Post by ekauqodielak on Apr 5, 2019 13:53:46 GMT -5
** Note: All images in this post can be opened to larger versions on right-click. These, and other relevant pictures, can be found here: Paul's Ears **
I've been sitting on this for most of the past week because that's how long it's taken me to wrap my head around the information I'm going to share with you. I've, also, hesitated to disclose what I've found because of the reverberations that could result. Realistically, though, very few people are likely to be willing to accept this truth, fewer than are willing or able to see and accept fake ears or Billys. And 'Paul' has, recently, become much more brazen about exposing (that which you will shortly find to be) the obvious. In fact, he's been pointing overtly at this secret, for decades. You may find that, amongst other things, a reevaluation of much of the negative sentiment held for 'Sir Billy', to be in order.
We didn't design this riddle, invite strangers in and relentlessly nudge them to unveil us; we tried to oblige, to reverse engineer the intangible, and, in so doing, misinterpreted some of the most important clues and asked the wrong questions. In fairness, Magickans are crackerjacks of misdirection.
So, I was quietly continuing my attempts to enumerate Pauls, when I began to notice that one of the Pauls has a right arm that is notably shorter than his left.
This was a useful differentiation, that none of the other Pauls shared and I began looking specifically for that Paul across timelines.
And, then, I noticed this:
That strange gap between what is, ostensibly, his forefinger and, stay with me here, what looks like, a toe or a finger sewn on in the place of a thumb reminded me of the hands of a very Siberian-looking (think: eyes like a white Husky) man I saw on the train in Brooklyn one day, when I was about 19. He appeared to have his, or someone's, large toes surgically attached where his thumbs should have been. Later, a friend told me that chopping off thumbs is a common mob punishment for theft.
Was this appearance of an unusual scar on Paul's thumb and the strange gap just an odd injury and/or photographic anomaly or, was it, possibly, really what it looked like to me? If I could establish a pattern of Pauls with that forefinger missing and replacement thumb, I thought I would, now, be able to pose a probable reason for various "Billys" to have stepped in to share "Paul's" identity and that, with this new identifying marker, it would be much easier to sort out who was who. In fact, a damaged right hand would, also, explain this:
Forcibly shifting my focus from ears to right hands, I was so hopeful that I had found a clearcut through this maze.
However, as with all things Paul-related, things just got murkier...Which hand is damaged or whether both are and which fingers and to what degree changes, just like his ears and his height and his voice and his eye color. So, there's clearly more than one Paul who is missing fingers. There are many variations.
Bonus: Now With More Ghost Hand Doves & Jesus' Feet Nailed To The Fret Board Doves
You tell me....
…how this right hand…
…can simultaneously exist with this one…
It's no wonder, really, that there was a "problem with his fingerprints" when he got busted for weed in Japan.
It appears that, at least, one Paul had an irregular right hand by January 24th, 1963, at the latest, per the appearance of the right middle finger, ring finger and pinky in this heavily retouched image:
Eagle eyes might be curious about the state of John's right hand in this image, as well.
Further scanning revealed that (another?) Paul had his hands damaged by September 1962, per the blurred paws on every available reproduction of this image:
They may have all even been born this way, with a congenital i'm-not-a-doctor-something-or-another-dactyly. There are indications that other Beatles and their associates were, also, missing fingers and/or concealing burn scars. But maybe we should start with these hands and branch our way out, carefully.
So, then, I wondered: How do these badfingers relate, if at all, to the Pauls that appear to wear heavy prosthetics to hide facial disfigurations?
I came back to this poor guy:
His hands were apparently so fucked up that bizarrely fading them out of photos was more deemed more pragmatic than trying to construct actual fingers out of the ether.
Like his hands and toes, he seems to largely vanish from the public parade of Pauls.
