|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 12, 2020 21:06:55 GMT -5
Exactly. Yeah, I mean, he started trying to counter-program my hand findings after I posted them and, very strangely, I have yet to find anyone else in the history of PID (or even just 'The Beatles' fandom) who noticed these things before I compiled all those pix of mutant Paul (etc) hands. Also, just the idea that anyone is coming up with theories in a vacuum, as he claims he does, is absurd on its face, since people have been speculating about PID for over fifty years.
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on May 12, 2020 23:21:24 GMT -5
Omg, I have no idea! How strange! I get hunches about things and I’ve got a feeling he’s from NJ and lived in MA. That’s probably just because of his accent though. I’m not a psychic-magick-satanist, I swear! 😂 I think he’s too smart to leave too many traces of his real self. You can’t talk as much as he does though, without leaving some trace behind. He’d be a tough one to figure out. Not impossible though... NOTHING is impossible (as we all know... ha!). I’m sure he reads this thread obsessively... He says he doesn’t read boards, but this one is all about him. There’s no way he doesn’t check in on it! Are we on the right track, Mike? And none of us should expect Mike to make a public video correction to his "Did The Beatles Write Their Own Music?" many errors and lazy research methods. And...don't expect Mike to make a public apology to his viewers and subscribers for pushing falsehoods about The Beatles Rubber Soul album. Nope...that would effect Mike's glorious image as head of PID research and all around Mr. Know It All as it concerns The Beatles just way too much for his ego to handle. The timing of his announcement to stopping PID research is also highly suspicious IMHO. Seems to me if you want to make one last haul of cash from PID babies and Memoir believers you just create a new "revelation"...and then also push a book adding more "new" info supporting that narrative. Yep...it stinks to high heaven when you keep asking people to once again buy books they already own! This has ego and greed written all over it IMHO.
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 13, 2020 10:20:15 GMT -5
Omg, I have no idea! How strange! I get hunches about things and I’ve got a feeling he’s from NJ and lived in MA. That’s probably just because of his accent though. I’m not a psychic-magick-satanist, I swear! 😂 I think he’s too smart to leave too many traces of his real self. You can’t talk as much as he does though, without leaving some trace behind. He’d be a tough one to figure out. Not impossible though... NOTHING is impossible (as we all know... ha!). I’m sure he reads this thread obsessively... He says he doesn’t read boards, but this one is all about him. There’s no way he doesn’t check in on it! Are we on the right track, Mike? And none of us should expect Mike to make a public video correction to his "Did The Beatles Write Their Own Music?" many errors and lazy research methods. And...don't expect Mike to make a public apology to his viewers and subscribers for pushing falsehoods about The Beatles Rubber Soul album. Nope...that would effect Mike's glorious image as head of PID research and all around Mr. Know It All as it concerns The Beatles just way too much for his ego to handle. The timing of his announcement to stopping PID research is also highly suspicious IMHO. Seems to me if you want to make one last haul of cash from PID babies and Memoir believers you just create a new "revelation"...and then also push a book adding more "new" info supporting that narrative. Yep...it stinks to high heaven when you keep asking people to once again buy books they already own! This has ego and greed written all over it IMHO. You're right that the research laziness, resulting in completely false claims, is offensive. I guess he's got his audience hypnotized to the point that he can just lie to their faces and they still don't question him. Surely, some of them are Beatles fanatics who probably already know when songs were written and who came in with what material, etc. It comes off as another power play.
|
|
|
Post by mothernaturesson on May 13, 2020 20:15:58 GMT -5
And none of us should expect Mike to make a public video correction to his "Did The Beatles Write Their Own Music?" many errors and lazy research methods. And...don't expect Mike to make a public apology to his viewers and subscribers for pushing falsehoods about The Beatles Rubber Soul album. Nope...that would effect Mike's glorious image as head of PID research and all around Mr. Know It All as it concerns The Beatles just way too much for his ego to handle. The timing of his announcement to stopping PID research is also highly suspicious IMHO. Seems to me if you want to make one last haul of cash from PID babies and Memoir believers you just create a new "revelation"...and then also push a book adding more "new" info supporting that narrative. Yep...it stinks to high heaven when you keep asking people to once again buy books they already own! This has ego and greed written all over it IMHO. You're right that the research laziness, resulting in completely false claims, is offensive. I guess he's got his audience hypnotized to the point that he can just lie to their faces and they still don't question him. Surely, some of them are Beatles fanatics who probably already know when songs were written and who came in with what material, etc. It comes off as another power play. 1. “PID Babies” is the funniest thing I’ve heard/read all week! 😂 2. I’d be *really* interested to find out who is on “his team or researchers”. I think it’s pretty lame to not give them credit, for the sake of (I’m assuming) keeping their identities protected. 😐 This is the internet, fool! Everyone’s got a screen name! If they wanted to remain anonymous, maybe say that. I’d be PISSED if I worked hard on something like that and didn’t get credit, outside of “a team of researchers”. 3. I feel like he had *some* useful information in the presentation - none of which was necessarily helpful in the intended context, but helped me on my way with some new ideas. I appreciated learning about Quincy Jones’ comments and a few other things/people that I didn’t know about, but, again, it was a launching point. Side note: I found that Quincy Jones article the other day... and it was misquoted in the presentation. Bravo. 👏🙄 4. Today, I was thinking about Mike being a Hypnotist... aren’t hypnotists considered a sort of magician? At least in antiquated schools of thought? I know that, now, they help people quit smoking and perform at county fairs, etc... but isn’t hypnotism, in the broad-sweeping, uninformed, finger pointing way that Mike is so fond of, a kind of brainwashing...? 5. I found this on his hypnotist website: I mean, really??? Sure...”International Association of Counselors and Therapists”... did y’all see that as an eye, like I did, on first glance?? I’m being intentionally obnoxious and am totally kidding (though, that really did look like an eye to me) - just highlighting HOW RIDICULOUS much of his barking is. He can spin anything into anything and people will believe it! STOP IT, MIKE!
