|
Faul
May 1, 2011 2:43:10 GMT -5
Post by ipuffin on May 1, 2011 2:43:10 GMT -5
What does comp stand for, compost? lol. It stands for comparison. You're obviously a newbie. Go to Pid miss him forum and you'll learn a lot. Then you'll see what I'm teaching you is true. lol. Typical newbie answer. Ask for something which is impossible to provide. Then when it's not, claim it as proof that you're right. It doesn't work like that in the real world. I can see that you have a lot to learn. Paul is dead. oh jeez I am not claiming Paul is alive. I really don't know that he is. I wouldn't BE here if I thought it was so simple. What I DO claim is that it is not something you can prove with still photos. Hell, I'm not sure it's something you can prove AT ALL - It doesn't mean we can't discuss it (ever heard about Post Modernism?) just means that the only way to PROVE it involves abducting him, or some crazy shit like that which none of us (I hope) is really up to.
|
|
|
Faul
May 1, 2011 6:04:15 GMT -5
Post by ipuffin on May 1, 2011 6:04:15 GMT -5
Don't think so. Closed mouths, same hairstyle, and yet low and behold, different headshapes - Gotcha! Oh dear. You'll have to come up with another silly explanation now lol. So far you've given us high heels, leaning over like a drunk, open mouths and a new hairstyle as excuses for obvious differences. lol. It gets sillier and sillier. What crazy ideas are you going to come up with next? My evidence keeps slapping you on the face, yet you keep coming back for more. lol. make-up. different exposure. different ASA of film. And then you have the trickiest bit: He can move his jaw even WITHOUT opening it! ( ) using the power of (da da da daaaaa) EMOTIONS! (gasp in the crowd) Left pic ladies and gentlemen, he is making a "serious" face (ever heard the expression "why the LONG FACE?") though it looks like he's trying hard not to laugh (probably after reading this thread). At the second it is completely the opposite. He is Smiling uncomfortably after a nasty question, (watch the whole clip before calling me a newbie), while obviously not wanting anything to do with it, giving the "I'm polite but I actually think you're an idiot" look. You must get that look a lot. PS I remember something Hugh Grant once said about this kind of smile at Jay Leno's (again, being uncomfortable, because the last time he was there he got the famous "what were you thinking?" bit). He said it's the Hollywood Smile - smiling only with your mouth, without the eyes.
|
|
|
Faul
May 1, 2011 6:36:40 GMT -5
Post by ipuffin on May 1, 2011 6:36:40 GMT -5
[ lol. It stands for comparison. You're obviously a newbie. Go to Pid miss him forum and you'll learn a lot. Then you'll see what I'm teaching you is true. Been there. Tumbleweeds. Plus all that red really hurts my eyes... But let's not cast stones at one another Remember what the SCRIPTURES have to say:
|
|
|
Faul
May 1, 2011 9:32:22 GMT -5
Post by jarvitronics on May 1, 2011 9:32:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
Faul
May 1, 2011 10:35:27 GMT -5
Post by ipuffin on May 1, 2011 10:35:27 GMT -5
LOL. Exactly. It's the lazy solution, and makes it an all-too-easy job for people to refute this. Imagine the issue finally being brought up again - the interviewer asks: So who's Faul? and the answer: there is no Faul. We never heard that name before the internet. End of discussion. If we don't want that - we have to keep it more sophisticated.
|
|
|
Faul
May 29, 2011 9:14:07 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on May 29, 2011 9:14:07 GMT -5
D is correctIt is disturbing to me that so many people can't see the obvious differences between real Paul and the impostor. You can also see that Doubleback Fake Paul has a rounder face. How many more proofs do you need?
|
|
|
Faul
May 29, 2011 13:42:34 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on May 29, 2011 13:42:34 GMT -5
You can see I know what I'm talking about.
|
|
thewalruswaspaul
For Sale
My mustache draws all the ladys......and the walrus....
