28IF vs. 51IS

[mciiii]

Did he tell the truth instead of fooling us?

[lili]

Can you please explain this a little better, McC III ? I don't recognize the second reference

[JoJo]

He's talking about this album cover, the licence plate on the VW reads "51IS"

[mciiii]

or maybe Bill is telling us, Paul is live his 51! he's not dead!

[mciiii]

I think there are a lot of clues here (on AR and PIL), the same pic manipulate, the 28IF and the 51IS, on Abbey Road are tree persons on the sunny side of the road, and one person in the shadow side (close to the van), on Paul is live is only one person on the sunny side, and the van and the guy lurking on the shadows was removed, the car who go to Paul/Bill head on Abbey Road was changed on Paul is Live for the MMT bus, and who knows what more are here.

Ah, don't forget, on Abbey Road Paul/Bill as no head shadow.

[-Wings-]

You bring up an interesting point about the pedesitrians in the background on the original Abbey Road. I've never given them any thought, but there ARE three standing on one side with one standing on the other... and the guy standing by himself is wearing a suit that looks like the one Bill has on.

Three Beatles together and one Beatle standing on the outside?

[mciiii]

wings said:

Three Beatles together and one Beatle standing on the outside?

Three Beatles under the sun, and one Beatle lurking in the shadows?

[il ras]

I read somewhere on the net about the man alone on the left who recognised himself and told to his sons, who had just bought the LP, that it was him on the cover: at the beginning they didn't believe it but, in the end, recognized him.
He also added something about the shoeless walking... so I'm not so sure it was intentional.
I'll post a link if I will be able to find it again.

[mciiii]

The shoeless thing was intentionaly like the way Paul/Bill cross the road (not in the same way of J G and R)

[lenmac]

I don't know if this will help but I have some alt AR pics from that day:

[lili]

It adds alot. It shows that Bill was taller than the others

[il ras]

I'm looking at lenmac pic (we all already know them...) but this time something strange came to my eyes...:
1) in the first of the four, look at george: even if he's closer to the camera, his head is at the same height of the others.

2) in the second and in the third photos the images of the four seems to have been pasted in the scene ( they all are in four different rectangular slides darker than the rest, can u see them?). After you have seen it there you see it in the first one and, perhaps, in the last one (i'm pretty sure about George).

[lenmac]

Oh I am sorry I should have known that they have been seen before

[il ras]

Plus, as I said here invanddis.proboards29.com/index.cgi?board=Clues&action=display&thread=1136228858&page=1
my opinion is that they pasted Paul's head on bill's (or whatever his name is) body.

[il ras]

lenmac said:

Oh I am sorry I should have known that they have been seen before

You did a great job!

[LOVELYRITA]

This does look "pasted" together.
Note, George, not only in the foreground, but his shadow lays differently from the others.
It could not have been taken at the same time.

The shadows don't fall the same behind any of the Beatles pictured. If the sun was shining on them at the same time, their shadows would be about the same behind them. Even though each one was moving in a different pace and speed, the shadows taken at the same time would fall behind them in the same way.

[il ras]

Yes. looking at the shadows we can divide them in two groups: Paul and George in the first and John and Ringo in the second. more or less.
But this doesn't happen with so much evidence in the other pics.