|
Post by B on Oct 24, 2019 18:49:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by B on Sept 29, 2020 20:07:57 GMT -5
paul is dead - the rotten apple 92 lllwww.youtube.com/watch?v=FAlda6DU_X8iamaphoney Sep 29, 2020 "November 30, 1969. F. Lee Bailey hosts this TV special to uncover whether Paul McCartney died in 1966 or not. Welcome to this RFO TV special from November 30, 1969 "Paul McCartney, the complete story told for the first and last time.". "
|
|
|
Post by beatles1966 on Oct 18, 2021 19:42:55 GMT -5
Iamaphoney website has new images on it, if anybody's interested. iamaphoney.com/
|
|
|
Post by admiralbilly on Dec 7, 2021 2:11:25 GMT -5
Iamaphoney website has new images on it, if anybody's interested. iamaphoney.com/Great to know.
|
|
|
Post by kvo on Feb 6, 2023 18:36:41 GMT -5
Well if you don't, you don't. All I'm saying is that iamaphoney may have found a gravemarker near old Route 66 that he felt was Paul's. The highway in his video may well be old route 66. I say that because the Last Trip To Tulsa song clearly points to old route 66, imo. In the Bill song "Press" (from the "Press To Play" album), there are these lyrics: "You can give me what I want I must confess, My body needs attention my mind is in a mess, Oklahoma was never like this.Never like this, it was never like this...." Bill put clues in his songs, like this reference to "the Bible Belt"(imo) of the US in "Heart of the Country": Heart of the country Where the holy people grow but if people don't pick up on them, it's all for naught. Bumping this old post. This could be nothing, but I'm always looking for patterns and connections. Sooo, "Last Trip to Tulsa", a PID song. Change (or rotation) of Beatle personnel around 1966/1967. Maybe someone never got on the MMT bus. Because Three Dog Night, formed in 1967, tell us in "Never Been to Spain" that they kinda like the Beatles (but, of course, they've never been to England). Interestingly, they've never been to Heaven (so no one actually "died"), but they've been to Oklahoma (on the last trip to Tulsa?). Somebody is told he was "born" in Oklahoma, but he really can't remember. Yeah, I bet he can't.
|
|
|
Post by beatles1966 on Feb 7, 2023 15:21:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Feb 7, 2023 21:58:25 GMT -5
I just saw it! Has anyone tried to run it backwards yet?
|
|
|
Post by johnnybowie on Feb 8, 2023 8:59:37 GMT -5
I just saw it! Has anyone tried to run it backwards yet? Yes, it’s Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da.
|
|
|
Post by beatles1966 on Aug 2, 2023 19:03:28 GMT -5
New video - Slightly different mix of the version of Now and Then IAAP has been posting since 2006 or so.
|
|
|
Post by beatles1966 on Apr 14, 2024 2:14:32 GMT -5
Well, it's been around a year since TheRevelAtion was meant to happen. Guess that was a bust, lol. IAAP still uploads stuff from time to time though. No idea why he's still uploadinf the same stuff that he did in the 2000s just repackaged. It's nothing new.
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Apr 14, 2024 12:21:02 GMT -5
Who knows if IAAP had any actual connection to BEATLE. But, there really hasn't been anything substantial that has come out about the 'mystery'. Tho, I haven't been a deep diver into the vids (maybe I've missed something?)
Some might think it's a red herring. Some a dead herring.
Or maybe some have gleaned some things others haven't?
Any thoughts - esp those more familiar?
|
|
|
Post by cayetana on Apr 21, 2024 10:44:49 GMT -5
>> Who knows if IAAP had any actual connection to BEATLE. Of course we can’t know for sure but like I said before, I just find it interesting that on Twitter he’s followed by The Beatles, Yoko Ono and Imagine Peace Tower: twitter.com/iamaphoney
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Apr 21, 2024 12:16:14 GMT -5
Could be an invested interest or a mild curiosity (they're observers like the rest of us). If invested - if they intended to pass on something substantial - it seems virtually everyone's missed it. So, they basically failed. Is the audience lacking perception or is the source so ambiguous it's just a circular little journey?