Posts: 124
|
Faul
May 29, 2011 14:02:51 GMT -5
Post by thewalruswaspaul on May 29, 2011 14:02:51 GMT -5
so then who the heck is this? doubleback?? Attachments:
|
|
|
Faul
May 29, 2011 14:07:13 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on May 29, 2011 14:07:13 GMT -5
so then who the heck is this? doubleback?? Yes, that's Doubleback Fake Paul. Don't confuse him with Crossover False Paul, because he's not the real impostor but the fake impostor. Crossover False Paul doesn't exist. The real Paul is dead.
|
|
|
Faul
May 29, 2011 14:22:57 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on May 29, 2011 14:22:57 GMT -5
Don't think so. Closed mouths, same hairstyle, and yet low and behold, different headshapes - Gotcha! Oh dear. You'll have to come up with another silly explanation now lol. So far you've given us high heels, leaning over like a drunk, open mouths and a new hairstyle as excuses for obvious differences. lol. It gets sillier and sillier. What crazy ideas are you going to come up with next? My evidence keeps slapping you on the face, yet you keep coming back for more. lol. make-up. different exposure. different ASA of film. And then you have the trickiest bit: He can move his jaw even WITHOUT opening it! ( ) using the power of (da da da daaaaa) EMOTIONS! (gasp in the crowd) Left pic ladies and gentlemen, he is making a "serious" face (ever heard the expression "why the LONG FACE?") lol. So now you're saying that when you make a serious face, your head shape suddenly changes and miraculously becomes longer?! Yikes! lol! Yet you are the one claiming that your head changes shape when you make a serious face! You are grasping at straws to debunk my comps, coming out with nonsense about shapeshifting heads. I've heard it all now! Sensible people will see that I am right. And insults are the sign that you've lost the argument. I'm enjoying slapping you're silly arguments about and destroying them with the intelligence of my arguments. If your defence of PIA rests upon the claim of shapeshifting heads, then I have clearly won the argument and proved that Paul is dead. People can see that I am too smart for the PIAers and their crazy theories about shapeshifting heads! lol
|
|
|
Faul
May 29, 2011 17:14:26 GMT -5
Post by ipuffin on May 29, 2011 17:14:26 GMT -5
You can see I know what I'm talking about. so, let me understand. I'm being ridiculed for saying our faces are flexible (as long as you don't inject too much botox) and here you are showing a picture that, according to your logic, shows that the real Paul had a cleft lip. or something horrible like that. That means they were ALL fakes - doesn't it?
|
|
|
Faul
May 29, 2011 17:23:39 GMT -5
Post by ipuffin on May 29, 2011 17:23:39 GMT -5
lol. So now you're saying that when you make a serious face, your head shape suddenly changes and miraculously becomes longer?! Yikes! lol! Yet you are the one claiming that your head changes shape when you make a serious face! You are grasping at straws to debunk my comps, coming out with nonsense about shapeshifting heads. I've heard it all now! Sensible people will see that I am right. And insults are the sign that you've lost the argument. I'm enjoying slapping you're silly arguments about and destroying them with the intelligence of my arguments. If your defence of PIA rests upon the claim of shapeshifting heads, then I have clearly won the argument and proved that Paul is dead. People can see that I am too smart for the PIAers and their crazy theories about shapeshifting heads! lol I think that mostly, people can see you are either a teenager, or a troll, or both. ...and I am NOT a PIA-er. All I say is: Give the Powers-That-Be some CREDIT! They are NOT amateurs. If they want someone replaced, they WILL replace him and NO ONE - especially not some teenager with apparently no knowledge whatsoever of 60's counter-culture - is going to see through it. THEY ARE SMARTER THAN YOU. THEY ARE SMARTER THAN ME. STOP FOOLING YOURSELVES, ALL! Paul may be dead, but we will NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! have proof - until THEY want us to get proof.
|
|
|
Faul
May 29, 2011 17:31:12 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on May 29, 2011 17:31:12 GMT -5
You can see I know what I'm talking about. so, let me understand. I'm being ridiculed for saying our faces are flexible No, you are being taken to task for claiming that the shape of a persons's whole head grows longer when you make a serious face. and here you are showing a picture that, according to your logic, shows that the real Paul had a cleft lip. or something horrible like that. That means they were ALL fakes - doesn't it? Cleft lip? lol. You are seeing things now lol. What are you babbling about? That comp shows the differences between Real Paul's and Doubleback Fake Paul's ears - nothing to do with lips at all. And neither Real Paul or Doubleback Fake Paul had a cleft lip. If one had, and not the other, it would be a bit of a give-away, wouldn't it? lol What are you going to come up with next, ipuffin? You are getting desperate. This proves I am right.
