|
Post by DarkHorse on Mar 27, 2009 13:53:25 GMT -5
When was this pic taken? Was it during that summer visit when Paul was still 'around' in the summer of '66 or was it during George and Pattie's trip to India that started September 19, 1966? (Notice George is in the beginning stages of a mustache)
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Mar 23, 2009 22:02:03 GMT -5
Really cool LB.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Mar 16, 2009 21:25:44 GMT -5
JPM is nowhere in that photo. Really DH? I understand if you don't think it is him per se but... Do you not concede that that particular gentleman has an astonishing resemblance in all ways to JPM? He resembles him but it's not him. For one, head shape. Another thing-- posture. I've never seen JPM with that sunken chest posture.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Mar 16, 2009 11:24:16 GMT -5
JPM is nowhere in that photo.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Mar 10, 2009 12:45:31 GMT -5
Who's the guy in the back with the mustache between Ringo and Patti? True photo:
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Feb 26, 2009 18:09:24 GMT -5
Perhaps this is merely a clue left by the Beatles. You have Derek wearing Pepper Faul's jacket, looking like Pepper Faul and you have a guy on the left who looks like JPM circa 1966. Neither one is actually Pepper Faul or Paul but the message is left....
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Feb 24, 2009 17:02:19 GMT -5
Beautiful scan Jojo. Now if you can get a closer pic of the guy on the left as you did with the Derek Taylor pic we can figure out who that is.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Feb 22, 2009 14:56:48 GMT -5
I gotta say that when you are on a forum that is strict to the topic at hand and outside influences are limited, you can get so much more accomplished in terms of research. I feel that although NIR has been generous to allow the PIA point of view, that has created somewhat of a block to getting any further progress done to what really happened to Paul and the Beatles in the fall of 1966.
People have their opinions as to what happened and for a long time it was that Paul died in a car crash. Now the trend here is that he lived on past 1966 and people are comparing pics of "Paul" from 1968 and saying that it is the same guy as the one in 1966 and before. So you can see why I think we haven't progressed that much and actually have regressed a bit. Does anybody else recognize this?
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Feb 21, 2009 10:56:39 GMT -5
Keep in mind PL that the quality of the black and white photo is low so that can change the shape of a face.
I still believe there was a different Faul for late 1966 through mid 1967. Just not sure this is him on the boat. Thanks for the scan Jojo.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Feb 20, 2009 21:59:17 GMT -5
Hey, I found another pic of Paul on a boat
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Feb 20, 2009 19:29:05 GMT -5
But Derek Taylor had a big nose: Yeah, but look at the angle that pic was taken on. That's a full on side profile while the boat pic is mainly the back of his head. So naturally his nose is gonna appear to be smaller. Still, the nose looks too small in the boat pic to be Derek imo.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Feb 20, 2009 17:54:17 GMT -5
But Derek Taylor had a big nose:
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Feb 19, 2009 17:46:01 GMT -5
Let me add to this by saying that if it were Paul there on the left, why would he be wearing a mop top haircut of all things?...where it would be easier for him to be recognized?
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Feb 17, 2009 23:38:41 GMT -5
Hey EB, have a good one!
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Feb 11, 2009 19:01:37 GMT -5
If so, it was right before he disappeared. That's when his hair started looking different.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Feb 11, 2009 17:28:42 GMT -5
Look at puzzled's pic. If he were wearing a wig, he wouldn't be able to shake his head like that. You can see the exposed scalp in that pic and you can see the length of the bangs.
It's possible Faul wore a wig on some occasions but I don't see the reason why. He wore his hair long as is.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Feb 11, 2009 16:30:27 GMT -5
Paul had a receding hairline that he covered up by growing his bangs long.
Faul never wore a wig.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Feb 6, 2009 17:34:55 GMT -5
I know it's late there, but hope you're having a great time.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!!!
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Feb 1, 2009 22:29:37 GMT -5
If that's your explanation for why he looks different when he looks different, what's your explanation for why he looks the same when he looks the same? He looks different a lot more often than he looks the same. We've been through this many times before. This discussion is getting old.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Feb 1, 2009 17:20:42 GMT -5
Even if you think that Paul now is the same as Paul pre-1967(how you do that is beyond me) how do you explain all the OTHER replacements (Frank Sinatra, Kieth Richards, David Bowie, Eric Clapton, Doris Day, Courtney Cox,etc,etc etc)? IMO some were better then the Macca replacement, some worse. We are dealing with systematic deception not just a one time thing. We can't because it's ( all of those people) unsubstantiated, and therefore, moot. So is Paul therefore unsubstantiated in your mind?
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Jan 31, 2009 21:50:38 GMT -5
The teeth are similar. But as you can fix teeth to make them straight, you can also fix them to be crooked...and to go to the degree of plastic surgery on the face, it wouldn't make any sense to not do the same with the teeth.
I also think there are differences in the teeth which I have noticed. One is that Paul's front incisors are narrower than Faul's for one. And as trutha said, there are differences in the shape of the head and the face, etc. which requires logical explanation.
Anyway, you should know by now you are wasting your time with this group. We are more confident now of this replacement than we were several years ago when the MFH group tried their best to convince us otherwise.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Jan 31, 2009 13:06:48 GMT -5
Great comparison JS2. Really convincing.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Jan 29, 2009 17:46:56 GMT -5
Yeah, Paul is alive. To this day. Wings, gimme some clues(other than the words of ACV) that could lead one to conclude that JPM survived past 1966....
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Jan 29, 2009 14:32:07 GMT -5
Yes, you are correct trutha.
What I was emphasizing was that over the years I've seen fades match up(at least somewhat) and when they do is because Faul's head is made smaller and then compared with Paul's at just the right angle. Even after that, the ears never match up.
I think it's a strong possibility that there were two Faul's(as has been discussed here of late). I just don't see JPM anywhere after 1966. I am not saying that he definitely died, just that he never took a pic after 1966 imo.
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Jan 29, 2009 12:22:05 GMT -5
....and the ears don't match up.
|
|