|
|
Post by ReallyReallyDead on May 14, 2005 7:10:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by revolver on May 14, 2005 15:45:01 GMT -5
Wow, Paul is looking very sanpaku there. I wonder what the date of that photo is. Supposedly, sanpaku indicates being in a weakened condition and therefore more accident prone. It can be a temporary or chronic condition. |
|
|
|
Post by ReallyReallyDead on May 15, 2005 7:08:45 GMT -5
I think Paul is looking up at the camera. Bill however...  |
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on May 15, 2005 8:54:31 GMT -5
Wow, Paul is looking very sanpaku there. I wonder what the date of that photo is. . That pic is posted at jpm.org & I got it out of a magazine called Pictures For Framing... published 64. That still doesn't answer the question tho. It's pretty obvious that this pic is from before 64 sometime.  |
|
|
|
Post by pennylane on May 15, 2005 9:38:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by jerriwillmore on May 16, 2005 15:22:55 GMT -5
Looks like the same guy except that eyes seem closer set. Could be the lighting. Why not please do a FADE comparing them?!  |
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on May 16, 2005 15:55:36 GMT -5
In that black & white photo, Paul's eyes look a shade or two lighter than George's.
|
|
|
|
Post by strawberryfields on May 17, 2005 17:05:27 GMT -5
I don't mean to be a bother, but I see the same guy, 100%
In fact, fades and comparisons with these pictures have been made by Khan rather recently, and it tuned out to be a fantastic match.
I'm not trying to disrupt the conversation though, so please, don't mind me.
*Sneaks out*
|
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on May 17, 2005 19:15:05 GMT -5
I don't mean to be a bother, but I see the same guy So did I. For many years. |
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Dec 26, 2005 21:38:03 GMT -5
The very first post on this thread, the pic on the left looks like they did some retouching on the eyes. I've seen this before and it looks doctored.
The rest of the face looks like JPM's but the eyes look strange. And it's not like he was scared to have a "wide eyed" look.
The picture on the left, looks like the White Album sessions, IF that's Bill, it's the closest he ever looked like JPM. I never saw a side by side of the white album pic with other pics of Bill from that time or even before this period. But this particular picture doesn't look like his face is as long as the Red Sgt. Pepper.
This has me wondering, and I had suspected this, that there was another Faul being used at the same time as Bill. Could it be that this "Faul" is someone totally different than Bill?
Could this be Dino Danelli, that was mentioned on another thread? Not Neil or Denny, that's for sure.
|
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Dec 26, 2005 21:38:58 GMT -5
I don't have the technology, but if I did, I would try to put a side by side of the bearded Faul with Dino....
|
|
|
|
Post by lili on Dec 27, 2005 10:02:52 GMT -5
Look at the last photo where everyone has their hands on each other's necks. Everyone is smiling but Paul. Paul looks so sad  Also, George's face & head is larger than Paul's. In photos after 1967, " Paul" & George have the same size head. Those 1st two photos really are close. I'm with Rita. It looks like the one of Faul has been tampered with to make him better resemble the Paul in that 1st photo. Since it was published in 1964, it might've been the guideline that they used. |
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Dec 27, 2005 22:13:09 GMT -5
That pic with all four in a "strangle"hold....it appears that the camera lens makes their faces look different. George looks like he has a nose as big as Ringo's, and we know that George didn't have a big schnoz...John looks bloated.
That pic of JPM in the group shot looks like it's been "fauxed" up. His eyes are not as droopy as JPM's really were and his lips look like the Faux Faul lip scar. I don't think the moped accident would have occurred in this early group photo.
Jpm's face is not as shaded as the pics of the other Beatles. The face is thinner than JPM's actually was. I looked long and hard at this photo and this is not an original JPM. These have been altered. Or should I say "Faultered".
For fans who are younger, they may not notice the differences, but for the fans who were around during their days, can tell there is some differences.
|
|
