mrshepherd
Hard Day's Night
Living is Easy with Eyes Closed...
Posts: 21
|
Post by mrshepherd on Aug 24, 2021 11:48:01 GMT -5
Whoever is playing Paul in here has a very long face in this photo!
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Aug 24, 2021 18:36:34 GMT -5
He has a longer face because he grew up having a longer face. That's Faul in July 1964 with the rest of The Featles.
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Aug 25, 2021 20:04:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Aug 25, 2021 23:23:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Aug 26, 2021 22:52:36 GMT -5
That one with the deep chin cleft is very rarely seen after 63 and never both sides of his face. I found a photo of him in the 70s, in the back of a car with Linda and Mary, while "Paul" was supposedly on tour with Wings -- but it definitely wasn't chin cleft Paul who was showing up to perform for the tour dates.
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Aug 26, 2021 22:58:56 GMT -5
Whoever is playing Paul in here has a very long face in this photo! View AttachmentThat's the Fireman.
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Aug 27, 2021 0:50:35 GMT -5
That one with the deep chin cleft is very rarely seen after 63 and never both sides of his face. I found a photo of him in the 70s, in the back of a car with Linda and Mary, while "Paul" was supposedly on tour with Wings -- but it definitely wasn't chin cleft Paul who was showing up to perform for the tour dates. The cleft chin can disappear when the mouth is in different positions or it can be added via prosthetic make up.
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Aug 27, 2021 1:19:41 GMT -5
I'm not going to say it's easy - it's actually very difficult, but for some it's *easier* than for others
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Aug 29, 2021 17:21:37 GMT -5
That one with the deep chin cleft is very rarely seen after 63 and never both sides of his face. I found a photo of him in the 70s, in the back of a car with Linda and Mary, while "Paul" was supposedly on tour with Wings -- but it definitely wasn't chin cleft Paul who was showing up to perform for the tour dates. The cleft chin can disappear when the mouth is in different positions or it can be added via prosthetic make up. View AttachmentView AttachmentView AttachmentThere's one with a *deep* chin cleft who vanishes after about 63, but did not die because he's shown in the 70s in the back of a car with Linda & Mary. There are two others with different clefts. One is more of an indentation just on the sculpted bottom of his (fake) chin. And the other is a shallow cleft. They appear over and over again throughout the decades.
|
|
|
Post by kvo on Jan 2, 2022 17:09:05 GMT -5
The cleft chin can disappear when the mouth is in different positions or it can be added via prosthetic make up. <button disabled="" class="c-attachment-insert--linked o-btn--sm">Attachment Deleted</button><button disabled="" class="c-attachment-insert--linked o-btn--sm">Attachment Deleted</button><button disabled="" class="c-attachment-insert--linked o-btn--sm">Attachment Deleted</button> There's one with a *deep* chin cleft who vanishes after about 63, but did not die because he's shown in the 70s in the back of a car with Linda & Mary. There are two others with different clefts. One is more of an indentation just on the sculpted bottom of his (fake) chin. And the other is a shallow cleft. They appear over and over again throughout the decades. So I have a question.....The Paul in the Coming Up video from 1980 who plays Ozzy Osbourne (I think), sure looks familiar to me. I froze and saved several shots of his face from that video. His chin and his facial expressions gave me a strange sense that I'd seen him before. I wonder whether he is the same Paul from the I Feel Fine, Ticket to Ride, and Help videos. All four of these videos are widely available on YouTube. He is older and heavier by 1980, but it looks like the same person to me. Hard to tell for sure though because of all the heavy make-up and wigs that were used in all four videos, but I got an odd feeling of familiarity the first time I viewed the Coming Up video.
