|
Faul
Apr 29, 2011 6:16:55 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 29, 2011 6:16:55 GMT -5
... and so Mr. Baby Fox News? And so Mr Pic Doctorer? We can see that your original pics were doctored. Using one of the pics you just posted and comparing it with one of your other, doctored, pics, your fraud is easily exposed - - We can all see you've stretched the pic and changed the colour! It's time you came clean and apologised for your dishonesty GN. By denying it you are only making a bigger fool of yourself.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 29, 2011 19:23:04 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 29, 2011 19:23:04 GMT -5
More proof of Doubleback Fake Paul - Maybe you all believe me now. GN has gone very quiet, lol. His Crossover False Paul has been proven as a false fake Paul. Just like his fake, doctored pics, lol.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 2:00:12 GMT -5
Post by ipuffin on Apr 30, 2011 2:00:12 GMT -5
More proof of Doubleback Fake Paul - Maybe you all believe me now. GN has gone very quiet, lol. His Crossover False Paul has been proven as a false fake Paul. Just like his fake, doctored pics, lol. oh for god's steak, first pic Paul is standing a bit BEHIND George, second pic the other way around All these photos can teach us is about the development of photography. Still-pictures are a VERY deceiving, VERY easy to manipulate, ESPECIALLY when we're dealing with B&W. You will NOT see anything you were not MEANT to see. Nothing you can see that isn't shown
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 7:00:43 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 30, 2011 7:00:43 GMT -5
More proof of Doubleback Fake Paul - Maybe you all believe me now. GN has gone very quiet, lol. His Crossover False Paul has been proven as a false fake Paul. Just like his fake, doctored pics, lol. oh for god's steak, first pic Paul is standing a bit BEHIND George, second pic the other way around lol. How easily you fool yourself. You only see what you want to see. You don't want to see the truth - I know what I'm talking about.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 7:02:39 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 30, 2011 7:02:39 GMT -5
I feel really disappointed that some of you cannot see the truth -
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 7:13:30 GMT -5
Post by ipuffin on Apr 30, 2011 7:13:30 GMT -5
oh for god's steak, first pic Paul is standing a bit BEHIND George, second pic the other way around lol. How easily you fool yourself. You only see what you want to see. You don't want to see the truth - I know what I'm talking about. Ah So? First in the B&W pic Paul IS a bit behind George, at least leaning. Again with the other picture. Leaning is enough to make a HUGE difference. PLUS you don't take into account different shoes, high heels. I mean, late 60's, come on. Do you see what trousers they are wearing? God knows what they had for SHOES.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 7:28:01 GMT -5
Post by jarvitronics on Apr 30, 2011 7:28:01 GMT -5
I feel really disappointed that some of you cannot see the truth - My own private photo albums contain quite a few pictures that make me and my loved ones appear the wrong height, build, facial structure, etc. -j P.S. This post wasn't actually written by me, it was written by fake twin pre-doubleback replacement over-the-counter redundant me.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 8:33:01 GMT -5
Post by ipuffin on Apr 30, 2011 8:33:01 GMT -5
the furniture i mobili die möbel chair arc chair ark chair yacht chariot -j Execution is the Chariot of Genius
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 9:56:37 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 30, 2011 9:56:37 GMT -5
lol. How easily you fool yourself. You only see what you want to see. You don't want to see the truth - I know what I'm talking about. Ah So? First in the B&W pic Paul IS a bit behind George Ah so? lol - make you're mind up! First of all you said "it was the other way around" until I proved you wrong. Prove he is leaning. High heels?! lol. You'll be claiming Paul is a transvestite next.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 10:00:37 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 30, 2011 10:00:37 GMT -5
I feel really disappointed that some of you cannot see the truth - My own private photo albums contain quite a few pictures that make me and my loved ones appear the wrong height, build, facial structure, etc. -j lol. So your screwy photos prove there is not a height difference between Paul and Doubleback Fake Paul?! lol. Grasping at straws with that one. You're as nutty as a fruitcake. No wonder you are a PIAer lol.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 10:11:18 GMT -5
Post by jarvitronics on Apr 30, 2011 10:11:18 GMT -5
You're as nutty as a fruitcake. No wonder you are a PIAer lol. Hey that's not fair! What did fruitcake ever do to you that you should think to insult it so? It's Boltzmann who was nutty. -j
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 10:15:02 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 30, 2011 10:15:02 GMT -5
You're as nutty as a fruitcake. No wonder you are a PIAer lol. Hey that's not fair! What did fruitcake ever do to you that you should think to insult it so? -j You cannot prove my evidence wrong so you resort to jibberish in order to confuse people. I know your game. Paul is dead.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 10:17:47 GMT -5
Post by GN on Apr 30, 2011 10:17:47 GMT -5
... and so Mr. Baby Fox News? And so Mr Pic Doctorer? We can see that your original pics were doctored. Using one of the pics you just posted and comparing it with one of your other, doctored, pics, your fraud is easily exposed - - We can all see you've stretched the pic and changed the colour! It's time you came clean and apologised for your dishonesty GN. By denying it you are only making a bigger fool of yourself. Dear Joseph McCarthy, here is the pictures you say: here is my original post about in this forum: invanddis.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=guests1&action=display&thread=6086&page=4here is the ORIGINAL YouTube Address where those frames where taken: Unfortunately it works no more but there others on YouTube of the same "quality" like this: and this: Please read the written: it was about False Paul mouth corners. Face dimensions were not impotant for that subject and GN doctored nothing.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 10:20:18 GMT -5
Post by ipuffin on Apr 30, 2011 10:20:18 GMT -5
Ah So? First in the B&W pic Paul IS a bit behind George Ah so? lol - make you're mind up! First of all you said "it was the other way around" until I proved you wrong. Prove he is leaning. High heels?! lol. You'll be claiming Paul is a transvestite next. What I meant was - same thing, about the LEANING only the other way - really, it's not that hard, you should try that sometime. And about the heels: - John has LONG HAIR, they wear FUR COATS....I mean, learn some history before you jump into conclusions. "Feminine" clothes constituted a large part of the early hippie style, which eventually transformed into "Glam" in the 70's. High High heels, baby. sigh....serenity now! .....relax......... Let it troll...let it troll...
