|
Post by jerriwillmore on Jun 9, 2004 15:11:57 GMT -5
I want it for obvious reasons! Actually it could be a PIA clue. Why would Will want to chip his tooth as well?
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Jun 9, 2004 16:20:14 GMT -5
I'm guessing by the quote marks you mean post 1966 Paul. If you don't like to say "Bill" or "Faul", feel free to use the above phrase, just for clarity. A chipped tooth is easily fixed, I mean that's pretty common knowledge. So yeah we have the paperback writer video still somewhere here with the chipped tooth clearly shown. The Revolver press conference came later, and he smiled a few times enough to show the teeth, no chipped tooth. So, 1966 Paul had already had it fixed, no need for a replacement to even address that issue.
|
|
|
Post by AUSTON on Jun 10, 2004 16:48:32 GMT -5
jerri - here you go: Poor baby. He looks to be in pain.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Jun 16, 2004 23:08:32 GMT -5
I thought Rain and Paperback Writer were played on Ed Sullivan in 1966. If these songs were recorded in 1966, then from the time of the moped accident till then Paul had no repairs for those items. If the moped accident was in, when was it, middle 1965?, and the Rain video was shot in early 1966, or even spring, Paul went 9-10 months with a broken tooth and a swollen upper lip (on his right side). Hmmmm.
Maybe the moped accident was a little later?................have to look for those dates.........it seems then that his tooth and lip are normal in August '66 in the interviews.
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Jun 17, 2004 4:15:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Jun 17, 2004 4:17:41 GMT -5
I want it for obvious reasons! Actually it could be a PIA clue. Why would Will want to chip his tooth as well? I doubt many entertainers his age still have their "original" teeth. Even Elvis had all of his capped -- and his were done in the 1950's. The point can also be made that chipping a tooth is a common occurrence -- even for non-Beatles like me
|
|
|
Post by AUSTON on Jun 18, 2004 11:22:10 GMT -5
I think Jerriwilmore might be talking about this: I don't know when this photo was taken. It looks to be pretty recently, though. Maybe within the past few years?
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Jun 18, 2004 16:05:41 GMT -5
Hmm... I'm gonna have to say that was flipped. I'm not 100% sure though.
|
|
|
Post by jonna on Jun 18, 2004 19:42:52 GMT -5
If thats his wedding ring on his finger then it has been flipped
|
|
|
Post by FlamingPie on Jun 18, 2004 19:57:18 GMT -5
The nose just looks wrong.
|
|
|
Post by Doc on Jun 19, 2004 2:06:53 GMT -5
Well, it looks mirror flipped to me--he parts the hair on the left nowadays, right? the nose is bent the other direction, yes?--but the tooth thing. Hmmmmmm. I don't buy the tooth thing. That photo has been shopped for the gap-tooth. Or else, Paul was recreating Fred Astaire's dental situation in the production number "We're Just a Couple of Swells" in that movie with Judy Garland. [You know the one where they blacked out their teeth and acted drunk? In ragged tuxedos and freckles?]
If we see Paul done up like Sir Alec Guiness as "Obi-Wan-Kenobi" from Star Wars, then we'll know that it has been shopped. To the hilt of a Luke Skywalker light sabre.
Is that car a limo? Is it a rental? Heather-----start child-locking the rear window controls. Just till he gets the tooth fixed. Again.
What is this thing with McCartney and his front teeth?
Don't eat the corn.
|
|
|
Post by Jai Guru Deva on Jul 26, 2004 23:55:04 GMT -5
It seems then that his tooth and lip are normal in August '66 in the interviews. I've been looking for such a photo of his tooth taken in the late summer of 66... Anyone have one?
|
|