|
Post by JoJo on May 22, 2009 17:18:35 GMT -5
That chin thing... kinda cool i have to admit. But it's not impossible to replicate with plastic surgery... I don't really want to start and arguement but how do you explain the earlobes and changes in singing voice? But if you were going to have an easier time of it from the POV of a surgeon charged with the task, you would absolutely want the jawline to be on the money. Teeth, eyebrows, eye color (yes even in the late 60's) can be changed, and most importantly, the cheekbones. It involves a hammer and some plaster type material to make the shattered cheek bones grow back the way you want.. must hurt like hell.
|
|
|
Post by Jai Guru Deva on May 23, 2009 17:38:17 GMT -5
Well you know, the fake ears certainly enhance the illusion...
|
|
|
Post by iameye on May 23, 2009 20:18:58 GMT -5
House of Mica/Macca
sorry couldn't resist. Carry on
|
|
|
Post by thisone on May 23, 2009 21:50:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on May 24, 2009 2:55:06 GMT -5
I think it's just an internal bulletin board for Arkham Asylum. They forgot to set their privacy settings correctly. Nothing to worry about.
|
|
Jude
Hard Day's Night
Acting Naturally
Posts: 34
|
Post by Jude on May 24, 2009 11:27:54 GMT -5
Thank you for having the guts to stand up and laugh at MFH's idiocy. I tried to join them a long time ago...not looking for an argument, just good Beatles-related conversation. But like you say, it's all name calling and excessive smilies at that place. PIDiots indeed! And when you try to point out to them how stupid they look they either giggle some more or get their panties in a twist like JS2 just did. Don't whine, JS2. You know it's true.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on May 24, 2009 23:49:38 GMT -5
It looks like they've been keeping a couple of Paul clone heads in a jar of preservative fluids for photographic uses. They rotate one head on a rotisserie and photograph it 360º while make-up artists prepare the other one for the next session. Then they select good angles and superimpose the head image over headless dressed dummies on a wire. This way Sir Paul can make live appearances all about town while his artificial heads covered the PR duties. Just think, you can go to the bank, make a withdrawal, and Sir Mannequin does the droll work for you.
|
|
|
Post by pauliedied on May 25, 2009 1:42:12 GMT -5
It looks like they've been keeping a couple of Paul clone heads in a jar of preservative fluids for photographic uses. They rotate one head on a rotisserie and photograph it 360º while make-up artists prepare the other one for the next session. Then they select good angles and superimpose the head image over headless dressed dummies on a wire. This way Sir Paul can make live appearances all about town while his artificial heads covered the PR duties. Just think, you can go to the bank, make a withdrawal, and Sir Mannequin does the droll work for you. Yeah, either that, or: he isn't dead... ;D
|
|
|
Post by Jai Guru Deva on May 25, 2009 2:25:34 GMT -5
You know, for some reason the brains of Young Frankenstein come to mind-- "Abby Normal"...
|
|
|
Post by mumrikusstarr on May 25, 2009 11:05:06 GMT -5
LOL Doc i think your really onto something
|
|
|
Post by Doc on May 25, 2009 23:59:57 GMT -5
You know, for some reason the brains of Young Frankenstein come to mind-- "Abby Normal"... So many great "Abby"s in the world; Abby Hoffman, Abby Lincoln, Abby from N.C.I.S., Abby Rose, Abigail Van Buren, Abby Rhode, Lil' Abner, you know, on and on. Yes. Gosh thank you. Abby Normal is the brains behind many an institution.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on May 26, 2009 0:45:41 GMT -5
LOL Doc i think your really onto something My first answer. Yes it's deep, but I think we've stumbled across the mannequin linkage. Some of the decoys were mannequin's on long cables, yanked through the airport crowds as a puppet show. Even the original Beatles were all puppets. Long before the truth could leak out, EMI/Capitol decided to hire four real guys to do the job. The New, Real Beatles were gradually revealed to the public in stages, replacing the 4 moptop Pinocchios that had been working via remote control since the signing of their first record contract. "Show biz makes mannequins of us all." -----Doc, 1987 "Ain't it the truth, ain't it the truth." -----Sylvester the Cat, 1956 "What's Up, Doc?" ----Bugs H. Bunny, 1949 Upon reviewing this tawdry, stupid, witless dreck, I reject it out of hand. My reworked response: Well, OK, really, the puppet thing is totally stupid but it raises a question of, in fact, ARE there elements of the puppetry arts that come close in any way to explaining the aura of mystery surrounding the marvelous Beatles band circa 1966-67? [cue dramatic background music from the TV series "Land of the Lost", Sid and Marty Krofft, circa 1974.........] ... which, in fact, begs the question as to whether or not CAN I use copyrighted television music from 35 years ago to underscore and accent my dramatic (though often puerile) text on message board forums? Do the Harry Fox people troll the net looking for infractions? Or even infarctions? No, no attack there. Could someone be fined for saying, "Underscore my next paragraph with the Theme Music from Jaws" can John Williams or even ASCAP come and do a cease and desist? I mean, I don't provide the music you see, only the title, which implicates the sound of the music to most people, thereby activating the song to play in their heads, automatically, from a recording in their subconscious. Wait---is that legal? Can we have a recording in our heads of "Hey, Jude"? I mean, I can make it play in my head at will from memory, YET I pay no further royalty. Do I owe for my memory of songs? Hmmmm................ Well, puppets have no memory, and puppets pay no royalty. They get off scott-free for just about everything. They pose themselves, and move according to somebody else's will, and don't worry about anything at all. But the puppets can never explain how it all works, because they aren't making it work, really, and frankly they don't care. Their existence is to entertain the crowd and tell the story, sing the songs. But since it's all a show anyway, it isn't so bad being the puppet, because the puppet is just helping the unseen puppet Master give the audience exactly what it wants anyhow. So, in the end you see, it is the audience who makes the demand on the master to make the puppets dance for us. So, if the theory of PID or PIA were true, ultimately, it is in fact we kids of that generation who provided the force for it to unroll, the Puppet Masters gave it the money and the method to play it out, as the Puppetry Players gave us the Big show that we asked for. Got'chur tickets?
