|
Post by eyesbleed on Aug 10, 2006 16:32:29 GMT -5
Anybody else find it a little too convenient that this big British "terrorist" thing comes up today?
Hey guess what....... nobody's talkin' about Lieberman today. There's no tellin' what the hell these crazy bastards are gonna try between now & November.
I was thinkin' earlier that the leaders of the other major countries have to know what really happened on 9-11. Don't they get tired of the US (bush) bullying them around all the time now? Why doesn't anybody grow a spin & go public.... oh ya, right, Bush/Cheney will probably nuke'em the next day. The idea was brought up during the Scholars for 9-11 Truth conference of some foreign countries doin' independent investigations....It seems to me the investigation's been done & the findings are conclusive. You would think that the other countries in the world would want these bastards exposed as bad as we do, but hell, what do I know?
|
|
|
Post by fourthousandholes on Aug 10, 2006 19:25:40 GMT -5
Great post. You've nailed it.
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Aug 10, 2006 21:42:54 GMT -5
Countdown With Keith Oberman was the only news program I saw today that actively address the question of whether this was just another massive exaggeration to keep the public frightened & timed for political gain. NBC did a story several months ago about this exact same type of explosive & yet nothings been done until right now. Plus, they knew this story was comin' at least a couple of days ago... hence the aggressive attacks on anti-Lieberman Dems yesterday as bein' soft on "terror" & enablers of Bin laden.
Don't short-change these bastards.... I'm tellin' ya... an unknown anti-war guy beats an incumbent senator & hundreds of thousands of people are... no.. millions of people are seriously inconvenienced in the next days....& from now on. Just wait till November.
|
|
|
Post by Mellow Yellow on Aug 10, 2006 23:04:28 GMT -5
Yeah, could someone clear something up for me. You see I was watching the news but there was so much damn ruckus in my house that I couldnt tell what the story was. I know that the anti-war guy beat lieberman. That is a good thing right?
|
|
|
Post by noodles on Aug 11, 2006 4:38:19 GMT -5
Countdown With Keith Oberman was the only news program I saw today that actively address the question of whether this was just another massive exaggeration to keep the public frightened & timed for political gain. The goverment and it's agencies along with the mainstream media certianly love to make these things sound as terrifying as they can. Yesterday they were using terms like 'unimaginable' and 'unprecedented', describing it as the UK's 9/11, 'worse than 9/11', etc. Who's terrifying who here exactly? Also interesting is on Wednesday the UK Home Secretary John Reid was talking about how we'd have to give up our freedoms in the short term. He must have know when said this that this latest 'foiled attack' was about to go public so his timing is incredibly suspect.
|
|
|
Post by fourthousandholes on Aug 11, 2006 6:43:04 GMT -5
Forget about it. November ain't comin'. 'The bastards' will run a "false flag" attack on some city that they don't like, and then postpone indefinitely the elections that would get them out of office. An "October surprise". Mellowyellow asked: "I know that the anti-war guy beat lieberman. That is a good thing right?" Yes, but it won't matter. (See above.)
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Aug 11, 2006 7:14:48 GMT -5
Yeah, could someone clear something up for me. You see I was watching the news but there was so much damn ruckus in my house that I couldnt tell what the story was. I know that the anti-war guy beat lieberman. That is a good thing right? It's almost unheard of for an incumbant senator to get beat, yet Leiberman got beat by a complete unknown who's solidly anti-war.,, so it's a fairly big deal.
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Aug 11, 2006 7:19:34 GMT -5
Forget about it. November ain't comin'. 'The bastards' will run a "false flag" attack on some city that they don't like, and then postpone indefinitely the elections that would get them out of office. An "October surprise". Ya that was kinda my drift.... ya think yesterday was fun.... wait till november. This was touched upon during the L.A. conference.... the fact that most likely, they'll call off the presidential elections using these methods, & stressing that we only have 2 yrs to out these bastards, but yer right... if they start feelin' the heat, they will indeeed move it up & declare martial law before THIS Nov... not Nov.2 yrs from now.
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Aug 11, 2006 7:32:51 GMT -5
Red Alert For Staged Government Terror Attack Terror alert a trial balloon for invasion of Iran, World War III
Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | August 10 2006
Today's red level terror alert in symbiosis with escalation of conflict in the Middle East is the trial balloon for a massive staged false flag terror attack, blamed on Hezbollah or Al-Qaeda, that will light the blue touch paper for World War Three.
Radio host Alex Jones, who predicted a staged attack on the World Trade Center involving the use of Osama bin Laden as a fall guy in July 2001, has now gone on record with a second prediction that a staged government terror attack will occur before the end of October unless a gargantuan effort to prevent it is launched.
Only through a massively increased counter-propaganda effort on behalf of all truth activists can prevent an imminent cataclysmic horror show that will make 9/11 look like a walk in the park.
We have exhaustively documented that criminal elements in control of major western governments have carried out terror attacks and deliberately manufactured fake alerts for political purposes.
In 2002, then White House press secretary Ari Fleischer told the Washington Times that terror alerts were issued "as a result of all the controversy that took place last week," referring to political heat bestowed on President Bush when 9/11 prior knowledge evidence first surfaced.
From this point onwards smoking guns of government complicity in 9/11 became intrinsically linked with fake terror alerts.
