|
Post by McCartneyIII on Oct 31, 2006 14:19:29 GMT -5
Once day i found this two pics and my friend StrawberryFields made this nice overlay and FlamingPie, did this masterpiece fade and KHAN this pretty Potato Faul That's mean Paul is Paul, and never was dead or was replaced
|
|
|
Post by That Latvian Guy on Oct 31, 2006 14:30:52 GMT -5
Then why are Paul's eyes a bit lower than Bill's?
|
|
|
Post by McCartneyIII on Oct 31, 2006 14:42:27 GMT -5
little angle diferences
|
|
|
Post by fourthousandholes on Oct 31, 2006 15:12:49 GMT -5
Oh puleeze. Two "suitable" pictures, and then you ignore all of John's clues, and obvious differences in height, appearence, voice prints, forehead lengths, etc. Sure.
|
|
|
Post by McCartneyIII on Oct 31, 2006 15:23:08 GMT -5
Oh puleeze. Two "suitable" pictures, and then you ignore all of John's clues, and obvious differences in height, appearence, voice prints, forehead lengths, etc. Sure. John Lennon radio interview with John Small of WKNR dispelling the rumors going around that Paul McCartney was dead. "It’s a joke, isn’t it? Paul isn’t dead: if he were, we would have told you. I don’t understand at all." He couldn’t comment on the clues, because "I’ll tell you, I’m not aware of any of them; I only read about them this morning in the paper and I can’t remember them. If you play anything backwards you’re gonna get a different connotation because it’s backwards. I’ve got no idea what Beatles records sound like backwards; I never play ’em backwards." He claimed not to think of himself as Christ-like, or Paul’s appearance on the Abbey Road cover as corpse-like: It’s the most stupid rumor I’ve ever heard. Sounds like the same guy that blew up my Christ remark, where the remark had been out for six months in England before anybody said anything about it, and this guy just blew it all up. Paul walks barefoot across the road because Paul’s idea of being different is to look almost straight, but have one ear painted blue; something a little subtle. We all were a bit like that. We used to go on stage with, say, one polythene bag on one foot, and nobody might notice it. Just us would be laughin’. So Paul, he decided to be barefoot that day, walkin’ across the road, but when you first glance at the album it looks like four Beatles or whatever fully dressed."
|
|
|
Post by McCartneyIII on Oct 31, 2006 15:41:35 GMT -5
I ONE IX = September 11Brian Samuel Epstein was born to Harry and Malka Epstein on September 19, 1934 in a private nursing home in Liverpool. linkI ONE IX = November 9Epstein visits the Cavern Club to see the band perform on November 9 1961 linkWhat i try to probe with this, you can read the two dates in this I ONE IX Sept 11 and Nov 9 is a mirrored date like is a mirrored image, this two dates are a reference to the man who discover The Beatles and modelate The Beatles image (He encouraged them to wear suits and clean up their stage performance. He insisted that they not smoke or eat onstage, and suggested the famous synchronised bow at the end of their performances) and work hard to made The Beatles jump to the fame. Epstein said, 'Look, if you wear a suit...' and everybody wanted a good suit, you know. A nice, sharp, black suit, man... We liked the leather and the jeans but we wanted a good suit, even to wear offstage. 'Yeah, man, I'll have a suit!' So if you wore a suit, you'll get this much money... Alright I'll wear a suit. I'll wear a fudgeing balloon if somebody's going to pay me. I'm not in love with the leather THAT much. Wear a suit, you'll get more money." linkSo what we got now I ONE IX HE is (for me) a clare Brian Epstein reference, the rhombus could it be the more close to a jewish star they can made, or yes an arrow the jump to the fame i mentioned before, or four points making a beetle figure. DIEWhy the piders only read DIE in english, and not read DIE in german? Die in german is THE , and is well know for all of us where the Beatles polish their style, bellow the bass drum there’s BEATLES wrote with flowers, so we got DIE BEATLES in german what translated to english is THE BEATLES, they never rename the band to Beatles. link
|
|
|
Post by revolver on Oct 31, 2006 16:30:53 GMT -5
Once day i found this two pics Too bad those pesky retractable ears keep getting out of alignment.
|
|
|
Post by McCartneyIII on Oct 31, 2006 16:54:14 GMT -5
Once a friend told me. "PIDers don't have the capacity for explanations for the lighting or angle being different, because they're too dumb to see it as that."
|
|
|
Post by FP on Oct 31, 2006 17:52:07 GMT -5
Once day i found this two pics Too bad those pesky retractable ears keep getting out of alignment. Haven't you learned anything about apparent foreshortening from atd?
|
|
|
Post by McCartneyIII on Oct 31, 2006 18:03:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Oct 31, 2006 18:56:52 GMT -5
Oh puleeze. Two "suitable" pictures, and then you ignore all of John's clues, and obvious differences in height, appearence, voice prints, forehead lengths, etc. Sure. Exactly.... we've been around this post about a billion times. Just because you guys can make an acceptable fade now & again, ya think that's all there is. And y'all act like this is the very first acceptable fade. FP made a few pretty good ones a long time ago... so what. We have shown long ago that fades can be made to show either argument..... REMEMBER? So.... what is it? Only stupid people are able to see the obvious differences in height & build? Only stupid people are able to see the vastly different foreheads or hear the different voices? What about all the other very odd pics of yer so-called Macca? I guess only stupid people would see the need for a replacement, if the #1 money makin' entertainer in the world had an accident. We're talkin' SHOW BIZ here folks & y'all's assumption that he NEVER had a replacement is really kinda weird. The show must go on after all. One thing is for sure tho.... I'm not stupid enough to forget that you (Mc3) are a guest in this house & if you were right here & called me "too stupid", you'd be flyin' head first out my front door right about now.