In fact, scores of photos he was in were retouched/composited/doctored-with-an-rx-to-induce-existential-crises by Dezo Hoffmann (someone who deserves his own thread...) to insert very different Pauls, whole or in part…
But he pops up every once in a while. You can tell by the tentacle-esque right arm that this is him:
And I think this is him, here:
And I think he makes several shadowy cameos in the music video for 'Wonderful Christmastime', which, with its bizarre Death Rides A Pale Horse and Twin Pauls bursting into flames imagery, may not be as pablumatic as it first appears:
Same guy or different?
And, then, there's this one who, from at least July 2nd, 1963, wore a prosthetic right cheek and possible glass eye:
It seems his right nipple was, also, lost:
Once you start honing in on the hands, you'll find that many of them are retouched, and poorly so. A smear indicating where fingers should be is second only to blurring the entire hand so it appears to be in motion. Maybe the Pauls even, intentionally, do move their disfigured hands when a photo they can't retouch is being taken. In post-processing, sometimes, other people's hands are copied and pasted in, entirely. Often, the Pauls or their photographers, will carefully hide the hands. Many times they are just shoved in pockets.
It's worth remembering that the majority of the pictures of The Beatles and of Paul were taken in a pre-(sorry)digital era, which means that, at one time, someone physically controlled 99% of all of these images and their availability for release. This is true even for the vast majority of his supposedly candid pix, which were most often and conveniently taken by his professional photographer wife and his professional photographer brother. FotoForensics is a helpful tool to help detect photographic tampering.
Now, some of you may know that I have been, previously, doggedly against the idea that there was anything other than normal cosmetic retouching done to most photos of our entomological subjects. My attitude about that was primarily formed as a knee-jerk reaction against the theories posed by PID '66ers, who insist that the timeline be linearly halved between the existence of One Real Paul and the emergence of Sir Billy. I have rejected that concept, from go, because it's plainly obvious that there have been multiple public Pauls, whose existences are documented in photographs taken years before The Beatles had even settled on a band name. The hardline PID '66ers will tell you that any photo of "Paul", from before late '66, that remotely resembles someone other than the face they have whimsically decided belonged to the One Real Paul, has been manipulated to create a false historical record of 'Billy'.
But, as I began digging for more evidence of hand deformities, it became clear that, in fact, not only were most of the photos I was finding altered far beyond zit removal, but they were doctored to the degree that they significantly changed the story we were being told. And, it wasn't just a (sorry, again) handful of images that had been fictionalized, it's most of them, which, in the context of a nearly 80 year old man, who has been one of the most famous people on the planet for almost sixty years, translates to tens of thousands of monkeyed images. It is still difficult for me to contemplate the enormous expenditure of resources, particularly energy, that has gone into this elaborate real-time rewriting of the reality of these men's lives, and those whose lives have intersected with them.
To completely understate the situation: there are a lot of things to wonder about here.
And, still, I'd be almost satisfied with just knowing what the fake ears are about.
Dasagriva "Dasagriva is one of the earliest sobriquet given to the Ravana. The name Dasagriva can be found in Valmiki Ramayana.
It is made up of two Sanskrit words, dasa and griva. Dasa which simply means ten and griva, a beautiful singing voice/neck. Thus, by simple translation, Dasagriva means one with ten beautiful singing voices."
"It is quite possible that societies - much like individuals - collectively repress information, concepts, and ideas which would produce high anxiety levels if dealt with consciously."
Well I thought perhaps they were saying wonky finger.
A few of us entertained this idea many moons ago because we looked at a few pictures that made us think yes..the 1966 and before Paul seemed to have a missing and/or damaged index finger on his right hand, as you stated. Then we dismissed it because it seemed there were far more that showed an intact finger. But, you make some good arguments regarding how that was perhaps dealt with. If true, a prosthetic would have to be part of the equation?
The Paul that was missing his right forefinger in '64 was still missing it in '68:
& this Paul in '63 has his left forefinger lobbed off at the first knuckle and it's still lobbed off in '69:
& yes, there are several different prosthetics shown in these images that they use for different fingers, some just for the finger tips and in some cases whole hand gloves (like for the guy in the two swimming pix with the octopus arm).