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 10:23:45 GMT -5
Post by jarvitronics on Apr 30, 2011 10:23:45 GMT -5
Hey that's not fair! What did fruitcake ever do to you that you should think to insult it so? -j You cannot prove my evidence wrong so you resort to jibberish in order to confuse people. There is no need to prove your evidence wrong, since you have no evidence. And I never post jibberish, I post jarberish. -j
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 10:40:58 GMT -5
Post by jarvitronics on Apr 30, 2011 10:40:58 GMT -5
the furniture i mobili die möbel chair arc chair ark chair yacht chariot -j Execution is the Chariot of Genius Sailing on a fab lake of ire and rimstone. -j
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 11:14:30 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 30, 2011 11:14:30 GMT -5
lol! Both of those pics came from you. Now then, can anybody spot the difference?! lol. You'll be saying black is white next GN. But keep on posting more youtube pics GN, in a desperate effort to hide the fact that you use doctored pics to discredit the fact that Doubleback Fake Paul is the real impostor.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 11:18:08 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 30, 2011 11:18:08 GMT -5
Ah so? lol - make you're mind up! First of all you said "it was the other way around" until I proved you wrong. Prove he is leaning. High heels?! lol. You'll be claiming Paul is a transvestite next. What I meant was - same thing, about the LEANING only the other way - really, it's not that hard, you should try that sometime. And about the heels: - John has LONG HAIR, they wear FUR COATS....I mean, learn some history before you jump into conclusions. "Feminine" clothes constituted a large part of the early hippie style, which eventually transformed into "Glam" in the 70's. High High heels, baby. sigh....serenity now! .....relax......... Let it troll...let it troll... All ifs buts and maybes with you, lol. You can't prove any of it. I, however post an actual comp where its provable fact that they are different heights in the picture. I therefore have the strongest evidence. And that's a fact. Not ifs buts and maybes, lol.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 11:21:06 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 30, 2011 11:21:06 GMT -5
You cannot prove my evidence wrong so you resort to jibberish in order to confuse people. There is no need to prove your evidence wrong, since you have no evidence. Everybody can see I have posted photo comps in this thread. They are evidence. Do you think lying is gonna fool people into believing your PIA claims? I am too clever for you. Is that another word for lies? lol.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 11:37:29 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 30, 2011 11:37:29 GMT -5
I suppose the different head shapes are due to Paul wearing high heels and leaning back. lol.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 11:42:24 GMT -5
Post by ipuffin on Apr 30, 2011 11:42:24 GMT -5
What I meant was - same thing, about the LEANING only the other way - really, it's not that hard, you should try that sometime. And about the heels: - John has LONG HAIR, they wear FUR COATS....I mean, learn some history before you jump into conclusions. "Feminine" clothes constituted a large part of the early hippie style, which eventually transformed into "Glam" in the 70's. High High heels, baby. sigh....serenity now! .....relax......... Let it troll...let it troll... All ifs buts and maybes with you, lol. You can't prove any of it. I, however post an actual comp where its provable fact that they are different heights in the picture. I therefore have the strongest evidence. And that's a fact. Not ifs buts and maybes, lol. What does comp stand for, compost? really, post a picture of them barefoot, in a police line-up (you know, with their backs to a wall with height lines) THAT would be proof. Until then, you are welcome to join us in the speculations.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 11:46:50 GMT -5
Post by ipuffin on Apr 30, 2011 11:46:50 GMT -5
I suppose the different head shapes are due to Paul wearing high heels and leaning back. lol. no. THIS involve MUCH more complicated tricks: Going to the hairdresser and opening your mouth!
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 18:08:57 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 30, 2011 18:08:57 GMT -5
I suppose the different head shapes are due to Paul wearing high heels and leaning back. lol. no. THIS involve MUCH more complicated tricks: Going to the hairdresser and opening your mouth! Don't think so. Closed mouths, same hairstyle, and yet low and behold, different headshapes - Gotcha! Oh dear. You'll have to come up with another silly explanation now lol. So far you've given us high heels, leaning over like a drunk, open mouths and a new hairstyle as excuses for obvious differences. lol. It gets sillier and sillier. What crazy ideas are you going to come up with next? My evidence keeps slapping you on the face, yet you keep coming back for more. lol.
|
|
|
Faul
Apr 30, 2011 18:14:42 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on Apr 30, 2011 18:14:42 GMT -5
What does comp stand for, compost? lol. It stands for comparison. You're obviously a newbie. Go to Pid miss him forum and you'll learn a lot. Then you'll see what I'm teaching you is true. lol. Typical newbie answer. Ask for something which is impossible to provide. Then when it's not, claim it as proof that you're right. It doesn't work like that in the real world. I can see that you have a lot to learn. Paul is dead.
|
|
|
Faul
May 1, 2011 0:48:33 GMT -5
Post by JoJo on May 1, 2011 0:48:33 GMT -5
|
|