|
Post by Jai Guru Deva on Aug 31, 2004 3:26:59 GMT -5
Hey take a look at the "McGear" signature upsidedown. Doesn't it look like it reads "No Paul"? For those who don't know, McGear is Paul's brother Mike McCartney, he just used a pseudonym. www.macca-central.com/albums/McGear/mcgear.htm
|
|
|
Post by LarryC on Aug 31, 2004 4:30:44 GMT -5
Hey take a look at the "McGear" signature upsidedown. Doesn't it look like it reads "No Paul"? For those who don't know, McGear is Paul's brother Mike McCartney, he just used a pseudonym. www.macca-central.com/albums/McGear/mcgear.htmWoah...how do you DO that JaiGuruDeva? I had to snag the image and flip it to see it! I doubt this was intentional, but it IS fascinating...except Mike needs to smoothe out his o's and a's a little more, and get a better grip on his n's while he's at it...
|
|
|
Post by Jai Guru Deva on Oct 20, 2004 1:42:20 GMT -5
Ruth McCartney (Paul's step-sister) also has a funny signature on her website. It's supposed to read, "(Heart) Love Ruth" To me, it also reads like " Heart Paul 2." Or to put it another way, " Love Paul Too." It's really quite odd. www.mccartney.com/ruth/welcome.html
|
|
|
Post by pennylane on Oct 20, 2004 1:56:30 GMT -5
thats pretty cool..
|
|
|
Post by Girl on Oct 20, 2004 5:57:04 GMT -5
It does indeed... great catch! [img src="http://galeon.hispavista.com/akostuff/img/Good-Post[1].gif"]
The only confusing part is when you look at the credits...?
|
|
|
Post by Girl on Oct 20, 2004 6:07:04 GMT -5
I see it! But what struck me was her main photo on that page... now THAT is the Mc Cartney face! It made me instantly see the difference in the Paul/Faul photographs, where I was having a little trouble before... that cleared it up for me. [img src="http://galeon.hispavista.com/akostuff/img/Good-Post[1].gif"]
|
|
|
Post by Jai Guru Deva on Jul 29, 2005 1:11:38 GMT -5
This one's a little messy, but the words "Paul McCartney" upsidedown reads "My Money". (It kind of makes sense since it's a publicity shot.) Jane Asher's autograph upsidedown and reversed reads "ROYAL ONE". The word "Royal" is clear enough, but "One" may be a little more difficult to read. No one can deny, though, she's a princess.
|
|
|
Post by Jai Guru Deva on Oct 9, 2010 13:44:51 GMT -5
I tried to explain this alternative writing to eyesbleed, but it's one those things you have to see with your own eyes.
I had found one where John Lennon's scripted "Imagine" on his album which read an entirely different way came out as "Impossible". Then I always meant to post one which read "Paul McCartey" in Faul's handwriting, and which read another way was "Fans I'm Tara" (as I recall).
|
|
|
Post by B on Oct 9, 2010 17:34:04 GMT -5
which read another way was "Fans I'm Tara" (as I recall).
|
|
|
Post by Jai Guru Deva on Oct 11, 2010 12:27:56 GMT -5
Okay, here's something you can play around with, if you go to www.johnlennon.com, the first thing you'll see on the intro page is a photo of John, the title "John Lennon", "Celebrating John Lennon On His 70th Birthday". You'll notice a little drawing at the top of the page it kind of like "Wo7oW". Read anther way may say, "No P M" (as in "No Paul McCartney"). You might be able to see it better on the white or black shirt in the store. Lennon Shirt
|
|
|
Post by mothernaturesson on Dec 24, 2020 17:28:38 GMT -5
I came across this post while looking into if anyone has done handwriting analysis for Paul(s). The link to his signature above is no longer active, so handy Google helped me find some examples. Consistently, upside down, Mike’s signature appears to say “Paul”. It doesn’t always look like it says “No”... but it certainly does sometimes! McGear is a mystery to me and something is absolutely, severely amiss there. I don’t really have anything to contribute in this thread, other than these photo compositions, but this is certainly interesting. The third photo is VERY strange... ”Mike Mac (Ex McGear* Ex Scaffold Ex - Actly?)” Maybe that last word says “Ex-Actually?” 🤔 WHO ARE YOU, MIKE MCGEAR?? 😱
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Dec 24, 2020 22:48:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Dec 25, 2020 0:47:15 GMT -5
And images/footage of at least two different people (I’d say 3 for Jim) officially on the record being presented as each of their parents.
|
|
|
Post by mothernaturesson on Dec 25, 2020 11:51:53 GMT -5
And images/footage of at least two different people (I’d say 3 for Jim) officially on the record being presented as each of their parents. Hey guys! Good to see you (well, talk with you anyway... haha!)! Happy holidays! ✨ I suppose I should have said “Mike McGear(s)”... I absolutely don’t believe there is just one. I also think there are 3 Jim’s who are possibly related. Again, not a wide gene pool in that area at that time, so they could just be similar looking, average English men. And I believe there are 2-3 Marys. I think the two different Mikes in the pics in that tweet are brothers, since there are some similarities in their facial structure, mouths and eyes. The one on the right appears to have different colored and parted hair and be of a younger age. He also appears to be quite a bit shorter than Paul, while the left side Mike is taller than Paul. I think we see the Mike in the left pic more frequently and I believe he is the “mainstream” Mike that we see today. It’s something about his teeth/mouth/jaw that makes me think that. I actually think that might be the same Paul in both pics because of his facial structure. (I’m gauging that from other pics I’ve seen of that same event in the right side pic.) Judging by the fact that two of them are in the left side pic with Jim at a relatively young age, I do think they are cousins or otherwise closely related (or maybe just close family friends...?). And (to be a big ol’ jerk) I think that is the least “attractive” Paul and Mike(s) is/are certainly, vastly different looking than ANY of the Pauls... not a ton of effort put into look-alikes there... great job people. 🙄 Just some ideas. 🤩
|
|
|
Post by mothernaturesson on Dec 25, 2020 12:24:02 GMT -5
I just found this and thought it was interesting... I don’t know if dimples are hereditary, but it’s an interesting coincidence (not that I believe in coincidences)... The second pic of Paul better shows the dimple. I do believe this is the “ unattractive “ Paul. Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by michelle on Dec 27, 2020 12:52:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mothernaturesson on Dec 27, 2020 20:46:34 GMT -5
Both children look a lot like Angela in facial structure and cheek shape, etc., but I’m not spotting dimples... Is this to say dimples are hereditary?
|
|