|
|
Post by revolver on Sept 21, 2004 20:54:05 GMT -5
 Guess "camera distortion" only affects Paul.  Wait a minute, his right eyebrow moved - it must be a stretch! ;D Here's another (by matchbox?) from macca4ever that is supposed to show a stretch:  I think it shows the opposite. I see a slight tilt of the head caused by different camera angles. Otherwise a perfect match. |
|
|
|
Post by Morph on Sept 21, 2004 21:22:24 GMT -5
Revolver, agreed wholeheartedly.  When there is slight movement, is it predictable? A person's skull is a 3 dimensional object, and a slight angle, expression, or lighting change, if its the same person, would reflect this predictable (and acceptable) movement. When Paul and Faul seem to match in a fade, but there is movement, it's as if the skull itself is changing shape. I get a bit naseous looking at those, personally. Don't know how the PIAers do it. ;D |
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Sept 21, 2004 21:24:19 GMT -5
I'm gonna stay out of this "was the pepper pic streched or not" discussion, and post this brilliant fade by Matchbox:  |
|
|
|
Post by SimMHoward on Sept 21, 2004 21:56:49 GMT -5
Wait a minute, his right eyebrow moved - it must be a stretch! ;D Here's another (by matchbox?) from macca4ever that is supposed to show a stretch:  I think it shows the opposite. I see a slight tilt of the head caused by different camera angles. Otherwise a perfect match. notice how the chin in the RP pic is longer than the other pic |
|
|
|
Post by Morph on Sept 21, 2004 21:59:46 GMT -5
I'm gonna stay out of this "was the pepper pic streched or not" discussion, and post this brilliant fade by Matchbox: I guess cropping the chin was the brilliant part...  |
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Sept 21, 2004 22:09:11 GMT -5
I guess cropping the chin was the brilliant part... Ask him why he did that. |
|
|
|
Post by matchbox on Sept 21, 2004 22:18:19 GMT -5
I guess cropping the chin was the brilliant part... HOHOHO ;D The reason for that is that I used Revolvers pic for the base, and faded the pre '66 pic over it. Because the chin on Revolvers pic was cropped off a bit, so was my fade. So I guess Revolver is the brilliant one after all.  |
|
|
|
Post by revolver on Sept 21, 2004 22:26:50 GMT -5
notice how the chin in the RP pic is longer than the other pic Not longer, just tilted forward like he's nodding his head. In mine you can't even see a difference in the chins:  |
|
|
|
Post by revolver on Sept 21, 2004 22:30:18 GMT -5
HOHOHO ;D The reason for that is that I used Revolvers pic for the base, and faded the pre '66 pic over it. Because the chin on Revolvers pic was cropped off a bit, so was my fade. So I guess Revolver is the brilliant one after all. It wasn't cropped. I stopped at the shadow.  |
|
