|
Post by iameye on Jul 22, 2011 17:41:43 GMT -5
|
|
NAYDON
For Sale
I believe in Jehova!
Posts: 237
|
Post by NAYDON on Aug 5, 2011 6:15:11 GMT -5
Please, dear u all! Could someone here can enlight me please? Where is the entrance to a hollow heart? ?? through the instrument? LOL! Freaking hollow-cked one. Bad try 4 me, seems like asshole ones = ass without hole. Thanks 4 your words.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Dec 21, 2011 2:01:28 GMT -5
Well, for a while I thought there might have been a Paul for 1964, a different one for 1965, and then the newest one, today's so called Billy/William etc. for 1966. Imean, i haven't thought about all this much in about 2 years, but as I sit and reflect on the whole business, I really can't say now that I have any idea what 1964 Paul might have looked like; I mean how was he different from Bill, and, well, I really don't know. I have tried to draw what I thought might have been correct, but as I remember those images, well, I don't remember ever seeing those images as real people. I guess what I am realizing is, I have no idea what Paul looked like in 1964, because in 1968 I thought I remembered what that was, but, and maybe I did, but I sure as heck can't remember now. I have absolutely no idea. That is frustrating, because I have nothing to point to or indicate whatever that "image" could have been. What could I have been clinging to? I mean, well, he looked essentially like Paul but a little more, well, uhm, a little bit more, uhm, I have no idea. I just don't know. It's all so vague now. And I honestly can't imagine reviewing all the pictures at this point, thousands and thousands, no I can't study all of those again--it's too much, it's simple too much. I just have to be happy with the memory of how grand the Beatles were, how great their music still is, and how wonderful Sir Paul (Derrick Hallibeck? Quentin McGibbons? Clarence Shulter?) is in his maintaining it all, and still writing, composing, playing, singing, performing, keeping the Beatle music alive and adding in hundreds of more songs of his own, I'll just enjoy the continuing success of James Paul McCartney and all his friends.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Dec 25, 2011 0:34:57 GMT -5
Well, for a while I thought there might have been a Paul for 1964, a different one for 1965, and then the newest one, today's so called Billy/William etc. for 1966. The devil is in the details, eh? But I get what you said in your post, the more you look the more it gets.. vague. One starts to think eh.. maybe nothing much at all happened back then, or is it we just become more relaxed about our doubts. But, I can't just let them off the hook that easy, something happened back in 1966 that still is unexplained, things are not settled and some things are still hidden. Apollo would say "in plain sight" of course..
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Dec 25, 2011 12:58:11 GMT -5
The thing for those of us who were around when the original Beatles came on the scene, we saw and we were fans and we had this image in our minds as to what these men looked like....so we thought....the really telling thing for me was the appearance of Sgt Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club...and what we had seen then seemed strange...but there was no clear explanation...we figured that they were older, and after having used drugs, changed their "look". This is the mindset that we were given. But in reality, the last public appearance of the Beatles in concert was August of 1966. The next appearance was in June of '67 when Sgt Pepper was released, that wasn't even a year later and we're talking about how much older they look. Even if they had abused drugs full throttle, in 10 months, how much could their appearance make them look years older?
What happened? Not only to them, but to us in our perception, could we have been so deluded as to think we knew what they looked like, that only in 10 months time, we think and see men who looked a great deal older?
Maybe it's old age beginning to set in with me, being only 50, but it makes me wonder what delusion were we under and when see pictures of what was Paul before 1966, such a stark difference as to "Bill"...the 1967 model to present....that we couldn't recognize the differences until someone posted side by side pics, and drawing lines to the eyes, nose, mouth, chin, etc...
Something has to be said about the passing of time and our perception of things looking back. We think we have seen these faces, and yet when we compare, even beginning to examine the differences in faces of Lennon, Harrison and Starr, then suspicions arise they were also switched out....perhaps not in a total transformation as Paul, but a strange thing occurred when the final concert ended and the emergence of Sgt Pepper. As the uniformed members stand in the middle of the cover, we see off to their right, the saddened faces of what was the Mop Tops...
