|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 8, 2020 19:52:08 GMT -5
And obvious question at this point would be: what did they do to piss off the Japanese mob and how does Yoko figure into that?
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on May 9, 2020 3:06:29 GMT -5
And obvious question at this point would be: what did they do to piss off the Japanese mob and how does Yoko figure into that? Well...we do know that Yoko knew who The Beatles were before she met John (despite the official narrative)...and that her and John after their marriage went to Japan several times on holiday. We also know the whole Yoko and John trying to get her daughter Kyoko back story (or is that just a cover story for something else?). Then there was all of Brian Epsteins gambling debts too. Maybe the connection is with the gambling debts. Did Brian also borrow money or owe the Yukuza debt money besides the cash he owed to mobsters in the UK? Could be...but who knows. It is odd that Kyoko remains a background character in the John and Yoko story with little really known about her at all.
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 9, 2020 14:44:22 GMT -5
And obvious question at this point would be: what did they do to piss off the Japanese mob and how does Yoko figure into that? Well...we do know that Yoko knew who The Beatles were before she met John (despite the official narrative)...and that her and John after their marriage went to Japan several times on holiday. We also know the whole Yoko and John trying to get her daughter Kyoko back story (or is that just a cover story for something else?). Then there was all of Brian Epsteins gambling debts too. Maybe the connection is with the gambling debts. Did Brian also borrow money or owe the Yukuza debt money besides the cash he owed to mobsters in the UK? Could be...but who knows. It is odd that Kyoko remains a background character in the John and Yoko story with little really known about her at all. My inclination is to think it has something to with Brian's gambling debts. We know he was in hock to the Jewish mobsters in London. Why not the Yakuza, too? But did/do the Yakuza even do that kind of loan sharking? And did they even have a presence in the UK in the late 50s/early 60s? As we've seen, there are 3 fingered Johns in '57, etc. that look like birth defects and, then, later Beatles who appear to have amputations as opposed to congenital issues. Were there any strange sub-group WWII allegiances between Japan and Germany or Russia? I find both Yoko's and Linda's first husbands curious, that they both had daughters with these guys before marrying Beatles, that they both went to the same college, both visual artists, etc. The backstory similarities are striking.
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on May 11, 2020 6:05:28 GMT -5
Well...we do know that Yoko knew who The Beatles were before she met John (despite the official narrative)...and that her and John after their marriage went to Japan several times on holiday. We also know the whole Yoko and John trying to get her daughter Kyoko back story (or is that just a cover story for something else?). Then there was all of Brian Epsteins gambling debts too. Maybe the connection is with the gambling debts. Did Brian also borrow money or owe the Yukuza debt money besides the cash he owed to mobsters in the UK? Could be...but who knows. It is odd that Kyoko remains a background character in the John and Yoko story with little really known about her at all. My inclination is to think it has something to with Brian's gambling debts. We know he was in hock to the Jewish mobsters in London. Why not the Yakuza, too? But did/do the Yakuza even do that kind of loan sharking? And did they even have a presence in the UK in the late 50s/early 60s? As we've seen, there are 3 fingered Johns in '57, etc. that look like birth defects and, then, later Beatles who appear to have amputations as opposed to congenital issues. Were there any strange sub-group WWII allegiances between Japan and Germany or Russia? I find both Yoko's and Linda's first husbands curious, that they both had daughters with these guys before marrying Beatles, that they both went to the same college, both visual artists, etc. The backstory similarities are striking. There is a lot their that demands some serious investigation IMHO. We know the US occupied and established bases in both Japan and Germany after WW2...so that may establish a link. Plus...I think the US had a big hand in rebuilding parts of Japan and Germany also after the war was over. The Yakuza would definitely have been doing business with lonely and bored US soldiers,business men and contractors who were visiting their gambling and whore houses for sure. IMHO...I believe Linda and Yoko were intelligence assets of both the CIA and MI6. Their were also many businesses and buisnessmen playing both sides of the war...before,during and afterwards. Alot of money was made. Yes...I believe a connection is there. More research is needed for sure...but presently I am too busy at the moment with family issues. Hopefully, by Spring or Summer I can check into this aspect more deeply. Also ...I think EMI made communication/radio equipment for the military during WW2.