Some Pauls seem to have a left hand mostly intact, minus the pinky; others always have it hidden or doctored in photos; others have a misshapen thumb and forefinger on that hand.
Am I seriously the only one who thinks it's a big deal that Paul McCartney doesn't have fucking hands?
Last Edit: Apr 6, 2019 22:04:41 GMT -5 by ekauqodielak
re: the badfinger vid - Yeah, it's showing up as 'plugin not found' on the forum, but plays fine for me @ jojo's. The folder it is in, also, has four pix of Joey Molland, looking both like a possible Paul and like someone whose face semi-recently had an encounter with fire.
That Dublin vid is the first time I've seen that unusually old looking John in motion. I've seen lots of pix of him but never video. He always stood out as seeming so much more mature, both physically and in manner, than the others, almost giving the vibe that he's the dad in his kids' band. I don't know if those are the 'original Beatles' because I don't think that exists, but those ones, at least in easily identifiable form, definitely must have disappeared not long after that footage was shot. And I agree that this Paul's hands appear to be perfectly normal, though I wouldn't put any graphic trickery out of the realm of possibility, at this point. His ear also looks completely real and attached to his head the way one expects an ear to be attached. He has the high nose bridge of the Paul in the Pyramus & Thisbe bit.
Post by ekauqodielak on Apr 6, 2019 23:14:43 GMT -5
Okay, I was hoping you guys would use this post as a launch pad for asking pertinent questions; since you’re not, I will.
How many variations of hand injuries/prosthetics do The Pauls have?
Do all of them have one or another hand issue?
Do any other McCartneys have hand abnormalities?
Do any Beatle associates have hand abnormalities?
Are the hand issues the result of injury or congenital?
If congenital, could the lack of ears be the result of the same condition?
If the result of maiming, when did it happen?
Were all The Pauls defingered at once?
If you had employed doubles as insurance on your investment, why would you ever have them all in the same place at the same time, given the risks for both discovery and mass injury/death?
Why would you hire doubles to be musicians, in particular, string players, who were missing multiple fingers?
What other celebrities are missing fingers?
How, with all the hands The Pauls have shaken, has no one noted, “He’s got fake hands”?
Does one of The Pauls have totally normal hands?
What were the quality of hand prosthetics in the late 50s? In the 60s? 70s? etc.
If you wanted a top of the line prosthetic during those eras, who would you go to?
Could the desire for working hands have been used as blackmail?
How did Beatle Co. and then Macca Co. ensure that most images of The Pauls showed passably normal hands?
Who did the retouching on those scores and scores of photos?
Alternately, why would anyone go through thousands of pictures of The Pauls and poorly retouch their hands and the right sides of their faces to suggest abnormalities to those areas? How would those pix wind up in official Beatle publications or as part of press packages? Why was normal cosmetic retouching not done on most of those same photos?
For the musicians: which of the songs ‘Paul McCartney’ supposedly authored can be played with a maximum of two or three fingers on each hand?
Are there any imaginable benefits to a player of any specific instrument having fewer than ten fingers or, specifically, not having fingers made of flesh?
Are there any factions historically known for using finger removal as incentive or punishment?
Aside from the peculiar death of ‘Vivian Stanshall’ and the German condom incident, were there any mentions of ‘Paul McCartney’ and/or The Beatles having been involved in a fire?
Could the German condom incident have been much different than the official story about it?
Who would have wanted to definger Beatles?
If The Pauls lost fingers as a result of intentional harm, how was it done?
Could acid have been poured on their basses?
Are there any references or asides made by any of the Beatles that could be reinterpreted in the context of The Pauls losing fingers?
If one or more Pauls were born with hand malformities, why make such a big secret about it to begin with and why continue elaborately hiding and simultaneously hinting at it?
etc.
Also, I think the puffy cheeks are the result of anti-rejection drugs required after ‘finger transplants’ and not part of an attempt at cosmetic disguise. And, seriously, guys: there were no cosmetic fillers available until the late 80s and for the love of god botox is not a filler, it freezes muscles to decrease the appearance of wrinkles and is not used in the meat of the cheeks.
