|
|
Post by ticket2ride on Aug 15, 2013 23:13:05 GMT -5
Why would anyone resurrect this topic? What happened this board? We used to discuss whether Paul was replaced or not. We used to discuss clues. I don't even recognize Nothing is Real anymore. The clues are all still there, but its in the music and its nothing to do with mind control, secret UK bloodlines or ANY OF THIS BULLSHIT. Where can I go to just talk about Paul is Dead clues these days!? Where?! Where can I go to talk about weird Paul McCartney lyrics that suggest that he is a double without someone insinuating that he is a clone or an old woman or anything stupid like that? Signed, a Disgruntled Beatles Fan who is Disillusioned with the Paul is Dead Community Obviously the OP`s view is absurd by most standards. But much as I disagree with her/him, and think the cloning argument is also whacky, as well as disagree with the simplistic Illuminati views etc, you can get some information that comes out of threads like this ifyou separate the dross from the stuff of real value. What I see more and more is how so many prominent people are connected, not only by being privileged but through ancestry such as people of the aristocratic Stanley line even though there are descendants who have not had privilege for hundreds of years. It is as if they know their own. And with what we know now about the Beatles` very small world with stronger than portrayed connections with Manson`s group, what we now know about the Sergeant Pepper cover not being their original choice, and what I know through my research on the music industry and the active recruiting of entertainers to serve purposes that they do not necessarily understand at first (I am writing a book on a famous hiphop artists and how he believes he is somehow very important in the occult scene but is in fact ignorant of the agendas is one of my book`s foci), the Paul Is Dead theory becomes far more interesting and obtains a new credibility. |
|
|
|
Post by cherilyn7 on Aug 16, 2013 15:58:37 GMT -5
I agree with ticket2ride: this is just pantomime stuff as if the great JPM was replaced by an old woman? Though the replacement does appear to have effeminate mannerisms which Paul did not.
|
|
|
|
Post by NothingIsReal1985 on Aug 24, 2013 20:23:41 GMT -5
Why would anyone resurrect this topic? What happened this board? We used to discuss whether Paul was replaced or not. We used to discuss clues. I don't even recognize Nothing is Real anymore. The clues are all still there, but its in the music and its nothing to do with mind control, secret UK bloodlines or ANY OF THIS BULLSHIT. Where can I go to just talk about Paul is Dead clues these days!? Where?! Where can I go to talk about weird Paul McCartney lyrics that suggest that he is a double without someone insinuating that he is a clone or an old woman or anything stupid like that? Signed, a Disgruntled Beatles Fan who is Disillusioned with the Paul is Dead Community Obviously the OP`s view is absurd by most standards. But much as I disagree with her/him, and think the cloning argument is also whacky, as well as disagree with the simplistic Illuminati views etc, you can get some information that comes out of threads like this ifyou separate the dross from the stuff of real value. What I see more and more is how so many prominent people are connected, not only by being privileged but through ancestry such as people of the aristocratic Stanley line even though there are descendants who have not had privilege for hundreds of years. It is as if they know their own. And with what we know now about the Beatles` very small world with stronger than portrayed connections with Manson`s group, what we now know about the Sergeant Pepper cover not being their original choice, and what I know through my research on the music industry and the active recruiting of entertainers to serve purposes that they do not necessarily understand at first (I am writing a book on a famous hiphop artists and how he believes he is somehow very important in the occult scene but is in fact ignorant of the agendas is one of my book`s foci), the Paul Is Dead theory becomes far more interesting and obtains a new credibility.
