|
Faked?
Jul 26, 2006 22:35:00 GMT -5
Post by atd on Jul 26, 2006 22:35:00 GMT -5
No, not faked. Nope. Again, no. Please, serious searchers, be aware that high camera angles, natural topdown lighting and changes in hairstyle can be deceiving and change the \"look\" of James Paul McCartney. An animated compare can cut through the \"style\" and lighting and show you the truth. For instance... A slight change of angle does not change a persons facial proportions in this manner. Here\'s the rule of apparent foreshortening... Ears go up, nose goes down. Ears go down, nose goes up.
|
|
|
Faked?
Jul 26, 2006 23:51:35 GMT -5
Post by FP on Jul 26, 2006 23:51:35 GMT -5
Um, is this addressed to us? If not, thanks for re-enforcing our point! Those are some nice examples. BTW, didn't you always think the color pic in the first fade was doctored?
|
|
|
Faked?
Jul 27, 2006 1:41:18 GMT -5
Post by atd on Jul 27, 2006 1:41:18 GMT -5
BTW, didn\'t you always think the color pic in the first fade was doctored? You have me confused with someone else (yet again). These two compares totally violate the rule of apparent foreshortening, thus lending proof to the statement that Paul was replaced. These compares also show us why that american plastic surgeon thought that \'Paul\' had his ears surgically lowered.
|
|
|
Faked?
Jul 27, 2006 2:09:22 GMT -5
Post by atd on Jul 27, 2006 2:09:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
Faked?
Jul 27, 2006 2:22:57 GMT -5
Post by beatlies on Jul 27, 2006 2:22:57 GMT -5
The head sizes of JPM and Faul in the above flashing-back-and- forth-between two photos are strikingly different. Faul's is much larger and longer shaped, and has a larger and higher forehead (allowing for what we can presume to be under JPM's wing, given JPM's smaller and rounder head). The relative positions of the eyes, nose, mouth, jaw, and ear placement are also clearly different, as is the distance between the eyes (Faul's is narrower). This would be even clearer if the "fade" was done slowly, rather than trying confuse, and induce headaches in, the viewers, who are presented above with something like a rippling blur.
|
|
|
Faked?
Jul 27, 2006 2:49:39 GMT -5
Post by il ras on Jul 27, 2006 2:49:39 GMT -5
Forget this kind of fades... Just look at this two pics Do you think that the guy on the right is the same in both the photos?
|
|
|
Faked?
Jul 27, 2006 7:00:07 GMT -5
Post by eyesbleed on Jul 27, 2006 7:00:07 GMT -5
Um, is this addressed to us? If not, thanks for re-enforcing our point! Those are some nice examples. You ARE joking, right? Do you not see that head inflate like a balloon? I hate to be the one to tell y'all this, but real heads don't do that.
|
|
|
Faked?
Jul 27, 2006 8:28:07 GMT -5
Post by eyesbleed on Jul 27, 2006 8:28:07 GMT -5
This is all a lot like the political situation right now. Ya got conservatives cheering Bush on even after it's obvious that Bush has destroyed the old Goldwater conservative party. Why do true conservatives cheer on the most extreem "big-spending-big-gov't" administration in US history? he has destroyed their party & yet they cheer him on.
Why do christians cheer him on... he's not a christian, he's an occultist.... just look at his actions & his decisions... those are not the actions of a good moral human being... quite the opposite, yet these well.meaning church goers cheer him on...WHY? It's like cheering on satan himself, yet they continue.
You decide what you want to see & that is exactly what you see... even if the evidence against you is overwhelming.
.... fingers in ears..... hands over eyes... ...lalalalalalalalalalalalalalala... I don't see you!
|
|
|
Faked?
Jul 27, 2006 9:53:05 GMT -5
Post by lili on Jul 27, 2006 9:53:05 GMT -5
I love you, eyesbleed ! ;D
|
|
|
Faked?
Jul 27, 2006 10:02:53 GMT -5
Post by JoJo on Jul 27, 2006 10:02:53 GMT -5
Welcome ATD.
|
|
|
Faked?
Jul 27, 2006 10:56:51 GMT -5
Post by FP on Jul 27, 2006 10:56:51 GMT -5
Oops, delete that please ^ This is all a lot like the political situation right now. Ya got conservatives cheering Bush on even after it's obvious that Bush has destroyed the old Goldwater conservative party. Why do true conservatives cheer on the most extreem "big-spending-big-gov't" administration in US history? he has destroyed their party & yet they cheer him on. Why do christians cheer him on... he's not a christian, he's an occultist.... just look at his actions & his decisions... those are not the actions of a good moral human being... quite the opposite, yet these well.meaning church goers cheer him on...WHY? It's like cheering on satan himself, yet they continue. You decide what you want to see & that is exactly what you see... even if the evidence against you is overwhelming. .... fingers in ears..... hands over eyes... ...lalalalalalalalalalalalalalala... I don't see you! Funny how you get to slide by that "no politics" rule. Didn't The Bug get banned for that? And I meant that everything ATD said was true. All the fades are good, other than the last one. I just left that part out. And atd, the pics are all at somewhat different angles in each fade you posted which involved in the missing tooth pic. img140.imageshack.us/img140/4249/paulandpaul23lg9.gif^ Look at our left ear. Moves a bit higher. So you can't compare the recent pic to the B&W one. img467.imageshack.us/img467/5234/pia9pd.gif^ The angle isn't completely perfect there either. If it was, the nose would be lower and the ears would be higher. img407.imageshack.us/img407/7209/paulandnotpaul16xt7.gif^ Here, it's the exact opposite. I love doing this. Feels like the good ol' days. ;D
|
|
|
Faked?
