|
Post by because on Oct 15, 2013 9:52:58 GMT -5
You answered my question. The one I didn't want to ask..... The clues then may point to the fact that there was no "real Paul" or if there was one that they accepted as real - he was gone. It explains to me why the current Paul seems to be guilt-free. I always thought that a Day in the Life was about a politically prominent person using the drugs that they were highly condemning ... I thought the phrase "holes that fill the Albert Hall" were "a--holes" .... Hey New is being sold on vinyl - so maybe more clues?
|
|
|
Post by cherilyn7 on Oct 15, 2013 16:18:44 GMT -5
Yes. I wonder how many Paul's there actually were/are.......... I always wondered if the Paul on the cover of Meet the Beatles was/is a different Paul. Does the group accept that there is a "real" Paul. - maybe the one who was with Jane Asher? He is the one who went missing......? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ John said, "I picked Paul to be my partner....now George came through Paul....", in an interview. Yes, there was a "real Paul" as with others who have been replaced in the entertainment world. There is always an "original" who has the talent and magic that only an original can have; though others may try to copy (as with Jim Morrison)...it is something that certain individuals have that marks them out from the crowd. It becomes a commodity. Back to Paul: I believe all four were replaced. I believe changes in relationships also are "markers" for changes....it becomes very complicated. Paul was different from the other three (original) as he did not have a married home life; though he was reputed to be with Jane for 5 years but never married her. As she was an actress (also child actress) she would be able to continue with the role after the real Paul disappeared and went on the India trip with "Bill" (see the body language in the photos). The group that went to Hamburg before they were famous; this was the original four (including Pete Best on drums), however, circa 1962 there seem to be photos that show a "different" Paul (vOOdOOgurU has posted these on another thread. Enlarge them and look for yourself)...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 15, 2013 18:01:59 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 15, 2013 18:07:23 GMT -5
"A why are clues only pointing to "Paul is dead"? Shouldn't it be "They are all dead"? Which also begs the question; who was putting the clues in there if all the originals were dead? Why would the 'Featles' want to shoot themselves in the (bare)foot? While all the while 'doctoring' photos to "cover their tracks"."Actually Linus, once you know "who" planted the clues, all will be clear. lol
|
|
|
Post by linus on Oct 15, 2013 18:10:58 GMT -5
The first pairing have different jaw-lines. The second pairing have different ears. And how many can we find that don’t match any of these? We also have a one-time glimpse of this other Paul In 1960. These photos were allegedly taken by their friend Astrid at some point after they arrived in Hamburg, (which is when they also changed their name to just The Beatles). This Paul has a long narrow face, a pointed right eyebrow and a much different mouth. The rest of the set contains only John, George and Stuart. Where did these eyebrows come from. If it's doctored, which 'Faul' is it supposed to look like? Aren't they all 'Fauls'? I'm not wondering who planted the clues. "If they're all dead, then who planted the clues?" is a rhetorical question. Albeit a serious one, when coming from a 'they were all replaced' paradigm.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 15, 2013 18:15:37 GMT -5
The first pairing have different jaw-lines. The second pairing have different ears. And how many can we find that don’t match any of these? It's a lighting issue.
|
|
|
Post by linus on Oct 15, 2013 18:18:28 GMT -5
It's a light issue LVX latin for Light.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 15, 2013 18:21:38 GMT -5
Well, if you don't wonder who planted the clues, maybe you can wonder who was supposed to find the clues. lol
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 15, 2013 18:23:57 GMT -5
It's a light issue LVX latin for Light.
|
|
|
Post by because on Oct 15, 2013 18:25:28 GMT -5
Thanks for all the help. This site is huge.... my question is that if all were replaced, how come we didn't get John is Dead, George is Dead and Ringo is Dead clues. Maybe they are there or maybe you all have already explored this?