TBH (to be honest), based on the evidence -- which, IMHO, is more credible than NOT, I'd like to add -- I've recently compiled, it seems that PMcC was replaced back in the fall of '66, plain and simple. But the PIA-ers are in denial, it seems. I was myself when I first found out about this possibility about 3 years ago [and even managed to rock myself to sleep since that time concerning all the reasons that Paul IS NOT dead, but alive as ever, which is why this deception of the masses in regards to Faul's TRUE identity has gone on for so long. Either Faul's fans (to quote Doughboy's line near the end of John Singleton's 1991 hood drama film Boyz In The Hood] "don't know, don't show, or don't even CARE" whether or not their REAL beloved PMcC is alive or not, and if NOT the circumstances surrounding his disappearance, and even possible subsequent death. It just goes to show how much that TPTB (the powers-that-be, the Illuminati, the ruling global elite, the banking cartel, the satanic Luciferians, etc., the people very likely responsible for Paul's disappearance) has the sheeple dumbed-down.
People are also so obsessed with celebrities these days [whether it's these arrogant, overpaid, greedy, immoral singers, actors, entertainers, sports stars, politicians, etc.] that they'd perish the possibility of something unfathomable -- such as this -- would happen to them. So FTR (for that reason) people would settle for anything, even if it's a cheap substitute, imitation, or double, in spite of the fact that it will ALWAYS be less than the best and will NEVER be anything like the real thing. Why eat nasty, unsatisfying, nutrient-deficient slop, when you can eat a decent, filling, tasty and nutritious meal?
But back to me... I hadn't come to accept that our deeply flawed-yet-beloved-and-sexy genuine Macca had left us in '66, or even some time later, until recently, of course. The fact of the matter is that I've gone through some trials & tribulations since that time [autumn of 2010 when I first discovered the possibility of this God-awful truth when I was doing research on the Illuminati and MK-ULTRA, or mind control] and it's strengthened my inner person and it's brought me to this point in my life. Two main aspects of the grieving process is DENIAL, and then ACCEPTANCE. It was something (the acceptance part) that just HAPPENED recently for me, without me even trying. What more do I need to say?
Concerning the older-than-dirt old lady... well... in congruence with what a few in this thread have already said, I happen to think that she could very likely be Faul's mother, hands down. In addition, we all know -- based on Paul's history -- that his real mother died back when he was in his teens, in the 1950's. And this elderly lady... well, she lived way past that point in time. And people need to quit all of this BUNK about this woman (or another lady) replacing Paul. The person that replaced him is MALE, plain and simple. If he wasn't, then he wouldn't have been able to father any children with that ugly, manly-jawed, Plain Jane, white trash, fame-hungry whore Linda (Epstein) Eastman. I've also seen Mary, and although she's pretty, she doesn't look like (the real) Paul McCartney or Linda at all... neither does Stella. Moreover I believe she was very likely [ritually] sacrificed (after she became ill she wasn't seen in the public eye, slim to none), because Faul's star shines bright as ever, in spite of how old (71) he is. |
|
|
|
Post by linus on Aug 25, 2013 15:05:22 GMT -5
