|
Post by JoJo on Mar 27, 2009 17:27:40 GMT -5
Evidently George knew Jon Lovitz. Lol, does look like him. I've seen pics of the late '66 India trip where George looked like this, so I'd say it's pretty likely.
|
|
|
Post by FP on Mar 27, 2009 18:16:30 GMT -5
Evidently George knew Jon Lovitz. Ramone! Patti is quite pretty in that picture. No need to draw attention to the fact that she gained some weight during that period.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Mar 27, 2009 18:31:34 GMT -5
The picture is dated September 29, 1966. But I wanted to get everyone's opinion first based on how George looked in the pic.
|
|
JS2
For Sale
Goo Goo G'Joob etc.
Posts: 192
|
Post by JS2 on Apr 27, 2009 8:00:24 GMT -5
True photo: The tampered one: None of THE BEATLES were the ORIGINAL ONES there ... Maybe the photographer took more than one picture? Give it up, Gnik.
|
|
|
Post by kvo on Dec 26, 2021 21:06:16 GMT -5
True photo: The tampered one: None of THE BEATLES were the ORIGINAL ONES there ... Maybe the photographer took more than one picture? Give it up, Gnik. Yes, none of the "Beatles" in this photo were the Beatlemania main "Fab Four" group (I believe there may very well have been a second string Fab Four group that performed sometimes during the live performance days). It is likely that Patti Boyd doesn't look right, as though she had gained weight, precisely because this isn't Patti Boyd in the photo. Just another look-a-like. How very shocking. The "George" and "John" are particularly comical. Who in heck were those guys? George looks like he aged 10 years overnight in this photo, but then miraculously got younger again by the time the studio film was made that was supposedly the recording of Hey Jude. The Beatles seemed to age in a very questionable way. Getting younger, then older, then young again, and so on.......
|
|