|
Post by ph0neyprophet on Dec 28, 2008 18:11:39 GMT -5
Looks fimiliar? I'm looking for that picture of Paul, with a huge forehead, and the same facial expression. Funny to see that picture in the version of Starting Over on Youtube played backwards..
|
|
|
Post by ph0neyprophet on Jan 11, 2009 9:26:10 GMT -5
Theree, this picture.
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Jan 11, 2009 22:21:59 GMT -5
I see what you mean about the forehead. Interesting...
|
|
|
Post by mommybird on Jan 11, 2009 22:36:36 GMT -5
And... There appears to be a resemblance but it is definitely not identical.
|
|
|
Post by MikeNL on Jan 12, 2009 5:39:39 GMT -5
This picture resembles a hideous picture of Faul.
---
you have a hatred towards post-66 McCartney or something?
|
|
|
Post by ph0neyprophet on Jan 12, 2009 14:10:54 GMT -5
No, of course not, but he doesn't even look like McCartney in that photo.
|
|
|
Post by ph0neyprophet on Feb 9, 2009 9:12:38 GMT -5
hmmmm.. maybe Paul and John helped each other out even after the Beatles breakup? Or I suppose it's possible that whomever Faul is, was also able to dress-up as Lennon and fill-in for him aswell from time to time? It would be the perfect double, who can imitate all..
|
|
|
Post by mommybird on Feb 9, 2009 10:41:50 GMT -5
Phoneyprophet, you might very well be right about that. Hmmmm....
|
|
|
Post by pauliedied on Feb 9, 2009 11:53:36 GMT -5
Yes that might be very right! Its very true: Paul and John shared one head. full legal proof:
|
|
|
Post by ph0neyprophet on Feb 9, 2009 12:42:46 GMT -5
I don't see why not. The image in the last post shows an amazing resemblence.. Their eye's are the same.. John's ears are smaller then Paul's, and I'm sure that if this did infact happen, Lennon's pinched nose would have easily become Macca's after some nose reduction surgery.
The one thing that nobody seems to notice about Paul now adays is how his hair has seem to look alot like John's.. One can only wonder, had Lennon not been shot what his hairline would look like, but maybe Paul is giving us the answer.
|
|
|
Post by FP on Feb 9, 2009 13:56:50 GMT -5
I don't see why not. The image in the last post shows an amazing resemblence.. Their eye's are the same.. John's ears are smaller then Paul's, and I'm sure that if this did infact happen, Lennon's pinched nose would have easily become Macca's after some nose reduction surgery. The one thing that nobody seems to notice about Paul now adays is how his hair has seem to look alot like John's.. One can only wonder, had Lennon not been shot what his hairline would look like, but maybe Paul is giving us the answer. You think John and Paul look more alike than Paul and Faul?
|
|
|
Post by ph0neyprophet on Feb 9, 2009 16:36:33 GMT -5
No, I'm saying that after seeing the image, if there would be anyone as Faul and get away with it because him and the real Paul look so much alike, it'd be Lennon. I'm not saying they look EXACTLY alike, but I'm saying with plastic surgery, John might be able to pull off Paul.
Lady Madonna definately suites Lennon if he were to sing the song. Pre-pepper, you can hear Lennon's voice hit that vocal that Paul uses to sing Madonna.
|
|
|
Post by ph0neyprophet on Feb 10, 2009 0:36:54 GMT -5
Oh! Wait a second, I flipped the two heads around! It really is kind of scary how the two of them have very similiar facial features. Edit: On second thought! I think we just found Faul!
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Feb 10, 2009 10:19:50 GMT -5
Incredible! Absolutely incredible!
Put two pictures together of Paul McCartney 1965 and Paul McCartney 1968 and some people will magnify whatever differences there are between them for the purpose of attempting to prove that they are not the same individual.
On the other hand, put two pictures together of John Lennon and Paul McCartney and some of those same people strain to find SIMILARITIES between them for the purpose of attempting to prove that they ARE the same individual.
In other words, Paul McCartney resembles John Lennon more than he resembles Paul McCartney.
Yes, of course, why didn't I think of it earlier? PIJ. Paul is John. No wonder there are no pictures of the two of them together.
|
|
|
Post by ph0neyprophet on Feb 10, 2009 12:30:55 GMT -5
No, no silly. When John was dealing with the government and had suspicion about death threats, he looked to Paul who suggested the idea of surgery since they both had similiar face features.
|
|
|
Post by pauliedied on Feb 10, 2009 14:04:43 GMT -5
No, no silly. When John was dealing with the government and had suspicion about death threats, he looked to Paul who suggested the idea of surgery since they both had similiar face features. yeah silly! why didnt you think of that! ;D
|
|
|
Post by ph0neyprophet on Feb 10, 2009 15:16:44 GMT -5
If those are the real Paul's eyes.. Then the other Paul in the previous picture next to John is Paul, but the photo with Paul's unusual looking face over John's face resemble Faul. I took John's photo with the original image above with the real Paul, and I overlapped them and drew on Paul's eyebrows along with cleaning John's messy face up a little bit, the resemblence to Faul is remarkable! Could it be possible in 1966 that Paul and John did have an argument and Paul left the Beatles? If they were dressing up as one another in previous photo shoots, could John might have took over as Paul? Maybe John got tired of Paul acting arrogant and Paul knew that so he left the Beatles, but John didn't want to breakup so George and Ringo stayed with him and they continued to write songs on their own until 1968 when Paul and John finally made up. Then of course the White Album was Paul's return album, then since they knew they were going to break up, but still being great friends, they made Abbey Road with Paul going along with the dead idea John gave earlier. This explains why John looked so different during MMT because without Paul, John needed someone to fill-in for him. Strawberry Fields was the last song John and Paul worked on together, as you can tell in the music video, the real Paul was in it, along with John dressing up as Paul. While they worked on the song, that was when Paul left, and out of anger, John, feeling as if he put Paul in his place, shouted out "I BURIED PAUL" at the end of the song. Sound like a real scenario now knowing that John did pretend to be Paul?
