About those Memoirs...,.

[B]

Yeah, you know the ones.

This thread is for people who want to comment on them.

Good, bad, or indifferent.

I hope many of you will respond.


Then again, I could write a whole book on the subject myself, so either way, they will be discussed.


For my two cents, they're the best thing since sliced bread, but at the same time disappointing.

I mean, they're amazing! to be sure.

And a treasure trove of useful and incredible information.

Stunning stuff, actually.

But .... I feel as if I had so much better an opinion of the Beatles' songs before I read them.

I'm still working my way through the "after 9/09 " edition, and so may have yet to discover things

written there-in that would make them better better better.

I'll have more to say soon, 'God willing and the creek don't rise'.

I find them somewhat lacking, I'm sorry to say.

But let's get the ball rolling. Fire at Will.

[B]

Jan 24, 2021 5:09:47 GMT -5 ekauqodielak said:

This is one of the most tedious fucking things I’ve ever willingly waded through.
Just got through a 30min chapter that sounded exactly like someone baked out of his gourd trying to explain his theory of the universe.
Also, this claim of “Paulism” and pretending anyone was trying to channel a dead guy is so idiotic. They could’ve come up with anything,
even a believable sounding story, while still denying the fact of The Beatles being multiples from go, and this is what they decided to go with...

Well... There's one point of view.

Anyone else want to chime in?

[B]

If you haven't read the memoirs, this video may help you understand a bit about it. Or why it might be of interest.

youtu.be/_QJZQvYYkXE

[B]

Shall we start at The Beginning?

I have a bad habit of starting books in the middle. It's a technique I learned when I was in prep school.
We were expected to read LOTS of books, and I never had the time or inclination, so I would pick up the assigned book
and start reading in the middle to get the gist of the story. Then I would go to The End to see how it all turned out.
And THEN I would go the beginning to read the text in detail. That way I would have at least a vague idea of what it was all about
in the event that I didn't quite get around to reading the whole text. Usually that worked out fairly well, but I still
have no idea who John Galt is or was, or why I should care. I mean... I tried with that one. I got about three pages in, and
my A-D-D kicked in. For keeps.

Any who: Even before the beginning, in the table of contents of the book, there is a paragraph written, and some darkened text in it that reads:

"Paul and I reveal it all".

which is kind of interesting, because it hearkens to the line in the "Saint Paul" song by Terry Knight that says

"While you & Sgt. Pepper saw the writing on the wall". V V the wall


Terry knight - Saint Paul (Paul Is Dead Song)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-sra4zpVx0
-------

ThePaulisdead
Sep 11, 2011

--------------

In the context of the actual text in the afore-mentioned paragraph, Billy writes:

"Now, at my world's end, I reveal it all."

at my world's end


In this book, the end comes before the beginning!

[ramone]

B:"But .... I feel as if I had so much better an opinion of the Beatles' songs before I read them."

Why B, different meanings behind them then most think?

[B]

Things I had always thought were stunningly cosmic insights from the Beatles were actually born of William focusing on himself, and his lot in life.
Or so it would seem.

For instance, upon hearing "Fool On the Hill", I had wondered who "the man of a thousand voices" was supposed to be.
Being an American, I immediately thought of Mel Blanc, who was widely known as that. He created the voices for many of the Warner Brothers cartoons characters.

That didn't seem to fit, so I pondered who else it might be.
Then I thought: "Oh! It could be Jesus, because thousands of preachers, ministers, etc. speak his words every week.
That's got to be it!", I figured.

But no.

According to the Memoirs, Billy (aka William Shepherd) was refering to himself, because he could mimick people well.
And there he was, singing the song, so.....
there ya have it.




No cosmic inferences there.

That's one example, out of dozens I could reference.

Another one: He says that Lennon's line about "So Sgt. Pepper took you by surprise" was about The Rolling Stones being caught off guard by the album.

I'm not even buying that one, because it doesn't work with the next line: ("You'd better look right through that mother's eyes").

------------

I'll have more to say, but I'm trying to decide whether the Billy Shears character is supposed to be kind of a jerk, and if so, for what reason,

or if William is playing games (my current suspicion) trying to be "cutesy", and leaving a lot to be inferred between the lines.

While the bio works in the sense that he tells you what was in his mind at the time, it is almost impossible for me to believe

that this account is altogether on the up and up, in the full sense of that expression. It seems like part of the truth, but not all of it.

But as I say, I'll have more to say shortly. It's still worth the read, because he does drop some surprising 'bombs'

along the way, and I'll mention some of them.

