|
Post by blackbird on Jul 2, 2008 17:14:50 GMT -5
www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1tD7pklg44HELLO!! This is MAJOR! I came here to see what was written and I can't find anything about this video that came out today!!!! I would think we would all be standing on our heads, going what the @%#! I would like to put in my worth about it and hopefully others will follow suite. Is this something we all expected to see in these videos??? Well, I wasn't expecting to see it. And as I said THIS IS MAJOR !! CAN I SHOUT IT ANY LOUDER !!! We have seen where these videos were going and we know about the OCCULT WORLD, SATANIC RITUALS, FREEMASONS, MIND CONTROL, ETC................BUT............. this is the first we have gotten a NAME of someone BIG, WHO IS ACTUALLY WALKING THE STREETS HIDING BEHIND DARK SHADES, EVEN BROADCASTING IT ON AN ALBUM COVER.
I don't mean Charlie Manson .............. I MEAN SOMEONE BIGGER. IF WE AREN'T GETTING HIPPED UP ABOUT THIS THEN SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG............... AND WE ARE STILL SLEEPING IN OUR LITTLE WORLD.
I hope I have overlooked the thread for this and someone tell me if I need to post this somewhere else. TIME TO LEAVE THE "DID JPM RETURN?" THREAD AND GET INTO SOME *REAL* DISCUSSION. STOP RUNNING AROUND IN CIRCLES OVER THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN HASHED OUT TOO MANY TIMES TO COUNT.
|
|
|
Post by MikeNL on Jul 2, 2008 17:19:38 GMT -5
CORRECT I HAVEN'T SEEN A SINGLE THREAD ABOUT THIS VIDEO. THIS VIDEO IS BIG, WATCH IT PEOPLE, PLEASE M.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jul 2, 2008 17:31:53 GMT -5
It's customary to provide a link..
|
|
|
Post by blackbird on Jul 2, 2008 17:38:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by MikeNL on Jul 2, 2008 17:44:51 GMT -5
iamawhich is the only channel where this vidoe is posted. the rest all directs to this source.
|
|
|
Post by blackbird on Jul 2, 2008 18:45:39 GMT -5
JOHN. . . . YOKOHave you all thought about what this is saying We saw John change ....... we saw the huge change in him, and many have probably wondered what happened. Yes the death of Real Paul - that is for those who choose to believe that - but I don't even want to get into that discussion in this thread. It isn't productive to what has been presented. Have you guys read the posts on the Iamaphoney Channel for the past many days? You can plainly see there is more going on that we think AND IT IS IN PRINT, RIGHT UNDER OUR NOSES. Go back and scan the posts from the past few days and further back. DO YOU SEE TAKE TIME AND LOOK IF YOU HAVE NOT.
THE BANTER THERE IS NOT "FUN" BANTER - NOT "PLAY" BANTER.
READ DEEPER - PLEASE GO AND READ
|
|
|
Post by blackbird on Jul 2, 2008 18:52:43 GMT -5
Besides John's appearance, didn't the personality change?? I was not as involved back then as so many of you were, but I can believe there was more going on with him. It wasn't just the loss of a friend - and there may have been guilt that was wrecking his body. BUT THERE WAS MORE GOING ON AND THIS VIDEO SHOWS THAT THERE WAS MORE GOING ON ...... STILL GOING ON NOW .....CONTROL ..... ISN'T IT ABOUT CONTROL ..... ISN'T IT ABOUT DOMINATION ..... ISN'T IT ABOUT POWER .....
|
|
|
Post by blackbird on Jul 2, 2008 19:00:39 GMT -5
WHAT WE ARE SEEING HAS CEASED TO BE FUN ..... IT HAS CEASED TO BE FOR ENTERTAINMENT ..... THIS IS REAL AND IT IS HAPPENING NOW.
THERE ARE THOSE BEHIND THE SCENES WHO HARM OTHERS, AS WE HAVE BEEN SHOWN.
NOW IS THE TIME TO REALLY SEE WHAT HAPPENED IN THE PAST ..... AND TO SEE WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THE PRESENT.
***** IT'S NOT ENTERTAINMENT ANY LONGER. YOU CAN TELL THAT FROM THE VIDEOS ..... YOU CAN TELL THAT FROM THE DIALOG THAT HAS TAKEN PLACE ON THE IAMAPHONEY CHANNEL *****
|
|
|
Post by blackbird on Jul 2, 2008 19:28:19 GMT -5
THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN MURDER AND REPLACED FROM THE PAST - WHAT ABOUT THEM - THIS HAS AFFECTED SO MANY ENTERTAINERS.
I DON'T WANT TO GET INTO PHOTO COMPARISONS IN THIS THREAD BUT WE KNOW THAT MANY HAVE BEEN KILLED AND REPLACED.
