|
Post by mysteryhair on Jan 1, 2011 23:15:16 GMT -5
A new year, a new .LeveL. †heRigh†Album was announced to come out October 3rd and it throws up some questions:
Are all tracks going to be sung by the good old iamaphoney singer or are we going to enjoy "Shoes" and "Jesus To Paul" by Paul and John too ?
Is †heRigh†Album going to be available as a physical CD or only on youtube.com/iamaphoney and TheWingedBeatle.com ?
MikeNL's facebook page:
It seems to me that "we" are mike and the whoeverisaphoney musician. I'd be happy to hear that mikey would make an appearance on †heRigh†Album.
What are your speculations about the right album ?
|
|
|
Post by MikeNL on Jan 2, 2011 15:12:45 GMT -5
No no no. I don't have anything to do with The Right Album.
Me and my friends are working on something else.
|
|
|
Post by mysteryhair on Jan 25, 2011 16:26:23 GMT -5
I guess the right album will have 14 or 15 songs including Jesus To Paul (I Found Out) and Shoes. I'm not sure about Now and Then, although tens of thousands have listened to his version of the song without even knowing it! I was rather surprised when I heard an excerpt of it on the austrian radio Didn't Revlover record some of the songs at AIR studios ? There should be therefore high quality tracks on the album. It's highly unlikely that TheRightAlbum will be available in stores and if so then there is a possibility that it'll appear on EMI
|
|
|
Post by seasaltcaramel on Feb 14, 2011 1:32:11 GMT -5
im curious... my thought was the code was actually a cipher and by applying the cipher to the code (album) a story would unfold. im imaging something like the album "zaireeka" by the flaming lips. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zaireekato be honest i haven't put much thought into the album. not out of ignorance, or anything like that but because the music is only a fraction of the mystery. if they are indeed magicians we only see the spell. for instance, i can easily imagine some one thinking for a moment that all the love songs that have been written are tributes to lucifer, or they are tributes to some great entity that's throne happens to be in our skulls. i can imagine that, and i can only assume that other people would at least be willing to consider that as a possibility. i think it's a possibility that this idea must have gone around the freak community at some point (and probably still does). The point behind the right album is that there is nothing very upfront about what it actually is. it is being dealt with in a very "occult" manner. If we were to think of the right album as an entity in it's own right what do we have? there is a lot of expectation for it's arrival, there are a lot of insinuations about what it is. but there is a lot of doubt. the great mystery is if the entity should be as confident as it appears to be. what is it capable of doing? we are told it will be a "revelation", is this figurative (a two month ordeal and it's forgotten) or literal (heironymous bosch). it appears to be of cosmic stock, not unlike the cosmic slop of parliament, but far less funky. or funky in a different way. this might sound very strange but here is what im thinking: 1882 has some deep lyrics, on many levels. could it be referring to wanting to be a beatle? or is it the words of wisdom from a beatle to an aspiring musician? but it seems like more than that. the master has a much deeper aspiration, he has been left with a responsibilty and he has been put in a situation were he is close to cracking up.
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Feb 14, 2011 11:49:11 GMT -5
im curious... my thought was the code was actually a cipher and by applying the cipher to the code (album) a story would unfold. im imaging something like the album "zaireeka" by the flaming lips. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zaireekato be honest i haven't put much thought into the album. not out of ignorance, or anything like that but because the music is only a fraction of the mystery. if they are indeed magicians we only see the spell. for instance, i can easily imagine some one thinking for a moment that all the love songs that have been written are tributes to lucifer, or they are tributes to some great entity that's throne happens to be in our skulls. i can imagine that, and i can only assume that other people would at least be willing to consider that as a possibility. i think it's a possibility that this idea must have gone around the freak community at some point (and probably still does). The point behind the right album is that there is nothing very upfront about what it actually is. it is being dealt with in a very "occult" manner. If we were to think of the right album as an entity in it's own right what do we have? there is a lot of expectation for it's arrival, there are a lot of insinuations about what it is. but there is a lot of doubt. the great mystery is if the entity should be as confident as it appears to be. what is it capable of doing? we are told it will be a "revelation", is this figurative (a two month ordeal and it's forgotten) or literal (heironymous bosch). it appears to be of cosmic stock, not unlike the cosmic slop of parliament, but far less funky. or funky in a different way. this might sound very strange but here is what im thinking: 1882 has some deep lyrics, on many levels. could it be referring to wanting to be a beatle? or is it the words of wisdom from a beatle to an aspiring musician? but it seems like more than that. the master has a much deeper aspiration, he has been left with a responsibilty and he has been put in a situation were he is close to cracking up. lol ;D Well, if you consider your own reflection, you will see the "Right" album very easily.