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on May 14, 2020 0:16:40 GMT -5
And none of us should expect Mike to make a public video correction to his "Did The Beatles Write Their Own Music?" many errors and lazy research methods. And...don't expect Mike to make a public apology to his viewers and subscribers for pushing falsehoods about The Beatles Rubber Soul album. Nope...that would effect Mike's glorious image as head of PID research and all around Mr. Know It All as it concerns The Beatles just way too much for his ego to handle. The timing of his announcement to stopping PID research is also highly suspicious IMHO. Seems to me if you want to make one last haul of cash from PID babies and Memoir believers you just create a new "revelation"...and then also push a book adding more "new" info supporting that narrative. Yep...it stinks to high heaven when you keep asking people to once again buy books they already own! This has ego and greed written all over it IMHO. You're right that the research laziness, resulting in completely false claims, is offensive. I guess he's got his audience hypnotized to the point that he can just lie to their faces and they still don't question him. Surely, some of them are Beatles fanatics who probably already know when songs were written and who came in with what material, etc. It comes off as another power play. Indeed Mr.K! Here's some more damning logic against Mike...using his own words. Mike claims to be a life long Beatles fan..who has read many books on the group and even was a hardcore record collector of their music. But yet...he is totally ignorant when it comes to how many of the songs on Rubber Soul were conceptualized and created by John and Paul? He ignored that information on purpose so he could push his and Uharriets new Memoir "revelation" narrative! It is their attempt at one last cashgrab of the PID community before he moves on! It is truly sickening IMHO...and it is for reasons such as this that PID/PWR research is not taken more seriously.
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on May 14, 2020 0:37:35 GMT -5
You're right that the research laziness, resulting in completely false claims, is offensive. I guess he's got his audience hypnotized to the point that he can just lie to their faces and they still don't question him. Surely, some of them are Beatles fanatics who probably already know when songs were written and who came in with what material, etc. It comes off as another power play. 1. “PID Babies” is the funniest thing I’ve heard/read all week! 😂 2. I’d be *really* interested to find out who is on “his team or researchers”. I think it’s pretty lame to not give them credit, for the sake of (I’m assuming) keeping their identities protected. 😐 This is the internet, fool! Everyone’s got a screen name! If they wanted to remain anonymous, maybe say that. I’d be PISSED if I worked hard on something like that and didn’t get credit, outside of “a team of researchers”. 3. I feel like he had *some* useful information in the presentation - none of which was necessarily helpful in the intended context, but helped me on my way with some new ideas. I appreciated learning about Quincy Jones’ comments and a few other things/people that I didn’t know about, but, again, it was a launching point. Side note: I found that Quincy Jones article the other day... and it was misquoted in the presentation. Bravo. 👏🙄 4. Today, I was thinking about Mike being a Hypnotist... aren’t hypnotists considered a sort of magician? At least in antiquated schools of thought? I know that, now, they help people quit smoking and perform at county fairs, etc... but isn’t hypnotism, in the broad-sweeping, uninformed, finger pointing way that Mike is so fond of, a kind of brainwashing...? 5. I found this on his hypnotist website: I mean, really??? Sure...”International Association of Counselors and Therapists”... did y’all see that as an eye, like I did, on first glance?? I’m being intentionally obnoxious and am totally kidding (though, that really did look like an eye to me) - just highlighting HOW RIDICULOUS much of his barking is. He can spin anything into anything and people will believe it! STOP IT, MIKE! Very good stuff Mother...and I personally believe his "team of researchers" are non-existent. It's there just to make it look like he is more "legit" or serious about the subject thsn he really is. For example...who writes a book and doesn't thank their editor,publisher and proof readers? If you have help in any endeavor...don,t you thank those people by name for their hard work? Yes...you do! But Mike doesn't...why? Because he has no "team of researchers"...it is just him and Uharriet taking info from real online researchers and creating a new narrative around all of it. And yes...hypnotism IMHO is a form of brainwashing and mind control! The reason I called his video..."Did The Beatles Write Their Own Music"...his BEST video is because it has gone the farthest to expose him for the fraud he is! Yes...he had a couple of nuggets of good info in there...but it was wrapped in truths,half-truths and lies. After all...the best propaganda has elements of truth in it! And Mike/Uharriet know this very well! A pyramid with anything round in the middle of it always symbolizes the all seeing eye of providence IMHO.