Why would anyone resurrect this topic? What happened this board? We used to discuss whether Paul was replaced or not. We used to discuss clues. I don't even recognize Nothing is Real anymore. The clues are all still there, but its in the music and its nothing to do with mind control, secret UK bloodlines or ANY OF THIS BULLSHIT. Where can I go to just talk about Paul is Dead clues these days!? Where?! Where can I go to talk about weird Paul McCartney lyrics that suggest that he is a double without someone insinuating that he is a clone or an old woman or anything stupid like that? Signed, a Disgruntled Beatles Fan who is Disillusioned with the Paul is Dead Community For the record, in 42 years, no who, what, when, where, why or how has been answered by the PID community. Heaven forbid a few people try to turn some new stones that haven’t been turned yet. If one doesn’t like a theory, refute it or ignore it. But don’t b**ch about it, or ridicule the OP. The point of a forum is to discuss and debate. It’s not the PIAers fault that they have a good enough case to engage PIDers in a healthy debate. If one doesn’t want to read about UK bloodlines or have PIAers engage them in discussion, then start a blog. At least we can debate things here at this forum. At the TKIN 60-IF forum, you get banned for disagreeing with the forum owner, who happens to be the guy that started the Pearl theory of this thread. |
|
|
|
Post by NothingIsReal1985 on Aug 26, 2013 20:51:47 GMT -5
For the record, in 42 years, no who, what, when, where, why or how has been answered by the PID community. Heaven forbid a few people try to turn some new stones that haven’t been turned yet. If one doesn’t like a theory, refute it or ignore it. But don’t b**ch about it, or ridicule the OP. The point of a forum is to discuss and debate. It’s not the PIAers fault that they have a good enough case to engage PIDers in a healthy debate. If one doesn’t want to read about UK bloodlines or have PIAers engage them in discussion, then start a blog. At least we can debate things here at this forum. At the TKIN 60-IF forum, you get banned for disagreeing with the forum owner, who happens to be the guy that started the Pearl theory of this thread. By 'PID community'... I really meant the fans who have speculated, dug up evidence (wheter obscure or concrete) of the circumstances surrounding Paul McCartney's disappearance back in the fall of '66; not any other 'community' in particular... so please don't put words in my mouth, therefore taking things out of context, because in regards to the Internet, things tend to get lost in translation.  Well, in a way, the PIAers have a good case... or at least some of them think they do, who knows, b/c the views concerning this differ from person to person, so I can't personally speak for anyone. But the PID/PWR evidence (in my humble, honest opinion) makes more sense to me the PIA/PWNR evidence or theories. In that case me -- as a PID/PWRer I'll agree to disagree with the PIA/PWNRers.  FTR (for the record) the only thing I know about the Pearl theory [whatever the forum owner's POV is concerning that old Pearl lady] is that there's a strong possibility that the elderly lady (Pearl) could be Faul's [Billy Shears' or William Sheppard's] mother... she looks old enough and there's a resemblance to Faul, anyhow. That's just my POV, but I digress. |
|
|
|
Post by linus on Aug 27, 2013 16:07:50 GMT -5
NIR1985, You do realize that, if there is a “Faul”, nobody knows what he looks like before his alleged surgery. So, to say that somebody resembles “Faul” is to essentially say that they also resemble “Paul”. Unless you're referring to old Paul and old Pearl. And in that case, if you also believe he had surgery, than any resemblance he would have to Pearl is by coincidence.
Also, I was responding to Jude, as well as NIR1985 - hence my reference to the ‘PID community’. And in further response to Jude, who discounts the Pearl theory as a valid clue; notice that there are now some people that think Pearl is actually part of all this. I'm not advocating the Pearl theory or GN/Sunking, but it goes to show who knows what may end up being a usable clue and what won’t. Most “clues” provided by The Beatles have thus far been dead-ends. (no pun intended).
My message was to anyone and everyone, the two comments I quoted were just good examples to use as springboards for my point, and yes, things get lost in translation over the net. And the part about ridiculing the OP goes back a long ways at this forum and at many other forums. I wasn’t trying to implicate you, NIR1985.