Jul 27, 2006 11:54:35 GMT -5
Post by DarkHorse on Jul 27, 2006 11:54:35 GMT -5
Funny how you get to slide by that "no politics" rule. Didn't The Bug get banned for that? The "no politics" rule has been eliminated. There is also an addition to rule #9.
|
|
|
Faked?
Jul 27, 2006 12:22:32 GMT -5
Post by JoJo on Jul 27, 2006 12:22:32 GMT -5
Funny how you get to slide by that "no politics" rule. Didn't The Bug get banned for that? The "no politics" rule has been eliminated. There is also an addition to rule #9. The Politics business was changed some time ago I might add. Bug well.. like some others, he tended to disrupt our train of thought. It's OK here, in the designated area so to speak. (let's keep it that way)
|
|
|
Faked?
Jul 27, 2006 12:30:23 GMT -5
Post by McCartneyIII on Jul 27, 2006 12:30:23 GMT -5
.... fingers in ears..... hands over eyes... ...lalalalalalalalalalalalalalala... I don't see you! Rigth!, that's the PIDers actitude everytime a PIAer debunke one theorie or "Faulwannabe" pic, because there's not one PID theory who stands still, from 1969 PID explotion til today. Exactly, .... fingers in ears..... hands over eyes... ...lalalalalalalalalalalalalalala... I don't see you!
|
|
|
Faked?
Jul 27, 2006 14:22:55 GMT -5
Post by revolver on Jul 27, 2006 14:22:55 GMT -5
You ARE joking, right? Do you not see that head inflate like a balloon? I hate to be the one to tell y'all this, but real heads don't do that. LSD can do that. I read it somewhere. It's called the Alice in Wonderland effect. The only cure is the red pill.
|
|
|
Faked?
Jul 27, 2006 14:38:14 GMT -5
Post by FP on Jul 27, 2006 14:38:14 GMT -5
Alright, my bad.
There's a lot in rule 9. You mean the
part? I know this is a PWR forum, and it actually makes more sense to post PIA stuff here than it is on MFH. But I don't use this forum to show off my new fades like I used to. I just post what's relevant to what's going on in the thread, or other posts I can't reply to. I even warned Mello Yellow about doing what I did in the past.
|
|
|
Faked?
Jul 27, 2006 15:47:16 GMT -5
Post by DarkHorse on Jul 27, 2006 15:47:16 GMT -5
Well, FP, we had you in mind when we created this section.
|
|
|
Faked?
Jul 27, 2006 16:56:17 GMT -5
Post by eyesbleed on Jul 27, 2006 16:56:17 GMT -5
Rigth!, that's the PIDers actitude everytime a PIAer debunke one theorie or "Faulwannabe" pic, because there's not one PID theory who stands still, from 1969 PID explotion til today. Exactly, .... fingers in ears..... hands over eyes... ...lalalalalalalalalalalalalalala... I don't see you! Interesting... what is it that we're not "seein'" It's obvious without fades that there's been more than one Paul. Are we just not lookin' at'em right? Just because y'all can make some good fades does not explain all the other pics that are obviously not JPM. So what's the point? I've never understood that. And there is no way in hell you can prove that JPM NEVER had a replacement. That's common practice in the entertainment industry ya know. Maybe not permenent replacements, but standins are very common... yet JPM NEVER had one fill in for him. Why is that? I'm not sure what yer talkin' about when it comes to PID theories. We have no proof that JPM died in 66 & there's a large number of members here who have concluded that he didn't die. I disagree with the idea that he lived on after 66, but I can certainly see why they would come to that conclusion. So there is no PID theory... other than the one put forth in song by the Beatles themselves. This isn't a PID forum.... but it's obvious he was replaced, so it's a PWR forum. OK, so yer sayin' that if everybody here would just "open their eyes" that we will realize all these pics of this other guy will suddenly look like JPM? Will our ears open up too so all the vocals sound the same? This all seems very magical... Will Bills eyesockets grow further apart or will JPM's come closer together? Will Bill shrink or will JPM grow? And I've been asking this for years & have yet to get an answer, but how is it that JPM NEVER had a replacement? That would make him one of the few major stars that hasn't had a standin at one time or another.... I just find this whole theory to be amazing.. & as far out there as they come. ...& they proclaim... "every single picture that says Paul McCartney IS Paul McCartney..... it has been proclaimed & so it is.
|
|
|
Faked?