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 11, 2020 14:35:02 GMT -5
My inclination is to think it has something to with Brian's gambling debts. We know he was in hock to the Jewish mobsters in London. Why not the Yakuza, too? But did/do the Yakuza even do that kind of loan sharking? And did they even have a presence in the UK in the late 50s/early 60s? As we've seen, there are 3 fingered Johns in '57, etc. that look like birth defects and, then, later Beatles who appear to have amputations as opposed to congenital issues. Were there any strange sub-group WWII allegiances between Japan and Germany or Russia? I find both Yoko's and Linda's first husbands curious, that they both had daughters with these guys before marrying Beatles, that they both went to the same college, both visual artists, etc. The backstory similarities are striking. There is a lot their that demands some serious investigation IMHO. We know the US occupied and established bases in both Japan and Germany after WW2...so that may establish a link. Plus...I think the US had a big hand in rebuilding parts of Japan and Germany also after the war was over. The Yakuza would definitely have been doing business with lonely and bored US soldiers,business men and contractors who were visiting their gambling and whore houses for sure. IMHO...I believe Linda and Yoko were intelligence assets of both the CIA and MI6. Their were also many businesses and buisnessmen playing both sides of the war...before,during and afterwards. Alot of money was made. Yes...I believe a connection is there. More research is needed for sure...but presently I am too busy at the moment with family issues. Hopefully, by Spring or Summer I can check into this aspect more deeply. Also ...I think EMI made communication/radio equipment for the military during WW2. But what about UK soldiers? My WWII knowledge is slim. I had history teachers who cared more about us memorizing dates than explaining the why and the what and the who of anything and it turned me off of war data entirely. I believe Astrid was an asset, if not an agent, as well. There are, also, a lot of unwitting assets, who don't realize they've been given entrée to xyz for the purposes of information gathering until they're being questioned. I may do some poking around about those strange first husbands. Hope all's relatively well, given the circumstances, with your family.
|
|
|
Post by joseph on May 11, 2020 21:37:16 GMT -5
There is a lot their that demands some serious investigation IMHO. We know the US occupied and established bases in both Japan and Germany after WW2...so that may establish a link. Plus...I think the US had a big hand in rebuilding parts of Japan and Germany also after the war was over. The Yakuza would definitely have been doing business with lonely and bored US soldiers,business men and contractors who were visiting their gambling and whore houses for sure. IMHO...I believe Linda and Yoko were intelligence assets of both the CIA and MI6. Their were also many businesses and buisnessmen playing both sides of the war...before,during and afterwards. Alot of money was made. Yes...I believe a connection is there. More research is needed for sure...but presently I am too busy at the moment with family issues. Hopefully, by Spring or Summer I can check into this aspect more deeply. Also ...I think EMI made communication/radio equipment for the military during WW2. But what about UK soldiers? My WWII knowledge is slim. I had history teachers who cared more about us memorizing dates than explaining the why and the what and the who of anything and it turned me off of war data entirely. I believe Astrid was an asset, if not an agent, as well. There are, also, a lot of unwitting assets, who don't realize they've been given entrée to xyz for the purposes of information gathering until they're being questioned. I may do some poking around about those strange first husbands. Hope all's relatively well, given the circumstances, with your family. I was surfing Linda's family history a while back and it led me to Pathé. Now I suspect that Pathé newsreels did two pieces on The Beatles where they spliced footage of the ones we lost with the replacements. One was a concert at the Manchester Apollo in November 63 and the other was of them boarding a plane on the 64 world tour. I looked at the wikipedia entry to get some info about who was in charge in that era but it jumps from WWII to the 70's in short order: "...French authorities in September 1942, delivered to the Nazis, and deported to Auschwitz where he died in October 1942.[15][16][17] The company was forced to undergo a restructuring in 1943 and was acquired by Adrien Ramauge.[19] Over the years, the business underwent a number of changes including diversification into producing programmes for the burgeoning television industry. During the 1970s, operating theatres overtook film production as Pathé's primary source of revenue. In the late 1980s, Italian financier Giancarlo Parretti tried to make a bid for Pathé, even..." en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path%C3%A9Being replacements in one of the biggest social engineering experiments in history, Faul and Fohn would have been in no position to choose who they shared pillow talk with. They would have had to have been paired up with members of the social engineering elitists.
