|
Post by FP on Feb 10, 2009 20:30:33 GMT -5
JPM his wearing his top-wig... Sir FAUL's ear is smaller... hair parted the "wrong" way as usual etc etc. JPM RIP 1966, get over it. You think plastic surgeons would worry about about the scar on his lip, the dent on his chin, the wrinkles around his eyes, getting the right teeth, but someone made the mistake of which his side his hair is parted on?
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Feb 10, 2009 20:50:25 GMT -5
JPM his wearing his top-wig... Sir FAUL's ear is smaller... hair parted the "wrong" way as usual etc etc. JPM RIP 1966, get over it. You think plastic surgeons would worry about about the scar on his lip, the dent on his chin, the wrinkles around his eyes, getting the right teeth, but someone made the mistake of which his side his hair is parted on? bbchords, you forget...the plastic surgeons also forgot to make the replacement as "cute" as the original.
|
|
|
Post by ph0neyprophet on Feb 10, 2009 21:12:52 GMT -5
The scar is from the moped accident.
|
|
|
Post by GN on Feb 11, 2009 7:51:51 GMT -5
another one of JPM in 1968 Great find Paliedied! Based on skull shape it's our dude. You're good sleuth. Could you figure out who was Paulie's wife? In Beatles tradition of deceit in the open her picture should be somewhere nearby too. I have only one suspect Different perspective but one can still appreciate Faul's narrow jawbone (in comparison with Paul's one)
|
|
|
Post by pauliedied on Feb 11, 2009 8:27:58 GMT -5
oh boy... its all a matter of perspective, angle , lightning, footage quality here: short jawbone, long nose, fake ear!
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 11, 2009 13:03:38 GMT -5
i really want to see some some pics of fauls topwig fauling off or something like that. it would be great if someone had some pics.
|
|
|
Post by puzzled on Feb 11, 2009 13:29:24 GMT -5
i really want to see some some pics of fauls topwig fauling off or something like that. it would be great if someone had some pics. Only because you asked:
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 11, 2009 14:06:39 GMT -5
oh my god. thats paul!? i didnt know he wore a wig. i thought faul was the only one...
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 11, 2009 16:05:02 GMT -5
wait, are you sure thats not tampered with. if not, can you send me the video link, if possible.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Feb 11, 2009 16:30:27 GMT -5
Paul had a receding hairline that he covered up by growing his bangs long.
Faul never wore a wig.
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 11, 2009 16:37:49 GMT -5
wow i never knew that. do you have any pictures to back up your statement?
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Feb 11, 2009 17:28:42 GMT -5
Look at puzzled's pic. If he were wearing a wig, he wouldn't be able to shake his head like that. You can see the exposed scalp in that pic and you can see the length of the bangs.
It's possible Faul wore a wig on some occasions but I don't see the reason why. He wore his hair long as is.
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Feb 11, 2009 18:08:30 GMT -5
IIRC, the bald-bangs footage is from 1964. He may have started wearing a "Beatle wig" later than that.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Feb 11, 2009 19:01:37 GMT -5
If so, it was right before he disappeared. That's when his hair started looking different.
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 22, 2009 13:50:24 GMT -5
Humor & sarcasm can be tough online sometimes. ;D But yep, it was pics like these that had me backing away from the PID theories a while back. These sure as hell aren't pics of Bill. And I'll take it a step further..... wanna know what a REAL McCartney album would sound like today? Play Chaos & Creation. The real JPM is on the cover for a reason. some pictures of faul have been manipulated to look more like paul.
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 22, 2009 20:44:39 GMT -5
What is your point of reference to determine larger in these photos? JPM almost never shows his forehead so what are you comparing it to? Check out the features in the profile shot..........a dead on match. shes comparing it to faul . his forehead is visibly larger, and jpm's face takes up more space on his face then fauls does . fauls face is mostly forehead and chin.
|
|
|
Post by pauliedied on Feb 23, 2009 7:06:55 GMT -5
i am sure that it was Paul who produced Mary Hopkin! how is THAT not JPM: Just cut off his sideburns.......
|
|
|
Post by thisone on Feb 24, 2009 1:52:47 GMT -5
Right hand drive guitar flipped over! Mary Hopkin!! OMG all my teenage nightmares come flooding back.
|
|
|
Post by B on Feb 24, 2009 15:06:55 GMT -5
pauliedied wrote: "how is THAT not JPM:"Here's how: Mary Hopkin - Goodbyewww.youtube.com/watch?v=TbhEtYdZ3WoThe person in the video working with Mary Hopkin is not the original Paul McCartney. That's all there is to it!
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Feb 24, 2009 15:25:41 GMT -5
pauliedied wrote: "how is THAT not JPM:"Here's how: Mary Hopkin - Goodbyewww.youtube.com/watch?v=TbhEtYdZ3WoThe person in the video working with Mary Hopkin is not the original Paul McCartney. That's all there is to it! I've posted about the ever-changing lip scar before, but I will again here. JPM supposedly had a moped accident on 12/26/65 that caused a scar on the left of his upper lip. Surprisingly, the scar seems to get better over time, then get worse, then get better again, etc... The scar is present in Sep, 1968 for the Hey Jude performance, but it appears to have healed nicely. Then, during this performance with Mary Hopkin in 1969, the scar appears to have regressed. Different lighting, and different angles, but that scar is WORSE in the LATER video. And there are several other examples of this ever-changing scar.
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Feb 24, 2009 15:35:18 GMT -5
There is a scar to the bottom left of his left eye, which a lot of people are probably well aware of, but it is very evident at times in the Say, Say, Say video.
I honestly don't really know how it could have been made without surgery.
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Feb 27, 2009 10:53:38 GMT -5
Yet more of the ever-changing lip scar.
In the June, 1967 "LSD" interview, the scar is BARELY visible, if at all.
Meanwhile, in the May, 1968 Apple launch interview, it dominates his face, just as it did in the Mary Hopkin promo clip I showed above.
So again, the scar heals, then unheals, then heals, then unheals, etc.
When it comes to proving that multiple Pauls existed simultaneously, this is just about as smoking gun as it gets.
|
|
|
Post by pauliedied on Jul 20, 2009 8:35:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Connor Terru on Jul 20, 2009 8:53:36 GMT -5
Or maybe Paul never died nor was replaced. It's as clear as the clear blue summer sky, PAUL IS ALIVE! Same freckles and chin mark= same man! same chin indentation=same man as well
|
|
|
Post by B on Jul 20, 2009 9:38:36 GMT -5
I think that photo is so indistinct that the individual shown could be just about anyone at all!
|
|