|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jul 11, 2004 2:15:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jul 11, 2004 2:18:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jul 11, 2004 2:57:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Jul 11, 2004 4:04:58 GMT -5
very interesting comparisons, Red Lion!
thanks!!
|
|
|
|
Post by SimMHoward on Jul 12, 2004 17:15:30 GMT -5
what does this prove? I can't see any point in taking the time to make the photos negative
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jul 12, 2004 17:53:30 GMT -5
Your Welcome XPT  |
|
|
|
Post by SimMHoward on Jul 12, 2004 17:58:18 GMT -5
haha, yes dodge the question RL, but this time I'm going to be rude and impatient, what is the point?
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jul 12, 2004 23:37:56 GMT -5
Dodging your question? No. It seemed more rhetorical in nature than directed towards me. If you look at what I have posted you will see that I have made no claims. I was ASKED to post this thread by one of the administrators of this board.
|
|
|
|
Post by SimMHoward on Jul 13, 2004 0:17:41 GMT -5
alright look, you still haven't answered, and this time you acknowledged that it was directed towards you, so I think its getting towards the point where its very obvious you are in fact dodging my question, now, on the other forum you did the same thing, adding only interesting eh? as your text, and everybody thought it was, but I don't, explain to me what making the photographs negative in photoshop does to add anything to any case in the world, or are you just looking for a way to make your case seem more substantial?
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jul 13, 2004 3:52:22 GMT -5
I said I made no CLAIMS. This does indeed answer your question. If you do not understand what this word means, get a dictionary and have someone who is mildly coherent read you its definition. There will be no more responses to your inquiries, regardless of your tantrums.
|
|
|
|
Post by SimMHoward on Jul 13, 2004 7:21:12 GMT -5
whatever, obviously you choose to ignore me and use some pathetic excuse to keep me from proving how clueless you actually are, if you want to play with the big guys like JoJo and XPT, I'd recommend a bit more creativity, I'll be waiting for you then.
|
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Jul 13, 2004 10:35:54 GMT -5
There will be no more responses to your inquiries What about mine? Okay, so why are you posting negative comparisons? |
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jul 13, 2004 11:48:12 GMT -5
Please Within, tone it down just a bit ok? I found it interesting, in that you could look at the pictures in a way that bypasses some kind of "recognition factor". ( I may be plagerizing here, but I see it that way) So yes, I'm the one who asked Red Lion to post them here. RL only, without captioning or making any editorial comment, asked you to have a look at it and decide for yourself if it means anything. Those who think it does, may say so. Those who don't... will please refrain from using a certain tone, and yes you know what I mean. Save the vitriol, it isn't good for us to have to read it, and it isn't good for you either really... I'm not a "big guy", I'm just someone who found this subject interesting, and for some reason I can't fathom, I decided to take on the job co admin.. |
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Jul 13, 2004 12:21:42 GMT -5
....I'm not a "big guy"... hey, JoJo, kwitcherbeefin.....  I'm not even A guy!! ;D  |
|
|
|
Post by SimMHoward on Jul 13, 2004 14:24:09 GMT -5
alright alright, I did say in the very beginning I was gonna be rude, but all I wanted was an explanation, you see, I was worried that you were trying to show differences in things like eyebrows, which in many of those pics match, I was just thinking about the details, thats all, the details... I would call you a big guy JoJo, and by big I mean that in the best possible way  |
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jul 13, 2004 14:31:16 GMT -5
Of course I will respond to you FP. But I have already answered that question, I was ASKED to post it here. If you need a more detailed answer here it is. One of the reasons PWR/PID was so fascinating for me was the picture comparisons. To me they clearly demonstrated two separate entities(which has kept me coming back to this subject). I know that viewing photos can be subjective, but I do feel that it is enjoyed by most who come here. At the very least photo comps generate enthusiasm, lively discussion and sometimes chaos. I really didnt have an intention when I posted as I was just complying with a request. I rarely even post here. I stumbled across a negative accidentally and wasnt sure if I was looking at pre or post 67 Paul so I made a few comps. I liked what I saw and decided to share a different perspective on photo viewing. Its really that simple, it wasnt posted to antagonize anyone. If you find value in it great , if not great, if it threatens you in any way then skip this thread. Hope this helps. |
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Jul 13, 2004 15:17:58 GMT -5
Of course I will respond to you FP. But I have already answered that question, I was ASKED to post it here. If you need a more detailed answer here it is. One of the reasons PWR/PID was so fascinating for me was the picture comparisons. To me they clearly demonstrated two separate entities(which has kept me coming back to this subject). I know that viewing photos can be subjective, but I do feel that it is enjoyed by most who come here. At the very least photo comps generate enthusiasm, lively discussion and sometimes chaos. I really didnt have an intention when I posted as I was just complying with a request. I rarely even post here. I stumbled across a negative accidentally and wasnt sure if I was looking at pre or post 67 Paul so I made a few comps. I liked what I saw and decided to share a different perspective on photo viewing. Its really that simple, it wasnt posted to antagonize anyone. If you find value in it great , if not great, if it threatens you in any way then skip this thread. Hope this helps. I was just asking in general. Thanks.  And if you want, I can make all the color pics black and white. Because if you're comparing a b&w negative, and a color negative, it'll just be too different from each other. - FP |
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jul 13, 2004 15:23:17 GMT -5
Haha, nooo of course not! Thank you Red Lion, I found it interesting, (still do) it was a little mind trick thing, like redirecting your focus away from the usual way your brain puts together facial recognition. One more thing, it's not gonna ever be absolute proof that any of us or the rest of this happy crew will ever be able to provide. No, 'fraid not.. We can present pics, photos, odd occurances, changes in behavior, etc etc... None of that lends itself to being put in front of a judge and jury, not a "real" one, OR self appointed ones.. 'mkay? |
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jul 13, 2004 15:27:45 GMT -5
Its a nice idea and please do so if you wish FP. And thank you JoJo.
|
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Jul 13, 2004 15:51:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by SimMHoward on Jul 13, 2004 16:16:39 GMT -5
all of them got distorted, what program did you use fp?
|
|
|
|
Post by jonna on Jul 13, 2004 20:01:19 GMT -5
damn flaming, have you been playing with your toy again? tisk tisk..
btw good job redlion and welcome
|
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Jul 13, 2004 20:38:05 GMT -5
Well, no matter if it's color or negatives, I'll always see 2 different people.
But it does seem that the negatives show off more differences than what ya notice normally.
|
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Jul 13, 2004 23:34:34 GMT -5
How the heck are they distorted? It's in JPG, so it might just be the quality.
|
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Jul 17, 2004 14:55:12 GMT -5
I still have no idea what you guys are talking about.
|
|
And if you want, I can make all the color pics black and white. Because if you're comparing a b&w negative, and a color negative, it'll just be too different from each other. 
