|
Post by eyesbleed on Nov 27, 2005 18:08:23 GMT -5
One of the things that was the hardest for me to grasp with the PID theory was the extended family aspect of the whole deal. So, what with all the heightened interest in the PWR theory since the release of Chaos & Creation; I was thinkin'.... If JPM wasn't dead, but seriously injured & out of commision for life.... possibly, that would explain volumes as to why they would all put up with this illusion & act accordingly... Granted, lots of money would make anything possible with the family, but this PWR scenerio does make the whole family involvement thing seem more logical.
|
|
|
Post by -Wings- on Nov 30, 2005 17:53:21 GMT -5
That could be a good explanation, but if James Paul did indeed die, I have to wonder how much involvement Sir Paul had with his family. After all, Sir Paul developed a new family fairly quickly for himself with Linda, and besides appearing with James Paul's father on occasion (the minimal amount of appearances could have been written into a contract), it seems like he was mostly self-contained with Linda and their children.
I remember, and I'll have to dig up the exact quote, that in one of my McCartney biography books, one of James Paul's family members complained that they never saw or heard from Paul anymore. This was taken in the '70s.
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Nov 30, 2005 18:09:23 GMT -5
That would be a great cite, -Wings
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Nov 30, 2005 18:15:02 GMT -5
Everytime I look at a picture of Bill/Sir Paul like this one compared to the James Paul one, I can't help but notice how large Bill's forehead is.
Oh and to stay on topic, I think it was double motivation for the family. Money and of course, if you don't comply you could get hurt or worse...die.
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Dec 1, 2005 7:48:51 GMT -5
Oh and to stay on topic, I think it was double motivation for the family. Money and of course, if you don't comply you could get hurt or worse...die. Yes, I'm sure there were ways to keep the extended family silent. It's just recently that I've thought more about the possibility of PWR, as opposed to PID. C&C is a factor of course, but I just can't shake those "retatded Paul" pics that are supposedly from 68.
|
|
|
Post by Jai Guru Deva on Dec 2, 2006 2:24:47 GMT -5
Something which has come to my recent attention is that three years before Angela married Jim, her first husband Eddie died in a car crash. So when Paul died (especially if it was a car crash), it would have been terribly difficult for Angela to accept or talk about. So you could see how she might have traumatized and willing to go along with things. Especially with Ruth, she might have thought it better not to upset the child. But I suspect young Ruth wondered why there was something different about "Paul", there is a story about how she was told "Paul" grew a mustache because of the moped accident.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Dec 2, 2006 4:43:36 GMT -5
Something which has come to my recent attention is that three years before Angela married Jim, her first husband Eddie died in a car crash. So when Paul died (especially if it was a car crash), it would have been terribly difficult for Angela to accept or talk about. So you could see how she might have traumatized and willing to go along with things. Especially with Ruth, she might have thought it better not to upset the child. But I suspect young Ruth wondered why there was something different about "Paul", there is a story about how she was told "Paul" grew a mustache because of the moped accident. Also, and maybe it's just me,, but Ruth resembles Paul, to a degree, am I wrong? But they are step-siblings and supposedly NOT related by blood. Hmmm.. I guess this is a red herring observation. And incidental resemblance's between unrelated step-siblings are possible.
|
|
|
Post by beatlies on Dec 2, 2006 6:30:47 GMT -5
Oh and to stay on topic, I think it was double motivation for the family. Money and of course, if you don't comply you could get hurt or worse...die. Yes, I'm sure there were ways to keep the extended family silent. It's just recently that I've thought more about the possibility of PWR, as opposed to PID. C&C is a factor of course, but I just can't shake those "retatded Paul" pics that are supposedly from 68. Eyesbleed, are you sure those pictures are from 1968? What is the source? There's a PID radio inteview with Lennon and Yoko Ono (or Charlie Brill or whoever) where Lennon brings up the topic of James Dean being brain damaged in the Porsche Spyder crash (Spyders from Mars another clue) and actually hidden in an institution. It's on Jojo's shoebox website.
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Dec 2, 2006 9:02:32 GMT -5
The source that sez the "retarded Paul" pics were from 68 was the guy who had the photo exhibit at the gallery where those pics were hanging.
I think there's a very good chance he was mistaken.
|
|
|
Post by lili on Dec 2, 2006 9:49:47 GMT -5
According to how Paul looks in those pics, I would say they were taken in 1963/64. I could also be mistaken. Did the boys go to miami in 1963/64 ? There is that one beach shot... I know that some of you believe that there are clues that point to Paul being brain-injured & that explains certain things about the actions of others. I myself believe differently. I'm a firm believer in PID. However, I have to be fair & say that most of the actions of the others ( how totally shocked & sometimes devastated John & George appear to be during 1967 ) could also be explained by Paul being so gravely injured that he was no longer Paul, and therefore "dead" to them.
|
|
|
Post by jerriwillmore on Dec 30, 2006 19:05:00 GMT -5
I'd like to believe he just ran off to Bora Bora.
|
|