Thanks for asking!

[B]

Moving from the table of contents into the actual first page of the text, which is page 13, we see this written in the "word stacking":

"I am that I am". (shown in red in this video: youtu.be/_QJZQvYYkXE?t=374 )

This is how God identified himself to Moses in the Old Testament of the Bible. He used those words.

Now, how many of you, if you had been called upon to replace Paul McCartney, and you were telling the tale of how it all went down -

How many of you would start out the account by saying, "I am that I am", knowing that those words would identify you as the God of the Old Testament?

I am guessing that for most of us, the answer would be NONE. And in fairness to Billy, it could be said that

"Well that word-stacking messenging was done by the editor of the book, and not necessarily by Billy."

which is true, of course. But by doing that, "the editor" is infering that statements such as the one we've already mentioned

at the start of the table of contents ("Now, at my world's end, I reveal it all.")

might mean more than just: "Now, being an old fart and likely to expire soon, my days are numbered, and 'my world' is at its end."

They could mean that the world as we've known it, is about to end.

And I would submit to you, the reader, that even if the word-stacking was done by the editor of the book, it was done

with the approval and permission of Billy (using the character's name in the book, but meaning William Shepherd aka Sir Paul McCartney).


SO.... when the word-stacking at the start of chapter 31 of the book reads:

"Paul was Horus" and "I am Ra" (i.e. William is Ra)

it is likely that those messages have the approval of the person telling the tale, even if they were not spoken by him, as well.


I would say there's no doubt about it: Billy, whose book has 666 pages by the way, wants you to know that he and JPM were gods of old.

Maybe even gods of now.

Yep. That's one of the points of the book. No doubt about it.

Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (Reprise)
youtu.be/8J1vbmB_I7I
------

We're sorry, but it's time to go!

[B]

One of the delights of reading the Memoirs book is unanticpated little revelations one encounters along the way.

These are sometimes not part of Billy's verbatim input, but notes from "the encoder" (the editor) regarding what is in the text.

One such example is found early on, on page 22.

What starts as a discussion of how "Lucy" is a reference to Lucifer goes on to explain how the Illuminati see the world, and ends with an expose of what the 322 symbol

used by the Skull and Bones society at Yale University is all about. What is surprising is that for this information to be in the book,

someone would have had to have snitched, it would seem, violating their oath of secrecy about that organization. We, in the public, aren't supposed to be allowed

such information, but there it is, for all to see. One wonders how such a thing could happen.


In another example: the Memoirs blithely mentions that America's Moon Landing (sic) was "an elaborate hoax" that was run from the same building in which the

worldwide "All You Need Is Love" broadcast took place. It (the moon landing) saved the world from World War 111, the commentary goes on to say. (page 482).


In a rather shocking revelation, Billy tells us that in the instance of Brian Jones' death, a person who was in the pool with Brian was told by satan,

"He's mine. Kill him." and that person obliged the devil. (The memoirs doesn't have an index, so I couldn't find where that is in the book for you all.)

Reading the book, you wonder how Billy could know what someone had heard in their head from the devil! No explanation is given for that.

----

The half-hour video below from David Wilcox is not related to the Memoirs book, but is a fairly good overview of how the Illuminati see things, according to him.

It might be worth a watch if you want to gain a bit of perspective on what Billy was (or is) caught up in from the time of his birth.


End of the cabal is near as humanity awakens
www.facebook.com/Taketheredpill7/videos/290740988845647
Taketheredpill

[Paul Bearer]

The point of this book and the trap Mike Williams has fallen into is that, anticipating the truth may come out, Billy is trying to paint himself as the "hero" that "saved" the group,
rather than the pretender who can perform, but does NOT compose his own music. Initially merely a temporary fill in so teenagers wouldn't commit suicide and so on,
but then one who decided to hold onto the role against the wishes of the surviving Beatles. To this day he does not compose his own music but has others do it for him,
for which he takes the full writing credits and thus the myth continues. Mike Williams is being manipulated and used, unless he is in on it.




edit by B - punctuation added for clarity

[B]

Apr 19, 2021 20:34:37 GMT -5 Paul Bearer said:

The point of this book and the trap Mike Williams has fallen into is that, anticipating the truth may come out, Billy is trying to paint himself as the "hero" that "saved" the group,
rather than the pretender who can perform, but does NOT compose his own music. Initially merely a temporary fill in so teenagers wouldn't commit suicide and so on,
but then one who decided to hold onto the role against the wishes of the surviving Beatles. To this day he does not compose his own music but has others do it for him,
for which he takes the full writing credits and thus the myth continues. Mike Williams is being manipulated and used, unless he is in on it.

