|
Post by ekauqodielak on Apr 10, 2019 16:58:26 GMT -5
It's just a matter of asking the right questions....
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on Apr 10, 2019 17:52:28 GMT -5
It's just a matter of asking the right questions.... Yeah...that is another one that has always given me the creeps!
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Apr 11, 2019 21:27:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on Apr 12, 2019 17:59:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Apr 12, 2019 19:41:04 GMT -5
A more than solid echo. But, if it's deliberate...WHY?
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on Apr 13, 2019 16:11:28 GMT -5
Performance ritual I would guess. Notice his mention of a Picasso painting as his inspiration for the two-fingered chord. the.maier-files.com/the-secret-occult-works-of-picasso/"Picasso widely used esoteric themes in his work. From time to time he painted himself as the Harlequin. This figure is related to Hermes and the Underworld, especially in his native Barcelona, where Harlequin’s triumph over death is re-enacted yearly in street carnivals. His friend Apollinaire occasionally described him as ‘Harlequin Trismegistus’. At other times he portrayed himself in terms of an image from the Tarot, floating between the material world and the spirit worlds."
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Apr 16, 2019 18:15:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Apr 26, 2019 11:55:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Apr 26, 2019 15:53:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by B on Apr 26, 2019 20:04:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Apr 26, 2019 21:34:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by B on Apr 28, 2019 15:16:12 GMT -5
kaleidoquake wrote: ♫ So we bitched about his fans and should we crush his sweet hands? ♫ Back in 1980 there was a book that came out called "Michelle Remembers" which featured the memories of a child who had allegedly been raised to be a sacrifice to satan. It was an interesting read, to be sure, as it included rather vivid recollections of what the child experienced at satanic rituals where blood sacrifices and murders allegedly took place. Later on the book's authenticity was seriously called into question. More about that can be found at this link: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_RemembersOne of the things I remember reading in the book was that Michelle claimed that some satanists would show their commitment to the evil one by having their middle finger amputated. This had to do with what the fingers represent in palmistry. The index finger, for example, relates to intellect. The pinkie finger pertains to sex and sex drive. The middle finger represented will, determination, self-motivation, and so forth, and so those who had it removed were demonstrating their willingness to be led by satan, letting him call the shots, as it were (according to the book). If such an individual were asked about his / her missing finger, they would say something like they lost it at the saw mill, or some such thing. So... we can speculate that if the Beatles were really hard-core satanists, they might have done such a thing. I don't believe that for a minute! But I guess it's one possible explanation for missing fingers. Actually the Ziggy Stardust song that I quoted is a bit intriguing in regard to all this. "Ziggy Stardust" Ziggy played guitar, jamming good with Wierd and Gilly, And The Spiders from Mars. He played it left hand, but made it too far, Became the special man, Then we were Ziggy's Band. Ziggy really sang, screwed-up eyes and screwed-down hairdo Like some cat from Japan, he could lick 'em by smiling He could leave 'em to hang He came on so loaded man, well-hung and snow white tan. So where were the spiders while the fly tried to break our balls? Just the beer light to guide us. So we bitched about his fans and should we crush his sweet hands? Ziggy played for time, jiving us that we were Voodoo The kids were just crass, He was the Nazz With God given ass He took it all too far But, boy, could he play guitar. Making love with his ego, Ziggy sucked up into his mind Like a leper messiah When the kids had killed the man I had to break up the band Ziggy played guitar ------------- This song could readily apply to the Beatles. "Weird" being John, "Gilly" being George. "Spiders" being "Beatles". The Beatles became Faul's band. etc. Maybe something said between the lines in this song.