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night 
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Aug 30, 2013 12:58:19 GMT -5
I spent years devouring every bit of info regarding PID, and came to the easy conclusion that Paul is not dead/was not dead by the time the 1970's rolled around, and was at best (worst?) employed an equally talented double to take his place as THE Paul McCartney. There's a blog I stumbled upon recently called They May Be Parted that, since January 2012, has been taking an in-depth look at the entirety of the Get Back sessions, from the early takes of Let It Be songs, to the bits of dialogue and sometimes entire conversations that were picked up by the mics between takes. Linus, ticket2ride, Nothingsireal985, I'd like you take a look at this post in particular: theymaybeparted.wordpress.com/2013/08/14/jan-7-on-their-own-at-the-holiday-camp/I've uploaded the audio of the conversation here: www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfbP7tQuTqs and I strongly suggest you three take a listen to it. What does it prove? Nothing, really. But as a former believer in PID, I find it very interesting that PID's answer to PIA has always "the devil is in the details". The small details, you know? Paul's ear lobe looks funny in this picture. Paul seems taller here, different eye color, etc. While PIA has always (rightfully, in my opinion) chalked these up to photographic anomalies, there have always been the staunchest of believers in PID who, like you, linus, don't think PIA even has any worthwhile arguments, so sure are you that Paul is not Paul. Its funny then, for me to listen to this candid conversation go on between George, Paul, and John about Brian Epstein when "Paul" is supposed to be a replacement who knows nothing of the days when Mr. Epstein managed their lives. Lets say, for the sake argument, that this dialogue is scripted. Would John have really joined Fake Paul in talking about what it means to be a Beatle and what the aspirations of the band truly are? More importantly, why would someone filling in for Paul even suggest that they'd all rather "go home"? Surely he wouldn't want to admit that his bread and butter might soon be taken away from him? Furthermore, why is that no one at any point in the long, drawn-out, uncomfortable sessions that audio engineers caught nearly every second of, why is it that no one ever slips up and calls Paul by his real name? They only call him Paul, and as tense as things get between George and he, George always takes the tone of someone who has known Paul for a very long time, not only a couple of years. So, that's something to think about, isn't it? But on the other hand there are perhaps dozens of Paul McCartney songs with strange cryptic lyrics that seem to suggest he is hiding something from the public, and THAT is what keeps my mind open to be the possibility that Sir Paul perhaps isn't who the world thinks he is. But I am not so sure there's as much evidence that Paul really died as there are "clues" that he was replaced (an act which is, in itself, probably not nearly so nefarious as people imagine). |
|
|
|
Post by linus on Aug 30, 2013 16:16:27 GMT -5
Great post Jude, love it, thanks. It brings up some good points.
Incidentally, for the record, I’m not a PIDer or a PIAer. I hope I haven’t, and don’t think I’ve ever, insinuated that PIAers don’t have any valid arguments because I believe they do. (not to mention, it would be great if they were right). In fact, I said in my earlier response, “It’s not the PIAers fault that they have a good enough case to engage PIDers in a healthy debate “
Both sides have very valid arguments, and I believe that is exactly how it was meant to be.
Especially when one takes into account things like Crowley’s notion of equilibrium established through paradox.
|
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Aug 30, 2013 18:06:08 GMT -5
Yeah thanks Jude great site. I have a book that attempted to do the same thing this web site does, and if I'm remembering correctly, the author was asked to cease and desist as far as putting certain pieces of conversation in the book. The book did get published, but in a pared down version. What they took out, I don't know, but here someone's doing it for free on the web many years later, and certain concerned parties just shrug it off. (times change)
I've listened to much (but not all) of the Nagra Tape Rolls and IMO they are guardedly candid, but not 100% either as they know the tapes are rolling. At the same time they didn't believe that they would end up in the hands of the thieves that would spread the audio essentially everywhere.
The feeling that crept up on me from listening was that yes, that Paul that speaks on those tapes is the real deal, the same Paul that John grew to despise enough to write "How Do You Sleep". But, was Paul replaced or missing for a while? I believe yes. I believe the Hello Goodbye video was smoke and mirrors for example. (amongst other things)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2013 19:54:44 GMT -5
wow, talk about eye in the sky  lol ...there are 7 Levels   <a href="http://s206.photobucket.com/user/morffin42/media/2012/XX/images-2_zps38581835.jpeg.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/bb203/morffin42/2012/XX/images-2_zps38581835.jpeg" border="0" alt=" photo images-2_zps38581835.jpeg"/></a>  ahhh ahh |
