|
Faul
Jul 18, 2013 17:55:13 GMT -5
Post by cherilyn7 on Jul 18, 2013 17:55:13 GMT -5
Big nose "Faul" looks like Alvin Stardust!
|
|
|
Faul
Aug 24, 2013 20:33:48 GMT -5
Post by NothingIsReal1985 on Aug 24, 2013 20:33:48 GMT -5
Although I've only been here for a short time this board has wandered from its original purpose. I don't really recognise/recognize this board anymore, either, and it's bothers me. As a result I don't like it. The subject has wandered far and away from the wheres, whens, whys, who's and hows concerning Paul McCartney's replacement (with "Faul" or the false/fake/faux Paul) with all of this nonsense that I don't really understand. It's even gotten to the point where there's PIA-ers up here causing confusion among the PID-ers... and I'm definitely within the LATTER group, or I wouldn't be here.
TBH (to be honest), based on the evidence -- which, IMHO, is more credible than NOT, I'd like to add -- I've recently compiled, it seems that PMcC was replaced back in the fall of '66, plain and simple. But the PIA-ers are in denial, it seems. I was myself when I first found out about this possibility about 3 years ago [and even managed to rock myself to sleep since that time concerning all the reasons that Paul IS NOT dead, but alive as ever, which is why this deception of the masses in regards to Faul's TRUE identity has gone on for so long. Either Faul's fans (to quote Doughboy's line near the end of John Singleton's 1991 hood drama film Boyz In The Hood] "don't know, don't show, or don't even CARE" whether or not their REAL beloved PMcC is alive or not, and if NOT the circumstances surrounding his disappearance, and even possible subsequent death. It just goes to show how much that TPTB (the powers-that-be, the Illuminati, the ruling global elite, the banking cartel, the satanic Luciferians, etc., the people very likely responsible for Paul's disappearance) has the sheeple dumbed-down.
People are also so obsessed with celebrities these days [whether it's these arrogant, overpaid, greedy, immoral singers, actors, entertainers, sports stars, politicians, etc.] that they'd perish the possibility of something unfathomable -- such as this -- would happen to them. So FTR (for that reason) people would settle for anything, even if it's a cheap substitute, imitation, or double, in spite of the fact that it will ALWAYS be less than the best and will NEVER be anything like the real thing. Why eat nasty, unsatisfying, nutrient-deficient slop, when you can eat a decent, filling, tasty and nutritious meal?
But back to me... I hadn't come to accept that our deeply flawed-yet-beloved-and-sexy genuine Macca had left us in '66, or even some time later, until recently, of course. The fact of the matter is that I've gone through some trials & tribulations since that time [autumn of 2010 when I first discovered the possibility of this God-awful truth when I was doing research on the Illuminati and MK-ULTRA, or mind control] and it's strengthened my inner person and it's brought me to this point in my life. Two main aspects of the grieving process is DENIAL, and then ACCEPTANCE. It was something (the acceptance part) that just HAPPENED recently for me, without me even trying. What more do I need to say?
Concerning the older-than-dirt old lady... well... in congruence with what a few in this thread have already said, I happen to think that she could very likely be Faul's mother, hands down. In addition, we all know -- based on Paul's history -- that his real mother died back when he was in his teens, in the 1950's. And this elderly lady... well, she lived way past that point in time. And people need to quit all of this BUNK about this woman (or another lady) replacing Paul. The person that replaced him is MALE, plain and simple. If he wasn't, then he wouldn't have been able to father any children with that ugly, manly-jawed, Plain Jane, white trash, fame-hungry whore Linda (Epstein) Eastman. I've also seen Mary, and although she's pretty, she doesn't look like (the real) Paul McCartney or Linda at all... neither does Stella. Moreover I believe she was very likely [ritually] sacrificed (after she became ill she wasn't seen in the public eye, slim to none), because Faul's star shines bright as ever, in spite of how old (71) he is.