|
|
|
Post by linus on Oct 15, 2013 18:38:49 GMT -5
Hey Because, perhaps you missed it from a few posts up, but I asked: If all of them were killed and/or replaced, why are there only "Paul is Dead" clues? Shouldn't it be "They're all dead" clues? I'm not saying there's only one John, George & Ringo, but their death clues just aren't there. Why single out Paul? I ask this to those that believe there were original Beatles for years, and then they were all suddenly replaced in 1966. There are, however, many foreshadowings to Lennon's death. That are documented in the "Pre-66 PID themes" thread. (with more to come). And to further illustrate my previous points, here are two photos from the forensic science article. Here are two photos from 1963. It's interesting that the Italian forensic scientists that posted their article in Wired, compared the jaw line of these two Pauls and declared them the same person. But failed to notice the glaringly different eyebrows.They also seem to have different noses, ears, mouths and chin cleft. Also, why did they use such a poorly-lit photo for their 'research'?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 15, 2013 18:39:20 GMT -5
Thanks for all the help. This site is huge.... my question is that if all were replaced, how come we didn't get John is Dead, George is Dead and Ringo is Dead clues. Maybe they are there or maybe you all have already explored this?They was just looking for love because only love understands death, and only love can explain life. Why Paul? Because he's a very good son. lol
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 15, 2013 18:44:48 GMT -5
Death is a concept by which we measure our God. lol
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 15, 2013 18:49:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by cherilyn7 on Oct 15, 2013 18:51:14 GMT -5
[quote We also have a one-time glimpse of this other Paul In 1960. These photos were allegedly taken by their friend Astrid at some point after they arrived in Hamburg, (which is when they also changed their name to just The Beatles). This Paul has a long narrow face, a pointed right eyebrow and a much different mouth. The rest of the set contains only John, George and Stuart. Where did these eyebrows come from. If it's doctored, which 'Faul' is it supposed to look like? Aren't they all 'Fauls'? I'm not wondering who planted the clues. "If they're all dead, then who planted the clues?" is a rhetorical question. Albeit a serious one, when coming from a 'they were all replaced' paradigm. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I don't believe any surviving Beatles exist: however, i don't think they all disappeared at exactly the same time so clues may have been placed though I am not a big fan of these elaborate "clues" and feel these were not placed by The Beatles themselves. As for the "eyebrows": later Pauls/Faul/Bill et al did not have these arched eyebrows (we are told by a recent contributor this was due to a stroke). These eyebrows are a dead giveaway that there different people before and after end of 1966 in particular. The "dopey look" I would suggest was due to alcohol. There was a Paul who was "chosen" by John as his partner; this person disappeared and I'm wondering if this could have been due, in part, to personal problems with drink and gambling. Excellent research/photos Linus; those pictures with Stu Sutcliffe in background look spooky!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 15, 2013 19:13:03 GMT -5
the king of cosmania
|
|
|
Post by because on Oct 15, 2013 22:17:30 GMT -5
Linus I did miss your question regarding "they're all dead" post. You really have given me so much information. Its amazing that we can see the differences but not question. Replacements and do. ubles is new information to most of us. I think from the pictorial evidence there seemed to be several replacements. Pictures we looked at over and over but could not/did not see......