|
|
|
Post by vOOdOOgurU on Sept 16, 2012 22:38:13 GMT -5
All I know is "UsedToSing" kicks ass. I've heard all of Volume 1 & 2, and was a fan of "TeenageLucifer" back when it was Teeny Lucifer. I think I preferred the earlier, more orchestrated version as opposed to the more tabla/guitar version, but it's still a great song, and my favourite of them all. If the RottenApple movies didn't tip me off, the production on TheRightAlbum definitely did. When I first saw TheRottenApple films, my first thought was, "whoever is making these movies has access to TOO much stuff." Let alone the editing, which said to me someone knew what they were doing and had the tools to do it. I just remember the information that Paul was in Africa in 1966 startled me. Cuz I remember the days of Anthology where Neil Aspinall never said where he went. I remember the 1970's and being a huge Beatles fanatic ( but I had more George Harrison solo albums than Beatles albums to be honest. I was a GH fan.), and the mythic tale of John went to Spain, and Ringo joined him there, and George went to India. I do not ever remember there being tale of where Paul went. Apparently this tale was told in Beatles Monthly, but I missed that issue. My grandparents used to send me the reprints done in the 80's of this magazine, but only intermittently. I don't have the complete set, and oddly enough, they sent me most of the issues post-1966. When I come to this site, I'm always reminded; I never liked Paul in the first place. Call it a kid's instincts, or even that part-animal we all are that still senses something amiss or danger. Who knows that primal instinct and how it works, but we must retain it somewhat regardless of "civilisation" and order in the chaos. We still don't like some people on first impression. May it be a picture, or in person. George John Ringo Paul My order of preference when I was about 8 or 9 years old. Just did not like Paul very much at all. Didn't like many of his songs, thought George kicked his ass all over the place musically and lyrically, and ... yeah. George Ringo ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ John Paul This is how it is now. I don't like John or Paul very much at all. Still like some of their songs (more John's than Paul's) but as people, and how they lived/live their lives, don't like them at all. Plus in a society where Ike Turner and John Lennon can be accused of the same crimes to people, but John was "just going through issues" and Ike is portrayed as a villain, well ... not much changes under the sun. (Abusive husband/errant father/drug addict/prone to violence) It's why when I see some of the things said about what PID is all about, I sit back and say, well what if you don't like Paul, or many of his songs at all? Where does that leave you if he's Saturn or an alien, or a lizard, or a double, or Aleister Crowley's son. What if you just think his songs are dead boring and can't figure out why he receives accolades as a songwriter, when he's nothing compared to a Brian Wilson pre-breakdown. As a musician myself who plays multiple instruments, I can't listen to anything Paul ever did apart from RAM and Back to the Egg with any sense that he gave a toss what he wrote. And how Geoff Emerick won a Grammy in 1973 for Band on the Run I'll never know. Any album I have that Emerick engineered/mixed for other artists, got remixed by someone else at a later stage. Cheap Trick's "All Shook Up" should've been one of those ones. Murky, muddy, dead sounding. Especially compared to their first 4 albums, which by the way, most bands would kill to have their first 4 albums ALL be as good. Anyway! (I apologise, I wanted to write something of an overview like this before, this just seemed good opportunity to do so.) Though I don't listen to TheRightAlbum often, because like others, I'm not sure exactly what its agenda is. And I take the "occult" seriously. Not because I believe in it myself, but that I believe OTHERS believe in it. And I take that seriously. I don't know what iamaphoney's agenda is. I just know they have access to material's they shouldn't have, and their production skills say they have tools that say "professional". Or at least the skills to use what tools are out there in a professional manner. He/They are no amateurs in two media related fields; film and music. Being an expert or experienced in one is sometimes too much for some. Not many can master one let