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 11, 2020 22:27:17 GMT -5
But what about UK soldiers? My WWII knowledge is slim. I had history teachers who cared more about us memorizing dates than explaining the why and the what and the who of anything and it turned me off of war data entirely. I believe Astrid was an asset, if not an agent, as well. There are, also, a lot of unwitting assets, who don't realize they've been given entrée to xyz for the purposes of information gathering until they're being questioned. I may do some poking around about those strange first husbands. Hope all's relatively well, given the circumstances, with your family. I was surfing Linda's family history a while back and it led me to Pathé. Now I suspect that Pathé newsreels did two pieces on The Beatles where they spliced footage of the ones we lost with the replacements. One was a concert at the Manchester Apollo in November 63 and the other was of them boarding a plane on the 64 world tour. I looked at the wikipedia entry to get some info about who was in charge in that era but it jumps from WWII to the 70's in short order: "...French authorities in September 1942, delivered to the Nazis, and deported to Auschwitz where he died in October 1942.[15][16][17] The company was forced to undergo a restructuring in 1943 and was acquired by Adrien Ramauge.[19] Over the years, the business underwent a number of changes including diversification into producing programmes for the burgeoning television industry. During the 1970s, operating theatres overtook film production as Pathé's primary source of revenue. In the late 1980s, Italian financier Giancarlo Parretti tried to make a bid for Pathé, even..." en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path%C3%A9Being replacements in one of the biggest social engineering experiments in history, Faul and Fohn would have been in no position to choose who they shared pillow talk with. They would have had to have been paired up with members of the social engineering elitists. And there seems to be zero information online about Adrien Ramauge except that he acquired Pathé in '43. This is same sentence appears in about 15 different languages, with no additional info about him.
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on May 11, 2020 23:27:56 GMT -5
There is a lot their that demands some serious investigation IMHO. We know the US occupied and established bases in both Japan and Germany after WW2...so that may establish a link. Plus...I think the US had a big hand in rebuilding parts of Japan and Germany also after the war was over. The Yakuza would definitely have been doing business with lonely and bored US soldiers,business men and contractors who were visiting their gambling and whore houses for sure. IMHO...I believe Linda and Yoko were intelligence assets of both the CIA and MI6. Their were also many businesses and buisnessmen playing both sides of the war...before,during and afterwards. Alot of money was made. Yes...I believe a connection is there. More research is needed for sure...but presently I am too busy at the moment with family issues. Hopefully, by Spring or Summer I can check into this aspect more deeply. Also ...I think EMI made communication/radio equipment for the military during WW2. But what about UK soldiers? My WWII knowledge is slim. I had history teachers who cared more about us memorizing dates than explaining the why and the what and the who of anything and it turned me off of war data entirely. I believe Astrid was an asset, if not an agent, as well. There are, also, a lot of unwitting assets, who don't realize they've been given entrée to xyz for the purposes of information gathering until they're being questioned. I may do some poking around about those strange first husbands. Hope all's relatively well, given the circumstances, with your family. Thanks K...much appreciated. As for the UK soldiers...I don't know for sure. A quick Google search showed this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demobilisation_of_the_British_Armed_Forces_after_the_Second_World_WarDemobilisation of the British Armed Forces after the Second World War and this: www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/british-army-operations-after-1945/How to look for records of... British Army operations after 1945 Could be some good info there. I will do some more digging into that when I get a little more free time.
|
|
|
Post by mothernaturesson on May 16, 2020 18:01:42 GMT -5
There’s a lot to read here and I’m not quite done yet, but I thought of two things from the February 1967 Beatles Book to share. (Ya know... This Beatles Book.) This photo looks like his left index finger was removed: And this one, I just thought was funny, since it was the drawing contest winner. That girl got it! Ok, back to reading...