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on Apr 30, 2019 1:51:33 GMT -5
kaleidoquake wrote: ♫ So we bitched about his fans and should we crush his sweet hands? ♫ Back in 1980 there was a book that came out called "Michelle Remembers" which featured the memories of a child who had allegedly been raised to be a sacrifice to satan. It was an interesting read, to be sure, as it included rather vivid recollections of what the child experienced at satanic rituals where blood sacrifices and murders allegedly took place. Later on the book's authenticity was seriously called into question. More about that can be found at this link: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_RemembersOne of the things I remember reading in the book was that Michelle claimed that some satanists would show their commitment to the evil one by having their middle finger amputated. This had to do with what the fingers represent in palmistry. The index finger, for example, relates to intellect. The pinkie finger pertains to sex and sex drive. The middle finger represented will, determination, self-motivation, and so forth, and so those who had it removed were demonstrating their willingness to be led by satan, letting him call the shots, as it were (according to the book). If such an individual were asked about his / her missing finger, they would say something like they lost it at the saw mill, or some such thing. So... we can speculate that if the Beatles were really hard-core satanists, they might have done such a thing. I don't believe that for a minute! But I guess it's one possible explanation for missing fingers. Actually the Ziggy Stardust song that I quoted is a bit intriguing in regard to all this. "Ziggy Stardust" Ziggy played guitar, jamming good with Wierd and Gilly, And The Spiders from Mars. He played it left hand, but made it too far, Became the special man, Then we were Ziggy's Band. Ziggy really sang, screwed-up eyes and screwed-down hairdo Like some cat from Japan, he could lick 'em by smiling He could leave 'em to hang He came on so loaded man, well-hung and snow white tan. So where were the spiders while the fly tried to break our balls? Just the beer light to guide us. So we bitched about his fans and should we crush his sweet hands? Ziggy played for time, jiving us that we were Voodoo The kids were just crass, He was the Nazz With God given ass He took it all too far But, boy, could he play guitar. Making love with his ego, Ziggy sucked up into his mind Like a leper messiah When the kids had killed the man I had to break up the band Ziggy played guitar ------------- This song could readily apply to the Beatles. "Weird" being John, "Gilly" being George. "Spiders" being "Beatles". The Beatles became Faul's band. etc. Maybe something said between the lines in this song. In my occult research in regards to this weird phenomenon of extended knuckles,fingers and body...there is a relation to the belief in becoming a "superman" with the power to elongate ones height...and stretch individual body parts. This also includes access to higher knowledge,wisdom and higher realms of consciousness through the process of "the great work"...unifying ones consciousness with their guardian angels consciousness (familiar). Does this unification with ones familiar spirit create these aspects to be caught in pics? IMHO...it is a form of spirit possession...or attachment. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Familiar_spirit"When they served witches, they were often thought to be malevolent, while when working for cunning folk they were often thought of as benevolent (although there was some ambiguity in both cases). The former were often categorised as demons, while the latter were more commonly thought of and described as fairies. The main purpose of familiars is to serve the witch or young witch, providing protection for them as they come into their new powers." I'm deep into studying these occult connections to what K is sharing and finding some odd connections and correlations to disfigurement. More to come soon.
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on Apr 30, 2019 2:04:54 GMT -5
This type of shape-shifting also reminds me of all those videos showing news media pundits,politicians and journalists changing with reptillian/demonic characteristics.
Weird thought...is this revealing the individuals possession by these familiars?
Are cameras somehow allowing us to catch glimpses of these familiar spirit attachments much like tape recorders catch the voices of disembodied voices not heard by the human ear?
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Apr 30, 2019 7:15:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Apr 30, 2019 10:08:19 GMT -5
Edit from B: Picture that kaleidoquake posted is not showing. I have attempted to fix that, but without success. Edit from kaleidoquake: I copied it to a different host.
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on Apr 30, 2019 20:48:43 GMT -5
It appears from the photos that this phenomenon is not fixed...but random. That is, it occurs from time to time...and is not a deformation or birth defect of multiple Beatle doubles. We know The Beatles were very deep ibto the occult...but how deep did their interest go really? Did it involve spell casting and spirit summoning? In the occult Goetia it is stated that their are some demon spirits who have the ability to transform the magician to any shape he/she desires...bending the purpose to serve the WILL of the individual. Did The Beatles "make a deal with the devil/demons" as The Memoirs suggests? And does this explain the manifestation of these examples of disfigurement or spirit possession/materialization seen in K's pics?
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on Apr 30, 2019 21:07:26 GMT -5
The black and white pic of George Harrison playing the acoustic guitar with a super extended finger appears to be a finger slide attachment IMHO.
