Would that "you" be me, B, or was that for "you all" (reading this)?
If this message was for me, personally, then I would say that the accusation
that I "value this junk more than anything I've given you" is not necessarily so.
As to whether, in this case, "much is stolen and misused just to make a buck",
I have no knowledge of whether THEGOLDENAGENT has made any money
on his/her videos, but I rather doubt it.
My inclination is to think that THEGOLDENAGENT may have also been
"Grandfather Aleister" and "Nowhereman999", whose videos I've found
to be intriguing and thought-provoking, so I've posted them.
Whether they are "junk" or not is in the eye of the beholder, imo.
I can understand, iameye, that - if you feel they are junk - it may displease you
that I have posted them, as they might seem (in your opinion) to be
disinformation, but I have never said to myself, "I think I'll post some
of GFA's videos to really piss off iameye".
That is, and was, not my intent.
Of course, I realize that if someone thinks they are speaking on the level
of, or on behalf of, a "god"/"goddess", as you seem to believe you do,
there may be an inclination on the part of yourself to think that your words
should carry more weight than those of a "mere mortal", but whether,
in fact, they do or will, depends on how readily a hearer/reader accepts
the notion that you have validity as one in such a capacity.
My present attitude toward iameye is that I can neither confirm nor deny
her validity as a god/goddess spokesperson; not because she isn't connected,
but because there's no way to determine how much of what she says is genuinely
inspired, and how much of it serves her ego.
Whether she has a Kingdom, or whether she is delusional, or whether it's
somewhere in between the two (most likely, imo), I have not been able to determine.
Really, short of some sort of psychic determination, there's really no way
to really know, imo. I will say this, she is uncannily cognisant of vast areas
of knowledge, and her current 'role' seems to fit the Beatle clues in such
a way that I would have to say she is certainly a part of the scheme.
(Maybe I'll comment more on that later.)
I don't dismiss what she has to say, but I don't rely heavily on it
either.
My attitude is that I'll find out soon enough, and either be pleasantly surprised,
or have my doubts confirmed.
I expect the manifestation of a heavenly kingdom relatively soon, but whether
it is "iameye's" or not, is yet to be seen.
I think there's an issue here with trying to discern where a person's
human identity starts and where their spirit identity "ends".
Does (can) anyone living as a mortal being have the capacity to speak 'perfectly'
as the mouthpiece of their essential spirit identity?
Do not the astrological aspects of ones birth impose a personality and outlook
that either limits or colors what a spirit would say and do through that person?
At what point do ego and subjectivity distort what might otherwise be
spiritual virtuosity?
Was Elvis "the King"? Did his life reflect "what Jesus would do"?
For better or worse, it may have.
I think we all need to be a bit leery of considering our earthly personna
to be a pure expression of the divine will.