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on May 14, 2020 1:05:28 GMT -5
More Rubber Soul Song Info -You Won't See Me Written in 1965 by Paul after a fight with Jane Asher. (The Beatles Bible.com) Think For Yourself An unusually harshly-worded warning about the perils of leaving bad deeds unrectified, the inspiration behind the song is unknown. In his 1980 autobiography I Me Mine, Harrison claimed not to remember its origins, although he made a self-deprecating reference to the likes of ‘Taxman’ and ‘Piggies’: ‘Think For Yourself’ must be written about somebody from the sound of it – but all this time later I don’t quite recall who inspired that tune. Probably the government." Whereas a number of Harrison’s later songs were awash with pseudo-cosmic wisdom, ‘Think For Yourself’ is remarkable for its earthy sourness. Parallels can be drawn between the song and ‘Within You Without You’, which found Harrison more at peace with the differences of others. Think For Yourself’ was recorded in a single session on 8 November 1965, under the working title ‘Won’t Be There With You’. The Beatles recorded the basic track – rhythm guitars, bass and drums – in a single take. They then overdubbed lead guitar, more bass (this time fed through a fuzz box), tambourine, maracas and organ, along with two three-part vocal tracks. "Paul used a fuzz box on the bass on ‘Think For Yourself’. When Phil Spector was making ‘Zip-A-Dee-Doo-Dah’, the engineer who’s set up the track overloaded the microphone on the guitar player and it became very distorted. Phil Spector said, ‘Leave it like that, it’s great’. Some years later everyone started to try to copy that sound and so they invented the fuzz box. We had one and tried the bass through it and it sounded really good." -George Harrison,1980 Prior to the recording, George Martin taped the group rehearsing the song. The Beatles were aware of this, deliberately playing up to the microphones. The recording went mostly unused, although a six-second segment of the group practising their harmonies found its way into the Yellow Submarine film, when The Beatles were called upon to revive the mayor of Pepperland. (The Beatles Bible.com) -If I Needed Someone Inspired by Roger McGuinn’s guitar work for The Byrds. ‘If I Needed Someone’ is like a million other songs written around a D chord. If you move your finger about you get various little melodies. That guitar line, or variations on it, is found in many a song, and it amazes me that people still find new permutations of the same notes." -George Harrison,1980 In 1965 The Beatles’ publicist Derek Taylor started his own public relations company, moving to America and representing, among others, The Byrds. Harrison asked Taylor to pass a message on to McGuinn to acknowledge the debt ‘If I Needed Someone’ owed to The Byrds’ ‘She Don’t Care About Time’ and ‘The Bells Of Rhymney’. McGuinn was already aware of the similarity. It is, additionally, interesting that Harrison’s own 12-string guitar work on 1964’s A Hard Day’s Night album had played a key role in the development of The Byrds’ own Rickenbacker-led jangling sound. The song also revealed Harrison’s burgeoning interest in Indian music. The song is based largely around a single chord, which anticipated the droning styles of later songs such as ‘It’s All Too Much’ and ‘Blue Jay Way’. (The Beatles Bible.com) Either Mike was too lazy to research the origins behind the songs on Rubber Soul, completely incompetent,or...he purposely ignored it!
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 14, 2020 20:13:46 GMT -5
You're right that the research laziness, resulting in completely false claims, is offensive. I guess he's got his audience hypnotized to the point that he can just lie to their faces and they still don't question him. Surely, some of them are Beatles fanatics who probably already know when songs were written and who came in with what material, etc. It comes off as another power play. Indeed Mr.K! Here's some more damning logic against Mike...using his own words. Mike claims to be a life long Beatles fan..who has read many books on the group and even was a hardcore record collector of their music. But yet...he is totally ignorant when it comes to how many of the songs on Rubber Soul were conceptualized and created by John and Paul? He ignored that information on purpose so he could push his and Uharriets new Memoir "revelation" narrative! It is their attempt at one last cashgrab of the PID community before he moves on! It is truly sickening IMHO...and it is for reasons such as this that PID/PWR research is not taken more seriously. Why would they move on when they have an audience willing to re-buy the same goddamned book (+ one extra paragraph of fatuous claims, per edition) every single year? I don’t have a problem with The Memoirs existing as a curious work of fiction, an imagined alternate history, but I really have a problem with Mike peddling faerie tales as facts, fabrications he very well knows are not at all true to an audience who mistakes him as acting in good faith. I find it doubly concerning that he is ostensibly employed in a quasi-medical profession wherein people are making themselves enormously vulnerable to him by revealing their most private details and traumas and he’s a huckster who has no problem swapping lies for adsense bucks. The lack of ethics he’s shown should have his memberships to those professional All Seeing Eye groups revoked, frankly. Is it possible that he’s only amoral in his private life and, at work, keeps things as on the level as a job brainwashing people can be? Maybe...but would you want to go to a doctor who has a side gig as a meth dealer? I’ve been known to buy Whole Tobacco Alkaloid Nicquid made by this guy who used to work in Poison Control and is now a nurse. None of this shit is *good* for you, but I trust his concoctions primarily because of his extensive medical and scientific background and training. The difference, though, is that Mike’s audience isn’t knowingly buying “poison”. They likely don’t even realize he’s using his hypnosis and NLP tools on them. It would be like me buying what I thought was fresh orange juice from my guy but it was actually from a can and also secretly dosed with his ejuice.