|
|
|
Post by beatlas231 on Jan 2, 2022 17:44:09 GMT -5
There's one with a *deep* chin cleft who vanishes after about 63, but did not die because he's shown in the 70s in the back of a car with Linda & Mary. There are two others with different clefts. One is more of an indentation just on the sculpted bottom of his (fake) chin. And the other is a shallow cleft. They appear over and over again throughout the decades. So I have a question.....The Paul in the Coming Up video from 1980 who plays Ozzy Osbourne (I think), sure looks familiar to me. I froze and saved several shots of his face from that video. His chin and his facial expressions gave me a strange sense that I'd seen him before. I wonder whether he is the same Paul from the I Feel Fine, Ticket to Ride, and Help videos. All four of these videos are widely available on YouTube. He is older and heavier by 1980, but it looks like the same person to me. Hard to tell for sure though because of all the heavy make-up and wigs that were used in all four videos, but I got an odd feeling of familiarity the first time I viewed the Coming Up video. This interview was Paul in April of 1980
|
|
|
Post by kvo on Jan 2, 2022 20:05:05 GMT -5
I'm not going to say it's easy - it's actually very difficult, but for some it's *easier* than for others <button disabled="" class="c-attachment-insert--linked o-btn--sm">Attachment Deleted</button><button disabled="" class="c-attachment-insert--linked o-btn--sm">Attachment Deleted</button> Four different Pauls. Only the first is the main Beatlemania performing Paul. He is the only one who has the correct bio-markers.
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Jan 2, 2022 22:02:28 GMT -5
I'm not going to say it's easy - it's actually very difficult, but for some it's *easier* than for others <button disabled="" class="c-attachment-insert--linked o-btn--sm">Attachment Deleted</button><button disabled="" class="c-attachment-insert--linked o-btn--sm">Attachment Deleted</button> Four different Pauls. Only the first is the main Beatlemania performing Paul. He is the only one who has the correct bio-markers. Why have you only got an opinion about Paul McCartney? In the past few months I've posted new threads on Sergei Eisenstein, Sean Connery, Judy Garland, Elvis Presley, Cary Grant, Marlene Dietrich, The Rolling Stones, Boy George and George Michael. I have added many more to the pinned thread in The Celebrity Flux board and also added corrections to the David Bowie, Shirley Temple, Frank Sinatra and Madonna threads. I've posted images, videos, vinyl recordings for audio-visual evidence plus articles of predictive programming, revelation of the method and other types of corroborating information. If you're going to come at me saying I'm wrong, come at me with something to back up your claims. My mind is there to be changed.
|
|
|
Post by michelle on Jan 2, 2022 22:16:35 GMT -5
I'm not going to say it's easy - it's actually very difficult, but for some it's *easier* than for others <button disabled="" class="c-attachment-insert--linked o-btn--sm">Attachment Deleted</button><button disabled="" class="c-attachment-insert--linked o-btn--sm">Attachment Deleted</button> Four different Pauls. Only the first is the main Beatlemania performing Paul. He is the only one who has the correct bio-markers.
|
|
|
Post by kvo on Jan 3, 2022 6:48:41 GMT -5
Four different Pauls. Only the first is the main Beatlemania performing Paul. He is the only one who has the correct bio-markers. Why have you only got an opinion about Paul McCartney? In the past few months I've posted new threads on Sergei Eisenstein, Sean Connery, Judy Garland, Elvis Presley, Cary Grant, Marlene Dietrich, The Rolling Stones, Boy George and George Michael. I have added many more to the pinned thread in The Celebrity Flux board and also added corrections to the David Bowie, Shirley Temple, Frank Sinatra and Madonna threads. I've posted images, videos, vinyl recordings for audio-visual evidence plus articles of predictive programming, revelation of the method and other types of corroborating information. If you're going to come at me saying I'm wrong, come at me with something to back up your claims. My mind is there to be changed. Didn't realize you were saying that all four of the Pauls were one and the same person. I don't see it. Only the first one in the row of four has all the correct bio-markers to be the main Beatlemania performing Paul. The others are either shopped combinations of faces or doubles/decoys. Though I believe Billy was sometimes a performing Paul during Beatlemania, and that there were two performing Johns and two performing Georges during Beatlemania. I only came here to discuss the Beatles. I am familiar with the faces of all of them. Every John, Paul, George, and Ringo (and I believe many were used in interviews, on stage, in promotional films and photo shoots). Not familiar enough with those other stars you listed, but I hate to hear that there were so many other celebrity replacements over the years. I'll have to leave it to others who are familiar with Cary Grant, Shirley Temple, and Judy Garland and have a particular expertise in the lives and careers of those stars to comment on those threads.