alone two. (Todd Rundgren and Mike Nesmith will give it a go though ) Which always said to me iamaphoney has help here, or its a group working together in different media. Whether that group was Apple related/MACCA related or not was in question as soon as the films were released and not one single pulldown from Youtube. Even with accusations rife within about the character of a certain individual, nothing was removed. TheRightAlbum has been on iTUnes for months now. Not one single removal of it by Apple. That says loads. Tons. They don't mind it being out there at all. And for a company who went after The Rutles for cash (cuz that's all you need), going after money from someone perceived as a ... well whatever iamaphoney is perceived as, Apple would want money from him/them on ANY thing even remotely related to The Beatles. Images. Content. Samples. Creative Work. They'd find some way of pulling it, even with it being BACKWARDS --- and I must say TheRightAlbum's backwards and forwards elements are pretty awesome. It's one of the best Beatles related products I've heard in years. BeReverse, UsedToSing, Kathy, MakeNoize, TeenageLucifer, LikeMoreWizards are all brilliant. Love those songs. Whether I'm morphing into a conduit for an inter-dimensional portal allowing beings from in between the spaces between spaces I don't know. I guess it may be better than being a conduit for ... well what music is around nowadays. And there are good artists out there, it's just you rarely hear about them moreso than ever before. At least in the 1970's, being good looking wasn't necessary. You could be Fairport Convention and get an audience. And get on TV. And etc. No further rant on the state of the music industry is to follow. I'm just saying, TheRightAlbum is fresh, inventive and has great songs on it. I prefer "Real Love" in reverse. I think "UsedToSing" is a better song. Though I miss the great George Harrison guitar solo. And what is it with Paul saying John would have vetoed George playing slide guitar on Threetles songs??? Did he not hear Mind Games? Or #9 Dream? Or most of Walls & Bridges? IT MIGHT AS WELL BE GEORGE HARRISON playing on those songs. Mind Games sounds more like a early 1970's Harrisong than a Lennontune. I don't like Paul. Never have. What this means for me coming up in TheRevelation I have no clue. I'll still like RAM and Back to the Egg regardless, but beat my head against a wall at the waste of a great idea "Monkberry Moon Delight" was, until he started screaming all over it. Great song, stupid vocal. And I don't like what happened to Mal Evans. Even before he got shot. He was loyal to them, and got very little in return for it. And the person he was most loyal to, well, I don't like very much at all. And seeing him go after Evans widow about auctioned goods ... it's just crap. It's like The Eagles suing Eagles.
|
|
|
Post by vOOdOOgurU on Sept 16, 2012 22:52:56 GMT -5
^^^^ and apologies for the rambling post up above. As said, I wanted to write something like an overview of impressions. About a bunch of things. The post above got that out of my system. And I can hear the difference between the Paul McCartney that wrote "Things We Said Today" and the one that wrote "Hey Jude". The first one was a better songwriter. How a 5 year old boy is supposed to go out and get her unless he was in the Children of God/Family International I'll never know. Saying a song was inspired by a child coping with his parent's separation, and then lyrically making nothing after the 1st verse have anything to do with that, is just bad songwriting. To accuse Harrison of being "religious" when you got Hark the Angels come in "Let It Be" is just being ... stupid. Nothing Harrison ever said made him out to be any better than anyone else in this material world. He was just as guilty, and admitted when he was not guilty for your choices. It was all "who could see it." I'm ranting and rambling again, like a Limestone Cowboy.
|
|
|
Post by vOOdOOgurU on Sept 16, 2012 23:01:13 GMT -5
and at least Harrison let Billy Preston out of his Apple contract when the ship was going down!!! If only Badfinger had had that fortune. Because in my mind, McCartney is attributable to their fortunes and how they went. And when I see people online scapegoating Joey Molland as if he's a villain, when he was the one telling them to get rid of their manager, which definitely would have saved Pete Ham's life if they did.