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on May 15, 2020 3:00:10 GMT -5
Indeed Mr.K! Here's some more damning logic against Mike...using his own words. Mike claims to be a life long Beatles fan..who has read many books on the group and even was a hardcore record collector of their music. But yet...he is totally ignorant when it comes to how many of the songs on Rubber Soul were conceptualized and created by John and Paul? He ignored that information on purpose so he could push his and Uharriets new Memoir "revelation" narrative! It is their attempt at one last cashgrab of the PID community before he moves on! It is truly sickening IMHO...and it is for reasons such as this that PID/PWR research is not taken more seriously. Why would they move on when they have an audience willing to re-buy the same goddamned book (+ one extra paragraph of fatuous claims, per edition) every single year? I don’t have a problem with The Memoirs existing as a curious work of fiction, an imagined alternate history, but I really have a problem with Mike peddling faerie tales as facts, fabrications he very well knows are not at all true to an audience who mistakes him as acting in good faith. I find it doubly concerning that he is ostensibly employed in a quasi-medical profession wherein people are making themselves enormously vulnerable to him by revealing their most private details and traumas and he’s a huckster who has no problem swapping lies for adsense bucks. The lack of ethics he’s shown should have his memberships to those professional All Seeing Eye groups revoked, frankly. Is it possible that he’s only amoral in his private life and, at work, keeps things as on the level as a job brainwashing people can be? Maybe...but would you want to go to a doctor who has a side gig as a meth dealer? I’ve been known to buy Whole Tobacco Alkaloid Nicquid made by this guy who used to work in Poison Control and is now a nurse. None of this shit is *good* for you, but I trust his concoctions primarily because of his extensive medical and scientific background and training. The difference, though, is that Mike’s audience isn’t knowingly buying “poison”. They likely don’t even realize he’s using his hypnosis and NLP tools on them. It would be like me buying what I thought was fresh orange juice from my guy but it was actually from a can and also secretly dosed with his ejuice. I think Mike is trying to pull out of the PID stuff because he knows people are starting to catch on to him and Uharriets con game...people are starting to ask harder and harder questions...which both Mike and Uharroet fail to answer. As I have said...I don't believe Mike will address any of the points we have all made in this thread. He will most likely ignore them and just try to pull out of PID as quickly as possible after they get their last big injection of cash from the sale of the Revised Billy's Back edition. I could be wrong about that though since Mike is watching the PID boards and social networking sites pretty closely. Or has his "spies/research team doing it for him. So...either way...we MIGHT just get a video from Mike about all of this. But I'm not holding my breath. Hell...if enough PID babies keep buying the books...I'm sure him and Uharriet will keep coming up with new "revelations". Who knows for sure though...time will tell. But my main problem is the same one you have K. Mike is pushing a fictional book as FACT! With no FACTS to support it! That...and his continued drum beating, and propaganda selling of Memoirs and its narrative is just disgusting IMHO. It is one thing to theorize and speculate...but its a whole different thing to state your theories and speculations are factual when you have no facts or real evidence to validate it! And this is what Mike does! IMHO...Mike is Uharriets cheerleader...he is the pied piper of lazy PID research...the turd in the PID punchbowl!
|
|
|
Post by mothernaturesson on May 15, 2020 13:19:02 GMT -5
Why would they move on when they have an audience willing to re-buy the same goddamned book (+ one extra paragraph of fatuous claims, per edition) every single year? I don’t have a problem with The Memoirs existing as a curious work of fiction, an imagined alternate history, but I really have a problem with Mike peddling faerie tales as facts, fabrications he very well knows are not at all true to an audience who mistakes him as acting in good faith. I find it doubly concerning that he is ostensibly employed in a quasi-medical profession wherein people are making themselves enormously vulnerable to him by revealing their most private details and traumas and he’s a huckster who has no problem swapping lies for adsense bucks. The lack of ethics he’s shown should have his memberships to those professional All Seeing Eye groups revoked, frankly. Is it possible that he’s only amoral in his private life and, at work, keeps things as on the level as a job brainwashing people can be? Maybe...but would you want to go to a doctor who has a side gig as a meth dealer? I’ve been known to buy Whole Tobacco Alkaloid Nicquid made by this guy who used to work in Poison Control and is now a nurse. None of this shit is *good* for you, but I trust his concoctions primarily because of his extensive medical and scientific background and training. The difference, though, is that Mike’s audience isn’t knowingly buying “poison”. They likely don’t even realize he’s using his hypnosis and NLP tools on them. It would be like me buying what I thought was fresh orange juice from my guy but it was actually from a can and also secretly dosed with his ejuice. I think Mike is trying to pull out of the PID stuff because he knows people are starting to catch on to him and Uharriets con game...people are starting to ask harder and harder questions...which both Mike and Uharroet fail to answer. As I have said...I don't believe Mike will address any of the points we have all made in this thread. He will most likely ignore them and just try to pull out of PID as quickly as possible after they get their last big injection of cash from the sale of the Revised Billy's Back edition. I could be wrong about that though since Mike is watching the PID boards and social networking sites pretty closely. Or has his "spies/research team doing it for him. So...either way...we MIGHT just get a video from Mike about all of this. But I'm not holding my breath. Hell...if enough PID babies keep buying the books...I'm sure him and Uharriet will keep coming up with new "revelations". Who knows for sure though...time will tell. But my main problem is the same one you have K. Mike is pushing a fictional book as FACT! With no FACTS to support it! That...and his continued drum beating, and propaganda selling of Memoirs and its narrative is just disgusting IMHO. It is one thing to theorize and speculate...but its a whole different thing to state your theories and speculations are factual when you have no facts or real evidence to validate it! And this is what Mike does! You guys are so right! I’ve been known to buy Whole Tobacco Alkaloid Nicquid made by this guy who used to work in Poison Control and is now a nurse. None of this shit is *good* for you, but I trust his concoctions primarily because of his extensive medical and scientific background and training. This makes sense to me! Who knows what is in the “FDA approved” stuff. I don’t trust them, at all. And look how long it took the unsuspecting masses to finally figure out/believe cigarettes cause cancer! LIARS! I want to say that these guys “aren’t worth the time”, but it is just so infuriating that people, similar to us, just interested in the truth - for our own peace of mind and for the public who DESERVES the truth (whether they think they want it or not) - have been led astray by these con men and are unlikely to see them for what they are. I mean, it’s hard enough to pull back the mainstream curtain of deceit. Their followers have to then work their around a thick, colorful tapestry of “PID TRUTH!!!” (That’s Mike yelling from a soapbox) if they want to get to the actual truth. If you are starting your research on the wrong foot (which is what these skeezes are setting up so many people to do!), you will be off track so quickly that you may not be able to find your way back. 😩 Mike and Uharriet are obviously educated (and “street smart” guys). The subjects that they write and talk about (and apparently practice [See: “Karma” on Mike’s website]) make me think that they would feel an obligation, based on their supposed belief systems, to use their knowledge to help others and support a community of research and truth - not to spoon feed bullshit to unsuspecting, upset, confused masses. (Ok, maybe that last part is just me, projecting my experience, going through the five stages of grief at the beginning of my PWR journey... HAHA!) Uharriet must be REALLY greedy to allow people to believe his book, going from writing about prayer, mindfulness and spirituality to this BS. Ick. He could so easily come out and say, “Alright everybody... settle down. It all REALLY IS fiction. Sir Paul has absolutely nothing to do with it. This is not a code. I really mean it. The Memoirs are classified as fiction because they are just that.” We should be able to spend our time researching and sharing ideas, not having to be the watchdog of other “researchers”, supposedly on the same side of reality! JUST KNOCK IT OFF, FOOLS! I had an interesting/silly thought... what if Mike talks all this trash about the pyramid of power to get noticed... because he wants to rise in the ranks…? I mean, he talks wayyy too much shit about all of that to have that pyramid logo on his website. He must KNOW that we would find it… and, in turn, tear him up for it! I really don’t know that much about how all of that works, so I don’t know how effective that tactic would be. It really just doesn’t make any sense. Timmy, you are KILLING ME! 🤣 Side note - I haven’t used HTML since like 2007 and I feel like a TOTAL goof trying to relearn how to quote, etc. haha!!