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Jan 3, 2022 9:02:20 GMT -5
Why have you only got an opinion about Paul McCartney? In the past few months I've posted new threads on Sergei Eisenstein, Sean Connery, Judy Garland, Elvis Presley, Cary Grant, Marlene Dietrich, The Rolling Stones, Boy George and George Michael. I have added many more to the pinned thread in The Celebrity Flux board and also added corrections to the David Bowie, Shirley Temple, Frank Sinatra and Madonna threads. I've posted images, videos, vinyl recordings for audio-visual evidence plus articles of predictive programming, revelation of the method and other types of corroborating information. If you're going to come at me saying I'm wrong, come at me with something to back up your claims. My mind is there to be changed. Didn't realize you were saying that all four of the Pauls were one and the same person. I don't see it. Only the first one in the row of four has all the correct bio-markers to be the main Beatlemania performing Paul. The others are either shopped combinations of faces or doubles/decoys. Though I believe Billy was sometimes a performing Paul during Beatlemania, and that there were two performing Johns and two performing Georges during Beatlemania. I only came here to discuss the Beatles. I am familiar with the faces of all of them. Every John, Paul, George, and Ringo (and I believe many were used in interviews, on stage, in promotional films and photo shoots). Not familiar enough with those other stars you listed, but I hate to hear that there were so many other celebrity replacements over the years. I'll have to leave it to others who are familiar with Cary Grant, Shirley Temple, and Judy Garland and have a particular expertise in the lives and careers of those stars to comment on those threads. I am not saying "all four Pauls are one and the same person" what I have posted there are two images of the original Paul (top two) and two images of the imposter who replaced him (bottom two). Don't try and put words in my mouth, thoughts in my mind or intentions in my actions. I have made myself very clear on this forum, and used images, audio and videos of performances to do so. I'll make myself clear again: All four Beatles were replaced with lookalike imposters in late June 1964. One of those images of the real Paul I posted above, is from the cover of the With The Beatles album. The real Beatles were around to to see its release in November 1963. Those Beatles made the movie A Hard Day’s Night, released the single Can't Buy Me Love/You Can't Do That in early 1964, and performed those songs live at the NME Awards show in May 1964. They then go on a world tour playing dates in Europe, Asia and Australasia. They never return to the UK to see the release of A Hard Day’s Night (album and movie) and are never seen again. All four - John, Paul, George and Ringo are never seen again. I'm not familiar with any of these public figures I have discovered were replaced with imposters. A week ago I had no idea what Sergei Eisenstein even looked like, but it didn't stop me from finding enough information in the public realm to say with a high degree of certainty that he was replaced with a lookalike. I didn't get that by being familiar with Eisenstein or having insider knowledge - I got that from honesty, from faith, from ingenuity. If you read my posts on here, they're full of corrections. I'm prepared to to make mistakes, correct them, and make fresh mistakes. It's all part of growth and development. If you've got anything to change my mind, bring it. I'll change my mind.
|
|
|
Post by kvo on Jan 3, 2022 9:49:27 GMT -5
Didn't realize you were saying that all four of the Pauls were one and the same person. I don't see it. Only the first one in the row of four has all the correct bio-markers to be the main Beatlemania performing Paul. The others are either shopped combinations of faces or doubles/decoys. Though I believe Billy was sometimes a performing Paul during Beatlemania, and that there were two performing Johns and two performing Georges during Beatlemania. I only came here to discuss the Beatles. I am familiar with the faces of all of them. Every John, Paul, George, and Ringo (and I believe many were used in interviews, on stage, in promotional films and photo shoots). Not familiar enough with those other stars you listed, but I hate to hear that there were so many other celebrity replacements over the years. I'll have to leave it to others who are familiar with Cary Grant, Shirley Temple, and Judy Garland and have a particular expertise in the lives and careers of those stars to comment on those threads. I am not saying "all four Pauls are one and the same person" what I have posted there are two images of the original Paul (top two) and two images of the imposter who replaced him (bottom two). Don't try and put words in my mouth, thoughts in my mind or intentions in my actions. I have made myself very clear on this forum, and used images, audio and videos of performances to do so. I'll make myself clear again: All four Beatles were replaced with lookalike imposters in late June 1964. One of those images of the real Paul I posted above, is from the cover of the With The Beatles album. The real Beatles were around to to see its release in November 1963. Those