But it's that Ike Turner/John Lennon thing. Despite all the evidence in front of our faces, we need a villain. We request it. We sometimes demand it. Meanwhile, the true villains ride off in the sunset, smiling they got away with it one more time.
|
|
|
Post by B on Sept 18, 2012 22:24:12 GMT -5
jessbottles wrote: "i have studied very carefully the voices in this recording and i will give an opinion without hesitation that this is NOT merely a Paul impressionist... this particular recording, only this song in his repertoire (as far as i can tell) is a DUET with none other than you know who himself" Oh Wow!!!!!!!!!!!! I hadn't been paying much attention, but when I heard this... PAUL, HE USED TO SING WITH ME (Ode to Paul McCartney) from richardthelionheartwww.youtube.com/watch?v=0RuLA0CYxewjust omg!from the description:"Download this song MP3 or FLAC! richardcummins.bandcamp.com/album/paul-is-liveThere are hidden goodies when you download the tune... This song is an ode to Sir Paul McCartney, alive and well. Written and Arranged By: Richard Cummins Performed by Richard Cummins in Entirety Copyright 2011 Electro-Tone Records www.richardcummins.comwww.paulislive.comI believe Sir Paul is alive and well, actually - one day I should like to do a proper recording with Him[/color]. He's Fab. Lyrics: Wednesday Morning You're alone you're in the street And somebody calls you You answer quite slowly Chorus: Paul he Used to sing with me, He used to... He blew his mind out in a car He hadn't noticed that the lights had changed A Hog's head of real fire Caught a glimpse of the Meter Maid Chorus Bridge: Had it been another day, I might have looked the other way... I`d never`ve been a``were`....ohhh.... Chorus `PAUL, HE USED TO SING WITH ME` COPYRIGHT RICHARD CUMMINS, 2011 ELECTRO-TONE RECORDS, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ...It`s well worth it to play the reverse chorus in the breakdown at 2:25 back `round the right way..."--------------------------------Could someone please do that for us? (Thank you in advance!)
|
|
|
Post by B on Sept 18, 2012 22:52:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by B on Sept 18, 2012 23:44:32 GMT -5
Interesting image, wouldn't you say? It's the entrance to his website. "Come in". (Cummins)In the brackets at the site, we read this: Click the logo and check out Richard's song " Something Very Wrong" in the J.K. Rowling (Harry Potter) Film! ------------You can hear a snippet of "Something Very Wrong" in this clip: Magic Beyond Words - La Historia de J.K. Rowling: Parte [2/6] Subtitulada en Español Jalif0804www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufPqN6EbxNk
|
|
|
Post by B on Sept 19, 2012 0:11:47 GMT -5
follow @ "LionoftheNorth" on TwitterRichard Cummins @lionofthenorth Singer/Songwriter, Stuntman, Beatles, Recorded w/Phil Keaggy, Recorded for Sony, Follower of Jesus, Member of the Ekklesia, www.paulislive.com, www.richardcummins.com..........................Richard Cummins is the .........................."Voice" of the Beatles in ..........................the new Guitar Hero style ..........................game from Paper Jamz!
