|
|
Post by revolver on Sept 11, 2006 0:49:03 GMT -5
 Thanks to KAHN for creating this photo comparison. Both pictures are adjusted for equal height, so their heads should be about the same size (assuming Bill = Paul). But Bill's head is noticeably larger and differently proportioned than Paul's. So we have here another PIA comparison that's really PWR.  The difference between this and other PIA facial comparisons, is that the full-body photos prevent any enlargement of Paul's head to better match Bill's. |
|
|
|
Post by lili on Sept 11, 2006 12:27:41 GMT -5
Nice comparison. Thanks KHAN, Revolver. I think that KHAN has mellowed out concerning our POV (at times). Paul   Bill |
|
|
|
Post by revolver on Sept 11, 2006 20:10:00 GMT -5
Actually KHAN was trying to demonstrate that they were the same guy because (he claims) they each appear to be bow legged. His explanation about the head size difference is that Paul was tilting his head back. 
|
|
|
|
Post by il ras on Sept 12, 2006 9:02:47 GMT -5
KHAN tried to put feet and crotches at the same level. Good job. The result (without mentioning the obvious differences between the two heads' shape) is that JPM seems higher than Bill: if you look carefully at the top of JPM's head you can easily notice that at the same level, in the other picture, there is just a a pick. It is not a matter of tilting because, if we assume that JPM was tilting his head back, this means that, putting his head in a normal position, he should appear even taller. The explanation is that the two picture are not in the same scale If you want feet and crotch to be at the same level you need a pic of Bill in a slightly smaller scale than the JPM's one. But you will obtain the result above described as JPM was a person with a normal structure and Bill is long-limbed person. In other words: if you arrange the scale of the two pictures (without stretching any  ) to make the legs of the two guys be of the same length, it is clear that the rest of body of the person with normal structure will be longer than the other one because, in a long-limbed person, legs represent an higher percentage of the whole body. Hope my poor English worked in this case... |
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Sept 12, 2006 9:07:27 GMT -5
Hope my poor English worked in this case... hey ilras, yer english is better than mine is on some days ;D |
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Sept 12, 2006 10:59:44 GMT -5
 Actually KHAN was trying to demonstrate that they were the same guy because (he claims) they each appear to be bow legged. Well this pic doesn't show both of them bow-legged at all. It shows Paul bow-legged but not Bill. Why? Because if you look at the knee area and measure the width of Paul's knees it gets narrower as you go towards the FEET. Whereas with Bill it gets WIDER as you go towards the FEET. The feet is where it should be measured from. Whoever thinks Bill looks bow-legged is looking at the line of the pantleg. |
|
|
|
Post by lili on Sept 12, 2006 11:40:29 GMT -5
I agree, DarkHorse. Good job, ilras. What struck me the most is how much SMALLER Paul's forehead was than Bill's ! It's very obvious.
|
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Sept 12, 2006 18:38:04 GMT -5
Was JPM really bowlegged, or was his right leg, (our left) just a bit bent?
Besides, this was covered under another thread where Lili showed both Paul and Bill in swimsuits...that would give a better indication as to bowlegging and length, etc.
The face alone tells that JPM had a shorter, somewhat wider face than Bill, who has an oblong face, longer and thinner...
|
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Sept 12, 2006 20:58:32 GMT -5
That pic of JPM is whilst playing, I would have just put it down to the way in which they danced, remember that John had this habit of bending his knees constantly and George swung his legs from side to side, ok they may not be the best descriptions but you know what I mean!!
|
|
|
|
Post by revolver on Sept 12, 2006 21:03:58 GMT -5
KHAN & Co. are staring the truth right in the face and can't see it. If they can look at those two photos and see the same guy, there's no point in arguing with them. I guess Paul's ego must have caused his head to swell.
|
|
|
|
Post by lili on Sept 15, 2006 11:17:30 GMT -5
Good one, Revolver ! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by LOVELYRITA on Sept 15, 2006 21:58:04 GMT -5
Lliving is easy with eyes closed...misunderstanding all you see.......if a person believes something long enough, such as PIA and look at these pics and swear they are the same man, they will fight it to the death to defend this.
It's funny how perception is. A truly attractive person can look in the mirror and see an "ugly" person. Perhaps they heard how ugly they were from their parents, or someone else. Hearing something long enough, even though it's not really true, can lead a person to live their lives thinking they are not attractive. As well as the person who is not attractive, but their egos have them thinking they are. Nobody else may think so, but in their mind's eye, they think they are really good looking. I often say "I'd like to see the mirror they look in." Or you may say Objects in mirror are better looking than they really are!
So these people have been told this is Paul Mc Cartney, and even though they see physical differences, they excuse drug use, or age as the natural reasonings for his image to be different. But one's face does not elongate, a body does not grow longer, legs don't get longer once one is fully grown..and certainly not as one ages. Usually as one ages, they get shorter.
So for those who have been lulled into this mindset, there's no talking to them or debating. It' s a no win situation.
|
|
) to make the legs of the two guys be of the same length, it is clear that the rest of body of the person with normal structure will be longer than the other one because, in a long-limbed person, legs represent an higher percentage of the whole body.