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on May 16, 2020 1:50:07 GMT -5
I think Mike is trying to pull out of the PID stuff because he knows people are starting to catch on to him and Uharriets con game...people are starting to ask harder and harder questions...which both Mike and Uharroet fail to answer. As I have said...I don't believe Mike will address any of the points we have all made in this thread. He will most likely ignore them and just try to pull out of PID as quickly as possible after they get their last big injection of cash from the sale of the Revised Billy's Back edition. I could be wrong about that though since Mike is watching the PID boards and social networking sites pretty closely. Or has his "spies/research team doing it for him. So...either way...we MIGHT just get a video from Mike about all of this. But I'm not holding my breath. Hell...if enough PID babies keep buying the books...I'm sure him and Uharriet will keep coming up with new "revelations". Who knows for sure though...time will tell. But my main problem is the same one you have K. Mike is pushing a fictional book as FACT! With no FACTS to support it! That...and his continued drum beating, and propaganda selling of Memoirs and its narrative is just disgusting IMHO. It is one thing to theorize and speculate...but its a whole different thing to state your theories and speculations are factual when you have no facts or real evidence to validate it! And this is what Mike does! You guys are so right! I’ve been known to buy Whole Tobacco Alkaloid Nicquid made by this guy who used to work in Poison Control and is now a nurse. None of this shit is *good* for you, but I trust his concoctions primarily because of his extensive medical and scientific background and training. This makes sense to me! Who knows what is in the “FDA approved” stuff. I don’t trust them, at all. And look how long it took the unsuspecting masses to finally figure out/believe cigarettes cause cancer! LIARS! I want to say that these guys “aren’t worth the time”, but it is just so infuriating that people, similar to us, just interested in the truth - for our own peace of mind and for the public who DESERVES the truth (whether they think they want it or not) - have been led astray by these con men and are unlikely to see them for what they are. I mean, it’s hard enough to pull back the mainstream curtain of deceit. Their followers have to then work their around a thick, colorful tapestry of “PID TRUTH!!!” (That’s Mike yelling from a soapbox) if they want to get to the actual truth. If you are starting your research on the wrong foot (which is what these skeezes are setting up so many people to do!), you will be off track so quickly that you may not be able to find your way back. 😩 Mike and Uharriet are obviously educated (and “street smart” guys). The subjects that they write and talk about (and apparently practice [See: “Karma” on Mike’s website]) make me think that they would feel an obligation, based on their supposed belief systems, to use their knowledge to help others and support a community of research and truth - not to spoon feed bullshit to unsuspecting, upset, confused masses. (Ok, maybe that last part is just me, projecting my experience, going through the five stages of grief at the beginning of my PWR journey... HAHA!) Uharriet must be REALLY greedy to allow people to believe his book, going from writing about prayer, mindfulness and spirituality to this BS. Ick. He could so easily come out and say, “Alright everybody... settle down. It all REALLY IS fiction. Sir Paul has absolutely nothing to do with it. This is not a code. I really mean it. The Memoirs are classified as fiction because they are just that.” We should be able to spend our time researching and sharing ideas, not having to be the watchdog of other “researchers”, supposedly on the same side of reality! JUST KNOCK IT OFF, FOOLS! I had an interesting/silly thought... what if Mike talks all this trash about the pyramid of power to get noticed... because he wants to rise in the ranks…? I mean, he talks wayyy too much shit about all of that to have that pyramid logo on his website. He must KNOW that we would find it… and, in turn, tear him up for it! I really don’t know that much about how all of that works, so I don’t know how effective that tactic would be. It really just doesn’t make any sense. Timmy, you are KILLING ME! 🤣 Side note - I haven’t used HTML since like 2007 and I feel like a TOTAL goof trying to relearn how to quote, etc. haha!! I find it very interesting that Mike in his last interview video about his "Did The Beatles Write Their Own Music" said with the release of that information he was expecting massive backlash over it. But he then says he was surprised to have received no backlash about it at all...but instead got overwhelming support for it. Question...why was Mike "expecting" heavy backlash for that video? Is Mike subtly admitting to knowing it was full of lies? If his "research" was so thorogh and meticulous...so full of factual information...then why was he afraid of backlash over it? Answer...Mike knew it was lazy and shoddy work! He knew that his over inflated theory was full of holes...and that sharp eyed researchers would notice its many flaws and would call him out on it. So...what does he do? He tries to get in front of the upcoming backlash by saying he has received no backlash! This makes those who might question his narrative..hesitant or slow to speak. Yes...a technique called reverse psychology!