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 16, 2020 18:43:29 GMT -5
There’s a lot to read here and I’m not quite done yet, but I thought of two things from the February 1967 Beatles Book to share. (Ya know... This Beatles Book.) This photo looks like his left index finger was removed: And this one, I just thought was funny, since it was the drawing contest winner. That girl got it! Ok, back to reading... Excellent find! Thanks for adding it. His “ears” are also bizarre in that pic and I’m not sure what to make of the black blob by his neck on the right side (his left). I think this is the Paul who started experimenting with electronica and hung out with Burroughs circa 65, if memory serves. I’ve been very curious about the Pauls who were suddenly seen always wearing glasses or sunglasses during this same time frame. I wonder if that drawing was a real submission or a plant. Do you know if The Beatles Book(s) were subscription only or if anyone could pick them up at a library/bookstore/comic shop/news stand?
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on May 17, 2020 2:49:38 GMT -5
There’s a lot to read here and I’m not quite done yet, but I thought of two things from the February 1967 Beatles Book to share. (Ya know... This Beatles Book.) This photo looks like his left index finger was removed: And this one, I just thought was funny, since it was the drawing contest winner. That girl got it! Ok, back to reading... That pic of Paul looks altered...and very badly at that! Where his left index finger is gone is a heavy line of black shading. A line of demarcation if you will. If these pics are from the original book...that is...this is how the photo is actually seen in its pages. Then it raises the question...why were The Beatles pics being altered from the very beginning? I find it all very odd and disturbing on several levels.
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 17, 2020 3:50:12 GMT -5
There’s a lot to read here and I’m not quite done yet, but I thought of two things from the February 1967 Beatles Book to share. (Ya know... This Beatles Book.) This photo looks like his left index finger was removed: And this one, I just thought was funny, since it was the drawing contest winner. That girl got it! Ok, back to reading... That pic of Paul looks altered...and very badly at that! Where his left index finger is gone is a heavy line of black shading. A line of demarcation if you will. If these pics are from the original book...that is...this is how the photo is actually seen in its pages. Then it raises the question...why were The Beatles pics being altered from the very beginning? I find it all very odd and disturbing on several levels. I don’t see what you’re seeing. I see a possibly suspicious shadow on his right thumb, the ridiculous ears and that bizarre blacked out blob along his neck. I see a scar on the skin of his hand which looks entirely real and unaltered. It’s the correct shape of and in the correct placement of what would be left over if that finger was amputated including the first knuckle.
|
|
|
Post by mothernaturesson on May 17, 2020 15:28:06 GMT -5
There’s a lot to read here and I’m not quite done yet, but I thought of two things from the February 1967 Beatles Book to share. (Ya know... This Beatles Book.) This photo looks like his left index finger was removed: And this one, I just thought was funny, since it was the drawing contest winner. That girl got it! Ok, back to reading... Excellent find! Thanks for adding it. His “ears” are also bizarre in that pic and I’m not sure what to make of the black blob by his neck on the right side (his left). I think this is the Paul who started experimenting with electronica and hung out with Burroughs circa 65, if memory serves. I’ve been very curious about the Pauls who were suddenly seen always wearing glasses or sunglasses during this same time frame. I wonder if that drawing was a real submission or a plant. Do you know if The Beatles Book(s) were subscription only or if anyone could pick them up at a library/bookstore/comic shop/news stand? You’re welcome! Yeah, his ears definitely look weird. I didn’t initially notice that he has the chipped tooth, too. I think there were a couple of them that had the chipped tooth. I’m not sure how they did that, but, personally, I like to believe that one of them actually chipped their tooth, another one mouthed off about it, so the first one whacked the other one in the face. Identifying feature problem, solved! Haha! Kidding! I’ve been curious about the glasses too. It seems like they started wearing them all of a sudden, and then stopped, just as suddenly. I was thinking the same thing about the drawing. That is just too funny that his fingers are all messed up! And we know that there is no such thing as coincidence… From what I have gathered, the books were for the members of The Beatles fan club. I believe it was their sort-of newsletter. I don’t think you could buy it anywhere. Based on the ad for the compilation book, I think that when they did have books to purchase, you had to purchase them from the fan club. The photo from this thread that really got me was the make up application photo, where a different person’s hand was pasted onto Paul’s at the knuckle. That was just so obvious when you looked at it closely! The skin color tone is so different!
