|
Post by iameye on Feb 21, 2009 0:51:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by FP on Feb 21, 2009 2:33:49 GMT -5
Still, the nose looks too small in the boat pic to be Derek imo. The Ovation network was just showing Imagine, and Derek Taylor is in the scene where Lennon is arguing with Al Capp. The guy on the boat isn't Derek Taylor. Watch here at 4:46. Derek Taylor has a weak chin and a big nose. I still stand by my opinion. Hopefully it'll be confirmed tomorrow.
|
|
dark66horse
Hard Day's Night
Nobody can deny that there's something there...
Posts: 23
|
Post by dark66horse on Feb 21, 2009 5:28:41 GMT -5
A Pepper Faul nose indeed. Hey, now please have a look at this and think for a moment about the possibility that the Beatles (Paul in particular) could have been cloned! The idea is that George W. Bush was one of several clones. Only change the words "Bush" with "Beatles" or "Paul". "The Bush clones were in fact identical twins as the zygote was split and implanted into Barbara and several surrogate mothers. So George W. Bush was not one man but three - identical zygote multiples raised to come into power at this time". Bush 1 (up to 2004) had a nose that skewed to his left, due to his nose having been broken in the past, and was clearly a party animal. He was the dominant clone in the White House during the early years of the George W. Bush presidency. Bush 2 (2004-2008) was a worry wort - requiring tranquilizers, having a nervous colon, and hitting the bottle. The faces of Bush 1 and Bush 2 were so dramatically different that there was buzz on the internet when Bush 2 stepped in to take over after the 2004 elections. Had the president had a nose job? Bush 3. March, 2008 is the switch date. He's calmer and with a thinner face, he doesn't slur his words as Bush 2 did. The sarcastic laugh of Bush 2 is also missing. Someone mentioned that Bush 3 even seems to have a "European accent".
|
|
|
Post by B on Feb 21, 2009 6:27:40 GMT -5
dark66horse, it is common courtesy to site sources when quoting someone else's material. Not only that, but by doing so, you save the forum you post the material to from potential lawsuits. Please make it a habit to post your source when you use other peoples' material; particularly when posting their written material. I believe that the source of what you've posted is zetatalk.com/ , but in any case, I shouldn't have to guess. Lest I be called a hypocrite, let me explain that although I posted a devil picture stolen from Rense.com, I didn't post what is termed "intellectual property", with David Dee's words accompanying it, as if I were the source of the ideas. That is the difference between what you did, and what I did. By rights, I really should have posted the source of the picture in any case, but frankly, I knew I could get away with not doing so, as the popular image of satan is pretty much in the public domain. That is to say, it isn't any one individual's "intellectual property". dark66horse wrote: "Hey, now please have a look at this and think for a moment about the possibility that the Beatles (Paul in particular) could have been cloned!"I have posted about that very thought in other threads. * I believe it is one of the meanings intended to be conveyed in the Magical Mystery Tour cartoon book and movie. But what is significant is why cloning might be associated with The Beatles. I think that there may have been people who used genetic material taken from Egyptian mummies to try to see if the personages of old could be brought to life in "modern" times. I think there are a number of individuals who may have been brought to life with the use of cloning techniques, with Paul McCartney possibly being one (among many) of such individuals. ** I have pointed out such songs as "Spirits of Ancient Egypt" by Wings, "My Mummy's Dead" by John Lennon, and "My Ever-Present Past" by McCartney as being suggestive of such a possibility. I would much prefer that anyone considering such a thing use Beatle-related material than any of the allegations of Nancy Lieder from Zeta Talk that Bush is a clone, though I suppose that helps bolster the argument. Or not. Images courtesy of iamaphoney ;D* invanddis.proboards29.com/index.cgi?board=Clues&action=display&thread=5310&page=1** Dave Clark Five (Rare Footage)www.youtube.com/watch?v=sehYnUVAcZM Check out Mike Smith at about 1:48, 3:06, and especially 4:46. Look familiar?The plan may have been to bring the best of the clones into The Beatles. (I know how absurd that sounds.) And just to be clear, I don't know for a fact that Mike Smith is a clone; I'm just speculating that he may be one. Even in 2003 there's a Faul resemblance, imo: www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ixzkg5O0co
|
|
|
Post by mommybird on Feb 21, 2009 8:33:58 GMT -5