Last Edit: Apr 9, 2019 8:08:33 GMT -5 by ekauqodielak
A 46-year-old man from Brighton found it particularly difficult when he was told he needed reading glasses. As well as other birth defects caused by the drug, John Roberts' ears did not develop. Because he is unable to wear glasses, Mr Roberts has had laser treatment on his "bad" eye and it is now usable.…As well as being born with the characteristic short arms caused by thalidomide - the morning sickness pill that caused birth defects in the late fifties and early sixties - his outer ears did not develop and his right eye was considered not to be functional by opticians.
The morning sickness drug thalidomide, which caused pregnant women to give birth to babies without arms and legs, was first developed by the Nazis, probably as part of their chemical weapons programme, according to new research. Two separate academics have revealed the discovery of documents indicating that the drug did not originate with Chemie Grünenthal, the postwar German chemical firm, as has always been claimed.
If, as their research suggests, thalidomide was first developed by scientists working in wartime Germany, it could have implications for the liability of the German government. So far it has given compensation only to German victims, although the drug was distributed in at least 46 countries.
Thousands of the drug’s victims are still battling for increased financial aid to help them cope with its legacy. There are 457 thalidomiders remaining in the UK; 2,700 in Germany; and a total of up to 6,000 worldwide.s
Mothers prescribed it between its launch in 1957 and 1961, when it was removed from the market, gave birth to children who lacked proper arms, legs, hands and feet. Some had also suffered brain damage and other disabilities.
Dr Martin Johnson, director of the Thalidomide Trust which provides help for surviving victims in the UK, has written a paper detailing evidence suggesting that the drug had been developed before Grünenthal secured a patent in 1954.
The company has always maintained that thalidomide was created by chance in 1953 by scientists who had tried to create an antihistamine but ended up with a tranquilliser.
Johnson suspects that it was actually first produced as a possible antidote to nerve toxins such as sarin, which was developed by Otto Ambros, a Nazi scientist who joined Grünenthal after the war.
“It is now appearing increasingly likely that thalidomide was the last war crime of the Nazis,” said Johnson.
One document unearthed by the Thalidomide Trust shows that Grünenthal apparently purchased the trade name of the drug – Contergan – and therefore probably the substance itself, from a French firm, Rhône-Poulenc, which was under Nazi control during the war years.
A confidential letter sent from Astra, which held the Swedish licence to distribute thalidomide, to its Norwegian subsidiary in 1958 states: “Unfortunately we can’t use the name Contergan in the Scandinavian countries, since Grünenthal obtained the name exclusively for the German market through an agreement with Rhône-Poulenc.”
From 1942 onwards Rhône-Poulenc registered 14 similar drugs, all ending with the same “ergan” suffix, a characteristic unique to the firm. Many of the drugs shared properties with thalidomide, such as affecting the nervous system.
“Not only is the name typical of the Rhône-Poulenc brand names of the 1940s; the action of thalidomide also belongs among this range of products,” said Johnson in his report.
Meanwhile, the author of a forthcoming book on Nazi scientists claims to have a copy of a document written in November 1944 by a director of IG Farben, the German pharmaceutical firm, which refers to the development of a substance, the chemical formula of which matches thalidomide.
Carlos De Napoli, an Argentinian who has published books on the activities of the Nazis who fled to South America after the war, claims his book, Hitler’s Laboratories, will show that the drug has its origins in the Nazi death camps.
IG Farben, whose bosses, including Ambros, were convicted of war crimes such as slavery and mass murder, ran the synthetic rubber and petrol processing plant at Auschwitz-Monowitz, which drew its labour from extermination camps.
De Napoli said the memo was sent on November 13, 1944 by Fritz ter Meer, an IG Farben executive, to Karl Brandt, an SS general who was Hitler’s personal physician and head of his euthanasia programme.