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Apr 30, 2019 23:24:16 GMT -5
It appears from the photos that this phenomenon is not fixed...but random. That is, it occurs from time to time...and is not a deformation or birth defect of miltiple Beatle doubles. We know The Beatles were very deep ibto the occult...but how deep did their interest go really? Did it involve spell casting and spirit summoning? In the occult Goetia it is stated that their are some demon spirits who have the ability to transform the magician to any shape he/she desires...bending the purpose to serve the WILL of the individual. Did The Beatles "make a deal with the devil/demons" as The Memoirs suggests? And does this explain the manifestation of these examples of disfigurement or spirit possession/materialization seen in K's pics? No, it's fixed. From what I can suss out at this point, the hand issues are fixed to: square chin Ringo (no right arm, funky left hand), one of the early (3 finger) Johns [the earliest John had an issue I'll get to later] and the guy who wore the John mask with the huge nose (index lopped off), the snub nosed George (bizarre tentacle left fingers) and three of the Pauls (with some as yet undetermined combination of: tiny finger nubs plus partial thumb left hand; bony 2nd pre-knuckle nubs on right hand; two finger right hand; red noodle fingers on left; burned to the bone mini right hand; lopped off left index.) timmyb52 I can understand why it might look inconsistent, at first glance. But you just have to train your eyes to see the prosthetics and/or where the images have been doctored (most commonly simply blurred) to hide the irregularities. They also shove their hands in their pockets and behind their backs a lot. And, again, not all of them have jacked up hands. But, frequently, the irregularities are on full display, such as with this dimestore index finger tip here: This Paul with the missing index finger tip has been a 'Beatle Paul' since, at the latest, February 17th 1963. With Ringos, in particular, it's necessary to not breeze over the shape of a hand without seeing what's really there:
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Apr 30, 2019 23:29:22 GMT -5
The black and white pic of George Harrison playing the acoustic guitar with a super extended finger appears to be a finger slide attachment IMHO. I don't recall any mention of an instance of George Harrison playing bottleneck slide guitar in 1962 during televised appearances in which the band played their Rock N Roll radio hits. As a devoted blues fan, that woulda snagged in my mind. I, also, don't see anything about the hands in these insets that could be construed as finger slides of any kind. Are cameras somehow allowing us to catch glimpses of these familiar spirit attachments much like tape recorders catch the voices of disembodied voices not heard by the human ear? I think it's the opposite. I think cameras (depending on who is wielding them...) can allow us to overcome the incantation of personality and cultivated distractions to see what's really there. In other words: that the potency of the emotional fixation fans have to the objects of their admiration is hypnagogic, blinding, somewhat metaphysical in its power, and only in the absence of those charms is truth visible. The lens must be degreased and the fog machine turned off. Also: I've been running some facial recognition software on batches of 'Beatles' but 1) it unfortunately does not include hand recognition and 2) the rampant photo-doctoring by dezo (and others...), the quantity of plastic surgery two of the Pauls have had, and the frequency with which those same two employed facial prosthetics from the mid-60s through the mid-80s has complicated being able to construct linear timeline. Additionally....I'm floating at about 75% convinced, at this point, that one of the Johns became a Paul, that Tara Browne was an early George and that, not only were there two Pete Bests (check the noses), but that one of them was a Ringo pinch hitter. So, for veracity, I'm relying mostly on cross-checking undoctored fan snapshots from Meet The Beatles For Real (a blog of fan encounters with the Beatles that has been gathering images since 2009), although, as I mentioned to you previously, later uploads include many officially sanctioned/PR/dezo/bullshitgarbage shots.
|
|
|
Post by B on May 1, 2019 12:33:43 GMT -5
kaleidoquake wrote: About as close as can be now! Edit by B: About as close as can be MAN. My misteak. Sun King at TKIN posted a Tara Browne "Ringo" picture years ago that was very convincing to me (that it was Tara Browne). It is here somewhere. If I find it, I will post it. Also he posted a picture featuring Paul, John, George, and Ringo, but they were all Faul in disguises. It had a blue background. If I find it, I will post it.
|
|
|
Post by IWILL on May 1, 2019 15:58:33 GMT -5
so, we go now lol
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 1, 2019 22:08:49 GMT -5
I just wanted to comment on some questions Ringo's story, here, raises: Was he strapped down into the cot? Why else would being in a cot cause him to have to use his feet to pick anything up? If the cot had sides, like a crib, as he says, how could have he have fallen out? Likewise, if he was strapped down, how could he have fallen out? If the sides were there, as he says, but not enough to keep him in the bed, why couldn't he have just used his hands to pick things up? Maybe someone here has experience with the sort of medical bed he says he was in and can explain this... Or maybe this story has holes in it because not all of it is true. Maybe he couldn't use his hands to pick things up because he didn't have a right arm and his left hand was bandaged up. And maybe that's the same reason he was unable to break his fall and, perhaps, why he fell in the first place. I am extremely accident prone. I sympathize with and understand there not needing to be any particular reason for why one might fall out of bed or walk into a wall. I do not take issue with the idea that someone could injure himself doing something as simple as trying to pick up a small object; seriously, I'm ready to brick off my kitchen, at this point. My problem is with the explanations he gives for the events. They don't follow. And, as a result, the narrative, as a whole, doesn't make any sense.
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 1, 2019 23:35:22 GMT -5
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_RemembersOne of the things I remember reading in the book was that Michelle claimed that some satanists would show their commitment to the evil one by having their middle finger amputated. This had to do with what the fingers represent in palmistry. The index finger, for example, relates to intellect. The pinkie finger pertains to sex and sex drive. The middle finger represented will, determination, self-motivation, and so forth, and so those who had it removed were demonstrating their willingness to be led by satan, letting him call the shots, as it were (according to the book). If such an individual were asked about his / her missing finger, they would say something like they lost it at the saw mill, or some such thing. So, the finger(s) that remain(s) signify the 'powers' one retains? Why Japan? Who or what is 'the fly'? And who is 'we'? 'The Nazz', eh?… Blue Meanies? Recurring Paul-As-Fool-On-The-Hill theme. "Hold you in his armchair / You can feel his disease" Who is the 'I' of this statement?
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 2, 2019 15:56:08 GMT -5
The Fireman without his mask
|
|