|
Post by FlamingPie on Sept 17, 2004 17:18:36 GMT -5
Anyone know where I cam find vintage pics of The Beatles in the Cavern Club?
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Sept 17, 2004 19:24:57 GMT -5
I'll betcha I have some in one magazine or another, & will look for'em shortly, when I get a few minutes.
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Sept 17, 2004 20:38:20 GMT -5
Thanks. But keep in mind I'm gonna use them for PIA purposes. ;D
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Sept 17, 2004 21:11:36 GMT -5
Thanks. But keep in mind I'm gonna use them for PIA purposes. ;D Oh ya, like I was gonna think otherwise! I can't believe I only found one pic..... but it's a good one.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Sept 17, 2004 21:25:14 GMT -5
I've got the "Some Other Guy" video.. Not too bad quality, I'll make some stills tomorrow. That's another rare one, maybe the whole vid, why not?
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Sept 17, 2004 21:31:32 GMT -5
Thanks! I'm looking for one pic in particular though...
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Sept 17, 2004 21:48:08 GMT -5
Thanks! I'm looking for one pic in particular though... Well tell me then, whatcha lookin' for?
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Sept 17, 2004 22:18:36 GMT -5
This pic: But vintage.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Sept 17, 2004 22:42:26 GMT -5
Ahh I think I get it.. I guess by vintage you mean published pre 67. I don't have it, pretty sure about that. But I get why you want to use this one. No bangs in the way, and it will match up with another you have in mind, no? What you need is a less grainy version, not so much "vintage" really, because I forsee that as a problem right off. "Vintage" could still have a problem with "fit to page" issues. Hey, that argument was kindly supplied by you guys, thank you very much! (anything you say may be used against you...)
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Sept 17, 2004 22:45:25 GMT -5
Ahh I think I get it.. I guess by vintage you mean published pre 67. I don't have it, pretty sure about that. But I get why you want to use this one. No bangs in the way, and it will match up with another you have in mind, no? What you need is a less grainy version, not so much "vintage" really, because I forsee that as a problem right off. "Vintage" could still have a problem with "fit to page" issues. Hey, that argument was kindly supplied by you guys, thank you very much! (anything you say may be used against you...) *points to pic in my latest thread*
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Oct 2, 2004 1:59:34 GMT -5
New question.
Does anyone have any vintage (published before '66) pics of Paul with his forehead exposed?
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Oct 2, 2004 8:22:13 GMT -5
New question. Does anyone have any vintage (published before '66) pics of Paul with his forehead exposed? I don't have the time to search that one out for ya right now, but ya might try looking thru our stash at www.jamespaulmccartney.org/That's what it's there for!
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Oct 2, 2004 12:55:19 GMT -5
I don't have the time to search that one out for ya right now, but ya might try looking thru our stash at www.jamespaulmccartney.org/That's what it's there for! Already did. Couln't find anything.
|
|