|
|
|
Post by mothernaturesson on May 17, 2020 15:39:31 GMT -5
That pic of Paul looks altered...and very badly at that! Where his left index finger is gone is a heavy line of black shading. A line of demarcation if you will. If these pics are from the original book...that is...this is how the photo is actually seen in its pages. Then it raises the question...why were The Beatles pics being altered from the very beginning? I find it all very odd and disturbing on several levels. I bought this Beatles Book (original, not a reproduction) on eBay and scanned it myself, so I can confirm that what you are seeing is completely unedited (by me, anyway). 😀 I got tired of all of the crappy/partial scans online and I am horrified by how many things are taken out of context, so I just wanted to be sure, for myself. I have a hard time taking a lot of what I see online at face value… so I end up spending wayyy too much money on books and materials… 🙄 BUT, just like spending the time to track down public records, having concrete info right in front of me makes it totally worth it! I’ve been pretty bad about staying organized, so I am working through my (compulsively collected) treasure trove of resources, to get them organized. Once I’m done, I will figure out a way to share what I’ve got. Does Google Drive work if I link it here? I don’t know much about file sharing and I have many PDFs that are more that 1 MB, so I can’t “attach” them.
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 17, 2020 16:16:00 GMT -5
You’re welcome! Yeah, his ears definitely look weird. I didn’t initially notice that he has the chipped tooth, too. I think there were a couple of them that had the chipped tooth. I’m not sure how they did that, but, personally, I like to believe that one of them actually chipped their tooth, another one mouthed off about it, so the first one whacked the other one in the face. Identifying feature problem, solved! Haha! Kidding! Check out the Is Paul Afraid of The Dentist thread. Yeah, I’d like to examine that span of Sun/Glasses Pauls a bit more. That and the street sign saying CIA...really makes one wonder both who created the drawing and who the intended audience was. Right? And it’s maddening because it’s like ‘ok well what the fuck are they covering up? What did that hand actually look like? ?’ And also, just ‘why pose him in a way that shows off his hands if you’ve decided mutant hands would be bad for business?’ Eppy had a strict rule that absolutely no photos of the band, even from press conferences, could be released without his OK.
|
|
|
Post by cypher on May 17, 2020 21:36:05 GMT -5
Self-deprecating fucked up 'humor' or one of the Lennons (a more sociopathic version) taking cruel jabs at another Lennon (the one with four fingers on his right hand).
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 17, 2020 21:55:28 GMT -5
Self-deprecating fucked up 'humor' or one of the Lennons (a more sociopathic version) taking cruel jabs at another Lennon (the one with four fingers on his right hand). You know, I’ve wondered about that…And I think, based on “his” drawings, that I came down on the side of him seeing himself as a monster and embodying it. There are additional photos of a “Paul” and the 4 fingered John doing “gimp” poses, both in Hamburg and in front of Abbey Rd during their first recording sessions there. It may have been a learned self-defense mechanism.