|
|
|
Faul
Aug 25, 2013 12:31:29 GMT -5
Post by cherilyn7 on Aug 25, 2013 12:31:29 GMT -5
I always thought "something strange about Linda"; just after her wedding to Faul a reporter asked how she felt. "We're very happy", she drawled but didn't look it. Dressed in a drab brown coat: she had just snared the world's most eligible bachelor. It seemed odd that after 5 years with Jane Asher he had dumped her for a plain Jane with no personality. As for anyone thinking Faul could be just an old lady in drag; that is just people trying to turn it into farce to get people off the real scent. As for him being 71, I had thought he was older than that. Paul was 24 in 1966 but the other guy as well as being taller, broader and having black hair when Paul's was brown, was also about 6 years older that would account for why Paul suddenly didn't look "baby faced" any more especially that black bushy beard was very aging. This means that Faul is now 77! However, as stated in the film by Jensen Rufe, "Billy died in 1977" therefore, we now have a second (official) imposter. The forum should, indeed, get back on track: too much disinformation is now clouding the issue.
|
|
|
Faul
Sept 4, 2013 23:51:30 GMT -5
Post by NothingIsReal1985 on Sept 4, 2013 23:51:30 GMT -5
As for anyone thinking Faul could be just an old lady in drag; that is just people trying to turn it into farce to get people off the real scent. As for him being 71, I had thought he was older than that. Paul was 24 in 1966 but the other guy as well as being taller, broader and having black hair when Paul's was brown, was also about 6 years older that would account for why Paul suddenly didn't look "baby faced" any more especially that black bushy beard was very aging. This means that Faul is now 77! However, as stated in the film by Jensen Rufe, "Billy died in 1977" therefore, we now have a second (official) imposter. The forum should, indeed, get back on track: too much disinformation is now clouding the issue. I agree with your assessment about the old lady (Pearl Witherington). There's a lot of dis-info agents around these parts. But TKIN ( 60if.proboards.com) & Doppelganger & Identity Research Society [ doppels.proboards.com] has limited registration, wherein the mods & admins have to approve of your membership before you can start posting there (they're members-only message boards/forums). But here anyone can sign up, which makes it a breeding ground where dis-info agents [and those in denial about JPM being officially deceased since the latter part of '66] abound, unfortunately. I, too agree that Faul (I think there could be two) is very likely older than JPM the man looks as though he's in his late 70's/early 80's. After all, clones don't age as well [e.g., Fohn Fennon(s)]. But more on that later. If these two fellas here are the same guy [which I don't believe they are], then Faul very had only had a face-lift; after all, plastic/cosmetic surgery is more common than ever (not that I sanction it or anything) and he has the money to do things like that. It also depends upon when these separate photos were taken. (see doppels.proboards.com/thread/322/twin-fauls) But then again, the ears are different -- which is a/the red herring -- and one is more aged, rugged & haggard-looking than the other.
Since I'm rather hungry -- not to mention it's pretty late -- I'll comment on Linda, JPM vs. Faul McFalsey and John Lennon vs. Fohn Fennon later on [along with images containing conspicuous evidence]. Peace.
|
|
|
Faul
Sept 20, 2013 14:35:57 GMT -5
Post by cherilyn7 on Sept 20, 2013 14:35:57 GMT -5
It seems McCartney bought his farm in Kintyre in June '66 The picture of Paul (with long legs) and Jane (looks like a young girl/double): if the farm was purchsed in June 1966 and the final concert of The Beatles was at Candlestick Park in August 1966, the Paul at Candlestick looks like JPM (the naturalness and joyful smile), however, the guy at the farm looks like "Faul" later with the black, bushy beard and acting elusive. This means that "Faul" bought the farm not JPM. It seems before the concert at Candlestick; the group sensed that this would be the final appearance of them playing live. How did they know this?
|
|
|
Faul
Dec 19, 2015 18:56:48 GMT -5
Post by maclen on Dec 19, 2015 18:56:48 GMT -5
Where is that tampered photo from? I don't know. Where did you find it? That's not Paul either. Wrong head shape. Paul had a round head. no, that's paul. the bloke behind and above george is bill or his double
|
|
mtd56
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 2
|
Faul
Jan 27, 2016 21:06:18 GMT -5
Post by mtd56 on Jan 27, 2016 21:06:18 GMT -5
I watched this video on YT which gives a very convincing argument that Paul was replaced by a studio musician named Billy Shepherd. The photos they have of this Billy show that he really did have the same figure and features as Paul, very similar. Also there is the fact that this Billy was the son of a famous musician in the UK named William Shepherd, and he had been playing music with his dad at a young age. Also, Billy had a Merseyside band named Billy Pepper and the Pepperpots that played in the Mersey around the same time as the Silver Beetles. Nothing much is heard from Billy after the end of 1966. They mention that John did not like him and nicknamed him Billy Shears because shepherds use shears. www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2jDaTD7xNY
|
|
|
Faul
Jan 29, 2016 14:14:53 GMT -5
Post by maclen on Jan 29, 2016 14:14:53 GMT -5
I watched this video on YT which gives a very convincing argument that Paul was replaced by a studio musician named Billy Shepherd. The photos they have of this Billy show that he really did have the same figure and features as Paul, very similar. Also there is the fact that this Billy was the son of a famous musician in the UK named William Shepherd, and he had been playing music with his dad at a young age. Also, Billy had a Merseyside band named Billy Pepper and the Pepperpots that played in the Mersey around the same time as the Silver Beetles. Nothing much is heard from Billy after the end of 1966. They mention that John did not like him and nicknamed him Billy Shears because shepherds use shears. www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2jDaTD7xNY I posted comments to that video under the name 'frank facts' and briefly dueled with a commenter claiming John was replaced, too.