Beatles made the movie A Hard Day’s Night, released the single Can't Buy Me Love/You Can't Do That in early 1964, and performed those songs live at the NME Awards show in May 1964. They then go on a world tour playing dates in Europe, Asia and Australasia. They never return to the UK to see the release of A Hard Day’s Night (album and movie) and are never seen again. All four - John, Paul, George and Ringo are never seen again. I'm not familiar with any of these public figures I have discovered were replaced with imposters. A week ago I had no idea what Sergei Eisenstein even looked like, but it didn't stop me from finding enough information in the public realm to say with a high degree of certainty that he was replaced with a lookalike. I didn't get that by being familiar with Eisenstein or having insider knowledge - I got that from honesty, from faith, from ingenuity. If you read my posts on here, they're full of corrections. I'm prepared to to make mistakes, correct them, and make fresh mistakes. It's all part of growth and development. If you've got anything to change my mind, bring it. I'll change my mind. Didn't mean to put words in your mouth. And I didn't see a top two or bottom two in the post to which I responded. I only saw four photos in a line. The first, from my analysis, is the main performing Beatlemania Paul. The bio-markers are there. His photos are usually shopped and blended, but the first in the line of photos is one of the few that shows his natural un-retouched face. His facial bio-markers are: Small attached ears, short nose, long distance between the end of the nose and top lip, curved philtrum, heart-shaped face, a chin that is rounded and rather long, the nose is cocked slightly to the right, almost as if it was once broken and re-set. And he never presents with eye bags or a chin cleft of any sort. The second photo is interesting, as that is the face with the deep chin cleft that Kaleidoquake spotted in the 1970s. The other two in the line of four look like shopped up blends to me. I won't be commenting on the other stars, though like Cary Grant or Judy Garland. Just don't know enough about it. We all have our areas of interest.
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Jan 3, 2022 10:20:11 GMT -5
I am not saying "all four Pauls are one and the same person" what I have posted there are two images of the original Paul (top two) and two images of the imposter who replaced him (bottom two). Don't try and put words in my mouth, thoughts in my mind or intentions in my actions. I have made myself very clear on this forum, and used images, audio and videos of performances to do so. I'll make myself clear again: All four Beatles were replaced with lookalike imposters in late June 1964. One of those images of the real Paul I posted above, is from the cover of the With The Beatles album. The real Beatles were around to to see its release in November 1963. Those Beatles made the movie A Hard Day’s Night, released the single Can't Buy Me Love/You Can't Do That in early 1964, and performed those songs live at the NME Awards show in May 1964. They then go on a world tour playing dates in Europe, Asia and Australasia. They never return to the UK to see the release of A Hard Day’s Night (album and movie) and are never seen again. All four - John, Paul, George and Ringo are never seen again. I'm not familiar with any of these public figures I have discovered were replaced with imposters. A week ago I had no idea what Sergei Eisenstein even looked like, but it didn't stop me from finding enough information in the public realm to say with a high degree of certainty that he was replaced with a lookalike. I didn't get that by being familiar with Eisenstein or having insider knowledge - I got that from honesty, from faith, from ingenuity. If you read my posts on here, they're full of corrections. I'm prepared to to make mistakes, correct them, and make fresh mistakes. It's all part of growth and development. If you've got anything to change my mind, bring it. I'll change my mind. Didn't mean to put words in your mouth. And I didn't see a top two or bottom two in the post to which I responded. I only saw four photos in a line. The first, from my analysis, is the main performing Beatlemania Paul. The bio-markers are there. His photos are usually shopped and blended, but the first in the line of photos is one of the few that shows his natural un-retouched face. His facial bio-markers are: Small attached ears, short nose, long distance between the end of the nose and top lip, curved philtrum, heart-shaped face, a chin that is rounded and rather long, the nose is cocked slightly to the right, almost as if it was once broken and re-set. And he never presents with eye bags or a chin cleft of any sort. The second photo is interesting, as that is the face with the deep chin cleft that Kaleidoquake spotted in the 1970s. The other two in the line of four look like shopped up blends to me. I won't be commenting on the other stars, though like Cary Grant or Judy Garland. Just don't know enough about it. We all have our areas of interest. Well if he's Beatlemania Paul, he's Beatlemania-ing while there's a different guy on the cover of With The Beatles which is out in the shops at the same time. Do you realise what you're asking me to believe?