|
|
|
Post by B on Sept 19, 2012 0:42:43 GMT -5
Michelle, his belle michelecummins.mlslink.mlxchange.com/You can hear the entirety of "Something Very Wrong" here: richardcummins.bandcamp.com/album/songs-from-magic-beyond-words-the-jk-rowling-story-movie-soundtrack"Richard Cummins was hired to provide original `Beatle -esque`songs for the soundtrack to the famous Harry Potter Author`s biographic movie, 'Magic Beyond Words: The JK Rowling Story'`on the Lifetime Network which is being released to coincide with Warner Bros feature production, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows". This album features the Film Producer`s hand picked tracks - music you hear in the film - as well as bonus tracks of the tunes that didn`t make the final cut."
|
|
|
Post by seasaltcaramel on Sept 19, 2012 0:44:37 GMT -5
Interesting image, wouldn't you say? It's the entrance to his website. "Come in". (Cummins)In the brackets at the site, we read this: Click the logo and check out Richard's song " Something Very Wrong" in the J.K. Rowling (Harry Potter) Film! ------------You can hear a snippet of "Something Very Wrong" in this clip: Magic Beyond Words - La Historia de J.K. Rowling: Parte [2/6] Subtitulada en Español Jalif0804www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufPqN6EbxNkit could also be dick cums in.
|
|
|
Post by B on Sept 19, 2012 1:28:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by iameye on Sept 19, 2012 14:52:12 GMT -5
Awake to righteousness, and sin not; for some have not the knowledge of God: I speak this to your shame. But some man will say, How are the dead raised up? and with what body do they come? Thou fool, that which thou sowest is not quickened, except it die.” Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the Kingdom of God For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God.
|
|
|
Post by B on Sept 20, 2012 2:29:38 GMT -5
jessbottles wrote: Anyway, what i meant by "that's my cue" is that i think i wanted it to be my parting contribution here, after it was well received (and i think worthy to be in the PID/A/E investigative universe - if it isn't already). I'm certain i'll not be able to resist dropping in to see what you thoughtful kind folks are finding! Best wishes B! "People come and go so quickly around here!" - DorothyWell I can't force you to stick around, but I think your contributions to the discussion have been notable, and I, for one, would wish for you to stick around! Far be it from me to keep a man from whatever calls, but if this were a real job, I'd make you an offer you couldn't refuse! ;D Same for vOOdOOgurU, ericnapster, beacon, linus, and everyone else, btw!Uh... not that I'm the boss!
|
|
|
Post by vOOdOOgurU on Sept 21, 2012 5:18:38 GMT -5
wow some great thoughts shared in this thread! great stuff vOOdOOgurU! and seasaltcaramel, I actually really like usedtosing and billyishere the most, but some others are cool too. I still haven't heard them all. There is a Monarch song or something, i liked also, i too think it is all far too elaborate to be just some guy in his mom's basement messing with vids and computers and working out recordings with his band buddies. Sometimes i think that i feel YOUTH involvement. I don't know. Not a hunch, just a feeling. Thanks Jessbottles
|
|
|
Post by vOOdOOgurU on Sept 26, 2012 16:42:52 GMT -5
Another thing intrigues me.
No Harrisongs were used for TheRightAlbum. Even though plenty post-67 contain "clues" or reversals, particularly Blue Jay Way and While My Guitar Gently Weeps.
Blue Jay Way is of course a Northern Song. But not While My ..., which is Harrisongs owned.
Is iamaphoney just not a fan of the Harrisong, or was it too much trouble to include a Harrisong because of legals. Hmmm. Cuz While My Guitar Gently Weeps A. Sounds cool backwards B. Has quite a few allusions to Paul.
|
|
|
Post by beacon on Sept 27, 2012 13:34:52 GMT -5
Another thing intrigues me. No Harrisongs were used for TheRightAlbum. Even though plenty post-67 contain "clues" or reversals, particularly Blue Jay Way and While My Guitar Gently Weeps. Blue Jay Way is of course a Northern Song. But not While My ..., which is Harrisongs owned. Is iamaphoney just not a fan of the Harrisong, or was it too much trouble to include a Harrisong because of legals. Hmmm. Cuz While My Guitar Gently Weeps A. Sounds cool backwards B. Has quite a few allusions to Paul. Maybe Olivia wasn't too keen on George's songs being used in Paul's latest vanity project! Wonder if IAAP is pissed because the Beatles re-releases are slated to come out just days after the Revelation, or maybe that is all part of the P.R. Plan?
