|
|
Post by pennylane on Aug 6, 2005 9:28:04 GMT -5
Has anyone heard these interviews from 65?
I found just a small description of the 'Paul' interview:
Paul talks of Northern songs and the London Stock Exchange. He talks about writing songs , the relationship with the press and marriage. Who to? According to Dorothy Killgallon Paul has been married to Jane Asher for a year!. The Beatles musical is also mentioned.
So another reporter claims Paul & Jane were married!
|
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Aug 6, 2005 10:16:48 GMT -5
Yes, I forget the other reporter who mentioned that, it's somewhere on the forum. Maybe this should have been obvious, but your other post mentions what has always been public knowledge, that Paul lived in her parent's home.. Would that have been considered 'proper' (by the parents) had they not been married? Of course you could look at it another way and maybe they figured it's a way of keeping an eye on them, dunno.
|
|
|
|
Post by missvagabond on Aug 6, 2005 10:26:16 GMT -5
Yes, I forget the other reporter who mentioned that, it's somewhere on the forum. Maybe this should have been obvious, but your other post mentions what has always been public knowledge, that Paul lived in her parent's home.. Would that have been considered 'proper' (by the parents) had they not been married? Of course you could look at it another way and maybe they figured it's a way of keeping an eye on them, dunno. So if Jane is a widow and Paul died or was replaced, there might be a legal aggreement keeping her quiet about it all. In any case, she would've been devastated. No wonder she won't talk about it at all.. I wonder why reporters think they were married? This interview with Dorothy Killgallon was in 1966. So it's not like she was having to remember that far back into history they way she would if it was later on. It was mentioned in the 'present' at that time. I haven't heard the interview, but I'd really love to. Did Paul? actually claim he was married? Or was it just something the reporter assumed?!  |
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Aug 6, 2005 12:56:52 GMT -5
That's interesting about Kilgallen. For those who don't know, she died mysteriously in November 1965 just as she was about to publish the details of her interview with Jack Ruby. ( www.jfkresearch.com/morningstar/killgallen.htm ) If Asher's father was a "handler" of the Beats, it makes sense that he would want them under his roof as much as possible. And he would have had considerable sway over the estate if Jane & JPM had been married and Jane was widowed before the age 21. (The other reporter was Walter Winchell, but he reported the marriage in early-mid 66.) |
|