|
|
|
Post by kvo on Jan 3, 2022 10:48:44 GMT -5
Didn't mean to put words in your mouth. And I didn't see a top two or bottom two in the post to which I responded. I only saw four photos in a line. The first, from my analysis, is the main performing Beatlemania Paul. The bio-markers are there. His photos are usually shopped and blended, but the first in the line of photos is one of the few that shows his natural un-retouched face. His facial bio-markers are: Small attached ears, short nose, long distance between the end of the nose and top lip, curved philtrum, heart-shaped face, a chin that is rounded and rather long, the nose is cocked slightly to the right, almost as if it was once broken and re-set. And he never presents with eye bags or a chin cleft of any sort. The second photo is interesting, as that is the face with the deep chin cleft that Kaleidoquake spotted in the 1970s. The other two in the line of four look like shopped up blends to me. I won't be commenting on the other stars, though like Cary Grant or Judy Garland. Just don't know enough about it. We all have our areas of interest. Well if he's Beatlemania Paul, he's Beatlemania-ing while there's a different guy on the cover of With The Beatles which is out in the shops at the same time. Do you realise what you're asking me to believe? Yes, I'm asking everyone to see the Confusion, Misdirection, and Obfuscation in the Beatles, right from the start. I think the CMOs would have been a more appropriate name for this group rather than the Beatles. I realize we see a deeply clefted Paul, with one half of the face shaded, on the first album. But I don't see that guy performing during Beatlemania. Mainly I see the man whose bio-markers I described doing the heavy lifting in terms of Beatlemania performing, with a little help from Billy here and there. But the deeply clefted Paul? Like I said, he is interesting. I don't see him performing during the world-wide touring years at all. His re-appearance in the 70s noted by Kaleidoquake fascinates me. But what I'm REALLY wondering about is what ever became of the earlier older Paul I noted several times before the band got its record contract with EMI. As I stated in other posts, I found one photo in particular of this early older Paul in a September 1962 issue of Mersey Beat together with an article titled "A Little Bare". But there are other early photos of this Paul as well.
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Jan 3, 2022 14:29:58 GMT -5
Well you haven't confused, misdirected or obfuscated me.
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Jan 3, 2022 15:09:58 GMT -5
Four different Pauls. Only the first is the main Beatlemania performing Paul. He is the only one who has the correct bio-markers. Why have you only got an opinion about Paul McCartney? In the past few months I've posted new threads on Sergei Eisenstein, Sean Connery, Judy Garland, Elvis Presley, Cary Grant, Marlene Dietrich, The Rolling Stones, Boy George and George Michael. I have added many more to the pinned thread in The Celebrity Flux board and also added corrections to the David Bowie, Shirley Temple, Frank Sinatra and Madonna threads. I've posted images, videos, vinyl recordings for audio-visual evidence plus articles of predictive programming, revelation of the method and other types of corroborating information. If you're going to come at me saying I'm wrong, come at me with something to back up your claims. My mind is there to be changed. As I have stated before it is more of a question of who HASN'T been replaced! Maybe the only major rock stars that have NOT been replaced were Angus and Malcom Young and Phil Rudd and Cliff Williams all of AC/DC! Of course someone will post some pictures proving me wrong!
|
|
|
Post by joseph on Jan 3, 2022 16:54:50 GMT -5
Why have you only got an opinion about Paul McCartney? In the past few months I've posted new threads on Sergei Eisenstein, Sean Connery, Judy Garland, Elvis Presley, Cary Grant, Marlene Dietrich, The Rolling Stones, Boy George and George Michael. I have added many more to the pinned thread in The Celebrity Flux board and also added corrections to the David Bowie, Shirley Temple, Frank Sinatra and Madonna threads. I've posted images, videos, vinyl recordings for audio-visual evidence plus articles of predictive programming, revelation of the method and other types of corroborating information. If you're going to come at me saying I'm wrong, come at me with something to back up your claims. My mind is there to be changed. As I have stated before it is more of a question of who HASN'T been replaced! Maybe the only major rock stars that have NOT been replaced were Angus and Malcom Young and Phil Rudd and Cliff Williams all of AC/DC! Of course someone will post some pictures proving me wrong! I'm currently looking at dozens of major movies stars, rock stars and novelists that I haven't announced yet. I've done enough that I don't really need to announce any more. What I'm more interested in right now is how these replacements changed the world and where it is going. I've got Stalin and Eisenstein and am pretty confident Shostakovich got replaced, so what I am seeing is a Soviet counter-revolution that was the basis of the Holodomor and the Great Purge. This seeps into the US via the replacement of Judy Garland performing in the propaganda movie Thousands Cheer, which uses the music of Shostakovich's imposter replacement, which was used in the Soviet propaganda movie The Counterplan which was released after Stalin Eisenstein and Shostakovich had been replaced. This calls into question World War 2, all wars since and the Cold War. These people are not dicking about with some troubadours having a joke on the public. They are killing millions upon millions of people.