|
|
|
Post by MikeNL on Sept 27, 2012 13:50:42 GMT -5
Another thing intrigues me. No Harrisongs were used for TheRightAlbum. Even though plenty post-67 contain "clues" or reversals, particularly Blue Jay Way and While My Guitar Gently Weeps. Blue Jay Way is of course a Northern Song. But not While My ..., which is Harrisongs owned. Is iamaphoney just not a fan of the Harrisong, or was it too much trouble to include a Harrisong because of legals. Hmmm. Cuz While My Guitar Gently Weeps A. Sounds cool backwards B. Has quite a few allusions to Paul. Maybe Olivia wasn't too keen on George's songs being used in Paul's latest vanity project! Wonder if IAAP is pissed because the Beatles re-releases are slated to come out just days after the Revelation, or maybe that is all part of the P.R. Plan? I thought it was interesting too, will people go back and re-purchase LP versions to play backwards? We'll all see in due time! 42 days! Now getting it ready for you!
|
|
|
Post by mysteryhair on Sept 27, 2012 14:40:04 GMT -5
or maybe that is all part of the P.R. Plan? The Paul Resurrection Plan ?
|
|
|
Post by vOOdOOgurU on Sept 28, 2012 3:13:56 GMT -5
Another thing intrigues me. No Harrisongs were used for TheRightAlbum. Even though plenty post-67 contain "clues" or reversals, particularly Blue Jay Way and While My Guitar Gently Weeps. Blue Jay Way is of course a Northern Song. But not While My ..., which is Harrisongs owned. Is iamaphoney just not a fan of the Harrisong, or was it too much trouble to include a Harrisong because of legals. Hmmm. Cuz While My Guitar Gently Weeps A. Sounds cool backwards B. Has quite a few allusions to Paul. Maybe Olivia wasn't too keen on George's songs being used in Paul's latest vanity project! Wonder if IAAP is pissed because the Beatles re-releases are slated to come out just days after the Revelation, or maybe that is all part of the P.R. Plan? Maybe she wasn't. Considering TheRightAlbum isn't exactly storming up the charts, or getting many views through iamaphoney music Youtube channel, I would think the re-releases would only HELP interest in it. Especially if it were specifically tied into TheRevelation. My general feeling is:A. PIA and Beatle Zealots stay clearly away from anything iamaphoney. This can be for a number of reasons, I'm sure each person has their own. Before I said I had reservations about the agenda within the works themselves (TheRottenApple, TheRightAlbum, TheRevelation) whilst living in a world of McDonalds, Subliminal Advertising, I need not go on. Why would iamaphoney have any worse agenda than oh, I don't know, calling Elvis Presley the King of Rock and Roll, when what was called Race Music had been around and rocking and rolling since 1922. Agenda has been afoot for many years. So that concern is less now about iamaphoney's agenda. Everyone has one, except for that monkey. B. I don't even see PID people embracing the works either. And I think part of that is allusions to the esoteric and occult. But consider what is occult. Native American Indian ceremonial practices would be deemed occult in the Western World. Pagan/Mystery/Esoteric/Occult, it's a generic term encapsulating many practices and belief systems. Like "Asian" encapsulates many people totally unlike one another. But it is no surprise that iamaphoney is kind of backed away from. Especially with Aleister Crowley in the mix. This man scares people more than anyone the CIA could come up with. And since Fear tends to make a person not Investigate; or find out for themselves what things are all about, or at least go beyond their misconceptions, or release themselves from an ignorance that has been somewhat enforced. It's almost iamaphoney has shot themselves/himself in the foot. Jimmy Page lives in Crowley's house, wow cooooool man. But it doesn't necessarily appear straight in your face in album artwork and song. iamaphoney puts it right in front of your eyes. And that's not necessarily something people want to see. Which goes back to the Beatle Zealot that wants