|
|
|
Faul
Jan 29, 2016 17:46:49 GMT -5
B likes this
Post by maclen on Jan 29, 2016 17:46:49 GMT -5
we should be looking at the gent behind and above george harrison. wouldn't he have made a good replica for paul or bungalow, for that matter
|
|
|
Faul
Mar 11, 2016 15:11:20 GMT -5
Post by maclen on Mar 11, 2016 15:11:20 GMT -5
I didn't find any info on him at all. So, who is this guy. What is this guy, and where is this guy, now. Any Beatles experts nearby who might venture a comment? Other than he looks like several pre, or, subsequent attempts to replace McCartney.
|
|
|
Faul
Mar 17, 2016 11:03:45 GMT -5
Post by chica on Mar 17, 2016 11:03:45 GMT -5
because the sky is Blue What I find interesting about the vid is the guy (Paul?) has smooth forearms, Paul's were very hairy.
|
|
|
Faul
Mar 17, 2016 11:09:25 GMT -5
Post by chica on Mar 17, 2016 11:09:25 GMT -5
WOW, Look at the difference in the chin on the last comparison!From 1963 to 1966: 43 weeks between
|
|
|
Faul
Mar 17, 2016 11:27:32 GMT -5
Post by chica on Mar 17, 2016 11:27:32 GMT -5
I always thought "something strange about Linda"; just after her wedding to Faul a reporter asked how she felt. "We're very happy", she drawled but didn't look it. Dressed in a drab brown coat: she had just snared the world's most eligible bachelor. It seemed odd that after 5 years with Jane Asher he had dumped her for a plain Jane with no personality. As for anyone thinking Faul could be just an old lady in drag; that is just people trying to turn it into farce to get people off the real scent. As for him being 71, I had thought he was older than that. Paul was 24 in 1966 but the other guy as well as being taller, broader and having black hair when Paul's was brown, was also about 6 years older that would account for why Paul suddenly didn't look "baby faced" any more especially that black bushy beard was very aging. This means that Faul is now 77! However, as stated in the film by Jensen Rufe, "Billy died in 1977" therefore, we now have a second (official) imposter. The forum should, indeed, get back on track: too much disinformation is now clouding the issue. If your talking about Bill Shepherd, he died in 1988.
www.starborne.net/music-directors/bill-shepherd/
|
|
|
Faul
Mar 17, 2016 11:44:04 GMT -5
Post by chica on Mar 17, 2016 11:44:04 GMT -5
I watched this video on YT which gives a very convincing argument that Paul was replaced by a studio musician named Billy Shepherd. The photos they have of this Billy show that he really did have the same figure and features as Paul, very similar. Also there is the fact that this Billy was the son of a famous musician in the UK named William Shepherd, and he had been playing music with his dad at a young age. Also, Billy had a Merseyside band named Billy Pepper and the Pepperpots that played in the Mersey around the same time as the Silver Beetles. Nothing much is heard from Billy after the end of 1966. They mention that John did not like him and nicknamed him Billy Shears because shepherds use shears. www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2jDaTD7xNY I posted comments to that video under the name 'frank facts' and briefly dueled with a commenter claiming John was replaced, too. I have been on David Biggs site for a while and I'm getting ready to quit it because I posted information that and he deleted it that the person he is claiming is Faul is Keith Allison formerly with Paul Revere and the Raiders. Keith is still performing under his own name and has an official site if you care to look it up. Also informed him that he is claiming that Faul is Bill Shepherd of Billy and the Pepper Pots and this is that person:
www.discogs.com/artist/411882-Bill-Shepherd
|
|