sciences we are able to analyze five separate video's of McCartney from 1963 to 2006. Firstly, five sound clips were grabbed and placed on one complete sound recording from the following video's: 1. Frost show, 1965 (UK) 2. Beatles interview in 1966 in the USA 3. 1968 interview in USA of Lennon and McCartney 4. 1963 Beatles interview with Dusty Springfield (UK) 5. 2006 Parkinson show (UK) The results are as follows:- please enlarge There is absolutely no argument that these five sounds are the same person. By the way, anyone can perform these tests independently, just give me a PM and I will show you how to do it and read the data correctly. The only way that this could be a different person is if you transplanted the voice box of one person into another, you cannot hide from this technology. It is simply quite impossible. Even if the person sounded similar or nearly the same, each persons voice box produces a unique fingerprint just like your fingerprints or your DNA. For example here is Lennon and McCartney's sound fingerprint on the same program compared:- Completely different, no lateral matching of frequency ranges in the narrow or wide bandwidths, tone, compression and pitch. Whereas the McCartney clips all match in pitch, tone, frequency, bandwidth and form patterns which simply cannot be copied by another person. So I have established and put my mind at rest and I hope everyone else's that the Macca of 63 is the Macca of 2006. The pictures however are a very different kettle of fish, I have an idea what is going on but I'm working on it. To be continued.......
|
|
|
Post by thewalrus1966 on Sept 26, 2013 16:58:28 GMT -5
Three interviews firstly Frost show 1965 www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-Q-5BnWhbASecondly an interview in 1966 www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVxCsszqz5ILastly an interview in 1968 www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MtbqSBNh54If you take sound samples from all three vids Paul has the same voice analysis results, same tone, same frequency in his words. There is no doubt that the Paul in 65 is the Paul in 68 but there is a difference. Screenshot of 68 vid: Different from his 1965 ear but why? Almost looks false doesn't it? Ears another, sorry for the pun. Here's a picture of Paul with a very strange hairline. look at his hairline about half way up his forehead. You see the distinct change as if he's either got a wig on or he has had plastic surgery in those parts? Remember the jaw pin in my first post? The face surgery? To be continued..............
|
|
|
Post by thewalrus1966 on Sept 26, 2013 13:47:40 GMT -5
Look closely people. One of the down sides of plastic Surgery is that in years to come it reveals itself. Poor Paul needs some more surgery to cover those Walrus tusks that have re-appeared. They are making quite a mess of his chin line. But a real give away was the 60,s black and white in which they thought they had hidden the surgical pin placed in his lower right side jawbone. Tut tut, we can brighten things up these days with software The Hollywood surgeons need to do some work Paul, I've clearly marked the areas that need work, you can always disappear for 3 months while the scars heal hey lad? Don't know how you are going to remove the metal jaw pin from the 60's b+w though, may prove a little difficult my little Walrus.
|
|