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on May 21, 2020 15:10:45 GMT -5
In this new video...Mike doubles down on his "Did The Beatles Write Their Own Music" narrative by "revealing" new drummers who claim to have played on Beatles songs and albums. ALL of this is again mostly alot of speculation with very little to no hard facts and evidence to support any of it. Mike even makes the non-sensical statement that Ringo could never keep time musically in his drumming at studio sessions...but yet could play perfectly in time while on tour? How is it that Ringo could not master his drumming parts while studio recording...but he could do it perfectly on tour? This make no sense! Mike then veers totally off topic by going into Jimmy Page's early years as a studio musician...which...has nothing at all to do with The Beatles! So what...there were studio musicians working for the record companies during the time of The Beatles. How does that mean The Beatles didn't play or write their own music? IT DOESN'T! Not in any way,shape or manner! And NO...Mike makes no effort at all on his part to correct the many factual errors he made in his "Did The Beatles Write Their Own Music" video presentation. He ignores it completely...and instead...doubles down on his weak narratives.
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on May 23, 2020 16:50:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on May 26, 2020 18:28:00 GMT -5
HE'S BACK! And just continues to triple down on his lame Rubber Soul wasn't written or performed by The Beatles nonsense. He even insinuates that the singles that came out before Rubber Soul were not written by The Beatles...which are We Can Work It Out and Day Tripper...but again he is wrong! www.beatlesbible.com/songs/we-can-work-it-out/We Can Work It Out "We Can Work It Out’ was released as a double a-side single with ‘Day Tripper’ in December 1965. It was recorded during the sessions for the Rubber Soul album, and released on the same day. The lyrics might have been personal. It is often a good way to talk to someone or to work your own thoughts out. It saves you going to a psychiatrist, you allow yourself to say what you might not say in person. Paul McCartney Many Years From Now, Barry Miles Recorded over two days in sessions amounting to 11 hours – The Beatles’ longest time spent completing a song to date – ‘We Can Work It Out’ bore the distinctive hallmarks of both its songwriters. Paul McCartney wrote the upbeat verses and chorus, reportedly after a disagreement with Jane Asher, while John Lennon had the idea for the pessimistic “Life is very short” counterpoint. In ‘We Can Work It Out’, Paul did the first half, I did the middle eight. But you’ve got Paul writing, ‘We can work it out, we can work it out’ – real optimistic, y’know, and me impatient: ‘Life is very short and there’s no time for fussing and fighting, my friend. John Lennon, 1980 All We Are Saying, David Sheff McCartney’s contribution was written at Rembrandt, the house in Heswall, Cheshire he had bought for his father in July 1964. In the dining room of the large mock-Tudor house was a piano, which McCartney often used to work out new songs on. However, ‘We Can Work It Out’ was written on an acoustic guitar in one of the bedrooms. I had the idea, the title, had a couple of verses and the basic idea for it, then I took it to John to finish it off and we wrote the middle together. Which is nice: ‘Life is very short. There’s no time for fussing and fighting, my friend.’ Then it was George Harrison’s idea to put the middle into waltz time, like a German waltz. That came on the session, it was one of the cases of the arrangement being done on the session. Paul McCartney Many Years From Now, Barry Miles" www.beatlesbible.com/songs/day-tripper/Day Tripper "Written to order when John Lennon and Paul McCartney realised they needed a new single at the tail end of 1965, ‘Day Tripper’ was released as a double a-side with ‘We Can Work It Out’. ‘Day Tripper’ was [written] under complete pressure, based on an old folk song I wrote about a month previous. It was very hard going, that, and it sounds it. It wasn’t a serious message song. It was a drug song. In a way, it was a day tripper – I just liked the word. John Lennon had the initial idea for ‘Day Tripper’, and collaborated with McCartney to complete the song. Written at Kenwood, Lennon’s house in Weybridge, Surrey in October 1965, the song is based on a 12-bar blues in E, switching up a tone (F#) for the chorus. That was a co-written effort; we were both there making it all up but I would give John the main credit. Probably the idea came from John because he sang the lead, but it was a close thing. We both put a lot of work in on it. Paul McCartney Many Years From Now, Barry Miles The song was a knowing reference to the burgeoning drugs-based counterculture of the mid-1960s. ‘Day tripper’ was a slang term for someone who failed to fully embrace the hippy lifestyle. That’s mine. Including the lick, the guitar break and the whole bit. It’s just a rock ‘n’ roll song. Day trippers are people who go on a day trip, right? Usually on a ferryboat or something. But it was kind of – you know, you’re just a weekend hippie. Get it? John Lennon, 1980 All We Are Saying, David Sheff Lennon and George Harrison had both been introduced to LSD earlier in 1965, although their use wouldn’t peak until 1967. McCartney later admitted the song was about drugs, though The Beatles’ clean-cut image at the time meant that the references were well hidden to all but those in the know. ‘Day Tripper’ was to do with tripping. Acid was coming in on the scene, and often we’d do these songs about ‘the girl who thought she was it’… But this was just a tongue-in-cheek song about someone who was a day tripper, a Sunday painter, Sunday driver, somebody who was committed only in part to the idea. Whereas we saw ourselves as full-time trippers, fully committed drivers, she was just a day tripper. Paul McCartney Many Years From Now, Barry Miles The lyrics employed other double meanings. “She’s a big teaser” was originally “She’s a prick teaser”, though they never seriously considered recording it like that. I remember with the prick teasers we thought, That’d be fun to put in. That was one of the great things about collaborating, you could nudge-nudge, wink-wink a bit, whereas if you’re sitting on your own, you might not put it in. Paul McCartney Many Years From Now, Barry Miles" Mike and his so-called "research team" are still lazy! Again...this took me about 15 minutes of research to find and confirm from online and book written sources. There are also many videos on Beatles history that confirm this...along with audio bootlegs from these sessions that show their progress on working on these songs. So...we once again have Mike pushing fake narratives built on his and UHarriets "Memoirs" garbage...which in this new interview Mike makes damn sure to push and promote! Mike and UHarriet are attempting to rewrite Beatle history with their bad historical revisionism!
