|
Post by rabbitteeth on Jan 3, 2017 16:14:38 GMT -5
Neil Aspinall has these facial features: - eyebrows that get large and sparse. - an oval chin, - a curved line above the eyes, - two hills on his upper lip, - a beaky nose (from the side) - rabbit teeth (seen in this picture, he didn't seem to smile much) That is how he can be recognised when acting as Paul's double. But his eyebrows would have to be colored darker or he might have put on false ones. He is in the video of the Dutch interview in 3 parts: m.youtube.com/watch?v=fbCpQXmStZ4I'd say he looks like her, she has pretty much the same features, except the eyebrows: www.google.ca/search?q=pearl+witherington
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Jan 3, 2017 12:40:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Jan 3, 2017 12:23:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Jan 3, 2017 10:53:56 GMT -5
They're both Paul. Kinda laughable, isn't it? Hi Ramone, no, they're obviously not the same person. There were many doubles of Paul and of the Beatles, especially when they were doing concerts. Probably all the big stars and other public figures like politicians have some to protect themselves. It looks like the doubles who had done the most touring took some time off to rest and to do something else and then they were replaced by some very bad doubles. It is written in many places that this camera guy underwent many surgeries and finally looked like the young Paul (page 3): 60if.proboards.com/thread/2679/all-doubters-evolution-faul I think it's rather that one of the good-looking Pauls had come back. So everybody, IF YOU SEE DOUBLES when looking at pictures, write down the facial features of each, try to tell them apart and to sort pictures by double. And get ready to post pictures of the same double in the "More than one double" thread. invanddis.proboards.com/thread/6520/more-double
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Jan 2, 2017 12:38:49 GMT -5
You can also find a lot of pictures by searching for images of the Beatles and Paul McCartney by year (especially from 1963 to 1966) and add any word(s) in order to get a different set of pictures. For example, you can search for: beatles 1963 Paul McCartney 1964 face beatles 1965 funny Paul McCartney 1966 teeth nose You can post your favorite online pictures here by doing this: invanddis.proboards.com/thread/2066/picture-helpTo post your favorite videos, you can do this: invanddis.proboards.com/thread/2078/embedded-video
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Jan 2, 2017 12:13:34 GMT -5
But thanks to the wonderful world wide web and thanks to the people who put things on it, we can see him alive again. We can watch Beatles concerts in a lot of different cities. Here is a list of them: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_BHere is a list of the interviews they gave, with the transcripts: www.beatlesinterviews.org/And here is a list of the TV appearances: beatlesource.com/TV/index.htmlYou can search and find a big part of all of that on Youtube and on Google. It is really fun to watch.
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Jan 2, 2017 11:41:49 GMT -5
Yes, the young Paul was cute, adorable, funny, nice, etc. And whether he died, left or just got older, the result is the same: He's gone. "Now am I dead, Now am I fled" (like he said in the Shakespeare script here): www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhJ67QsFg1Q
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Jan 1, 2017 15:15:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Dec 28, 2016 9:32:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Dec 26, 2016 12:12:22 GMT -5
Alice in Wonderland Chapter VI: Pig and Pepper 'The door led right into a large kitchen, which was full of smoke from one end to the other: the Duchess was sitting on a three-legged stool in the middle, nursing a baby; the cook was leaning over the fire, stirring a large cauldron which seemed to be full of soup. `There's certainly too much pepper in that soup!' Alice said to herself, as well as she could for sneezing. There was certainly too much of it in the air. Even the Duchess sneezed occasionally; and as for the baby, it was sneezing and howling alternately without a moment's pause. The only things in the kitchen that did not sneeze, were the cook, and a large cat which was sitting on the hearth and grinning from ear to ear.' www.cs.cmu.edu/~rgs/alice-VI.htmlwww.youtube.com/watch?v=LPbk7Bc15Q4
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Dec 25, 2016 15:26:34 GMT -5
Greetings and thanks, Applepie.
I read the story about the rabbit hole, the white rabbit and the cook of the duchess who put too much pepper in the soup. I hope I will not get as much trouble as Alice in Wonderland.
I don't know if that's what you mean, but I see now there are two rabbits on Sgt Pepper's drumplate.
I don't believe everything I read, especially in conspiracy theories, but they usually have some part of truth in them. I believe what makes sense to me.
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Dec 20, 2016 18:17:19 GMT -5
And I read with a lot of interest the summary of the posts by Apollo C Vermouth (said to be Neil Aspinall), because only insiders know what really happened. willemaus.wordpress.com/2015/07/03/apollo-c-vermouth/He wrote: 'Several recruits were used for differing reasons, Some used for photo ops, others for interviews. It required quite a cast of characters. It also explains the dfferences in photo comparisons.' Even for him, there are many different persons appearing if we search for Neil Aspinall in the images of Google. So there were obviously doubles for him too. I saw some people call some of them FrankenNeil or Frankenstein Aspinall. They look more like bodyguards. There seemed to be only one old Neil, so my guess is the real young Neil would be the one looking like the old one, the guy with the smallest face who is seen in many comparisons matching with Paul, showing he was indeed a double for Paul. What do you think?
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Dec 20, 2016 17:59:33 GMT -5
Hi guys, this is my second post here, after the one in the 'let me introduce to you' section: invanddis.proboards.com/thread/8227/hello-rabbitteethI've been reading many posts on this forum for some months trying to learn about this PID rumor and then about the Beatles in general. I also saw many of the websites comparing Paul and Faul. And it's obvious that they are indeed not the same person. But I also noticed that the websites do not have the same person for Paul (and for Faul). Luckily, I read rather early in a book that the Beatles used doubles. This resolved a big part of the mystery. Looking at pictures, I could easily see it was true that there were many different Pauls or Fauls, long before 1967 and afterwards.
|
|
|
Post by rabbitteeth on Dec 20, 2016 17:06:31 GMT -5
Hi guys,
this is my first post here. I am from Montreal, Canada.
I was born at the end of the 50s, so I was too young to follow the Beatles when they were together.
But during my teenage years, in the 70s, I listened to the radio a lot and bought many records.
I liked many songs by Paul and Wings, starting with Uncle Albert.
And I loved many of the Beatles songs that were still played on the radio, especially the first ones. I love harmonies. I also like Elvis, the Beach Boys, Neil Sedaka and a big part of the oldies.
I thought most of the last Beatles songs were either too noisy or too slow. But I loved a few, mostly by Paul.
And now that I listened more to the last albums, I especially like the vaudevillian kind of songs.
I knew the main things about the Beatles' careers and personal lives, but not the details.
I never paid any attention to this PID rumor that was said to be false, but after I saw an article about it in a magazine, I decided to do research on it online.
I read many posts on this forum, many websites and many books, looked at pictures and watched videos of the shows and of the press conferences (that's real fun).
Paul was always my favorite Beatle because he was so good looking and seemed so nice.
And yes, I do have rabbit teeth, like him. Even if that must be some kind of flaw, I was often told I had a beautiful smile and I think it's because of my rabbit teeth. I think it's also the main reason Paul was so good looking.
|
|