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Oct 31, 2006 19:38:33 GMT -5
Once a friend told me. "PIDers don't have the capacity for explanations for the lighting or angle being different, because they're too dumb to see it as that." How wise your friend is............. Remember the geniuses that have been chastised for seeing things which appear to the ignorant masses not to be there? I don't think I need to name names. Not that i'm calling myself or anyone else a genius for believing PID or PWR, nor for that matter am I calling anyone who doesn't believe ignorant, just making a point. However I think you need to get yourself some more open minded friends bud.
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Oct 31, 2006 21:34:11 GMT -5
the game is over, and PIA wins the whole battle. The game was over a long time ago. Remember the ear lobes? Paul's were attached , Sir Paul's were not. This would render your fades as having all of the usefulness of a bull with extra nipples. Run along now.
|
|
|
Post by FP on Oct 31, 2006 23:56:19 GMT -5
the game is over, and PIA wins the whole battle. The game was over a long time ago. Remember the ear lobes? Paul's were attached , Sir Paul's were not. This would render your fades as having all of the usefulness of a bull with extra nipples. Run along now. If it's that simple, tell all your friends! This place can become huge. Ring up the Post, or Dateline! Sorry, but I've seen pics where Paul's lobes look detached, and where "Faul's" are attached. So it's not a consistency. Oh, and you may wanna consider creating your own site, because the Don Knotts/Phil Ackrill/Charlie Brill stuff may not make great first impression... But I respect you for sticking to "basic" PWR and not turning into one of the fanatics.
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Nov 1, 2006 0:15:16 GMT -5
But I respect you for sticking to "basic" PWR and not turning into one of the fanatics.
That signpost up above, Red Lion: a sure sign you're heading down the wrong information lane. Take it as a cautionary note.
|
|
|
Post by atd on Nov 1, 2006 1:58:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by il ras on Nov 1, 2006 7:42:32 GMT -5
Better look with Elvis is alive boys! Did you mean "luck"? Anyway: 1 Fades don't' say anything 2 eyes and mouth are more or less in the same position in both pics: why does the nose grow so much?
|
|
|
Post by FP on Nov 1, 2006 8:08:06 GMT -5
You realize that pic won't match with stretched Pepper?
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Nov 1, 2006 8:18:52 GMT -5
If it's that simple, tell all your friends! This place can become huge. Ring up the Post, or Dateline! What the hell is up with you guys & the press?? Y'all just like to go 'round the same post over & over again don't ya. Why don't you call the press? And while yer at it, call the folks with the facial recognition programs so they can shut y'all up once & for all.
|
|
ggee
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 9
|
Post by ggee on Nov 1, 2006 8:40:37 GMT -5
the game is over, and PIA wins the whole battle. The game was over a long time ago. Remember the ear lobes? Paul's were attached , Sir Paul's were not. This would render your fades as having all of the usefulness of a bull with extra nipples. Run along now. Must be the moustache...
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Nov 1, 2006 9:14:49 GMT -5
And while yer at it, call the folks with the facial recognition programs so they can shut y'all up once & for all. I'd like to see what a true forensic scientist would do with this information. Certainly declaring early Paul to be the same man as late Paul would defy some laws of forensic science...
|
|
|
Post by McCartneyIII on Nov 1, 2006 9:57:13 GMT -5
Why don't you call the press Eyesbleed? because even you and youre nuts friends don't believe nothing about what is post here in NIR (Nobody Is Replaced), Game Over more pictures of Lili
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Nov 1, 2006 12:04:52 GMT -5
The game was over a long time ago. Remember the ear lobes? Paul's were attached , Sir Paul's were not. This would render your fades as having all of the usefulness of a bull with extra nipples. Run along now. Must be the moustache... I wonder what anyone can say to this obvious example of attached vs. detached earlobes...
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Nov 1, 2006 12:55:59 GMT -5
I've seen pics where Paul's lobes look detached, and where "Faul's" are attached. So it's not a consistency. After all this time, you are somehow still on the wrong side. Your fades, which have bolstered our POV as well as showcased the vast differences between the two men, have been appreciated tremendously. Now your words take center stage. Paul's earlobes are not consistent. What should we make of this statement? Does Paul arise in the morning and decide if he is in the mood for attacheys or detacheys? Shouldnt those ear lobes be consistent if in fact its been the same guy all along? Thanks for your help FP, you have been invaluable.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Nov 1, 2006 13:27:20 GMT -5
If it's that simple, tell all your friends! This place can become huge. Ring up the Post, or Dateline! What the hell is up with you guys & the press?? Y'all just like to go 'round the same post over & over again don't ya. Why don't you call the press? And while yer at it, call the folks with the facial recognition programs so they can shut y'all up once & for all. The press? The PRESS?!!! Oh, gawd, NO, never call "the Press"..............uh-uh, nope, na-da, ookey, nein, never.
|
|