|
|
|
Post by maclen on Nov 10, 2016 11:28:59 GMT -5
paul was still experimenting with different facial expressions congruent with maturation and innate acting ability. he was interpreting and reinterpreting himself consistent with the rewards and stresses surrounding him. this has contributed to or aided the effort to make us think there was more than one paul prior to later '66
|
|
|
Post by bandi on Nov 10, 2016 12:08:37 GMT -5
Ever wonder if the truth will be released to the world ? I don't know if it will be a good thing or not. I think that in one aspect it'll be good and in another aspect it will be hard for many to believe, for example, that they were probably cloning these men and exchanging them for different copies since the beginning. A guy came out yesterday with 'insider' information that John Kerry looks so different from years ago because he's been cloned since becoming secretary of state; and that the original Hillary died on October 8, 2016 and has been cloned which is what we see up until this very day. For most who don't believe in cloning, please see the videos of cartoon's Betty Boop, circa 1930's on youtube. They were showing us way back then what was up, but only one in ten million probably realized what they were trying to tell us. This is the method of disclosure which they are sworn to follow which is: they must show and/or tell us what they're doing/have done because if they don't they'll pay accordingly. This, they believe, clears their karma. They literally must show us or any attempts to control us will fail. Below are three examples of the method of disclosure in action; all are from the 1930's. THEY WERE SHOWING US WHAT THEY WERE DOING 80+ YEARS AGO ! There are plenty more on YT. No one has to believe this stuff, that's up to each of us individually. Please put aside your preconceived notions and beliefs and spend a few minutes with these: www.youtube.com/watch?v=icM3VPIqC9Ewww.youtube.com/watch?v=tSGya87HcCowww.youtube.com/watch?v=-smv-gZS34g
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Nov 10, 2016 16:44:01 GMT -5
Ever wonder if the truth will be released to the world ? I don't know if it will be a good thing or not. I think that in one aspect it'll be good and in another aspect it will be hard for many to believe, for example, that they were probably cloning these men and exchanging them for different copies since the beginning. A guy came out yesterday with 'insider' information that John Kerry looks so different from years ago because he's been cloned since becoming secretary of state; and that the original Hillary died on October 8, 2016 and has been cloned which is what we see up until this very day. For most who don't believe in cloning, please see the videos of cartoon's Betty Boop, circa 1930's on youtube. They were showing us way back then what was up, but only one in ten million probably realized what they were trying to tell us. This is the method of disclosure which they are sworn to follow which is: they must show and/or tell us what they're doing/have done because if they don't they'll pay accordingly. This, they believe, clears their karma. They literally must show us or any attempts to control us will fail. Below are three examples of the method of disclosure in action; all are from the 1930's. THEY WERE SHOWING US WHAT THEY WERE DOING 80+ YEARS AGO ! There are plenty more on YT. No one has to believe this stuff, that's up to each of us individually. Please put aside your preconceived notions and beliefs and spend a few minutes with these: www.youtube.com/watch?v=icM3VPIqC9Ewww.youtube.com/watch?v=tSGya87HcCowww.youtube.com/watch?v=-smv-gZS34gPlease, the clones you are referring to are mere software upgrades. Experimental cloning has always been looked at throughout time, but an actual clone knows how to stand out and shine a light when the pressure is beginning to build ...faster than a Wall, look how it towers over Paul
|
|
|
Post by bandi on Nov 10, 2016 18:08:06 GMT -5
Would you help me out, beatlas231 please ? You said "Please, the clones you are referring to are mere software upgrades. Experimental cloning has always been looked at throughout time, but an actual clone knows how to stand out and shine a light when the pressure is beginning to build ...faster than a Wall, look how it towers over Paul "... I see the reflection on the left and how it's bigger than 'Paul'. Other than seeing that, I'm confused by your post. I just don't understand what you're saying, could you break it down for this slowpoke please ?
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Nov 10, 2016 18:12:58 GMT -5
Would you help me out, beatlas231 please ? You said "Please, the clones you are referring to are mere software upgrades. Experimental cloning has always been looked at throughout time, but an actual clone knows how to stand out and shine a light when the pressure is beginning to build ...faster than a Wall, look how it towers over Paul "... I see the reflection on the left and how it's bigger than 'Paul'. Other than seeing that, I'm confused by your post. I just don't understand what you're saying, could you break it down for this slowpoke please ? Look at the Tweet posted above Paul, note the avatar saying DREAM which Paul is looking up at Da Vinci style
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Nov 10, 2016 18:15:01 GMT -5
is this the same body I'm inhabiting
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2016 8:53:09 GMT -5
just don't understand what you're saying, could you break it down for this slowpoke please ? Look at the Tweet posted above Paul, note the avatar saying DREAM which Paul is looking up at Da Vinci style
|
|
|
Post by bandi on Nov 20, 2016 22:21:20 GMT -5
I still don't understand and I guess you're just way too advanced in mind to break it down for me. I'll keep trying to understand though; meanwhile like Solomon I'll keep asking for more understanding while I look inside rather than seeking answers from outside. I'm not sure if you were sincerely trying to help me understand beatlas231/lucy or, if you were just having a few laughs with yourself while you enjoy your lofty-ness of mind. Thank you though if it's the former and, thank you if it's the latter.
|
|