|
Post by DarkHorse on Apr 4, 2006 19:24:52 GMT -5
Bill/Faul/Sir Paul had his hair combed straight down, flat on the top in the first scene on the bus in MMT and his head still appeared longer than Paul's.
|
|
|
Post by FP on Apr 4, 2006 19:39:54 GMT -5
Which scene on the bus? Wasn't he wearing a hat?
|
|
|
Post by Paul Bearer on Apr 5, 2006 14:59:14 GMT -5
See JoJo's smoking gun video of intercut comparisons of the 1966 Los Angeles press conference of JPM and the infamous 1967 British TV-LSD-promoting interview with Faul; that's just one of the many obvious visual/audio proofs we have available. Where can I see that? What's the link?
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Apr 5, 2006 17:22:28 GMT -5
Where can I see that? What's the link? Geez Skirmisher, "please read all previous posts". (I'm kidding..) LINK
|
|
|
Post by revolver on Apr 5, 2006 20:20:26 GMT -5
That video should be required weekly viewing for all PWR disbelievers.
|
|
|
Post by FP on Apr 5, 2006 20:33:45 GMT -5
That video should be required weekly viewing for all PWR disbelievers. I've seen it plenty of times.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Apr 5, 2006 20:58:51 GMT -5
Which scene on the bus? Wasn't he wearing a hat? The video is merely an illustration, some find it shows two different guys, esp when they look at the mannerisms, body language, expressions, etc. Some feel it's further proof that it's the same guy. (which I don't get, no really..) But so much more fun, is the Beatle Mystery. It's a party to which all are invited, and yet the invitation is a real head scratcher. To figure it out, you need a black light, a mirror, a background in Lewis Carroll, the tarot, an understanding in ancient myths, perhaps a grasp of cyphers, and anything else I can't remember at the moment. No sense of adventure? Your loss... To answer your question, a bit before he has on the hat, (which leads into the FOTH video), he is hatless, yes.
|
|
|
Post by FP on Apr 5, 2006 22:03:58 GMT -5
Ah, okay, thanks JoJo.
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Apr 5, 2006 22:13:39 GMT -5
JoJo, is that Magic Alex sitting behind Bill?
|
|
|
Post by -Wings- on Apr 6, 2006 0:18:51 GMT -5
Well said. That's why I can't get outraged over the idea of 'them' (be it Beatles, G-men, or even the big bad pentagram-adorned lizard people in the Illumaniti World Order who shot Kennedy) replacing Paul McCartney. It lends itself to so much fun and mystery.
|
|
|
Post by FP on Apr 24, 2006 0:39:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Apr 24, 2006 10:50:25 GMT -5
Those heights are stated from many other sources also. In my opinion, George, John and Paul were probably closer to 5'10" and Ringo 5'7". Doesn't everybody exaggerate their height anyway?
|
|
|
Post by FP on Apr 24, 2006 14:47:22 GMT -5
Those heights are stated from many other sources also. In my opinion, George, John and Paul were probably closer to 5'10" and Ringo 5'7". Doesn't everybody exaggerate their height anyway? Well as long as it can be agreed those three were the same height.
|
|
|
Post by FP on Apr 25, 2006 23:38:24 GMT -5
Here's my take on Dylan being replaced: He wasn't. Check it out:
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Apr 26, 2006 1:48:03 GMT -5
Agreed. The only change that I see really, is advancing under-eye bags, the look of chronic and progressive toxemia.
But, we know that poets must live hard and die young, or merely live hard and look the part.
Truly, at times I think he was a political prophet, and like it is said, a prophet is not recieved in his own hometown (country).
Maybe he did soften up from pressure. I don't know of any stories or news blips to support that. I think he may have got weary writing activist songs when good changes didn't come.
Though I think he did have an impact. He raised awareness. SOme of his old songs still have that power. I believe that some things in America are better than they were in the 60;s. Not a lot, not enough. We are a complacent people, we Americans. We need voices like Dylan to roust us up to watchfulness against the gradual erosion of our public servants and our rights as a people.
I know someone who sang back ups on the new Neil Young album. According to him, there were 100 singers engaged to do such. It happened in a very long, grueling recording session at Capitol records in LA.
My friend remarked that the politics and lyrics were a bit shocking, but that most of the singers were in support of Young's ideas and a couple of times, appluase and cheering broke out at hearing (and being asked to sing) certain things.
Every government in the world needs corrective, "monitory" voices heard out in the open to keep a check and balance on their national body politic.
How else can any organization made of mere mortals be kept from eventual total corruption from greed, abuse of power and hubris?
Universal surveillance and compliance is what an evolving power structure seeks sooner or later; I say the populace ought equally to have ways to look in on them as well as pulling the reins on the excesses of governance.
It's defining limits in both directions.
|
|
|
Post by FP on Apr 26, 2006 18:15:13 GMT -5
Agreed. The only change that I see really, is advancing under-eye bags, the look of chronic and progressive toxemia. Exactly. I think the first and last picture make the best comparison. I threw in the middle two because they were at a similar angle.
|
|
|
Post by revolver on Apr 26, 2006 20:03:05 GMT -5
Here's my take on Dylan being replaced: He wasn't. Check it out: Could be wrong, but I think the first one is from '65 or '66. His hair wasn't that long in '64.No, that's right. It was that long by the end of the year.
|
|
|
Post by FP on Apr 26, 2006 21:14:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by FP on Apr 26, 2006 21:15:23 GMT -5
Crap, left this window open, didn't see your post, sorry.
So do you think he was replaced?
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Apr 26, 2006 21:45:43 GMT -5
Well yer not askin me but I don't think he was replaced... at least not permanently... or anything close to the Paul/Faul/Billy game. With JPM & Bill I can tell the 2 apart instantly... with the exception of a very few pics.... no problem. Instant recognition now. I haven't seen anything close to that when skimmin' over the posted Dylan stuff. Of course.... I have no time to really look into it, so I couldn'y say for sure. Hell man.... I don't have enough time to delve into all this beatle stuff as much as I'd like, so I don't have much interest in usin' that valuable time on Dylan. But that's just me.
|
|
|
Post by revolver on May 1, 2006 22:03:51 GMT -5
So do you think he was replaced? I don't know. I started the thread so it could be investigated if anyone wants to pursue it.
|
|
|
Post by FP on May 14, 2006 19:37:41 GMT -5
It looks to me that either John, or both of them are wax figures.
|
|
|
Post by lili on May 15, 2006 9:54:09 GMT -5
Or cardboard ones. Hey, I never would've thought of that if you didn't say what you did. Thanks, FP.
|
|
|
Post by FP on Jun 13, 2006 21:45:22 GMT -5
Peplexed, is that it?
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Jun 13, 2006 21:55:35 GMT -5
Peplexed, is that it? That fits the bill no pun intended but there are 2 or 3 others. There is one somewhere......will find.....Thinking cap time......let me exercise the steel sieve......
|
|