|
|
|
Faul
May 29, 2011 17:40:57 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on May 29, 2011 17:40:57 GMT -5
lol. So now you're saying that when you make a serious face, your head shape suddenly changes and miraculously becomes longer?! Yikes! lol! Yet you are the one claiming that your head changes shape when you make a serious face! You are grasping at straws to debunk my comps, coming out with nonsense about shapeshifting heads. I've heard it all now! Sensible people will see that I am right. And insults are the sign that you've lost the argument. I'm enjoying slapping you're silly arguments about and destroying them with the intelligence of my arguments. If your defence of PIA rests upon the claim of shapeshifting heads, then I have clearly won the argument and proved that Paul is dead. People can see that I am too smart for the PIAers and their crazy theories about shapeshifting heads! lol I think that mostly, people can see you are either a teenager, or a troll, or both. Most people can see that my evidence speaks for itself and has had you running about in desperation coming up with all kinds of rubbish about shapeshhifting heads and cleft lips! Yikes! And now you are resorting to name-calling because you can see that I'm running rings around your silly arguments. lol. Then why are you arguing against my clear and obvious evidence that Paul was replaced? You are obviously an illuminati plant. lol. Tell that to Richard Nixon! Google "Watergate". TPTB often make mistakes that clever people uncover. I can see that you have a lot to learn.
|
|
|
Faul
May 29, 2011 17:51:29 GMT -5
Post by ipuffin on May 29, 2011 17:51:29 GMT -5
Cleft lip? lol. You are seeing things now lol. What are you babbling about? That comp shows the differences between Real Paul's and Doubleback Fake Paul's ears - nothing to do with lips at all. And neither Real Paul or Doubleback Fake Paul had a cleft lip. If one had, and not the other, it would be a bit of a give-away, wouldn't it? lol What are you going to come up with next, ipuffin? You are getting desperate. This proves I am right. I meant the face on the bottom left. The strange thing he is doing with his mouth. sigh I don't know what you mean by "whole shape" of the head, but there is always a difference between open mouth, closed mouth - and for those of us who refused to wear braces as kids, there will even be a considerable difference between when the mouth is closed "on" the front teeth than on the molars. But let's leave all that. Suppose I'm a good PID-er, not doubting anything, listens to "Saint Paul" every Sunday - from what I gather, you purpose that the replacement came pretty early on before 66. Did I understand correctly? with all this doublefake stuff, can you tell me who is the guy that made wonderful music between 66-72? Because frankly, that's the only "Paul" that was any good.
|
|
|
Faul
May 29, 2011 17:58:11 GMT -5
Post by jarvitronics on May 29, 2011 17:58:11 GMT -5
You are obviously an illuminati plant. -j
|
|
|
Faul
May 29, 2011 18:02:02 GMT -5
Post by jarvitronics on May 29, 2011 18:02:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Faul
May 29, 2011 18:07:37 GMT -5
Post by ipuffin on May 29, 2011 18:07:37 GMT -5
this just gets better and better. Now I'm from the Illuminati. Cool!!! Or maybe I am a Tavistock agent because I happen to think Psychedelic culture brought us more good than 2000 years of Christianity, and that 10-minuets complicated songs are preferable to 2.5 minuet love-songs about nothing? ...or a communist? Yeah, let's stick with commie. always good.
|
|
|
Faul
May 29, 2011 18:09:02 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on May 29, 2011 18:09:02 GMT -5
Left pic ladies and gentlemen, he is making a "serious" face. At the second it is completely the opposite. He is Smiling To prove what sillyness ipuffin is talking, I have made a comp where both Real Paul and Doubleback Fake Paul have "serious" faces. Real Paul has a thinner face than Doubleback Fake Paul. He also has a wider mouth.
According to ipuffin's logic, both should have long faces because according to him your whole head suddenly grows longer when you put on a serious face lol. But what does the evidence prove? That Doubleback Fake Paul's face doesn't suddenly grow longer when he puts on a serious face! lol. Back to the drawing board for ipuffin. ;D
|
|
|
Faul
May 29, 2011 18:15:24 GMT -5
Post by iameye on May 29, 2011 18:15:24 GMT -5
You are obviously an illuminati plant. -j As am I.