I DIDN'T WANT TO LEAVE THEM OUT BECAUSE THIS GOES DEEPER THAN JAMES PAUL MCCARTNEY.
SOME WERE JUST MURDERED IN WAYS THAT MAY HAVE LOOKED LIKE SUICIDE.
WE WANT THEIR SOULS TO BE AT PEACE - WE WANTED THE TRUTH TO BE KNOWN - AND - WELL THAT IS WHAT WE ARE GETTING TRUTH ...... AND IT AIN'T PRETTY ...... BUT IT IS TRUTH !
IF THE VIDEOS WE ARE SEEING NOW ARE NOT A SLAP IN THE FACE THEN WE AREN'T LIVING ..... IT'S TIME TO SNAP OUT OF IT AND SEE.
|
|
|
Post by B on Jul 2, 2008 19:35:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Jul 2, 2008 22:50:29 GMT -5
Why is everybody screaming? we are here, relax. I've seen the vid, but not poster comments but I'll jog over in a minute. At any rate, Yoko is into Satan, which we knew.So was John, which we knew. Instead of screaming about it, just settle down and let's begin discussion, about what, I don't know because no one actually said anything....
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Jul 2, 2008 23:00:46 GMT -5
BUT THERE WAS MORE GOING ON AND THIS VIDEO SHOWS THAT THERE WAS MORE GOING ON ...... STILL GOING ON NOW .....CONTROL ..... ISN'T IT ABOUT CONTROL ..... ISN'T IT ABOUT DOMINATION ..... ISN'T IT ABOUT POWER ..... I got nuthin out of that "dialog" so what's it all about, Annie?
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Jul 2, 2008 23:25:10 GMT -5
ok, I see , something there
are you a good witch?
and which which is which?, to quote a friend.
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Jul 2, 2008 23:47:06 GMT -5
but let's remember: Indica Gallery was a counterculture art gallery in Mason's Yard (off Duke Street), Mayfair, London, England during the late 1960s, in the basement of the Indica Bookshop co-owned by John Dunbar, Peter Asher and Barry Miles . It was supported by Paul McCartney and hosted a show of Yoko Ono's work in November 1966 at which Ono first met John Lennon.[1] The International Times newspaper was started in the basement of the Indica bookshop.[2] Paul McCartney's involvement John Dunbar, Peter Asher and Barry Miles decided to start the Indica Gallery in September 1965, as an outlet for art and literature.[3] They found empty premises at 6 Masons Yard, which was in the same courtyard as the Scotch of St James club,[4] which McCartney frequently visited.[3] McCartney was the Indica bookshop's first customer - before it was officially opened - as he used to look through the books in the basement at night, and leave a note for the books he had taken to be put on his account.[3] Some of the first books he bought were Ed Sanders "Peace Eye Poems'", "and the Mind" by Deropp, and "Gandhi on Non-violence".[5] The wood that was needed for the shelves and shop counter was picked up from the lumber yard by Dunbar and Miles in McCartney's Aston Martin car.[5] Artists such as Pete Brown also helped in the renovation of the Indica, and Brown remarked that as he was helping to paint the interior, he would often look over his shoulder and see McCartney sawing a piece of wood. McCartney's girlfriend, Jane Asher, donated the shop's first cash till,[7] which was an old Victorian till that she had played with as a young girl.[7] McCartney helped to draw the flyers - which were used to advertise the Indica's opening - and also designed the wrapping paper.[6][8] Barry Miles later introduced McCartney to the works of William Burroughs, and Allen Ginsberg,[9] and their conversations were infused with subjects such as Buddhism, drugs, and 'pataphysics, which McCartney later put into the lyrics of Maxwell's Silver Hammer.[9] After one evening at Lennox Gardens, McCartney had an idea that he told to John Lennon the next day, which was an album title called "McCartney goes too far", which Lennon thought was a great title, and insisted that McCartney should do it.[10] In 1966, the Indica bookshop was separated from the Indica Gallery, and moved to 102 Southampton Row in the summer of 1966. the last not to be confused w/ the first ha ha jeeze, I actualy need the india graphic from an IAAP (maybe 231) vid that looks like: or this:
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jul 3, 2008 10:21:15 GMT -5
Satan, look at me... Has anybody here ever seen the 1965 film, SATAN'S BED, starring...wait for it..................Yoko Ono? I haven't seen it, but It just became priority number one. Here's a description from IMDB: "This movie has recently taken a place (alongside such gilded classics as Plan 9 from Outer Space and Manos, Hands of Fate) on my list of the Worst Movies of All Time. But don't let that discourage you! This movie is rarely less than entertaining. Yoko Ono stars (oddly enough, she gets top billing, even though this film was released a good three years before she became widely known) as a young Japanese who comes to the U.S. as the fiancee of a drug-smuggling government agent. And that's about as much sense as one can make of the plot, such as it is. The rest involves homicidal perverts and a succession of deeply unpleasant individuals. Whether you're pro-Yoko or anti-Yoko, you can't help but feel awful for her character in this film. Never before have I seen a pathetically innocent character treated so badly in a film. And that's where the caveat comes in: this movie can be a very nasty experience in places. The group of murderous perverts rape and kill a number of women before the film is over, and Yoko's character is frequently subjected to the nonconsensual sexual attentions of a portly, greasy-looking gentleman. It makes one wonder how anyone could have seen this film as genuine, unironic entertainment. The frequent nudity is barely titillating, and the nonstop sexual nastiness ought to be enough to remove any hope of arousal. That being said, this film is useful as an historical relic of the grindhouse market and is sufficient to whet your B-movie appetite." Here's a trailer for it. WARNING: there's a smidge of nudity: www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiUg6HE8hLo