|
|
|
Post by mumrikusstarr on May 26, 2009 0:57:57 GMT -5
I'm playing "Strawberry Fields" in my head right now, does that mean i'm going to jail? O.o
|
|
|
Post by Doc on May 26, 2009 3:37:32 GMT -5
I'm playing "Strawberry Fields" in my head right now, does that mean i'm going to jail? O.o I think they can only enforce it in the same place in which the "crime" was committed. If you actively listen to it in your mind, then you'll be sentenced to pay a fine and remanded to spend 10 days to the jail inside your head. Cerebral lock-down. Oh woe, woe and alas.
|
|
|
Post by B on May 26, 2009 9:37:09 GMT -5
Doc wrote: "Ain't it the truth, ain't it the truth." -----Sylvester the Cat, 1956BZZZT! NO, I'm sorry. That is incorrect according to the judges. It was Snagglepuss. from wikipedia:"Snagglepuss first appeared in several episodes of The Quick Draw McGraw Show and became a regular segment on The Yogi Bear Show. In his earliest appearances he was orange instead of pink and called Snaggletooth. In later episodes, Snaggletooth was referred to as Snagglepuss's cousin. He also appeared in other Hanna-Barbera series such as Yogi's Gang in 1973, as a co-host for Laff-A-Lympics in 1977 and 1978, Yogi's Treasure Hunt in 1985 and as a teenager on Yo Yogi! in 1991." Sylvester Sufferin' Succotash!
|
|
|
Post by mumrikusstarr on May 26, 2009 11:04:40 GMT -5
I'm playing "Strawberry Fields" in my head right now, does that mean i'm going to jail? O.o I think they can only enforce it in the same place in which the "crime" was committed. If you actively listen to it in your mind, then you'll be sentenced to pay a fine and remanded to spend 10 days to the jail inside your head. Cerebral lock-down. Oh woe, woe and alas. ;D
|
|
JS2
For Sale
Goo Goo G'Joob etc.
Posts: 192
|
Post by JS2 on May 28, 2009 9:41:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mumrikusstarr on May 28, 2009 11:45:33 GMT -5
LOL JS2 thanks for the commercial!
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on May 29, 2009 6:21:36 GMT -5
Dear god....
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on May 29, 2009 10:25:25 GMT -5
FUNNY! So why are y'all still stuck on the whole PIA vs PID thing? That's so yesterday. I'm PIA & I disagree with y'all (almost) entirely. You haven't even begun to disprove the existance of the replacement.
|
|
JS2
For Sale
Goo Goo G'Joob etc.
Posts: 192
|
Post by JS2 on May 29, 2009 11:21:26 GMT -5
Someone asked me to post that, I'm tired of this PID vs. PIA shit.
|
|
|
Post by FP on May 29, 2009 11:47:53 GMT -5
You haven't even begun to disprove the existance of the replacement. It doesn't work that way - it's your job to prove his existence (in ways other than saying "open yer eyes!!" ;D ). Clearly, since you still believe there was a replacement, and we don't, all evidence on both sides will always be seen subjectively.
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on May 29, 2009 22:32:34 GMT -5
You haven't even begun to disprove the existance of the replacement. It doesn't work that way - it's your job to prove his existence (in ways other than saying "open yer eyes!!" ;D ).. Ya, well I guess I could've done without that last sentence Clearly, since you still believe there was a replacement, and we don't, all evidence on both sides will always be seen subjectively. Can't argue with that
|
|