|
|
|
Post by keytothetruth on Apr 28, 2024 17:26:49 GMT -5
Could be an invested interest or a mild curiosity (they're observers like the rest of us). If invested - if they intended to pass on something substantial - it seems virtually everyone's missed it. So, they basically failed. Is the audience lacking perception or is the source so ambiguous it's just a circular little journey? Not sure what you mean by “they’re observers”, the people in the Beatles official circle are the ones who know the truth. The fact they follow IAAP on Twitter clearly shows he has connections, if he was just some random guy making PID stuff they wouldn’t care. Imo the whole IAAP thing was created by Neil Aspinall, with the content run owned by Apple, which is backed up pretty well by this blog post: beaconfilms2011.blogspot.com/2013/03/?m=1
|
|
|
Post by ramone on Apr 29, 2024 10:41:59 GMT -5
"The fact they follow IAAP on Twitter clearly shows he has connections,"
Not really, by that logic anyone following would have to have a connection.
What I mean by observers is that they might just be curious as any outsiders (if they have nothing to do with IAAP).
But, maybe they do have a connection. (thanks for the link) But, even the link says : " As ever, I don't propose any of this as gospel, it may be miles off the mark, but, I put it out there to prompt discussion and debate and, hopefully, it might bring us nearer to solving the riddle."
So, let's really funnel this down - say there is a connection - what was the goal? If they were trying to give the public something substantial info wise - what was accomplished ? (whoever was behind it)
|
|
|
Post by keytothetruth on Apr 29, 2024 21:25:40 GMT -5
"The fact they follow IAAP on Twitter clearly shows he has connections," Not really, by that logic anyone following would have to have a connection. What I mean by observers is that they might just be curious as any outsiders (if they have nothing to do with IAAP). But, maybe they do have a connection. (thanks for the link) But, even the link says : " As ever, I don't propose any of this as gospel, it may be miles off the mark, but, I put it out there to prompt discussion and debate and, hopefully, it might bring us nearer to solving the riddle." So, let's really funnel this down - say there is a connection - what was the goal? If they were trying to give the public something substantial info wise - what was accomplished ? (whoever was behind it) I just find it weird that The Beatles official Twitter account would follow a relatively unknown guy who makes PID videos, since everyone in the Beatles camp has always shot down the PID rumor. Not to mention it’s weird they would follow a content creator they have no connection with at all. But putting aside the Twitter thing, yes, you have to wonder what IAAP was supposed to reveal, if a revelation was the purpose. Personally I don’t really believe Paul was actually replaced, I think the whole PID thing was a massive sort of proto ARG, although I think with a much deeper meaning than just a marketing ploy. We don’t really know what the meaning is, but I think Mal Evans and Neil Aspinall wanted to reveal it. But with what happened to Mal and his diary, Neil realized he couldn’t talk about it openly, so he created IAAP, but I think the reason it never seemingly revealed anything substantial, and had misinformation, is because ultimately the people keeping the secret wouldn’t let it be revealed. But IAAP did reveal some backwards messages people didn’t know about before, and released some revealing archival footage. But Neil died, and it seems that after The Winged Beatle, which was the ultimate goal of the project, there wasn’t really any new evidence to show, and Paul didn’t actually want to do The Revelation, so that’s why now Martin Heurlin/Billy Martin just repackages the same content. But obviously all this is just my theory.
|
|
|
Post by cayetana on May 6, 2024 14:19:46 GMT -5
Could be an invested interest or a mild curiosity (they're observers like the rest of us). If invested - if they intended to pass on something substantial - it seems virtually everyone's missed it. So, they basically failed. Is the audience lacking perception or is the source so ambiguous it's just a circular little journey? Which just brings me back to Apollo’s message that always kind of stood out to me: “ “What we have here is failure to communicate.” The key to any illusion is misdirection. A few puffs of smoke, and the clever use of a mirror, can conjure the unthinkable. What was meant as a diversion, became a seperate entity. And, as I have mentioned,great pains were taken to put the train back on the tracks, so to speak. “Pepper” was meant to invoke thought. It was to answer questions not yet asked. It was both a “hello” and “goodbye.” It didn’t work. “Tour” tried in vain to redirect your attention to the thing that escaped everybody’s perception. It didn’t work. “Submarine,” with it’s allusions to Sgt. Pepper, sunk as if it had screen doors. Look to these examples to find the missing links. This was our intention.” He also remarked that “ Many have actually hit the mark, but refused to accept the conclusions”. Still, this “many” must be a relatively small number of those who followed the mystery, or he wouldn’t be talking about “failure to communicate “ I guess.