|
|
|
Faul
May 29, 2011 18:21:44 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on May 29, 2011 18:21:44 GMT -5
Cleft lip? lol. You are seeing things now lol. What are you babbling about? That comp shows the differences between Real Paul's and Doubleback Fake Paul's ears - nothing to do with lips at all. And neither Real Paul or Doubleback Fake Paul had a cleft lip. If one had, and not the other, it would be a bit of a give-away, wouldn't it? lol What are you going to come up with next, ipuffin? You are getting desperate. This proves I am right. I meant the face on the bottom left. The strange thing he is doing with his mouth. lol. It's called a finger! lol. This proves you have not got a good eye for detail. Not surprising since you cannot tell the difference between Real Paul and Doubleback Fake Paul. Even when the they are pointed out to you. DOH! The comps like the one above show that Real Paul has a longer head than Doubleback Fake Paul. Anybody can see this. But since you are an illuminati plant you'll say you can't see it. Just like you said Real Paul's finger was a cleft lip lol! You're disinfo won't work on me, I'm too clever. No, Doubleback Fake Paul first appeared way before 1966, as my comps prove. He kept coming and going, before permanently replacing Real Paul in 1967. Both.
|
|
|
Faul
May 29, 2011 18:23:33 GMT -5
Post by ipuffin on May 29, 2011 18:23:33 GMT -5
oh, for the love of jellybabies, you just can't judge a face like that.... you are taking me too literally, just like you take the pics for reality.
We don't have one "stock serious face" it just doesn't work like that. We have LOTS of emotions, and to try and categorize them would be even sillier now, but I still attempted to do that.
There is a difference between being serious and putting a "mock serious" face. I would even say teasing (look in his eyes!).
and of course, different angles (again) different length from the camera...in short, unless you took those phtographs yourself, you know absolutely NOTHING.
That's why there is a very specific way of taking pictures for that purpose. Maybe the japanese police can provide us with this.
But until you do, you are just giving ammunition to PIA-ers (as you call them) to laugh at us all. Because this is not REALLY scientific.
I am not here for evidence. I'm not into playing CSI. Next you'll want to scientifically prove the existence/in-existence of god as an argument against/for going to church.
THAT'S why I said you were a teenager - you still hang on to an idea of "truth" that is within your reach. That's how I was when I was a teenager.
|
|
|
Faul
May 29, 2011 18:28:25 GMT -5
Post by iameye on May 29, 2011 18:28:25 GMT -5
Next you'll want to scientifically prove the existence/in-existence of god as an argument against/for going to church. it's easy some call it magic lol onto the House for Dinner Son of a
|
|
|
Faul
May 29, 2011 18:30:48 GMT -5
Post by jarvitronics on May 29, 2011 18:30:48 GMT -5
To prove what sillyness ipuffin is talking, I have made a comp where both Real Paul and Doubleback Fake Paul have "serious" faces. Real Paul has a thinner face than Doubleback Fake Paul. He also has a wider mouth.
You can also clearly see that real Paul has a turtleneck. Any Paul without a turtleneck is therefore an obvious fake. Don't even try to argue that the turtleneck isn't real. This kind of anti-logic will always fail. Next you are going to argue that a turtleneck isn't the same as a face, because the turtleneck can be changed, but you are wrong about that! You still have a lot to learn about turtlenecks. I feel sorry for anyone who can't see the obvious truth about real Paul's turtleneck. Double-over Cross-back Paul NEVER had a turtleneck except for once when his brother Double-cross Back-over Nigel gave him one on Boxing day because he forgot to buy him a present before Christmas and all the stores were closed on Christmas so he had to wait until Boxing Day to buy the turtleneck, which PROVES that there were no fake Pauls before Christmas. If you don't believe this then look on Sgt. Pepper there is a picture of Sonny Liston and he is a BOXER!!! See? SEE??? Iron-clad proof!!! Why can't you lame PIAers see this? -j
|
|
|
Faul
May 29, 2011 18:39:51 GMT -5
Post by truthseeker on May 29, 2011 18:39:51 GMT -5
oh, for the love of jellybabies, you just can't judge a face like that.... you are taking me too literally, just like you take the pics for reality. lol, now you're claiming pics aren't real? Cleft lips, shapeshifting heads and now pics that aren't real! Yikes! So only a certain "serious" face makes your head longer?! Your PIA arguments just get sillier and sillier. Same angles - GOTCHA! Here we have proof you're only here to discredit PID. Thank you for exposing your true motive PIA plant! And here is more evidence of ipuffin's real motives. What does puffin mean? Most will say a bird. But there is another 'hidden' meaning - Apple! Symbol of the illuminati formed company that Doubleback Fake Paul headed! ipuffin deliberately uses a username in homage to the illuminati and Doubleback Fake Paul! More proof that this forum has been infiltrated by Doubleback Fake Paul's stooges in order to try and discredit my proofs!
|
|