|
|
Post by paulrus on Jul 4, 2004 15:48:01 GMT -5
Yeah, i´m new at this board and i want to know if anyone here believe that Paul didn´t die. I strongly believe that Paul is alive. All this backwards things are just bad luck.
Bye
|
|
|
|
Post by SimMHoward on Jul 4, 2004 16:39:25 GMT -5
You're looking at one of the biggest PIAers there is, but that doesn't mean we can't all get along  |
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jul 4, 2004 16:40:20 GMT -5
First, welcome Paulrus!  Just a guesstimate, but of the regular posters, the majority at least believe Paul was replaced. There are a few who don't, they don't hide that fact. |
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Jul 4, 2004 17:20:02 GMT -5
Most definately replaced & probably dead is my conclusion.
WELCOME
|
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Jul 4, 2004 17:44:30 GMT -5
Dead and replaced.
|
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Jul 4, 2004 21:34:03 GMT -5
dead and replaced. |
|
|
|
Post by revolver on Jul 4, 2004 22:11:42 GMT -5
Paul died in September '66 from most likely a car accident.  Was replaced by December '66.  |
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Jul 4, 2004 23:32:51 GMT -5
Welcome Paulrus! (great name! ;D)
I belive Paul's alive. But I belive something happend, not sure what though.
|
|
|
|
Post by matchbox on Jul 5, 2004 0:12:40 GMT -5
I believe Paul is alive. But the folks here are cool regardless of PID-PWR-PIA beliefs.  |
|
|
|
Post by mindgames1 on Jul 5, 2004 10:03:23 GMT -5
I believe Paul Was Replaced. Maybe he's dead, I can't be sure of this.
|
|
|
|
Post by lj on Jul 5, 2004 11:07:39 GMT -5
dead and replaced too.
|
|
|
|
Post by raymi46 on Jul 5, 2004 21:06:07 GMT -5
Dead...no
Replaced...yes.
perhaps due to an accident or a chronic illness.
|
|
Cake
Hard Day's Night 
Posts: 1
|
Post by Cake on Jul 6, 2004 6:56:17 GMT -5
Right i'm new here too! I'm not really sure what to think really, but i voted no. It's really interesting to hear about it all though so i'll go read through everyone's posts and make a desicion  |
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jul 6, 2004 18:02:57 GMT -5
Very much dead, very much replaced.
|
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jul 6, 2004 21:21:31 GMT -5
Paulrus, just curious, what exactly do you mean?
|
|
|
|
Post by ecenzo1 on Aug 10, 2004 22:33:45 GMT -5
Accuse me of comming late to the party. But reading as many posts as I have in the last few days, I'm forced to see a third possibility that, frankly, never occured to me before. Aside from the obvious two, the thought of a third senario is somewhat interesting. They are:
1.) Paul is alive
2.) Paul is dead and as a result replaced. And:
3.) Paul is alive, but for whatever reason (possibly some debilitation due the accident) he was replaced.
I would like to hear some thoughts...
|
|
|
|
Post by kazu on Aug 11, 2004 5:52:12 GMT -5
PIA, but something is fishy with his look.
|
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Aug 11, 2004 7:20:23 GMT -5
...thought of a third senario is somewhat interesting. ......Paul is alive, but for whatever reason (possibly some debilitation due the accident) he was replaced. I would like to hear some thoughts... I think Scatterdome had a theory along those lines. It was hard for me to follow, though, so I don't know the details. Anything's possible, but the "musical clues" seem to all reference death.... I'm sure someone with more (Beatle) historical knowledge will offer comments on your theory. |
|
|
|
Post by kazu on Aug 11, 2004 20:36:19 GMT -5
It would be interesting if, Paul was in an accident, A double was brought in to replace him. Paul was scooted to a farm (where Faul also stayed) And they had "how to be a Paul" school taught there.
That would make an interesting story.
|
|
|
|
Post by ecenzo1 on Aug 11, 2004 21:24:45 GMT -5
I think the "stand-in" theory would answer alot of questions. Who better to prep the imposter than the genuine article? It would also answer the question why no one has come forward to debunk or verify the truth behind the mystery. It would be easier to convince the "inner circle" to not reveal the truth if they believed they were aiding the "dibilitated" Paul rather than propigating an out-and-out lie.
|
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Aug 12, 2004 2:51:31 GMT -5
also, a living man has a living voice, that could record.....
And, a living man can, who's not copletely impaired, can personally authorize goings-on that apply to him legally........
A living man can say yes or no, approve or disapprove.
A living man might write new songs.
All providing he is conscious, willing, lucid, and not neurologically limited.
I'd prefer to think Paul continued to live.
When was Strawberry Fields recorded?
|
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Aug 12, 2004 4:24:51 GMT -5
When was Strawberry Fields recorded? Began November 24, 1966, at Abbey Road, with additional work on November 28 and 29 and December 8, 9, 15, and 21. - Beatlesongs |
|
Imgonnaopenmymind
Hard Day's Night
I am the voice of James Faul McCartney. :o
Posts: 20
|
Post by Imgonnaopenmymind on Aug 21, 2004 11:08:28 GMT -5
I'm one of the ones who think Paul was replaced, but he didn't have to die for a replacement to occur. I think he was unhappy with the no-hear, let's-not-practice attitude on tour and quit. They simply found an impersonator and slapped Paul's name on him.
|
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Aug 21, 2004 11:53:02 GMT -5
Began November 24, 1966, at Abbey Road, with additional work on November 28 and 29 and December 8, 9, 15, and 21. - Beatlesongs ...and in his own words, he wrote it while he was in Amaria, Spain filming How I Won The War. |
|
Was replaced by December '66. 