|
|
|
Post by NothingIsReal1985 on Aug 31, 2013 20:07:49 GMT -5
NIR1985, You do realize that, if there is a “Faul”, nobody knows what he looks like before his alleged surgery. So, to say that somebody resembles “Faul” is to essentially say that they also resemble “Paul”. Unless you're referring to old Paul and old Pearl. And in that case, if you also believe he had surgery, than any resemblance he would have to Pearl is by coincidence. Also, I was responding to Jude, as well as NIR1985 - hence my reference to the ‘PID community’. And in further response to Jude, who discounts the Pearl theory as a valid clue; notice that there are now some people that think Pearl is actually part of all this. I'm not advocating the Pearl theory or GN/Sunking, but it goes to show who knows what may end up being a usable clue and what won’t. Most “clues” provided by The Beatles have thus far been dead-ends. (no pun intended). My message was to anyone and everyone, the two comments I quoted were just good examples to use as springboards for my point, and yes, things get lost in translation over the net. And the part about ridiculing the OP goes back a long ways at this forum and at many other forums. I wasn’t trying to implicate you, NIR1985. Well, before his surgery... he still looked a lot like JPM, although I could still tell he was NOT indeed Paul, even in Kenya in 1966. Whether he'd had any surgery by then, I don't know. So in a way, you're right about it being up for debate what he looked like before he gotten any surgery (that is, IF he'd had any) to look more like JPM [who he was assigned to replace] after he was bumped off between September-November of '66. But I DO know one thing... obvious (other) physical differences (like height, complexion, body hair, eye & hair color, hair whorls, fingerprints, teeth, skull, jaw & facial shape and overall facial features) aside both JPM & Bill/Billy Shears [AKA William Sheppard] have the same body type & shape in general, including high arches (in feet), short torso, long legs, slender graceful fingers & hands, and a high, prominent Negroid-like backside (I'm a black woman with a butt like that, so don't take offense, lol). If Pearl had anything to do with this... then perhaps it's because she's related (somehow) to the "Queen" Elizabeth II and therefore has connections with the British royal family, which wouldn't surprise me in the least. [BTW, she's (QE2) is NOT the REAL queen of the British Empire, which was why she'd "knighted" Sir Faul McFalsey; it TAKES one wealthy, greedy, powerful fake to KNOW one. After all, crows & vultures birds of a feather flock together, and (ravenous) wolves that run in packs got each other's backs. Have to find that link showing why she's the fake "queen" of England. So apologies for the misunderstanding, Linus. |
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Jan 22, 2017 22:26:39 GMT -5
That is an extraordinary story, what she did during the war. She would be my first choice for Sgt Pepper, because it sounds close to Pearlpearl. John's song "How do You Sleep?" says: ' So sgt. pepper took you by surprise You better see right through that mother's eyes ... Jump when your mamma tell you anything' www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/johnlennon/howdoyousleep.htmlPaul's song "Jet" says: 'And jet I thought the major was a lady suffragette... Ah Mater' www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/paulmccartney/jet.htmlAnd there are Beatles songs like "Your mother should know" and "Cry Baby Cry, make your mother sigh". She may have started a band right after the war, in 1946, 20 years before the album Sgt Pepper was recorded. |
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Jan 22, 2017 22:39:23 GMT -5
Apollo C Vermouth wrote: ' I saw a film today, oh boy, the English army had just won the war… ”There seems to be a small connection between the above lines from “A Day in the Life,” and the mysterious “Billy Shears." Although purely conjecture on my part,it would seem that the “film” mentioned may have been “The Bridge Over the River Kwai.”Why? Not to bore you with a synopsis of the film, (you can explore that one on your own) but it concerns members of the English army being held in a Japanese prison camp and used to construct a tactical bridge for their captors. In the end, the bridge was ultimatelybuilt and then destroyed by the English army, thus aiding in the victory over the Japanese. One major character in the film, Lt. Commander SHEARS, was played by actor WILLIAM Holden. This character plays a pivitol role in the destruction of the bridge. In one scene, he tells a nurse that “all you need is love.” Actually, one of the memorable lines of the movie. Could the name “Billy Shears” of SPLHCB be inspired by the character of this flim mentioned on the same album? Seems logical as the mention of seeing a “film” was important enough to become lyrics of a song. What profound effect did it have on Lennon, who went on to play in a movie titled, “How I Won the War". Comments? Happy Easter! Apollo willemaus.wordpress.com/2015/07/03/apollo-c-vermouth/ |
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Jan 22, 2017 22:45:13 GMT -5
Pearl was very pretty when she was young and had a small face, rabbit teeth and dark hair like Paul McCartney. So she looked a little like him.