|
|
|
Post by cayetana on May 6, 2024 14:46:10 GMT -5
Could be an invested interest or a mild curiosity (they're observers like the rest of us). If invested - if they intended to pass on something substantial - it seems virtually everyone's missed it. So, they basically failed. Is the audience lacking perception or is the source so ambiguous it's just a circular little journey? Not sure what you mean by “they’re observers”, the people in the Beatles official circle are the ones who know the truth. The fact they follow IAAP on Twitter clearly shows he has connections, if he was just some random guy making PID stuff they wouldn’t care. Imo the whole IAAP thing was created by Neil Aspinall, with the content run owned by Apple, which is backed up pretty well by this blog post: beaconfilms2011.blogspot.com/2013/03/?m=1I agree, I seriously doubt they’d be following a random guy — I mean, it’s not just one (The Beatles) account, it’s three official accounts we’re talking about. Interesting that Paul / William / whoever he is doesn’t follow Iamaphoney — you’d think if they were just outside observers he’d be the one who’d want to know what it’s all about — is this more evidence that he’s actually in the know about the whole thing?
|
|
|
Post by cayetana on May 6, 2024 14:59:16 GMT -5
Oh, by the way…. This might sound stupid (I mean I’m sure it’s been discussed on this forum, I just never came across this subject) but in his above message ACV quotes “Cold Hand Luke” (“What we have here is failure to communicate.”). Maybe he was hinting at something in that movie that was relevant to the mystery?
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on May 6, 2024 15:17:18 GMT -5
Could be an invested interest or a mild curiosity (they're observers like the rest of us). If invested - if they intended to pass on something substantial - it seems virtually everyone's missed it. So, they basically failed. Is the audience lacking perception or is the source so ambiguous it's just a circular little journey? Which just brings me back to Apollo’s message that always kind of stood out to me: “ “What we have here is failure to communicate.” The key to any illusion is misdirection. A few puffs of smoke, and the clever use of a mirror, can conjure the unthinkable. What was meant as a diversion, became a seperate entity. And, as I have mentioned,great pains were taken to put the train back on the tracks, so to speak. “Pepper” was meant to invoke thought. It was to answer questions not yet asked. It was both a “hello” and “goodbye.” It didn’t work. “Tour” tried in vain to redirect your attention to the thing that escaped everybody’s perception. It didn’t work. “Submarine,” with it’s allusions to Sgt. Pepper, sunk as if it had screen doors. Look to these examples to find the missing links. This was our intention.” He also remarked that “ Many have actually hit the mark, but refused to accept the conclusions”. Still, this “many” must be a relatively small number of those who followed the mystery, or he wouldn’t be talking about “failure to communicate “ I guess. In Cool Hand Luke, the prison guard makes Luke dig deep holes and then orders him to fill them up again, over and over again. What were the "four thousand holes in Blackburn Lancashire", referred to in the Beatles song "A Day in the Life"?