The report, in which the drug is referred to simply by a four-digit number – 4589 – states it has been tested and is ready for use. De Napoli says he discovered the document in the IG Farben archive in 1978 but realised only recently the significance of the formula it contained. “There is absolutely no doubt of the Nazi development of and experimentation with thalidomide in the world war two camps,” he said.
Johnson said the 1954 patent for thalidomide implied that it had already been tested on humans, even though trials on people did not officially take place until later. Grünenthal subsequently said it had “lost” much of the testing paperwork.
Johnson concluded in his report: “The patents suggest that thalidomide was probably one of a number of products developed at Dyhernfurth or Auschwitz-Monowitz under the leadership of Otto Ambros in the course of nerve gas research.”
Grünenthal said: “To our knowledge there was no collaboration between Grünenthal and Rhône-Poulenc for the development of Contergan/thalido-mide. Three Grünenthal employees discovered thalidomide and Grünenthal is the sole inventor on the patent.”
Sanofi-Aventis, which took over Rhône-Poulenc, said it was searching its archives.
Additional reporting: Declan McGarvey
Experiments on prisoners
Grünenthal was founded in 1946 by the soap manufacturers Alfred and Herman Wirtz, twins who were both former members of the Nazi party.
Their chief scientist was Dr Heinrich Mückter, a fledgling pharmacologist who had carried out wartime experiments on Polish prisoners to find a cure for typhus. He caused the death of hundreds in the process.
According to Grünenthal, Mückter was one of those responsible for inventing thalidomide.
Otto Ambros was the most qualified scientist with Nazi links to work for Grünenthal. His knowledge was used by the Nazis to develop deadly nerve toxins such as sarin. He was sentenced to eight years at the Nuremberg trials.
The synchronicity in this instance is not them being by the collapsing building at 'just the wrong time', but that at a time we are discussing three-fingered Paul,
a story shows up on national TV showing a woman pianist who sustained identical injuries to those shown to Paul's hand. What are the odds?
I'm not saying it's proof that a building fell on Paul, but if that's not some sort of message from the cosmos, I don't know what is!
And, still, I'd be almost satisfied with just knowing what the fake ears are about.
♫ Well I've been meaning to talk to you about it for some time! ♫
Cartilage just isn't much of a priority for these guys:
Ears and noses aren't a big deal for them.
It seems that President Eisenhower met with Skinny Bob and the gang in 1954 at Holloman Air Force Base, and an agreement was made:
"They would help us with developing our technology...
They could abduct humans for various experiments, but had to provide names of all those they abducted to Earth’s Majestic 12 committee (and) The public would not be informed about the existence of ETs."
"What was in it for them?" you might ask.
The answer is a bit complicated, but it comes down to this. They use human genetics to create their bodies - the bodies they use when functioning in physical form on this planet. Unlike us, however, they generally operate in what is sometimes referred to as "4-D" (forth dimension) reality, where-as we muddle through from day to day in the "3-D" world. What that means is that they have the ability to hop in and out of our time line, and they are invisible to us most of the time - AND 'they only come out at night'. Now in fact, they don't 'come out' at night; they are here all along, but 3-D and 4-D merge at night, which is why ghosts, werewolves, bigfeet and aliens tend to be nocturnal, from our perspective. During the day, when 3-D has the upper-hand, the 4-D beings are in a reality that is 'ghostly' to us; however it is at night when the grey aliens do their work, which basically involves maintaining the 3-D systems of nature on the planet. It is also when they obtain genetic material for their own use in body-manufacturing. We, as humans, are 'wired' for 3-D awareness, so when humans are taken to obtain genetic material - an event that takes place in 4-D reality - people don't remember it. If a person has any memory of it, it tends to be dream-like and not readily accessible.
Got it so far? Good.
Now 3-D and 4-D reality are two polarities of one thing, like the two sides of a coin. They go together like peanut butter and jelly. You could think of 3-D as the positive charged reality, and 4-D as the negatively charged side of things, but they are intermingled, and at night the 'barrier' between the two systems evaporates.