It's a possibility that she could have had a son she had to leave during the war.
She could be the mother of the real James Paul or one of his doubles.
OK, bring on the koolaid.
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jan 23, 2017 23:03:36 GMT -5
Adding to threads like this, Kool-Aid may not be enough. JMO.
|
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Jan 23, 2017 23:47:37 GMT -5
Kool Aid Man:
Now that that presentation as been presented -
back to our regularly scheduled programming.
|
|
|
|
Post by delysid on Feb 12, 2017 3:46:28 GMT -5
This just proves that you can match up any two random people in a fade pretty easily. That, in fact, was the idea of 'morphing' in the first place. Anybody remember when this tech came along in the 80's? People were going overboard with it on TV (Max Headroom etc) and then it was reborn on the web circa '97 when people did similarly. These days it's obviously mainly used to connect McCartney with...erm...like anybody you want. |
|
|
|
Post by delysid on Feb 12, 2017 3:51:22 GMT -5
Apollo C Vermouth wrote: What profound effect did it have on Lennon, who went on to play in a movie titled, “How I Won the War". You've got it the wrong way round though. He got the line for the song from the movie he'd been in already, 'A Day In The Life' being a song that arose in 1967 with his film role being the previous year. |
|
|
|
Post by delysid on Feb 12, 2017 4:10:07 GMT -5
Why would anyone resurrect this topic? What happened this board? We used to discuss whether Paul was replaced or not. We used to discuss clues. I don't even recognize Nothing is Real anymore. The clues are all still there, but its in the music and its nothing to do with mind control, secret UK bloodlines or ANY OF THIS BULLSHIT. Where can I go to just talk about Paul is Dead clues these days!? Where?! Where can I go to talk about weird Paul McCartney lyrics that suggest that he is a double without someone insinuating that he is a clone or an old woman or anything stupid like that? Signed, a Disgruntled Beatles Fan who is Disillusioned with the Paul is Dead Community Obviously the OP`s view is absurd by most standards. But much as I disagree with her/him, and think the cloning argument is also whacky, as well as disagree with the simplistic Illuminati views etc, you can get some information that comes out of threads like this ifyou separate the dross from the stuff of real value. What I see more and more is how so many prominent people are connected, not only by being privileged but through ancestry such as people of the aristocratic Stanley line even though there are descendants who have not had privilege for hundreds of years. It is as if they know their own. And with what we know now about the Beatles` very small world with stronger than portrayed connections with Manson`s group, what we now know about the Sergeant Pepper cover not being their original choice, and what I know through my research on the music industry and the active recruiting of entertainers to serve purposes that they do not necessarily understand at first (I am writing a book on a famous hiphop artists and how he believes he is somehow very important in the occult scene but is in fact ignorant of the agendas is one of my book`s foci), the Paul Is Dead theory becomes far more interesting and obtains a new credibility. Although I have time for the 'music-biz controlled by nefarious agents' argument as put forward by several authors, I am mindful of how these narratives appear to get published when there is an opinion-massage going on. I notice that what we now call the 'alt-right' (it may have changed its name by now as it's a movement thing) essentially takes up what were formerly 'whacko' ideas and plays them across many social media where they earn grass-roots support. Indeed, I have long noticed that even PID was somewhat infiltrated/corrupted by the presence of 'activists' who didn't seem /don't seem to know shit about their basic Beatles before they get onto their supposed 'secrets' which additionally happen, miraculously, to reflect a certain world-view where Beatles dating black women is assumed to be a bad thing. Yeah, didn't miss that. Saying that there's been grass-roots infiltration of topics groups and interest-groups used to be a very far-fetched idea to claim could be the case. Now that's very much changed. The success of The Don has built on such grassroots politicisation of interest-groups with the general theme 'Everything You Know Is