|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Sept 18, 2004 22:21:33 GMT -5
 Wait for it to load... Yeah, so the angles aren't 100%, yet the eye distance matches up, along with the head shape. I blame the ears not matching because the "Faul" pic was taken like 4 or 5 feet away, and the other 2 pics maybe 10 or 15 feet away. Camera distortion. Or plastic surgery. I know you'll still think they're 2 different people, but I hope this makes you reconsider the PID stereotypes of "Faul's" eyes being closer together, or his head being taller, etc... |
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Sept 18, 2004 22:40:24 GMT -5
Omigod!  I finally came to my senses Flaming Pie, thank you!! Now that Paul is really the same guy all these years after all, I have so much more free time now! Ok, no offense, hehe..  ;D It was an interesting fade, and I've already given my opinion extensively on this topic so.. I'll just say job well done, and leave it at that... |
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Sept 18, 2004 22:52:21 GMT -5
Omigod! I finally came to my senses Flaming Pie, thank you!! Now that Paul is really the same guy all these years after all, I have so much more free time now! Ok, no offense, hehe.. ;D It was an interesting fade, and I've already given my opinion extensively on this topic so.. I'll just say job well done, and leave it at that... I said in my first post, I'm not expecting that. For right now, my main goal is to make you reconsider the PID stereotypes of "Faul's" eyes being closer together, or his head being taller, etc. P.S. Look at how well "Faul's" eyebrows match up with the Cavern pic. |
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Sept 19, 2004 15:38:28 GMT -5
Come on, who wants to start the 5 page debate? ;D
Edit: Ooh, 500 posts!
|
|
|
|
Post by revolver on Sept 19, 2004 18:26:30 GMT -5
I'll jump in by saying there are too many variables in camera angle, distance from camera, etc. to be useful for comparison. Ideally, the photos should all be taken by a camera approximately perpendicular to the subject's face and at a long enough distance to rule out lens-distortion effects. We should be able to see the tops of the head in each shot, not just the face. And lastly, Paul doesn't look like Paul AFAICT, even when some of the features appear to be in sync.
|
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Sept 19, 2004 19:24:35 GMT -5
I'll jump in by saying there are too many variables in camera angle, distance from camera, etc. to be useful for comparison. Ideally, the photos should all be taken by a camera approximately perpendicular to the subject's face and at a long enough distance to rule out lens-distortion effects. We should be able to see the tops of the head in each shot, not just the face. Well I can never be positive when it's a closeup shot of him, because they could have cropped out the surroundings to make it look like a closeup. Nobody can be sure, other than the person that took it. So tell me what differences you see? ;D |
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Sept 20, 2004 17:09:44 GMT -5
So I'm guessing all of you are still in shock by my fade? ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Sept 20, 2004 20:35:38 GMT -5
Just speakin' for myself here, I'm a little burned out on fades from the last go'rounds.
I'm still firmly in the fades-R-fun camp, just kinda over it temporarily.
It's hard to be critical of stuff you create, but there's plenty of problems with this fade.
I still think yer first one was much better.
|
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Sept 20, 2004 21:07:52 GMT -5
Just speakin' for myself here, I'm a little burned out on fades from the last go'rounds. I'm still firmly in the fades-R-fun camp, just kinda over it temporarily. It's hard to be critical of stuff you create, but there's plenty of problems with this fade. I still think yer first one was much better. By "first one" do you mean this one? And what problems do you see? |
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Sept 20, 2004 22:11:24 GMT -5
By "first one" do you mean this one? And what problems do you see? Ya, that one. Since I've been at margarita happy hour all evening, my comments on what I see movin' around in yer new fade may not be all that reliable!.  |
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Sept 21, 2004 8:37:02 GMT -5
So I'm guessing all of you are still in shock by my fade? ;D Is that a joke?  |
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Sept 21, 2004 8:42:16 GMT -5
This was your best fade. I wish you would compare the bodies in this fade so that YOU could see what we are talking about..... |
|
madtitan125
For Sale 
"There is no knowledge that is not power!"
Posts: 99
|
Post by madtitan125 on Sept 21, 2004 8:54:26 GMT -5
I logged in, but thinking about it...what's the point?
All I'll say about Faul/Paul, is that JPM was never mistaken for Count Chocula. 'Nuff said.
|
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Sept 21, 2004 15:53:12 GMT -5
Is that a joke? Yes.  Comparing the body is MUCH harder than the face. With anyone. If you give me pics of Faul/Paul where you think the pose/camera angle is the same, then I'll see if it'll make a good fade. |
|
|
|
Post by southpaw on Sept 21, 2004 19:14:35 GMT -5
FP i won't be impressed(with your fades) until you take 65,66 pics of Paul and fade them into late 66 early 67 pics of "paul".
|
|
|
|
Post by SimMHoward on Sept 21, 2004 19:18:19 GMT -5
why should that be necessary?
|
|
|
|
Post by DarkHorse on Sept 21, 2004 19:51:35 GMT -5
Comparing the body is MUCH harder than the face. With anyone. If you give me pics of Faul/Paul where you think the pose/camera angle is the same, then I'll see if it'll make a good fade. No. That's not what I am talking about. What I am talking about is in your fade if you show the whole body(if the pic allows it) or at least down to the chest and show Paul's head on Faul's body or Faul's head on Paul's body. |
|
I finally came to my senses Flaming Pie, thank you!! Now that Paul is really the same guy all these years after all, I have so much more free time now! 
;D