Love Peace and the like, but refuses to look at the people promoting it as anything less than Holy. It gets myopic. And usually you'll get an automated quote read in some magazine or some biography that is espoused as their own opinion. But really it's just Mythos Programming. George didn't like George's tie. John laid on his back for this vocal. First backwards recordings on album. That last one gets on my nerves. The Beatles most certainly did not come up with the first backwards recordings to be heard. Maybe on a POP album, but no no no not in history. Go back to any avant garde movement, your Varese's and the like. They were doing all this stuff and quite seriously I might add. Pop was a children's toy in their minds. Just like I Feel Fine is not the first recorded guitar feedback on an album. Go back to Lowman Pauling for that. And the fuzzzzzzz tone. Why no Harrisongs. It bothers me, being a Harrison fan by proxy. He merged East and West in a way that no one had truly done before. All during the time of Enoch Powell. He was much cooler than Lennon. Rudyard Kipling espoused East and West and never the twain shall meet --- well Harrison achieved a meeting. He should be applauded for crossing that boundary, but us little people latch on to whether we like the Sitar or not. Madness. He achieved something quite notable and historic. So iamaphoney NOT including any Harrisong, even when some of them do actually deal with Paul Is Dead, is a bit suspect. And if Harrison had any open complaint about Beatles Politics or bad vibes, 99% of the time he namedrops a Paul McCartney song. Guaranteed. Or that little thing in track order (LP) where for every "heavy" Harrison song, what immediately follows is a McCartney "light" song. Within You,Without You/When I'm 64. Blue Jay Way/Your Mother Should Know. Something/Maxwell's Silver Hammer. Only a Northern Song/All Together Now. They stop the practice somewhat on "The Beatles" but it's right back again for "Yellow Submarine". And it started in 1967. There's an agenda there to undermine someone, if you ask me. IMO Within You Without You is the most epic thing The Beatles ever did, and certainly the most beautiful song on Sgt.Pepper by miles. Lyrically. Musically. Philosophically. It actually says something of portent and meaning. I was a Harrison fan the first moment I heard it years ago as a child. Had never heard anything like it. In all my Partridge Family and Monkees television mania. WYWY was like this ... thing. I'm disappointed there's not a Harrisong on TheRightAlbum, at the same time maybe that's a good thing. Maybe it does point even moreso that this IS a McCartney vanity project, and legalities prevent certain songs from appearing. Or they just do not fit in with the agenda. Or just regulate Harrison once again to "second tier Beatle." I think McCartney in all honesty prefers to have Harrison stay in his place. It doesn't upset the Apple Cart.
|
|
|
Post by vOOdOOgurU on Sept 28, 2012 3:30:22 GMT -5
Maybe Olivia wasn't too keen on George's songs being used in Paul's latest vanity project! Wonder if IAAP is pissed because the Beatles re-releases are slated to come out just days after the Revelation, or maybe that is all part of the P.R. Plan? I thought it was interesting too, will people go back and re-purchase LP versions to play backwards? We'll all see in due time! 42 days! Now getting it ready for you! I doubt the re-purchase. Though Vinyl rules, and I'm a turntable Junkie, it's just not a convenient media playing device in the age of the iPod and MP3 player. Too clunky.
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Oct 9, 2012 16:19:26 GMT -5
In my opinion the problem John fell into was that he labled himself a LOSER in the CROOK,LOSER,HERO trilogy. This is a common problem in the modern world,EVERYONE has become a crook or loser without a hero in sight! Losers complain,worry,feel they are"sinners",or"victims"etc.etc.etc. He used to be a HERO and had a great song"Working Class Hero"but he seemed to die a loser.
|
|