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 18, 2020 3:13:17 GMT -5
I’ve been pretty bad about staying organized, so I am working through my (compulsively collected) treasure trove of resources, to get them organized. Once I’m done, I will figure out a way to share what I’ve got. Does Google Drive work if I link it here? I don’t know much about file sharing and I have many PDFs that are more that 1 MB, so I can’t “attach” them. I've tried a variety of sites, apps, hosts and stalled out after not finding anything that pleased me, across the board. If the gallery display is nice, the tagging is shit. If the tagging is solid, it's a private, paid service where people have to be individually invited to view anything. If it's a public host with large capacity that doesn't down res images, there basically is no way to organize any images. And on and on and on. So, I wound up focusing more on privately sorting Pauls (et al) into matches and eventually started feeling like a complete fucking lunatic ("What'd you do today?" "Compared fake ears…" "All day?" "…Since Wednesday… last Wednesday…"). But I'd love to get my stuff and the stuff JoJo shared with me and the stuff I scraped from defunct Beatles Multiples sites, etc. up and available for others to easily interface with. And I'm betting you've got a solid trove saved up, yourself. Maybe we can brainstorm a bit together about this. But, yes, people can access Google Drive from here if you just give them the link and any password you've protected the files with. I think if you set up a Google Photos acct, you can link images from there -- but that's one of the ones whose tagging I found very lacking.
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 18, 2020 5:47:45 GMT -5
mothernaturessonSo…uh…the Paul in both images below have what looks to me like a matching missing index finger scar, very similar chin clefts and chin shapes, similar general bone structure and eye size and skull size and their noses are identical. And both images appear, at any rate, to be oriented in the correct direction, going by the side on which his shirts button…But the wonky thumb and missing finger/scar are on opposite hands…Glasses Paul in pic 2 seems to have the correct chipped tooth and Somber Paul in pic 1 would appear to have his watch on the correct wrist for a lefty. In both pix, his hair seems to be whorling in the same direction. Are these not the same guy? Which, if either, image is flipped? What are some explanations for this?…I know timmyb52, you'll probably say it's all doctored in esoteric visual code. Are there other possibilities? Were London bohemians wearing women's blouses in the mid-60s?
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on May 18, 2020 11:15:36 GMT -5
That pic of Paul looks altered...and very badly at that! Where his left index finger is gone is a heavy line of black shading. A line of demarcation if you will. If these pics are from the original book...that is...this is how the photo is actually seen in its pages. Then it raises the question...why were The Beatles pics being altered from the very beginning? I find it all very odd and disturbing on several levels. I bought this Beatles Book (original, not a reproduction) on eBay and scanned it myself, so I can confirm that what you are seeing is completely unedited (by me, anyway). 😀 I got tired of all of the crappy/partial scans online and I am horrified by how many things are taken out of context, so I just wanted to be sure, for myself. I have a hard time taking a lot of what I see online at face value… so I end up spending wayyy too much money on books and materials… 🙄 BUT, just like spending the time to track down public records, having concrete info right in front of me makes it totally worth it! I’ve been pretty bad about staying organized, so I am working through my (compulsively collected) treasure trove of resources, to get them organized. Once I’m done, I will figure out a way to share what I’ve got. Does Google Drive work if I link it here? I don’t know much about file sharing and I have many PDFs that are more that 1 MB, so I can’t “attach” them. Thank you so much Mother for confirming the photos as authentic and original from the sourced material. Llike you...I am also weary of online info without confirming it myself to the best of my abilities. NOW...the question for me is this...were pics of The Beatles altered themselves by EMI to show amputations and other weird oddities...or were there actual mutiple Beatle look alikes with missing digits and other deformities? The message being sent IMHO is just DARK! Very disturbing on multiple levels for sure. BUT...was this also some type of test? That is...were the controlling elites trying to measure the awareness of the masses in the 60s? Were the elites trying to see how much they could get away with without being noticed by the sleeping masses of the 60's? Was this being used as a measuring device whose results would tell them whether or not their future plans for social engineering going into the 70's -2000's could go forward succesfully by utilizing The Beatles and music itself as their main tool in terms of shaping young minds and how over time they could change the social norms of society (future generations)? Whatever it's intent...this shit is very DARK!