From what I've heard from Mike Williams, I don't think he's "in on it", or anymore manipulated than any of the rest of us.

I do think that Sir Paul writes most of what he claims as his, though obviously he could get a little help from his friends if he needed it.

As for the idea of Billy trying to paint himself as the "hero" that "saved" the group, I'd say there's no doubt that you are correct with that statement!

Billy makes that claim throughout the book, though there's no way to know how they would have done had someone else been given the job.

Clearly they did all right with Sir Paul filling in, and I have to give him credit for all the pain-in-the-arse things he had to do along the way,

like learning to play left-handed, and having his looks altered in order to get the job, and so forth. I don't know how many people would have been able to

accomplish or tolerate what he did. But that said, it would seem to me that The Beatles could have gone on with him or without him.

Unless.... there was a Beatles mission that only certain people could have accomplished, above and beyond merely making music.

That seems to be the case. I say, having read the book. (Or most of it, anyway.)

anticipating the truth may come out

more on that coming up! (God willing)

[B]

I haven't forgotten about this thread. Unlike her majesty, I have a lot to say yet, I keep telling myself.

What I don't seem to have is lots of time and energy to do it, and - in addition - this book somewhat defies definitive statements about it,

because every time I pick it up I seem to react to it differently. I mean, for instance, the song Billy's Back.

Billy's Back!

Who cares? (other than Billy)

I tell ya this album he proposes ain't gonna be no Sgt Pepper's!

But then I read it again, and I kind of get where he's coming from.

Something said between the lines, perhaps.

Yes, perhaps that is what it is.

whispered words of wisdom, almost

"Volumes of literature based on herself" as Country Joe once described it.

Not So Sweet Martha Lorraine - Country Joe & The Fish
www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBUOKnLdJpc
-------

sbritt
Jan 17, 2011



Stay tuned...

[B]

In the meantime, feel free to chime in!

[B]

In the Memoirs book, Billy says to compare these two versions of "For No One" to hear the difference between William's voice and Paul's.
So before I get back into some of the heavier stuff, have a listen.


Paul McCartney "For No One/Eleanor Rigby" 1984 (William) ----------------------------------------------------------- For No One (Remastered 2009) (Paul)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAlmqVmszaU
---------

[ramone]

Pretty darn close.
I think the difference is somewhat more pronounced with Rigby.

[B]

--------

[B]

Will he?


Paul McCartney - I'll Get You ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Beatles I'll Get You RARE TV PEFORM
www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOp-FCGSwJE
---------


More about the Memoirs coming soon!

[B]

One of the more peculiar things about the blue Memoirs book is the seemingly random appearance throughout of the "eye in a triangle" image in the text.

It is a drawing similar to the one on the back of the dollar bill, but a bit more like this, enclosed in a triangle:




It shows up every couple of pages, or sometimes multiple times in the context of discussions every few paragraphs.

I asked Tom Uharriet what its significance was, but he made a non-committal comment on his facebook page.

So.... what is its purpose? Why does it show up in the text?


If Paul was Horus, and William was Ra, (as Memoirs calims) as well as "the son of the magickian" (son of Aleister Crowley), I have to surmise that

it serves as a magick sigil that enables "Horus" to read the reactions of the readers of the book to what is written in it.

In other words, Paul or William's guiding spirit can use it to "see" the thoughts of the book's readers, and instantly interact with them on the mental plane!

This may explain why I (and others) have reacted differently to the book every time we pick it up.

"Another kind of mind there"

to react to, without the use of drugs. Fascinating!


Dave Mason -" look at you look at me"
www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSfAYnI3MBc


ezywoo
Apr 26, 2010

[B]

it serves as a magick sigil that enables "Horus" to read the reactions of the readers of the book to what is written in it.

Gee, did I say something about sigils?

[B]

Paul was Horus, and William was Ra

What would Ra sound like if we didn't know him as William?

I mean, we tend to like the Western veneer of Sir Paul, but what would he be like in the - er - "Raw"?

Maybe this:


RA told me "Share This ASAP! So People Can Do This Before June 10" & Story of Enlightenment (2021)
youtu.be/o8FnoeuHrX4


SAM THE ILLUSIONIST
Jun 4, 2021

[B]

just holding the space for now....


The Winged Beatle : McCartney on the Paul Is Dead myth.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lno5dDPekIs



Jun 17, 2021