It's all very strange.
|
|
|
Post by cherilyn7 on Jun 21, 2012 3:40:49 GMT -5
In Ed Sullivan pic it is clearly seen 2 are wearing boots with heels; the other 2 flat heeled shoes (remember Cuban heeled "Beatle boots" which started a fashion? This can drastically affect the comparison of heights. As for Ringo he is now unrecognisable facially from the 60's.
|
|
|
Post by cherilyn7 on Jul 17, 2012 3:55:05 GMT -5
Re post above from Viboronay July 2011 in pic of Faul holding Hofner bass skywards, he is clearly doing Satanic salute with his right hand. Zoom in. It was a different person post 1966 (year could be significant; same year John met Yoko) but the Sgt Pepper character seems different from the person we see today...the real Paul wud never have grown a big black beard (why would he need to except as a pretty obvious "disguise"). It was in our faces and we never spotted it. Also why was Linda in Wings (total crap)?
|
|
|
Post by cherilyn7 on Jul 17, 2012 3:56:43 GMT -5
Re post above from Viboronay July 2011 in pic of Faul holding Hofner bass skywards, he is clearly doing Satanic salute with his right hand. Zoom in. It was a different person post 1966 (year could be significant; same year John met Yoko) but the Sgt Pepper character seems different from the person we see today...the real Paul wud never have grown a big black beard (why would he need to except as a pretty obvious "disguise"). It was in our faces and we never spotted it. Also why was Linda in Wings (total crap)?
|
|
|
Post by truthseeker on Sept 14, 2012 19:11:29 GMT -5
It was a different person post 1966
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Dec 20, 2016 17:59:33 GMT -5
Hi guys, this is my second post here, after the one in the 'let me introduce to you' section: invanddis.proboards.com/thread/8227/hello-rabbitteethI've been reading many posts on this forum for some months trying to learn about this PID rumor and then about the Beatles in general. I also saw many of the websites comparing Paul and Faul. And it's obvious that they are indeed not the same person. But I also noticed that the websites do not have the same person for Paul (and for Faul). Luckily, I read rather early in a book that the Beatles used doubles. This resolved a big part of the mystery. Looking at pictures, I could easily see it was true that there were many different Pauls or Fauls, long before 1967 and afterwards.
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Dec 20, 2016 18:17:19 GMT -5
And I read with a lot of interest the summary of the posts by Apollo C Vermouth (said to be Neil Aspinall), because only insiders know what really happened. willemaus.wordpress.com/2015/07/03/apollo-c-vermouth/He wrote: 'Several recruits were used for differing reasons, Some used for photo ops, others for interviews. It required quite a cast of characters. It also explains the dfferences in photo comparisons.' Even for him, there are many different persons appearing if we search for Neil Aspinall in the images of Google. So there were obviously doubles for him too. I saw some people call some of them FrankenNeil or Frankenstein Aspinall. They look more like bodyguards. There seemed to be only one old Neil, so my guess is the real young Neil would be the one looking like the old one, the guy with the smallest face who is seen in many comparisons matching with Paul, showing he was indeed a double for Paul. What do you think?
|
|
|
Post by applepie on Dec 21, 2016 11:53:40 GMT -5
And I read with a lot of interest the summary of the posts by Apollo C Vermouth (said to be Neil Aspinall), because only insiders know what really happened. willemaus.wordpress.com/2015/07/03/apollo-c-vermouth/He wrote: 'Several recruits were used for differing reasons, Some used for photo ops, others for interviews. It required quite a cast of characters. It also explains the dfferences in photo comparisons.' Even for him, there are many different persons appearing if we search for Neil Aspinall in the images of Google. So there were obviously doubles for him too. I saw some people call some of them FrankenNeil or Frankenstein Aspinall. They look more like bodyguards. There seemed to be only one old Neil, so my guess is the real young Neil would be the one looking like the old one, the guy with the smallest face who is seen in many comparisons matching with Paul, showing he was indeed a double for Paul. What do you think? Strange days— indeed!