Wrong', once a hippy lefty idea now repurposed as 'alt-right' fodder. Of course, the argument in it has merit. Anybody who thinks they get INFORMATION ONLY from the media is probably already locked and loaded to kill Satanic Faul at the earliest opportunity. For those who skipped the kool aid, the idea that authors could be targeted (based on pre-existing themes and interests) for 'information-bursts' they then write up is far from far-fetched. Being somebody who considered briefly back in the 80's that Frank Zappa might have been outing the origins of AIDS (on his triple album 'Thing Fish') based upon insider knowledge gained from his dad, I was quite surprised that an author I'd actually had dealings with, the late Dave McGowan of Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon : Laurel Canyon, Covert Ops & The Dark Heart of the Hippie Dream,
chose to take in his promo interviews, a stance of actually believing his material (he was very doubtful about the premise while writing it, I can tell ya). I guess he could have done so to fit in with the 'vibe' of sites like White Ice Radio (erm...I meant Red Ice Radio...or did I?) where Hitler was a good guy just trying to 'Make Germany Great Again' but then I wondered if there's a team of bought-and-sold writers and bloggers. That they hang around the Jan Irvin circuit of 'donate donate for this important alt right research' is worrying as who can have the slightest doubt that these guys would take CIA cash? They'll take cash from a baby ffs. |
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Feb 12, 2017 5:21:03 GMT -5
Kool Aid Man: Now that that presentation as been presented - back to our regularly scheduled programming. LOL I got that one  |
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Feb 12, 2017 16:25:48 GMT -5
Hi Ramone and Red Lion,
you both implied that this thread is crazy. And some things in it do seem crazy.
I wouldn't even know Pearl's name if it wasn't for this thread. It is not something I found myself and I don't know where GN found out about her.
So I cannot say that I'm sure she was connected to Paul McCartney. She looked a lot like him, but people who are totally unrelated can look alike.
We would need someone who was close to Paul and the Beatles to tell us the truth.
That's why I based most of my posts on Apollo C Vermouth's posts and on song lyrics. Because only insiders know what happened.
|
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Feb 12, 2017 16:37:14 GMT -5
John Lennon's song "How Do You Sleep?" says that Sergent Pepper was a mother. Now there are a lot of mothers. It's not necessarily Pearl of course.
In many websites and videos, they make comparisons between Paul McCartney and Obama's mother.
There is a very little resemblance, but I see no reason why she would be connected to him, so I am gonna discard that entirely.
But if there was a thread like this about her with people finding things that show a connection, then I might believe there was one.
Because in this thread, people did find some things about Pearl that show a possible connection. And I found some myself. And there is a very big resemblance to Paul McCartney.
That's why I believe in her involvement as a possibility, not as a proven fact.
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Feb 13, 2017 1:29:08 GMT -5
Hi Rabbit, Happy motoring!!
|
|
flowerchild
Help!
not in Kansas anymore.......
Posts: 68 
|
Post by flowerchild on Feb 13, 2017 12:38:37 GMT -5
Soooooo.... Six Degrees of Separation anyone? -Wikipedia
|
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Feb 14, 2017 13:01:09 GMT -5
Hi Ramone and Red Lion, you both implied that this thread is crazy. And some things in it do seem crazy. I wouldn't even know Pearl's name if it wasn't for this thread. It is not something I found myself and I don't know where GN found out about her. So I cannot say that I'm sure she was connected to Paul McCartney. She looked a lot like him, but people who are totally unrelated can look alike. We would need someone who was close to Paul and the Beatles to tell us the truth. That's why I based most of my posts on Apollo C Vermouth's posts and on song lyrics. Because only insiders know what happened. He was telling himself (clearly because everyone else would have got it by now) You better C right thru that Mother's I. Something tells me you're a genius too, unfortunately nobody (thankfully) knows you secretly believe Paul McCartney gave birth to Barack Obama.. Donald is that You?! |
|