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Jan 4, 2022 4:29:53 GMT -5
There's one with a *deep* chin cleft who vanishes after about 63, but did not die because he's shown in the 70s in the back of a car with Linda & Mary. There are two others with different clefts. One is more of an indentation just on the sculpted bottom of his (fake) chin. And the other is a shallow cleft. They appear over and over again throughout the decades. So I have a question.....The Paul in the Coming Up video from 1980 who plays Ozzy Osbourne (I think), sure looks familiar to me. I froze and saved several shots of his face from that video. His chin and his facial expressions gave me a strange sense that I'd seen him before. I wonder whether he is the same Paul from the I Feel Fine, Ticket to Ride, and Help videos. All four of these videos are widely available on YouTube. He is older and heavier by 1980, but it looks like the same person to me. Hard to tell for sure though because of all the heavy make-up and wigs that were used in all four videos, but I got an odd feeling of familiarity the first time I viewed the Coming Up video. The two who stand out most to me in that video are the Paul on drums and the 3rd (farthest away) sax player.
|
|
|
Post by kvo on Jan 4, 2022 13:25:00 GMT -5
So I have a question.....The Paul in the Coming Up video from 1980 who plays Ozzy Osbourne (I think), sure looks familiar to me. I froze and saved several shots of his face from that video. His chin and his facial expressions gave me a strange sense that I'd seen him before. I wonder whether he is the same Paul from the I Feel Fine, Ticket to Ride, and Help videos. All four of these videos are widely available on YouTube. He is older and heavier by 1980, but it looks like the same person to me. Hard to tell for sure though because of all the heavy make-up and wigs that were used in all four videos, but I got an odd feeling of familiarity the first time I viewed the Coming Up video. The two who stand out most to me in that video are the Paul on drums and the 3rd (farthest away) sax player. But what about our main Beatlemania performing Paul (by now, you know the one I mean)? His un-retouched face was JoJo's avatar. It is the head shot where he is holding a cigarette, though that is most of his photos. Do you (or does anyone here) see him again after the August 1966 Memphis interview? Specifically, the one done in the dressing room where we see only the four band members and the interviewer. Because that is the last time I spotted that guy. Ever. But I am still looking....He looks different in the Memphis interview than in JoJo's avatar, but I think it is just another weird bowling ball wig. They seem to have put big false eyelashes on him in Memphis and loaded him up with layers of pan cake make-up. Think they were trying to disguise what these men actually looked like? Being facetious here. Of course they were.
|
|
|
Post by ekauqodielak on Jan 4, 2022 13:35:23 GMT -5
The two who stand out most to me in that video are the Paul on drums and the 3rd (farthest away) sax player. But what about our main Beatlemania performing Paul (by now, you know the one I mean)? His un-retouched face was JoJo's avatar. It is the head shot where he is holding a cigarette, though that is most of his photos. Do you (or does anyone here) see him again after the August 1966 Memphis interview? Specifically, the one done in the dressing room where we see only the four band members and the interviewer. Because that is the last time I spotted that guy. Ever. But I am still looking....He looks different in the Memphis interview than in JoJo's avatar, but I think it is just another weird bowling ball wig. They seem to have put big false eyelashes on him in Memphis and loaded him up with layers of pan cake make-up. Think they were trying to disguise what these men actually looked like? Being facetious here. Of course they were. I think Memphis is a different one. I don't think the "main one" ever performed in the US during Beatlemania. And, yes, absolutely, the wigs/haircuts were to help disguise them. Also, your frowny early one is seen in a convertible (with "the other Beatles") in I think '63 Italy. They've got hoards of people running up to the car and "Paul" is scowling.
|
|