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Jan 1, 2017 15:15:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Jan 3, 2017 16:14:38 GMT -5
Neil Aspinall has these facial features: - eyebrows that get large and sparse. - an oval chin, - a curved line above the eyes, - two hills on his upper lip, - a beaky nose (from the side) - rabbit teeth (seen in this picture, he didn't seem to smile much) That is how he can be recognised when acting as Paul's double. But his eyebrows would have to be colored darker or he might have put on false ones. He is in the video of the Dutch interview in 3 parts: m.youtube.com/watch?v=fbCpQXmStZ4I'd say he looks like her, she has pretty much the same features, except the eyebrows: www.google.ca/search?q=pearl+witherington
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Jan 3, 2017 16:37:45 GMT -5
I didn't even know Neil Aspinall's name before. Now I know how important he was to the Beatles. When George Harrison was inducted into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame, his wife Olivia said this: "If he were here, he’d get a kick out of tonight. He’d be wanting to see everybody and party. But there probably would be a lot of people that he would thank. If you think of the span of his entire career, there would be so many people who are in this room tonight that he may want to mention, but I’m going to mention one that I’m sure of. And it’s the person in this room that George knew the longest in his life. That he met behind the air raid shelter when he was sneaking off to have a ciggie in school. Someone who looked after him, and all of them, from the time they were thirteen till – for George – the end of his life. And that is the mysterious Neil Aspinall. Thank you Neil for holding it together for all these years, because really, the whole phenomenon might not have happened or stayed together as long as it did without him. He’s helped us, he’s helped his family and George loved him dearly and many of you as well, so thank you very much. Now let’s let George’s music speak for itself." thateventuality.tumblr.com/post/94645829058/george-harrisons-posthumous-inApollo C Vermouth wrote that Neil Aspinall was a nom de plume (a pseudonym). willemaus.wordpress.com/2015/07/03/apollo-c-vermouth/Because of the "all", I think he may be Uncle Albert and the Albert Hall who had to fix many holes. www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/paulmccartney/unclealbertadmiralhalsey.htmlwww.azlyrics.com/lyrics/beatles/adayinthelife.htmlwww.azlyrics.com/lyrics/beatles/fixingahole.html
|
|
|
Post by B on Mar 14, 2018 18:17:37 GMT -5
^^^^^^ This post makes no sense to me. And I am doubtful, to be sure.
|
|
|
Post by B on Mar 20, 2018 15:20:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by TheRoller on Mar 20, 2018 17:46:20 GMT -5
^^^^^^ This post makes no sense to me. And I am doubtful, to be sure. This is 'theatre of one actor' genre. One actor dances as woman Ginger. The same actor changes costume and dances as man Fred. Two reels of film are cut and fused together. To the public it looks like man and woman dancing together. Youtube has video about movie making techniques at the time, 1935 and on. It was Bill dancing male and female parts in the picture above. Bill was 23 at the time. At the age of 18 Bill met Italian man 17 years her senior during touristy trip to Austria. Man Luidgy Freddy invited Bill to Rome. He was setting up first movie studio in Italy. He thought they could make movies together. This is from Russian history books. P.S. This movie making technique was disclosed to us in the Soviet Union by government. There is no way to figure it out. Both actors have the same scull. That's the clue! Everything IMHO! I’m Italian,but,WHO THE FUCK is Luidgy Freddy??? 🤣🤣
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Jun 23, 2018 18:05:32 GMT -5
aspinal never doubled for mccartney - but, there's a foto of him posing with jp&r while holding a 6 string on stage and standing in george's usual place; correct us if we're wrong. otherwise, it's purveying puckey to assert paul was doubled by neil and it illustrates insincerity on the part of the purveyor - as no one can be that honestly stupid to think that really transpired
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Dec 30, 2018 4:35:09 GMT -5
The "Paul" in your avatar is the one in whose face people have found stunning similarities to the latter years Aspinall. Feature for feature overlays, eye distance, nose length and shape, lips, chin, etc. But you probably know that.
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Jan 2, 2019 18:05:54 GMT -5
through the instrument? LOL! Freaking hollow-cked one. Bad try 4 me, seems like asshole ones = ass without hole. Thanks 4 your words. What in the world
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Jan 3, 2019 0:34:20 GMT -5
Doesn't everyone's crotch glow like that?
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on Jan 3, 2019 2:06:51 GMT -5
Doesn't everyone's crotch glow like that?
|
|
iameye
Electric Arguments
Posts: 1,119
|
Post by iameye on Jan 3, 2019 8:06:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Jan 27, 2019 9:50:57 GMT -5
Interesting how the camera operator sneakily zooms in on the huge scar carved into the left side of Martin's face. What's that from? Pt. 1 @ 00:03:36:
|
|