|
|
|
Post by jarvitronics on May 7, 2024 7:55:30 GMT -5
Could be an invested interest or a mild curiosity (they're observers like the rest of us). If invested - if they intended to pass on something substantial - it seems virtually everyone's missed it. So, they basically failed. Is the audience lacking perception or is the source so ambiguous it's just a circular little journey? Which just brings me back to Apollo’s message that always kind of stood out to me: “ “What we have here is failure to communicate.” The key to any illusion is misdirection. A few puffs of smoke, and the clever use of a mirror, can conjure the unthinkable. What was meant as a diversion, became a seperate entity. And, as I have mentioned,great pains were taken to put the train back on the tracks, so to speak. “Pepper” was meant to invoke thought. It was to answer questions not yet asked. It was both a “hello” and “goodbye.” It didn’t work. “Tour” tried in vain to redirect your attention to the thing that escaped everybody’s perception. It didn’t work. “Submarine,” with it’s allusions to Sgt. Pepper, sunk as if it had screen doors. Look to these examples to find the missing links. This was our intention.” He also remarked that “ Many have actually hit the mark, but refused to accept the conclusions”. Still, this “many” must be a relatively small number of those who followed the mystery, or he wouldn’t be talking about “failure to communicate “ I guess. When I read, "a few puffs of smoke," I immediately thought of it as a reference to getting high. It might be because I was high at the time. Lol. -j
|
|
|
Post by cayetana on May 7, 2024 12:35:52 GMT -5
Which just brings me back to Apollo’s message that always kind of stood out to me: “ “What we have here is failure to communicate.” The key to any illusion is misdirection. A few puffs of smoke, and the clever use of a mirror, can conjure the unthinkable. What was meant as a diversion, became a seperate entity. And, as I have mentioned,great pains were taken to put the train back on the tracks, so to speak. “Pepper” was meant to invoke thought. It was to answer questions not yet asked. It was both a “hello” and “goodbye.” It didn’t work. “Tour” tried in vain to redirect your attention to the thing that escaped everybody’s perception. It didn’t work. “Submarine,” with it’s allusions to Sgt. Pepper, sunk as if it had screen doors. Look to these examples to find the missing links. This was our intention.” He also remarked that “ Many have actually hit the mark, but refused to accept the conclusions”. Still, this “many” must be a relatively small number of those who followed the mystery, or he wouldn’t be talking about “failure to communicate “ I guess. In Cool Hand Luke, the prison guard makes Luke dig deep holes and then orders him to fill them up again, over and over again. What were the "four thousand holes in Blackburn Lancashire", referred to in the Beatles song "A Day in the Life"?Very interesting, thanks!
|
|
|
Post by cayetana on May 7, 2024 12:38:12 GMT -5
Which just brings me back to Apollo’s message that always kind of stood out to me: “ “What we have here is failure to communicate.” The key to any illusion is misdirection. A few puffs of smoke, and the clever use of a mirror, can conjure the unthinkable. What was meant as a diversion, became a seperate entity. And, as I have mentioned,great pains were taken to put the train back on the tracks, so to speak. “Pepper” was meant to invoke thought. It was to answer questions not yet asked. It was both a “hello” and “goodbye.” It didn’t work. “Tour” tried in vain to redirect your attention to the thing that escaped everybody’s perception. It didn’t work. “Submarine,” with it’s allusions to Sgt. Pepper, sunk as if it had screen doors. Look to these examples to find the missing links. This was our intention.” He also remarked that “ Many have actually hit the mark, but refused to accept the conclusions”. Still, this “many” must be a relatively small number of those who followed the mystery, or he wouldn’t be talking about “failure to communicate “ I guess. When I read, "a few puffs of smoke," I immediately thought of it as a reference to getting high. It might be because I was high at the time. Lol. -j Ahaha, really? Me too!! (And no, I wasn’t high! I actually thought it’s a reference to Paul/Bill and his penchant for pot).
|
|
|
Post by cayetana on May 13, 2024 11:21:18 GMT -5
>> I think the whole PID thing was a massive sort of proto ARG, although I think with a much deeper meaning than just a marketing ploy. We don’t really know what the meaning is, but I think Mal Evans and Neil Aspinall wanted to reveal it.>>
That’s very much how I feel about it now. I used to believe Paul died but it doesn’t make that much sense to me anymore. Replaced? Well, maybe.
A while ago someone left an interesting comment under one of the videos on the Silly Willy Shepherd channel comparing the Beatles mystery to Cicada 3301 and Pink Floyd’s Publius Enigma and here’s what Kenny Milne, a person who seems to know a thing or two about it , answered: “ I do thought take your point on the Internet mysteries you mentioned. Whilst maybe not in that vein, there is a similarity in that there is layers of info to get through. To really get down through this rabbit hole, you need to have good info on what John and Paul were into back in the mid 60s. Their interests, fascinations, motivations etc.” Apollo too kept saying there were layers of info that needed to be peeled off in order to get the whole picture. It’s a curious remark about their fascinations and what they were into in the mid 60s though. Crowley? LSD and other psychedelics (George: “ It changed me, and there was no way back to what I was before. It transforms you”. Paul / Bill: “ You ask yourself, ‘How do you come back from it? How do you then lead a normal life after that?’ And the answer is, you don’t.”)? Timothy Leary? The Tibetan Book of the Dead? Did they create this proto ARG based on all of that?
|
|