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on May 27, 2020 19:11:16 GMT -5
Another day...another lame attempt by Mike at Beatle history revisionism. Yes...we all know Andy White played on the early Beatles sessions! But...how does that fact prove Mike's and UHarriets unsubstantiated notion that ALL of The Beatles recorded songs were written and performed by others during album recording sessions? It doesn't! This video is just another bad attempt by Mike to make connections where there is none! Baby food for PID babies is all it is. And still...Mike refuses to acknowledge the grievous errors made in his "Did The Beatles Write Their Own Music" video presentation concerning the songs on Rubber Soul.
|
|
roo
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 13
|
Post by roo on May 30, 2020 15:55:47 GMT -5
Where do even I begin on this?
While it is true that Bernard Purdie overdubbed on Beatle recordings, it wasn’t Ringo’s drumming. It was on early recordings of the Beatles backing Tony Sheridan where he re-recorded PETE BEST’S drumming. Watch Fab Four Archivist’s video on that. I genuinely believe he just remembered it wrong. People misremember things all the time.
Andy White only drummed on a total of two Beatle songs (Love Me Do and P.S. I Love You). I think we all know the story behind that so I’m not gonna repeat it.
I don’t know where the hell he’s getting this Ronnie Verrell stuff from. Same thing with Vic Flick and Jimmy Page. Flick literally said what tracks he played on in the Pawn Stars clip.
Regarding the Quincey Jones quote. Jones himself later admitted that he just kinda word-vomited it out and that he didn’t really even mean it. He made a public apology for it and even apologized to Paul personally.
This guy’s channel is getting out of hand.
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on Jun 1, 2020 4:10:20 GMT -5
Where do even I begin on this? While it is true that Bernard Purdie overdubbed on Beatle recordings, it wasn’t Ringo’s drumming. It was on early recordings of the Beatles backing Tony Sheridan where he re-recorded PETE BEST’S drumming. Watch Fab Four Archivist’s video on that. I genuinely believe he just remembered it wrong. People misremember things all the time. Andy White only drummed on a total of two Beatle songs (Love Me Do and P.S. I Love You). I think we all know the story behind that so I’m not gonna repeat it. I don’t know where the hell he’s getting this Ronnie Verrell stuff from. Same thing with Vic Flick and Jimmy Page. Flick literally said what tracks he played on in the Pawn Stars clip. Regarding the Quincey Jones quote. Jones himself later admitted that he just kinda word-vomited it out and that he didn’t really even mean it. He made a public apology for it and even apologized to Paul personally. This guy’s channel is getting out of hand. Thanks roo for posting those facts...too bad Mike doesn't feel he has to do the same thing with his video presentations.
|
|
|
Post by bazzo49 on Jun 1, 2020 5:55:43 GMT -5
I must admit that I'm quite surprised at the reaction to the Mike Williams presentation here. The Beatles was a well planned psyop designed to deceive those who followed them. This forum has many who believe that there were doubles, Paul may have died and been replaced, and the recordings, albums and other productions were full of occultist clues.
Back in the late 50's and early 60's we all knew that the stars did not write the material and didn't play the instruments in most cases. This practice continued well into the era of the British invasion with the Beatles as well as the other big groups of the time. The US situation has been covered by Dave McGowan where he states the same practices continued in the USA.
We know that many other musicians played on Beatles recordings and this has been admitted by the members of the band as well as their producer.
Mike Williams presents a very well researched and presented case to support his assertion that the Beatles did not write many of their songs. While some of his claims can be may be biased by his opinions on the PID issue, I believe that there is very little evidence on record to substantiate the claims by the band members that they wrote all of the songs other than their own statements.
Knowing that most of the things they said and did were scripted according to the plan laid down by their controllers, and that most of these things were false and designed to deceive, I do not believe they wrote the songs themselves either.
I'm sure they wrote some, particularly from the White album onwards, but much of what they released prior to that was written by others. I also don't believe that their musical skills as players was up to playing the songs either. As far as I'm aware, there are no films of live performances by the group of them playing the songs from Revolver or Sgt Peppers which would provide evidence of their ability to play these live. The songs they wrote as solo artists following the demise of the Beatles do not come near the quality of those written for the period after they quit touring and their breakup. Certainly there was some good material but the consistency just wasn't there. Many songs seemed incomplete, unfinished, or undeveloped. John Lennon, the song writing genius, wrote a lot of stuff which was just crap. Lyrics and music were both substandard. Therefore, I have to agree with Mike Williams that the Beatles did not write all their songs. Not that I really care because the whole thing was a lie anyway. Their legacy deserves to be undone for what they did. The music however, I still love and enjoy. The people themselves, no!
|
|
|
Post by kennethmd on Jun 1, 2020 12:48:37 GMT -5
EMI have taken the tape recording that Brian Epstein had use to record The Beatles at the Cavern Club. Clean it as must they can, put it on a album and release it in 1979. The Album was title The Beatles:Live at the Cavern. I've use to own that Album. I can only remember some of the songs on that album, which were I saw her standing there, hippy hippy shake, long tall sally, mr. moonlight, till there was you, besame mucho, searching, and some other songs I can't remember. Could the Beatles played their instruments? Yes, their Decca audition recording said they could. Did The Beatles wrote their own songs? Yes, But that were only the lyrics themself, not the music itself. Only Paul Mccartney was the only one of the Beatles that could write and read music. The other Beatles learn how to read and write music later. Where studio musician use as stand in for the Beatles? No, only Andy White was use as a stand in. The other studio musicians where only use for adding extra track to the Beatles song.
