|
Post by xpt626 on Feb 14, 2005 6:30:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by -Wings- on Feb 14, 2005 15:59:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Feb 16, 2005 15:32:10 GMT -5
I found this on jpm.org so I thought I'd add it to the thread. It's pretty consistant with the other early autographs, but I noticed how the "P's" change drastically starting at Sgt.P. The "winking eye" sig is closer, but the P is still all wrong.
|
|
|
Post by BandOnTheJet on Feb 19, 2005 10:47:36 GMT -5
I love Ringo's signature for some reason, isn't it cool?
|
|
|
Post by BandOnTheJet on Feb 19, 2005 10:52:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by -Wings- on Feb 19, 2005 14:15:10 GMT -5
Oh, I've got awful handwriting, and my signature fluxiates wildly. I don't think you can judge too much from signatures either, unless we've all died and been replaced with lookalikes.
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Feb 19, 2005 19:20:00 GMT -5
...this doesnt' seem like a convincing thread. I made the original post in order to make the point that many of the "Paul" signatures out there, even the vintage ones, are not authentic.
|
|
|
Post by BandOnTheJet on Feb 19, 2005 21:34:11 GMT -5
I made the original post in order to make the point that many of the "Paul" signatures out there, even the vintage ones, are not authentic. Ah, well good point, then I was just saying that if it is to prove Paul's changed, so did John's as well. But I had heard a similar story that most Beatles signatures are unauthentic a year ago. Looks like I have proof now! Cheers, Umang
|
|