|
|
|
Post by puzzled on Feb 11, 2009 13:44:58 GMT -5
That first pic looks a lot like Stallone's eyes
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 11, 2009 14:11:41 GMT -5
hmmmm.. maybe Paul and John helped each other out even after the Beatles breakup? Or I suppose it's possible that whomever Faul is, was also able to dress-up as Lennon and fill-in for him aswell from time to time? It would be the perfect double, who can imitate all.. wow that is really scary. wat are you thinking?(john had surgery?!)
|
|
JS2
For Sale
Goo Goo G'Joob etc.
Posts: 192
|
Post by JS2 on Feb 11, 2009 14:36:39 GMT -5
If those are the real Paul's eyes.. Then the other Paul in the previous picture next to John is Paul, but the photo with Paul's unusual looking face over John's face resemble Faul. I took John's photo with the original image above with the real Paul, and I overlapped them and drew on Paul's eyebrows along with cleaning John's messy face up a little bit, the resemblence to Faul is remarkable! Could it be possible in 1966 that Paul and John did have an argument and Paul left the Beatles? If they were dressing up as one another in previous photo shoots, could John might have took over as Paul? Maybe John got tired of Paul acting arrogant and Paul knew that so he left the Beatles, but John didn't want to breakup so George and Ringo stayed with him and they continued to write songs on their own until 1968 when Paul and John finally made up. Then of course the White Album was Paul's return album, then since they knew they were going to break up, but still being great friends, they made Abbey Road with Paul going along with the dead idea John gave earlier. This explains why John looked so different during MMT because without Paul, John needed someone to fill-in for him. Strawberry Fields was the last song John and Paul worked on together, as you can tell in the music video, the real Paul was in it, along with John dressing up as Paul. While they worked on the song, that was when Paul left, and out of anger, John, feeling as if he put Paul in his place, shouted out "I BURIED PAUL" at the end of the song. Sound like a real scenario now knowing that John did pretend to be Paul? I could almost buy that. I was gonna do a similar thing, but as a hoax.
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on Feb 11, 2009 14:49:30 GMT -5
Incredible! Absolutely incredible! Put two pictures together of Paul McCartney 1965 and Paul McCartney 1968 and some people will magnify whatever differences there are between them for the purpose of attempting to prove that they are not the same individual. On the other hand, put two pictures together of John Lennon and Paul McCartney and some of those same people strain to find SIMILARITIES between them for the purpose of attempting to prove that they ARE the same individual. In other words, Paul McCartney resembles John Lennon more than he resembles Paul McCartney. Yes, of course, why didn't I think of it earlier? PIJ. Paul is John. No wonder there are no pictures of the two of them together. I feel your aggravation, 65if2007, I really do...
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 11, 2009 15:07:51 GMT -5
No, no silly. When John was dealing with the government and had suspicion about death threats, he looked to Paul who suggested the idea of surgery since they both had similiar face features. to go that far!? seriously?
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Feb 11, 2009 19:52:04 GMT -5
If those are the real Paul's eyes.. Then the other Paul in the previous picture next to John is Paul, but the photo with Paul's unusual looking face over John's face resemble Faul. I took John's photo with the original image above with the real Paul, and I overlapped them and drew on Paul's eyebrows along with cleaning John's messy face up a little bit, the resemblence to Faul is remarkable! Could it be possible in 1966 that Paul and John did have an argument and Paul left the Beatles? If they were dressing up as one another in previous photo shoots, could John might have took over as Paul? Maybe John got tired of Paul acting arrogant and Paul knew that so he left the Beatles, but John didn't want to breakup so George and Ringo stayed with him and they continued to write songs on their own until 1968 when Paul and John finally made up. Then of course the White Album was Paul's return album, then since they knew they were going to break up, but still being great friends, they made Abbey Road with Paul going along with the dead idea John gave earlier. This explains why John looked so different during MMT because without Paul, John needed someone to fill-in for him. Strawberry Fields was the last song John and Paul worked on together, as you can tell in the music video, the real Paul was in it, along with John dressing up as Paul. While they worked on the song, that was when Paul left, and out of anger, John, feeling as if he put Paul in his place, shouted out "I BURIED PAUL" at the end of the song. Sound like a real scenario now knowing that John did pretend to be Paul? I could almost buy that. I was gonna do a similar thing, but as a hoax. Oh fantastic, thanks.
|
|
|
Post by ph0neyprophet on Feb 12, 2009 12:51:37 GMT -5
On second thought, the whole government part does appear to be far-fetched.
But maybe Paul was John for a brief period, then John got tired of it and wanted Paul to do it on his own..
Then when Lennon came crying back, Paul told him to go **** himself.
|
|
|
Post by 65if2007 on Feb 12, 2009 14:22:59 GMT -5
On second thought, the whole government part does appear to be far-fetched. But maybe Paul was John for a brief period, then John got tired of it and wanted Paul to do it on his own.. Then when Lennon came crying back, Paul told him to go **** himself. Maybe, just maybe, it's always been nothing other than John, Paul, George and Ringo.
|
|