Jul 27, 2006 19:50:31 GMT -5
Post by FP on Jul 27, 2006 19:50:31 GMT -5
OK, so yer sayin' that if everybody here would just "open their eyes" that we will realize all these pics of this other guy will suddenly look like JPM? Will our ears open up too so all the vocals sound the same? This all seems very magical... Will Bills eyesockets grow further apart or will JPM's come closer together? Will Bill shrink or will JPM grow? You gotta back yourself up when you say things like that... Okay, show me a John, George, and/or Ringo stand in.
|
|
ggee
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 9
|
Faked?
Jul 27, 2006 20:13:54 GMT -5
Post by ggee on Jul 27, 2006 20:13:54 GMT -5
OK, so yer sayin' that if everybody here would just "open their eyes" that we will realize all these pics of this other guy will suddenly look like JPM? Will our ears open up too so all the vocals sound the same? This all seems very magical... Will Bills eyesockets grow further apart or will JPM's come closer together? Will Bill shrink or will JPM grow? You gotta back yourself up when you say things like that...
|
|
|
Faked?
Jul 27, 2006 20:20:18 GMT -5
Post by eyesbleed on Jul 27, 2006 20:20:18 GMT -5
Nobody ever said there was a replacement for any of them, but there's plenty of pics showin' an obvious JPM replacement.
It's widely agreed upon among us folks who keep oure eyes closed, that the most noticeable differences between JPM & Bill is the space between the eyes,& their height differences.
DAMN... I still didn't get an answer to that one big question explainin' why all these funny-lookin' pics really are JPM... they gotta be coz he NEVER had a replacement.
|
|
|
Faked?
Jul 27, 2006 20:27:03 GMT -5
Post by atd on Jul 27, 2006 20:27:03 GMT -5
I should clarify here that, this thread is meant to clear up confusion about what JPM really looked like. I KNOW, without a doubt, that Paul was replaced. However, there are some pictures of Paul that can confuse the viewer. Ilras , this picture of Paul was not faked or altered... He is facing the camera with his head tilted down and his jaw open. This position makes his nose appear longer and changes his apparent look. However, this is an illusion. He hasn't changed. In this pic... Paul has tilted his head back towards his neutral position, becoming more recognizable. The ears drop and nose apparently shortens (again an illusion) I have done countless hours of analysis. Believe me, I would tell you if I thought it was faked. Thanks for all your great posts and pictures. Beatlies, I quite enjoy your posts, you are an excellent researcher. My compares are not meant to obscure with the speed of transitions, quite the opposite. I find that slow fades are an easy way to blend two different people. a tactic used quite frequently by KHAN and FP. Having said that, however, I will use from now on, a 20 ms instead of a 10 ms transition, in my future compares, due to your feedback. Some of my future posts will contain the fast compares, as thay are a lot of work to re-do. ( I have amassed quite a collection I have yet to fully share) I'm asking the PWR crowd to refine your sight even more. This is the only way we will get to the undisputable truth. Please remember this...The only ways that the PWNR crowd can get the features of two different pictures to 'Match', is to use pictures where the ears are obscured or the pictures have been altered. Most of the time the altered pictures are of Faul, or as I call him, notPaul (!Paul). Most of the PWNR 'matches' are not, they just think that they can proclaim them as such and get away with it. A perfect match between two different men is impossible....the devil's in the details. Thanks for the welcome Joe...greets to all.
|
|
|
Faked?
Jul 27, 2006 20:35:15 GMT -5
Post by revolver on Jul 27, 2006 20:35:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Faked?
Jul 27, 2006 20:43:05 GMT -5
Post by FP on Jul 27, 2006 20:43:05 GMT -5
You gotta back yourself up when you say things like that... If you think the ratio is the same in those pics, the top of Paul's head was MASSIVE! Faul barely has a forehead! DAMN... I still didn't get an answer to that one big question explainin' why all these funny-lookin' pics really are JPM. If there's a funny pic of you, you'll think you were replaced? Everyone has had some bad pics taken of them. And there are more post '66 pics like that because there have been more pictures altogether of him. i107.photobucket.com/albums/m281/ilras/65rw08.jpg^ Let me say that George's head looks the weirdest in that shot. Show me a fade of mine like that. But it's your job to prove that they're altered, or else it doesn't mean a thing.
|
|
|
Faked?
Jul 27, 2006 21:05:22 GMT -5
Post by atd on Jul 27, 2006 21:05:22 GMT -5
But it's your job to prove that they're altered, or else it doesn't mean a thing. I have, but you just go LALALALALALALALALALALALA!!! btw, you are correct FP, KHAN is the slow motion bandit, not you. Cheers, NotRevolver aka atd.
|
|