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Jul 3, 2008 11:07:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jul 3, 2008 12:03:06 GMT -5
she was on the scene quite early, rember this? this is upside down, advanced mathematics was the line from the news reel......anyone have a clue what it means? That's the news reel that Yoko and Cox just happened to appear in, no? And through some freak, serendipitous accident, somehow managed to include the word NOW in all caps. As for the meaning, I just tried to enlarge it and sharpen the focus, but the notebook entry just continues to be unreadable. Furthermore, I needed summer school to get through Algebra I, so if it is indeed "advanced mathematics", then it's probably just as well that I can't read it...
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Jul 3, 2008 12:22:47 GMT -5
it's something about those "boxes"....I dunno either.... the flow
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Jul 3, 2008 13:06:04 GMT -5
JOHN. . . . YOKOHave you guys read the posts on the Iamaphoney Channel for the past many days? You can plainly see there is more going on that we think AND IT IS IN PRINT, RIGHT UNDER OUR NOSES. Go back and scan the posts from the past few days and further back. DO YOU SEE TAKE TIME AND LOOK IF YOU HAVE NOT.
THE BANTER THERE IS NOT "FUN" BANTER - NOT "PLAY" BANTER.
READ DEEPER - PLEASE GO AND READ could you please give examples of this? Perhaps I missed it....so are you saying Yoko is the Antichrist? That would stink. ;D
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Jul 3, 2008 17:54:41 GMT -5
Sorry, but I don't get it either. It's just another arty avant-video full of Beatle stuff. And I don't see any theatening comments, so I must be missing something.
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Jul 12, 2008 16:27:07 GMT -5
Satan, look at me... Has anybody here ever seen the 1965 film, SATAN'S BED, starring...wait for it..................Yoko Ono? I haven't seen it, but It just became priority number one. Here's a description from IMDB: "This movie has recently taken a place (alongside such gilded classics as Plan 9 from Outer Space and Manos, Hands of Fate) on my list of the Worst Movies of All Time. But don't let that discourage you! This movie is rarely less than entertaining. Yoko Ono stars (oddly enough, she gets top billing, even though this film was released a good three years before she became widely known) as a young Japanese who comes to the U.S. as the fiancee of a drug-smuggling government agent. And that's about as much sense as one can make of the plot, such as it is. The rest involves homicidal perverts and a succession of deeply unpleasant individuals. Whether you're pro-Yoko or anti-Yoko, you can't help but feel awful for her character in this film. Never before have I seen a pathetically innocent character treated so badly in a film. And that's where the caveat comes in: this movie can be a very nasty experience in places. The group of murderous perverts rape and kill a number of women before the film is over, and Yoko's character is frequently subjected to the nonconsensual sexual attentions of a portly, greasy-looking gentleman. It makes one wonder how anyone could have seen this film as genuine, unironic entertainment. The frequent nudity is barely titillating, and the nonstop sexual nastiness ought to be enough to remove any hope of arousal. That being said, this film is useful as an historical relic of the grindhouse market and is sufficient to whet your B-movie appetite." Here's a trailer for it. WARNING: there's a smidge of nudity: www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiUg6HE8hLoI just watched Satan's Bed. Well, I watched some of it and gave the fast-forward button a workout. Nothing to see here, folks. It's just a bad movie. A really bad movie. And this if coming from someone who LOVES bad movies. But not this one. Did I mention its badness yet? It's actually two movies in one. There's the Yoko half, where drug dealing mobsters have taken her hostage in order to convince her fiance' that he can't quit the mob. And then there's the half that's like a far less cohesive version of Last House On The Left, with two guys and a girl raping and robbing women. As far as I could tell, the two halves have nothing to do with one another. Again, the badness. Incidentally, Yoko made a VERY convincing Japanese woman. ;D
|
|