|
|
|
Post by timmyb52 on May 18, 2020 11:27:50 GMT -5
mothernaturesson So…uh…the Paul in both images below have what looks to me like a matching missing index finger scar, very similar chin clefts and chin shapes, similar general bone structure and eye size and skull size and their noses are identical. And both images appear, at any rate, to be oriented in the correct direction, going by the side on which his shirts button…But the wonky thumb and missing finger/scar are on opposite hands…Glasses Paul in pic 2 seems to have the correct chipped tooth and Somber Paul in pic 1 would appear to have his watch on the correct wrist for a lefty. In both pix, his hair seems to be whorling in the same direction. Are these not the same guy? Which, if either, image is flipped? What are some explanations for this?…I know timmyb52 , you'll probably say it's all doctored in esoteric visual code. Are there other possibilities? Were London bohemians wearing women's blouses in the mid-60s? This is all about messaging IMHO. Someone/someones went to a shit load of trouble to do this. And all it comes back to for me is messaging. Or it is a huge social engineering test of some kind. Or BOTH! Whatever it is...it isn't good. The person or persons behind this are very SICK! Both mentally and ideologically!
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 18, 2020 18:25:49 GMT -5
mothernaturesson So…uh…the Paul in both images below have what looks to me like a matching missing index finger scar, very similar chin clefts and chin shapes, similar general bone structure and eye size and skull size and their noses are identical. And both images appear, at any rate, to be oriented in the correct direction, going by the side on which his shirts button…But the wonky thumb and missing finger/scar are on opposite hands…Glasses Paul in pic 2 seems to have the correct chipped tooth and Somber Paul in pic 1 would appear to have his watch on the correct wrist for a lefty. In both pix, his hair seems to be whorling in the same direction. Are these not the same guy? Which, if either, image is flipped? What are some explanations for this?…I know timmyb52 , you'll probably say it's all doctored in esoteric visual code. Are there other possibilities? Were London bohemians wearing women's blouses in the mid-60s? This is all about messaging IMHO. Someone/someones went to a shit load of trouble to do this. And all it comes back to for me is messaging. Or it is a huge social engineering test of some kind. Or BOTH! Whatever it is...it isn't good. The person or persons behind this are very SICK! Both mentally and ideologically! Dude, I told you about the recording engineer, though.
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 22, 2020 9:05:10 GMT -5
|
|
sally
Hard Day's Night
Posts: 26
|
Post by sally on Jun 7, 2020 21:40:56 GMT -5
That pic of Paul looks altered...and very badly at that! Where his left index finger is gone is a heavy line of black shading. A line of demarcation if you will. If these pics are from the original book...that is...this is how the photo is actually seen in its pages. Then it raises the question...why were The Beatles pics being altered from the very beginning? I find it all very odd and disturbing on several levels. I bought this Beatles Book (original, not a reproduction) on eBay and scanned it myself, so I can confirm that what you are seeing is completely unedited (by me, anyway). 😀 I got tired of all of the crappy/partial scans online and I am horrified by how many things are taken out of context, so I just wanted to be sure, for myself. I have a hard time taking a lot of what I see online at face value… so I end up spending wayyy too much money on books and materials… 🙄 BUT, just like spending the time to track down public records, having concrete info right in front of me makes it totally worth it! I’ve been pretty bad about staying organized, so I am working through my (compulsively collected) treasure trove of resources, to get them organized. Once I’m done, I will figure out a way to share what I’ve got. Does Google Drive work if I link it here? I don’t know much about file sharing and I have many PDFs that are more that 1 MB, so I can’t “attach” them.
|
|
|
Post by cypher on Aug 13, 2020 17:13:08 GMT -5
At least two Pauls exhibiting similar types of post-injury deformities and post-surgical reconstruction outcomes.
|
|