In January of 2003 FBI and CIA whistleblowers told Capitol Hill Blue that the White House was scripting phony terror alerts to maintain hysteria, upkeep President Bush’s approval ratings and milk extra defense funding. The report that five Pakistani men had entered the States via Canada and were planning on carrying out a dirty bomb or biological attack was completely conjured up by the Bush administration’s black propaganda office. New York Harbor was shut down to visibly pump up the fear. One of the named suspects, Mohammed Asghar (pictured left), was tracked down to Pakistan by the Associated Press. He was a fat guy running a jewellers shop and had never even been to America.
World Net Daily commented,
“Other sources within the bureau and the Central Intelligence Agency said the administration is pressuring intelligence agencies to develop "something, anything" to support an array of non-specific terrorism alerts issued by the White House and the Department of Homeland Security…CHB reported that FBI and CIA sources said a recent White House memo listing the war on terrorism as a definitive political advantage and fund-raising tool is just one of many documents discussing how to best utilize the terrorist threat.”
Since those early admissions, every single major terror alert that the US, UK or Canadian government has issued has proven to be completely fraudulent and scripted.
Two months ago this website, in an article entitled 'Nexus Points Emerge For Potential Summer Attack,' predicted that, "Numerous nexus points have emerged that suggest major western governments are preparing for a summer terror attack that will come close to but not match 9/11 in scale and will provide the justification needed for an air strike on Iran before the midterm elections in early November."
Government mouthpieces in the US, UK and Israel are all hyping the inevitability of a Hezbollah nuke attack on a major western or Israeli city, which will provide the perfect justification for Neo-Fascist bloodsuckers to expand the war from Lebanon into Syria and Iran.
Developments today indicate that the governments of the US and the UK are engaging in a process of announcing the prevention of numerous terror plots, in order to prepare the groundwork for a real attack, under protest that they did all they could to defend the people, but that one attack slipped through.
Arrests in the US, the UK and Canada of supposed terror cells that in each case turn out to be low grade morons, victims of government entrapment, or outright fabricated evidence, are part of this conditioning process.
We have provided links to all our investigations of these staged terror alerts and more at the end of this article.
Watershed leaps in the public profile of the 9/11 truth movement directly correlate to the staging of scripted terror alerts. Each time a new national poll is released showing more people questioning the official story of 9/11, a terror alert or a high profile terror arrest is announced. Last time around it was the arrest of Al-Zarqawi - now it's a re-hash of Operation Bojinka - a plot masterminded by admitted US government agent Ramzi Youssef.
The ramifications for the freedoms of all westerners and the very lives of thousands of Iranians and Syrians, as well as US troops, are too grave to even contemplate.
We must be more vigilant that ever before in an more vocal in our efforts to educate the world about who benefits from terror and where the weight of evidence points towards.
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Aug 14, 2006 11:01:19 GMT -5
Cheney actually "warned" before the Lieberman-Lamont election that if Lamont won then "al-Qaeda" (wink, wink) would take it as a sign of "weakness" on america's part and therefore "attack us."
This was a pre-event veiled threat by "9-11"-perpetrator Cheney that they would retaliate for the Bush/Lieberman loss by staging a fake terror "alert" or false flag terror attack. I'm not so sure that they would feel the need to declare martial law before the November elections sincs their computer voting machines like Diebold (causing the run-off election theft of "9-11" truther McKinney in Georgia) are now in place across the nation (but not in Connecticut!) and are certain to steal the elections again for the Republikans/Bush regime.
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Aug 14, 2006 16:51:21 GMT -5
Remember this? A kiss, well.. that means something in certain circumstances..
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Aug 14, 2006 22:10:18 GMT -5
Remember this? A kiss, well.. that means something in certain circumstances.. This is as sincere as "Judas Kiss"....leading to betrayal and death... Why is it that Lieberman is connected with strange elections? Being he was the running mate in the hideous 2000 Presidential election farce Al Gore/Bush? Is he like the "sacrificial bull"? Is this preparing the illuminati to bring about WW III and their new age messiah? They have been planning WW III since the days of Albert Pike and his Morals and Dogma book and free masons. Keep your eyes on the man who can bring peace to the middle east...
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Aug 30, 2006 0:45:31 GMT -5
Coincides with the pre-release media hype for SNAKES ON A PLANE; the liquid/bottles screen subliminally corresponds to the venom of a snake? Another headline last week in the midst of all this was "BOY SNEAKS ONTO PLANE" about a 12 year old boy supposedly SNEAKING-snaking onto a plane in the U.S.n
The NYT ran an article quoting Connecticut people as saying they would now switch their prefernce to voting for Lieberman, because the "TERROR ALERT SNAKES PLANE" flooding the USA-British news had given them no choice but to supprt the Hawkish tough-on-terror pro-war, pro-Bush Lieberman. How incredibly "lucky" for Lieberman! Maybe he'll get a new Osama bin Laden tape for Halloween ...........
|
|
|
Post by fourthousandholes on Aug 30, 2006 7:29:22 GMT -5
Beatlies wrote: "The NYT ran an article quoting Connecticut people as saying they would now switch their prefernce to voting for Lieberman, because the "TERROR ALERT SNAKES PLANE" flooding the USA-British news had given them no choice..."
Sure.
|
|