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on Jun 5, 2020 4:38:16 GMT -5
I must admit that I'm quite surprised at the reaction to the Mike Williams presentation here. The Beatles was a well planned psyop designed to deceive those who followed them. This forum has many who believe that there were doubles, Paul may have died and been replaced, and the recordings, albums and other productions were full of occultist clues. Back in the late 50's and early 60's we all knew that the stars did not write the material and didn't play the instruments in most cases. This practice continued well into the era of the British invasion with the Beatles as well as the other big groups of the time. The US situation has been covered by Dave McGowan where he states the same practices continued in the USA. We know that many other musicians played on Beatles recordings and this has been admitted by the members of the band as well as their producer. Mike Williams presents a very well researched and presented case to support his assertion that the Beatles did not write many of their songs. While some of his claims can be may be biased by his opinions on the PID issue, I believe that there is very little evidence on record to substantiate the claims by the band members that they wrote all of the songs other than their own statements. Knowing that most of the things they said and did were scripted according to the plan laid down by their controllers, and that most of these things were false and designed to deceive, I do not believe they wrote the songs themselves either. I'm sure they wrote some, particularly from the White album onwards, but much of what they released prior to that was written by others. I also don't believe that their musical skills as players was up to playing the songs either. As far as I'm aware, there are no films of live performances by the group of them playing the songs from Revolver or Sgt Peppers which would provide evidence of their ability to play these live. The songs they wrote as solo artists following the demise of the Beatles do not come near the quality of those written for the period after they quit touring and their breakup. Certainly there was some good material but the consistency just wasn't there. Many songs seemed incomplete, unfinished, or undeveloped. John Lennon, the song writing genius, wrote a lot of stuff which was just crap. Lyrics and music were both substandard. Therefore, I have to agree with Mike Williams that the Beatles did not write all their songs. Not that I really care because the whole thing was a lie anyway. Their legacy deserves to be undone for what they did. The music however, I still love and enjoy. The people themselves, no! Everyone is free to BELIEVE anything they want too bazzo. BUT...it is a whole different matter to PROVE in what one believes or doesn't believe...especially when there is a huge lack of established FACTS and EVIDENCE to convince others of your own personal beliefs. Mike...has presented his belief in PID with little to no facts,no hard evidence...just theory,speculation and a fictional book. And that is fine. BUT...he makes no effort to correct his mistakes...or apologize to his audience for them! His "Did The Beatles Write Their Own Music" video was heavily flawed...it left out relevant information concerning Rubber Soul and The Beatles...it was largely biased, PID opinionated, and a very lazy hack job. He accepts only factual information that supports his narrative...while rejecting or purposely ignoring other factual information that contradicts it! That is a sign of a researcher who wishes to push a biased narrative belief over actual TRUTH! Whether The Beatles were controlled or not does not automatically mean they had no talent as musicians and songwriters. Many talented people are controlled. Artists,scientists,doctors,film makers,journalists,etc. Does this mean they have no talent? Of course not! We have witnesses who saw The Beatles compose songs...record them...and perform them! We have written,audio and visual confirmation of all this with books,bootlegs and videos. The Beatles also continued to write,record and perform songs post-Beatles...or was this all fake too? What does Mike have? He has speculation...that is all. Did The Beatles have help from time to time from others? Of course...but to say The Beatles didn't write,record and perform their own music at all is just a theory with little to no hard evidence to support it as FACTUAL and historical!
|
|
roo
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 13
|
Post by roo on Jun 9, 2020 12:01:01 GMT -5
I forgot to bring this up. But with the Quincey Jones quote, why is he treating a random, possibly drunk, quote that as I said before, was admitted word vomit a gospel? Like, he’s treating that ridiculous quote like it’s incriminating evidence.
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on Jun 11, 2020 23:01:24 GMT -5
I forgot to bring this up. But with the Quincey Jones quote, why is he treating a random, possibly drunk, quote that as I said before, was admitted word vomit a gospel? Like, he’s treating that ridiculous quote like it’s incriminating evidence. Because Mike is a biased researcher...he presents only what fits his "Memoirs" narrative fiction. Facts don't matter...historical accuracy doesn't matter...hard evidence is not relevant!
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on Jun 11, 2020 23:05:42 GMT -5
Just more "Memoirs" Beatles/occult propaganda crap from Mikey. A true sleeper if ever there was one. ZZZZ!
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on Jun 25, 2020 16:28:40 GMT -5
More shameless promotion of a fictional book by Mikey for PID babies.
|
|
|
Post by B on Jul 17, 2020 19:01:25 GMT -5
"Mike Williams' Paul Is Dead Channel 7 hours ago (edited) I will be doing a review of the new edition of Billy's Back. There is some very important information contained in the footnotes which are above and beyond Memoirs (hint: watch my big presentation). I'm about 100 pages in and taking notes (the book is 400+ pages). I'm hoping to get an analysis out within 90 days. I will talk more about it in a channel update which I hope to have out in a week or so."
|
|