The gray aliens (and others) who met with President Eisenhower knew that us 3-D dwelling Earthlings were slated to move up into a 5th dimensional state at some point in the near future, which the 4-D -ers [meaning them] were not in a position to do, so what they wanted to do was develop a hybrid version of us and them which would enable them to make the jump as well. Their concern was that without us as a source of genetic material, they would not be able to maintain their 4-D existence. So the agreement described above was reached.
Well... the human leadership quickly caught on to the fact that if the greys could make bodies for themselves from our genetics, they could also probably make clones of human "VIP"s like presidents, congressmen and women, actors, rock stars, scientists, and so on; and so it appears that they requested in the agreement that the aliens also provide back-up bodies for 'people that mattered' (as opposed to "useless eaters") that could be used in the event that such individuals died unexpectedly, or were in need of doubles. As a result, cloning facilities similar to what the aliens have onboard their craft were established in underground facilities in places like Dulce, NM, or Area 51 in Nevada for the manufacture of human duplicates (as opposed to grey alien bodies) to benefit 'the elite' among us. It is interesting that the video below was posted in the movies thread here, as it is a good - uh - replica of some of what goes on deep underground.
Anyone wanting a graphic representation of how the greys manufacture their bodies can find information on it in this book, which I highly recommend:
Now the thing is, in the 1960s, the cloning techniques employed at the time did not allow for very good ears, noses, or hair, since the greys don't have them. In the time that has passed since, those things have all been perfected.
Oh, and... one more thing. The greys have four fingers (including their thumbs), and a palm that folds in the middle. Just sayin'.
Okay, I was hoping you guys would use this post as a launch pad for asking pertinent questions; since you’re not, I will.
How many variations of hand injuries/prosthetics do The Pauls have?
Do all of them have one or another hand issue?
Do any other McCartneys have hand abnormalities?
Do any Beatle associates have hand abnormalities?
Are the hand issues the result of injury or congenital?
If congenital, could the lack of ears be the result of the same condition?
If the result of maiming, when did it happen?
Were all The Pauls defingered at once?
If you had employed doubles as insurance on your investment, why would you ever have them all in the same place at the same time, given the risks for both discovery and mass injury/death?
Why would you hire doubles to be musicians, in particular, string players, who were missing multiple fingers?
What other celebrities are missing fingers?
How, with all the hands The Pauls have shaken, has no one noted, “He’s got fake hands”?
Does one of The Pauls have totally normal hands?
What were the quality of hand prosthetics in the late 50s? In the 60s? 70s? etc.
If you wanted a top of the line prosthetic during those eras, who would you go to?
Could the desire for working hands have been used as blackmail?
How did Beatle Co. and then Macca Co. ensure that most images of The Pauls showed passably normal hands?
Who did the retouching on those scores and scores of photos?
Alternately, why would anyone go through thousands of pictures of The Pauls and poorly retouch their hands and the right sides of their faces to suggest abnormalities to those areas? How would those pix wind up in official Beatle publications or as part of press packages? Why was normal cosmetic retouching not done on most of those same photos?
For the musicians: which of the songs ‘Paul McCartney’ supposedly authored can be played with a maximum of two or three fingers on each hand?
Are there any imaginable benefits to a player of any specific instrument having fewer than ten fingers or, specifically, not having fingers made of flesh?
Are there any factions historically known for using finger removal as incentive or punishment?
Aside from the peculiar death of ‘Vivian Stanshall’ and the German condom incident, were there any mentions of ‘Paul McCartney’ and/or The Beatles having been involved in a fire?
Could the German condom incident have been much different than the official story about it?
Who would have wanted to definger Beatles?
If The Pauls lost fingers as a result of intentional harm, how was it done?
Could acid have been poured on their basses?
Are there any references or asides made by any of the Beatles that could be reinterpreted in the context of The Pauls losing fingers?
If one or more Pauls were born with hand malformities, why make such a big secret about it to begin with and why continue elaborately hiding and simultaneously hinting at it?
etc.