Trutha posted this: www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYHv0uwMY5c If you haven't watched it yet, you should. It's the origin of the photos of Faul with his left ear improperly attached. RedLion posted: Yesterday at 5:04pm, Grannybird wrote:Someone on my forum pointed out that Paul looks as he did in 1965, not 1966. Either way, he is wearing something that I have seen him in before. It may be a big stretch, but is there any chance JPM had an outfit that you never saw him in? RedLion, I do wonder why with all that has been said by Valis and DarkHorse, it's my post that you feel you need to sarcastically comment on. I may say things that you disapprove of, but I do try very hard NOT to make it personal against you. Thank you for posting that link, Trutha. I've been wondering for awhile where those photos came from. What cracks me up is the yahoo on the David Icke forum who stated that the original video footage does NOT show an anomaly. You showed him, eh ! ;D
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Feb 21, 2009 10:10:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Feb 21, 2009 10:33:11 GMT -5
Thanks for posting "Derek On The Boat", JoJo! Here's a comparison. For my money, the length of the jawline seems too different. The "Pepper Paul" jawline is shorter in a way that I don't think is explained by the angle. It seems to me as if a Pepper Paul face had been "attached" to Derek's prior to the original publication. Along this "seam". As illogical as this would initially seem, it's really not that different from any of the other intentionally placed clues we've been investigating.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Feb 21, 2009 10:56:39 GMT -5
Keep in mind PL that the quality of the black and white photo is low so that can change the shape of a face.
I still believe there was a different Faul for late 1966 through mid 1967. Just not sure this is him on the boat. Thanks for the scan Jojo.
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Feb 21, 2009 13:13:10 GMT -5
A Pepper Faul nose indeed. T . Had the president had a nose job? ] hey is that 12 degrees? "Capsicum Orion (USDA Organic) Pepper Hybrid, Capsicum 'Orion', is a plant with bountiful foliage that produces large, smooth, thick-walled fruits. Its blocky, 4-lobed peppers are thick walled, widely adapted, and tolerant to hot weather. At 65 days the fruit can be harvested green or if left on the plant will turn red at about 85 days. Multiple disease resistances make Orion a superstar in your garden. Capsicum refers to a wide variety of tropical pepper plants with the genus of the same name. The name is perhaps derived from the Latin ""capsa,"" or box for the pod-like fruit. Capsicum is a relative of the tomato and requires similar growing conditions." ;D www.naturehills.com/product/organic_orion_pepper.aspx
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Feb 21, 2009 13:34:20 GMT -5
Thanks for posting "Derek On The Boat", JoJo! It seems to me as if a Pepper Paul face had been "attached" to Derek's prior to the original publication. Along this "seam". thanks JoJo! it's just too grainy and the light is shitty............. side burns match, though also.
|
|
|
Post by mommybird on Feb 21, 2009 13:45:05 GMT -5
PL, you could very well be right. I would not be surprised by anything at this stage of the game.
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Feb 21, 2009 13:58:51 GMT -5
John had a sandwich that day but is happening in this photo?
|
|
dark66horse
Hard Day's Night
Nobody can deny that there's something there...
Posts: 23
|
Post by dark66horse on Feb 21, 2009 14:16:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mrshears on Feb 21, 2009 15:22:17 GMT -5
im pretty sure that who we think is 67 paul is derek.
|
|
dark66horse
Hard Day's Night
Nobody can deny that there's something there...
Posts: 23
|
Post by dark66horse on Feb 21, 2009 15:41:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Feb 21, 2009 16:48:04 GMT -5
Dear dark66horse,
Our staff has opted not to approve your account, and therefore it has been removed.
PAUL IS DEAD! MISS HIM MISS HIM MISS HIM!
Their quota of "good post" posters is filled, and pure logic does not mix well on emotionally driven forums.
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Feb 21, 2009 16:52:11 GMT -5
Funny indeed. Why would anybody wanna be on such a closed minded forum anyway? I got news for'em...... Paul ain't dead. Anyway, I'm off to go see the Fab 5 out of Houston. Saw them last year & they're a great band. Got front row center seats for the young'un & myself.... it'll be her first rockshow. ;D
|
|
|
Post by FP on Feb 21, 2009 16:52:57 GMT -5
Dear dark66horse,
Our staff has opted not to approve your account, and therefore it has been removed.