Also, I think the puffy cheeks are the result of anti-rejection drugs required after ‘finger transplants’ and not part of an attempt at cosmetic disguise. And, seriously, guys: there were no cosmetic fillers available until the late 80s and for the love of god botox is not a filler, it freezes muscles to decrease the appearance of wrinkles and is not used in the meat of the cheeks.
Seems to me that "the elies" weren't too picky when it came to their Paul doubles.
And, still, I'd be almost satisfied with just knowing what the fake ears are about.
♫ Well I've been meaning to talk to you about it for some time! ♫
Cartilage just isn't much of a priority for these guys:
Ears and noses aren't a big deal for them.
It seems that President Eisenhower met with Skinny Bob and the gang in 1954 at Holloman Air Force Base, and an agreement was made:
"They would help us with developing our technology...
They could abduct humans for various experiments, but had to provide names of all those they abducted to Earth’s Majestic 12 committee (and) The public would not be informed about the existence of ETs."
"What was in it for them?" you might ask.
The answer is a bit complicated, but it comes down to this. They use human genetics to create their bodies - the bodies they use when functioning in physical form on this planet. Unlike us, however, they generally operate in what is sometimes referred to as "4-D" (forth dimension) reality, where-as we muddle through from day to day in the "3-D" world. What that means is that they have the ability to hop in and out of our time line, and they are invisible to us most of the time - AND 'they only come out at night'. Now in fact, they don't 'come out' at night; they are here all along, but 3-D and 4-D merge at night, which is why ghosts, werewolves, bigfeet and aliens tend to be nocturnal, from our perspective. During the day, when 3-D has the upper-hand, the 4-D beings are in a reality that is 'ghostly' to us; however it is at night when the grey aliens do their work, which basically involves maintaining the 3-D systems of nature on the planet. It is also when they obtain genetic material for their own use in body-manufacturing. We, as humans, are 'wired' for 3-D awareness, so when humans are taken to obtain genetic material - an event that takes place in 4-D reality - people don't remember it. If a person has any memory of it, it tends to be dream-like and not readily accessible.
Got it so far? Good.
Now 3-D and 4-D reality are two polarities of one thing, like the two sides of a coin. They go together like peanut butter and jelly. You could think of 3-D as the positive charged reality, and 4-D as the negatively charged side of things, but they are intermingled, and at night the 'barrier' between the two systems evaporates.
The gray aliens (and others) who met with President Eisenhower knew that us 3-D dwelling Earthlings were slated to move up into a 5th dimensional state at some point in the near future, which the 4-D -ers [meaning them] were not in a position to do, so what they wanted to do was develop a hybrid version of us and them which would enable them to make the jump as well. Their concern was that without us as a source of genetic material, they would not be able to maintain their 4-D existence. So the agreement described above was reached.
Well... the human leadership quickly caught on to the fact that if the greys could make bodies for themselves from our genetics, they could also probably make clones of human "VIP"s like presidents, congressmen and women, actors, rock stars, scientists, and so on; and so it appears that they requested in the agreement that the aliens also provide back-up bodies for 'people that mattered' (as opposed to "useless eaters") that could be used in the event that such individuals died unexpectedly, or were in need of doubles. As a result, cloning facilities similar to what the aliens have onboard their craft were established in underground facilities in places like Dulce, NM, or Area 51 in Nevada for the manufacture of human duplicates (as opposed to grey alien bodies) to benefit 'the elite' among us. It is interesting that the video below was posted in the movies thread here, as it is a good - uh - replica of some of what goes on deep underground.
Anyone wanting a graphic representation of how the greys manufacture their bodies can find information on it in this book, which I highly recommend:
Now the thing is, in the 1960s, the cloning techniques employed at the time did not allow for very good ears, noses, or hair, since the greys don't have them. In the time that has passed since, those things have all been perfected.
Oh, and... one more thing. The greys have four fingers (including their thumbs), and a palm that folds in the middle. Just sayin'.
Coincidence or soft disclosure?
Ever notice how Vulcan Spocks hair is a Beatle wig?
.jpg){kind=icon}