PAUL IS DEAD! MISS HIM MISS HIM MISS HIM!Their quota of "good post" posters is filled, and pure logic does not mix well on emotionally driven forums. Bush clones = pure logic?
|
|
|
Post by mommybird on Feb 21, 2009 18:09:30 GMT -5
Eyesbleed, sorry that you feel that way. You know that I have the greatest respect for you. You would be welcome on my forum anyday of the week, no matter what your beliefs are now. You & I have history. Dark66Horse, sorry if I've offended you. Yes, my forum is strictly PID. It says so in the header. I fail to see why this makes us "closed minded" ? So, we believe differently than many of you. So what ? We have had people who think differently join us & it just causes consternation. My time on the internet is frequently limited, and I would much rather spend it discussing what I'm interested in discussing. I do not have time to go back & forth about the most basic premise ( whether Paul did indeed die in September 1966 ). BTW, I have discussed your posts here, as have many other members of my forum. I'm really sick of being put down because of what I believe. That is the main reason that a forum was created for me. It is so I can discuss my beliefs with people with like minds. There are other forums for discussing variations of this issue, such as NIR. I denied you, and others like yourself, because the members of my forum do not have the time ( or the inclination ) to refute other's viewpoints. You are entitled to believe what you believe, as are we. There are a few of us who do so on the David Icke forum, but that is by choice. My forum is meant to be a place where people who believe that Paul died can discuss it in peace. I am really starting to feel unwelcome here. Has this forum now become a place only for people who believe that Paul was replaced temporarily or not replaced at all ? If so, I will be happy to leave here for good.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Feb 21, 2009 18:42:29 GMT -5
Has this forum now become a place only for people who believe that Paul was replaced temporarily or not replaced at all ? If so, I will be happy to leave here for good.
It's the current topic of discussion of late, by those who feel strongly about it.. I think that describes the situation accurately? Who knows, perhaps some other topic will bump this one, that's the fluid nature of internet forums. (especially one that allows all points of view to be discussed)
OK, I know some who frequent MFH may feel when they come here, their points of view are not welcomed at all, but we at least start from the premise that Paul was replaced.. If you're not on board with that, then you probably aren't going to find your points are well received.
Other than that, and I'm reminded of this because of the recent five year anniversary, the discussion amongst the original founders was that we needed a place where differing ideas were not constrained by a moderator or moderators who ban or otherwise chastise those who don't tow the line.. To, oh I dunno, a document written in Nepalese?
NIR should stay what it is, a place for an assortment of differing views. Those that spin off their own forums so they can have a place they want to discuss their own views, more power to them, and D66H, they have the right to admit or deny anyone they wish.
|
|
|
Post by mommybird on Feb 21, 2009 18:51:37 GMT -5
Jo posted: NIR should stay what it is, a place for an assortment of differing views. Those that spin off their own forums so they can have a place they want to discuss their own views, more power to them, and D66H, they have the right to admit or deny anyone they wish. That is how I feel also. I like coming here, because I am interested in seeing other people's viewpoints. Not to mention that I have friends here. I am more than willing to discuss all viewpoints here, when I have the time. I like having a place where I can focus on my beliefs without interruption.
|
|
|
Post by Jai Guru Deva on Feb 21, 2009 19:04:45 GMT -5
Hey, I'm not so sure we're not looking at two different boats. There seem to be some minor structural differences in design. However, if it is the same boat, then photos must have been taken at different times. I can't then explain why some furniture appears in one and disappears in the other...
|
|
|
Post by P(D)enny La(i)ne on Feb 21, 2009 19:10:00 GMT -5
John had a sandwich that day but is happening in this photo? iameye, what are you saying, here? I feel as if you've left a word out of your sentence?
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Feb 21, 2009 19:47:20 GMT -5
John had a sandwich that day but is happening in this photo? iameye, what are you saying, here? I feel as if you've left a word out of your sentence? ha yea, sorry should read: but what is happening in this photo?
|
|
|
Post by B on Feb 21, 2009 20:04:33 GMT -5
His breakfast is about to leave the table? Those Chinese junks pitch and yaw, you know.
|
|